Jul 18, 2006 COMMENT
Israel's path to total war
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HG18Ak02.html
One of the most malignant aspects of the new chapter in the
Arab-Israeli conflict is the myth of Israel as the assaulted
party, lavishly propagated by the White House and the infinite
pro-Israel pundits in the US media, including the editors of the
New York Times, who have labeled Israel's blatant aggression
against the nation of Lebanon as "legally and morally
justified".
Never mind that the rest of the world, including the European
Union, does not share this perception of who is mainly at fault
for the deadly cycle of violence that has gripped the Middle
East again. The irony is that one can detect greater voices of
dissent and opposition to Israel's massive, disproportionate
response to the token kidnapping of a few of its soldiers than
is the case im the "pluralistic" US media, nowadays sheepishly
toeing the official line.
This line was expressed by President George W Bush in his press
conference alongside President Vladimir Putin on Sunday when he
stated firmly, "In my judgment, the best way to stop the
violence is to understand why the violence occurred in the first
place. And that's because Hezbollah has been launching rocket
attacks out of Lebanon into Israel."
Sure, Hezbollah conducted a raid across the border and kidnapped
two Israeli soldiers, and that as a show of solidarity with the
much-repressed Palestinians, but the rocket attacks on Israel
were in response to Israel's massive bombardment clearly
pre-planned to attain the dual objective of defanging Hezbollah
and creating a regime change in Lebanon, perhaps as a prelude to
a wider war on Syria and Iran.
Gideon Levy in the liberal Israeli paper Haaretz has put it
cogently: "In Gaza, a soldier is abducted from the army of a
state that frequently abducts civilians from their homes and
locks them up for years with or without a trial - but only we're
allowed to do that. And only we're allowed to bomb civilian
population centers."
The White House-led masterly mischaracterization of the
chronology of events culminating in the widening war show how
nicely adapted are the standards of public relations that serve
the Israeli war machine, currently pressing hard to pave the
road for a future attack on Iran, by either the US or Israel
itself, without the fear of any retaliation through Lebanon,
thus depriving Iran of one of its multiple lines of defense.
Little wonder, then, that the pro-Israeli pundits in Washington
are wasting no time in pushing for an attack on Iran. "Why
wait?" asks William Kristol of the Standard Weekly,
rationalizing his warmongering bid in the form of "It is our
war, too."
But of course, assuming that the script for war on Iran began
with the one-ton bombs on Gaza residential neighborhoods a few
weeks ago, propelling Hezbollah inevitably into action, and the
specter of wider war getting more and more imminent as we
witness the ever-expanding list of "targets" by Israel, now
including government buildings in both Gaza and Lebanon.
Ze'ev Schiff, considered a top Israeli military analysts, penned
an article titled "Invitation for escalation: Take note of what
hasn't been hit" arguing that the Israeli air raids were
deliberately selective, sparing the Lebanese government and army
and focusing on Hezbollah strongholds. But wire reports of
"colossal damage" to Beirut in retaliation for the Hezbollah
rocket attacks on Haifa tell a distinctly different story, that
is, a spiraling conflict that is fast turning the capital city
of a sovereign nation to rubble.
Not to be outdone by the Israeli apologists, New York Times
columnist David Brooks disingenuously penned an opinion article
in the Sunday paper titled "As Israel withdraws, its enemies go
berserk".
Putting the discourse of Israel as the aggrieved party to full
throttle, Brooks and other like-minded pundits are busy
cultivating an ill-informed American public, as there is no
serious attempt by the US media to bring home the Palestinians'
sufferings to Americans. There are not even half-decent reports
on their plight after the recent barrage of lethal Israel
attacks throwing Gaza into "semi-feudalism", other than a
passing reference in the New York Times that there is no
electricity or adequate running water, causing the beginning of
a massive health epidemic. As Arnold Toynbee once wrote in A
Study of History, "The absent are always in the wrong."
A war to create Pax Israelica?
A disconcerting truth, revealed recently by two prominent Jewish
American political scientists, about the extraordinary control
of United States' foreign policy by the pro-Israel forces, has
now been fully confirmed by the empirical realities of this
brutal war.
Despite dire warnings by certain US politicians, such as Senator
John Warner, the Bush administration has failed to call on
Israel to halt its offensive, opting instead to focus on Syria
and Iran - reminding one of the Vietnam War when Moscow or
Peking (Beijing) were often blamed for the efforts of the North
Vietnamese.
History unfortunately repeats itself more often on the tragic
side, for otherwise we would not be witnessing such concerted
scapegoating of Syria and Iran for the two-pronged warfare
Israel has deliberately ignited. On the one hand, this is to
dismantle the Palestinian Authority and return the Palestinians
to the status quo ante, somewhat similar to the millet system in
the old Ottoman Empire (in the best-case scenario). And on the
other hand, seeking the "implementation of the UN resolution"
calling for the disarming of Lebanese militias.
Of course, from an observer's point of view, it is ironic that
Israel has no qualms about disregarding other relevant United
Nations resolutions, above all 242 and 338, which call for the
restoration of rights of Palestinians, focusing selectively on a
resolution pertaining to a sovereign nation.
As the tide of war intensifies, it is increasingly obvious that
Israel's hidden objective is to inflict such mortal wounds on
the weak nation of Lebanon as to bring it to its knees and thus
take a giant step toward its grandiose objective of a Pax
Israelica.
A big regional superpower, bounded in a small physical space and
bloody, ill-defined borders, Israel's warmongering is not a
result of its absence of policy, as claimed by The Nation's
recent editorial. Rather, it is the result of a sedimented power
dynamism better understood from the prism of the (Michel)
Foucaultian theoretical framework, which shows how the operation
of (sacred) knowledge/power of Zionist ideology has now
manifested itself in the deadly form of military regression that
Israel has opted for in Lebanon and the occupied territories.
Indeed, Gideon Levy and other Israeli liberals currently
bemoaning Israel's "war of choice" miss this crucial point that
long ago was articulated by the likes of Maxime Rodinson in his
writings on Israel as a post-colonialist, expansionist state,
for the very motif of this state militates against anything
short of a "Greater Israel".
The key question is, of course, if the present architects of
this state will ever settle for the less-than-grandiose notion
of a tiny Jewish state in a sea of Arabs.
Looking back, at Israel's masterly use of preemptive warfare,
most vividly demonstrated in the course of the 1967 war, and its
clever maneuvers of taking half-steps toward the fulfillment of
a "two-state" solution, such as the Oslo Agreements, only
somehow to nullify those measures under one excuse or another,
then their breach of peace with Lebanon and the Palestinian
people is anything but surprising.
Rather, Israel's actions today fully conform with its prior
history, and its cyclical pattern of warfare with its Arab
subjects and neighbors. Israel's strategy of provoking the
"hostile other", eg, by assassination of a Hamas chief on June 8
and its "mistaken" shelling of Gaza, killing scores of
civilians, without venturing a word of apology to the innocent
victims, is indeed quite familiar in the annals of Arab-Israeli
conflict, as is its strategy of massive, overwhelming response
to a token breach from Lebanon.
A more penetrating vision may, no doubt, discern some
underlying, disconcerting realities, about the nature of world
politics, role of power and the premature post-Cold War
predictions of the world's passage beyond the old paradigm known
as "realism". The military logic of action by Israel, discarding
all peaceful options with the Palestinian people, is indicative
of a Leviathan running rampant, in a world supposedly led by the
US "unipolar moment".
Yet that moment is increasingly turning a different color, that
is, as the appendage of a much smaller state, whose supporters
"wield political power disproportionate to their number", to
paraphrase Toynbee. To add to Toynbee's insight, as the biased
interpretations of the present conflict cited above clearly
show, wielding media power is a key as to how this political
power has come to such heights that bedevil and mesmerizes those
who study it today.
Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD, is the author of After Khomeini: New
Directions in Iran's Foreign Policy (Westview Press) and
co-author of "Negotiating Iran's Nuclear Populism", Brown
Journal of World Affairs, Volume XII, Issue 2, Summer 2005, with
Mustafa Kibaroglu. He also wrote "Keeping Iran's nuclear
potential latent", Harvard International Review. He is author of
Iran's Nuclear Program: Debating Facts Versus Fiction.
(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HG18Ak02.html
10 comments on the current crisis in the Middle East
TPMCafe, NY - 12 hours ago
... is the absence of a comprehensive peace”, it distinguishes
... is both in contravention of UNSCR 1559 and untenable ... is
in the region as is the UN Under-Secretary ...
CLICK:>>