Resistance in the US Military to the War on Iraq
By Ann Wright
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/062506A.shtml
Sunday 25 June 2006
As a 29-year Army and Army Reserves veteran, I am horrified to
see the politicization of the US military under the Bush
administration. The "ethics and professionalism" of the US
military has been targeted for destruction by the civilian
appointees of this administration. They want "yes" men and women
who do not question the legality of the policies of the
administration. Tragically, from the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs on down, Rumsfeld and crew have been successful in
stifling professional discussion within the military, with the
exception of former Army Chief of Staff Shinseki and now six
retired generals. Under the Bush administration, there is no
accountability or responsibility for criminal actions; privates
and sergeants are court-martialed, while senior civilian and
military leaders responsible for the criminal policies are free.
Despite the "yes, sir" attitude of senior military officers
toward the Bush administration's illegal policies, there is
resistance within the US military to the war on Iraq. Military
personnel know they have the right and duty to refuse illegal
orders, including the order to deploy to an illegal war. They
know the United States executed German and Japanese military
officers and civilians for their participation in wars of
aggression in World War II. They know that the Nuremberg
principles adopted by the international community after World
War II require civilians and military personnel to stop their
government from committing illegal acts. Those in the military
who dissent and resist what they know are illegal actions of the
Bush administration are persons of the highest courage and
conscience.
Resistance to the war on Iraq within the US military community
is growing. Over eight thousand American soldiers are absent
without leave (AWOL), most living underground in the United
States. Many now refer to AWOL as "Against War of Lies" instead
of Absent Without Leave. Individual non-public resistance in the
military generally results in an administrative discharge
without publicity. Thousands have turned themselves in to
military authorities and have been administratively discharged
from the military. US military bases discharge dozens of war
resisters each week.
Public resistance by military personnel to the war on Iraq
results in court-martial to make an example of the resister.
Some military personnel have applied for conscience objector
(CO) status. Most have been denied CO status and ten have been
court-martialed and imprisoned for publicly refusing to obey
orders to deploy to Iraq to commit criminal acts there,
including murder by bombing innocent civilians, shooting
innocent civilians, and torture. Those who refuse to deploy to
Iraq and kill for the Bush administration generally receive more
punishment than those who commit criminal acts of murder and
torture.
Four women who had served in the military were honored last week
at the annual War Resisters meeting in New York City. Three had
applied for CO status and had been refused by the military. One
is now imprisoned at Fort Lewis, Washington, for refusing
weapons training and deployment. One completed her assignment in
Iraq and returned to become a co-founder of Iraq Veterans
Against the War (IVAW).
Hundreds of US military have chosen to resist the war by living
in Canada, most under the radar of the now-conservative Canadian
government. Twenty-four US military have publicly moved to
Canada and are seeking political refugee status. They are
supported by an incredible network of Canadians citizens and
American war resisters from the Vietnam era who are now Canadian
citizens, who assist the next generation of US military who
resist illegal wars of aggression.
This weekend Iraq Veterans Against the War, Veterans for Peace
and Gold Star Families for Peace, including Cindy Sheehan and
myself, participated in Buffalo, New York, fundraisers for US
war resisters living in Canada. We met seven of the twenty-four
brave men and their families who have said that the Bush
administration's war on Iraq is a war crime and that their
participation in the war would mean that they too are war
criminals. While they are volunteers for the defense of our
country, they are not "yes" men to the administration; they are
"yes" men to the Constitution of the United States. They are
persons of conscience who see the war for what it really is and
are resisting the pressures to dutifully comply to military
orders to conduct illegal actions.
Their decisions to live in Canada underscore the right of
military personnel to challenge an illegal order and to live
with the consequences of that challenge. They have chosen live
in Canada with their families rather than being imprisoned for
saying no to killing for the Bush administration's goals. Should
the security of the United States truly be threatened, they
would defend it.
They live free of guilt of killing innocent Iraqis. But the
decision to live in Canada comes with its own penalties. These
brave soldiers and marines leave the support network of friends
and buddies in the military. These persons of courage endure
family divisions when family members do not agree with their
decision to leave the military and go to Canada. These honorable
men undertake the daily struggles of suddenly caring for their
families in a new country. These honorable soldiers are unable
to return to the United States until an amnesty is offered by a
future president. But the consequences of this act of conscience
mean these soldiers and marines will not have the lifelong guilt
of murdering innocent civilians, nor the nightmares of seeing
their friends blown up in a war whose purpose they believe is
illegal and a war crime.
This week Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada will become the
first officer to refuse to deploy with his unit to Iraq. He will
be the first officer of this war who refuses to participate in
military actions guaranteed to destroy his future emotional, if
not physical, life - and impact his family for decades to come.
This week also marks the first time in this war that a church is
offering sanctuary to war resisters. The membership of First
United Methodist Church of Tacoma, Washington, just outside of
Fort Lewis, where Lieutenant Watada is stationed, has said that
they will resist the Bush administration's illegal war by
sheltering any who refuse to participate in the war.
Another aspect of resistance within the military community comes
from retired generals who are now publicly questioning the
military operational plans that have put US troops in jeopardy
in Iraq and the impact of the war on Iraq on the military and
its ability to respond to genuine threats to US national
security.
For the twenty-nine years I was in the military, either on
active duty or in the Reserves, my worst nightmare was that an
administration would get the United States into a military
conflict that I knew was illegal. Today, if I were recalled from
the US Army's Retired Ready Reserves, I would have to say, "I
will not serve the Bush administration's war on Iraq. I will not
agree to be recalled. You will have to court-martial me as I
will not participate in this illegal war of aggression, this war
crime."
Acts of resistance, big and small, recognized nationally or
never heard of by most, by military and civilians are all
important elements of ending the illegal war, the war crime,
committed by the Bush administration. People of conscience all
over the country are refusing to be silent and are taking
courageous steps to end the illegal war on Iraq.
What will you do to stop this illegal war?
Ann Wright
Ann Wright is a retired Colonel with 29 years in the US Army and
Army Reserves and as a US diplomat for 16 years, and resisted
the war on Iraq by resigning in March 2003 from her position as
Deputy Chief of Mission, or Deputy Ambassador from the US
Embassy in Mongolia.
Ann served in the diplomatic corps in Nicaragua, Grenada,
Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Sierra Leone, Micronesia and
Mongolia and helped reopen the US Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan,
in December, 2001. As a US military officer, she participated in
post-conflict reconstruction in Grenada, Panama and Somalia. She
received the State Department's Award for Heroism as the acting
US Ambassador during the evacuation of the international
community during the brutal rebel takeover of Freetown, Sierra
Leone, in 1997.
With her service in both the US military and the US State
Department in areas of conflict all over the world, she felt the
US invasion and occupation of an oil-rich Moslem country that
had done nothing to the United States and was no threat to US
national security would make the world more dangerous and place
the United States in greater jeopardy. She believed the act of
invading Iraq would be an act of aggression, a war crime.
Two others from the US diplomat corps also believed the Bush
administration's war on Iraq was illegal and resisted by
resigning from the US government. As civilian US government
employees, there was no penalty to their resistance to the war
except giving up their careers.
Links:
GI Hotline
War Resisters Support Campaign-Canada
Peace Has No Borders
War Resisters League
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Veterans for Peace
Gold Star Families for Peace
Military Families Speak Out
The Real War Heroes
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/062506A.shtml