-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Annexation without representation?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:57:06 +0000
From: Randy Miller
To: randysmiller@hotmail.com
Congress wants to sell out, but do they want their seat in
Congress? Are we
going to have a Senate building that adds hundreds more seats
from Mexico
and Canada? Are the Senators from Mexico going to come to
Washington or are
the Senators from Washington going to go to Mexico City for
votes? Or more
likely, after the annexation, is the Bureaucrats just going to
get rid of
the Senate all together and just keep the seat of Kennedy as a
museum piece
to show where he once ruled year after year?
Can you please have the Congressman mail me a written
explanation of these
policies outlined in the article below and why the Senate is
doing away with
U.S. sovereignty? I completely oppose any further integration
with Mexico
as well as the "free" movement of goods and people between the
two
countries. I expect the Senate to pass a cease and desist order
to the
Executive Branch of government as far as integration without
representation
is the concern. The executive branch of government can not issue
a joint
resolution of annexation (or integration) with any other
country. The joint
resolution of annexation between the United States and the
Republic of Texas
of 1845 was voted on by the people of the Republic of Texas in
well
documented history, even though Texas seceded from the Union
later. There
is NO provision in the Constitution which, obviously few
Senators have ever
read, that states the Executive Branch of government can
carryout an
integration or annexation of the level being carried out. Mexico
is in no
way able to assist in the "defense of N. America" as proposed.
Mexico has
always been a corrupt state and this is in large part why the
Republic of
Texas was formed in the first place and had to go to war with
Mexico to
defend Texans rights. The idea of integration with Mexico as
planned by the
President of the United States is on the face of it-absurd- and
renders
useless Texas as a Republican form of government joined with the
other
states in a Union of the United States. I am sure without a
doubt that an
integration (which is nothing more than an executive mandated
joint
resolution of annexation) would be opposed by the vast majority
of Texans
including many Texans of Mexican origin who are aware of the
corrupt state
Mexico is. The idea that the United States can police Mexico
upon this
executive mandated integration is ridiculous. This is why
Americans hold
the United States Senate in contempt with their ideas of an open
border.
The more the border is open, the more violent crime and
corruption mounts
along the border.
Instead of cutting off this crime and corruption at the border,
the Senate
and President along with their special interest groups have
decided to open
this border further, grant amnesty and reward illegal behavior
including
identity theft (including paying social security to those who
have stolen
social security numbers) and sell out the citizens of the United
States
whose fathers, mothers, cousins and all manner of relatives gave
their lives
to build this country into the most powerful in the world today.
Now some people in the Senate and other institutions feel that
it is wrong
that the United States is powerful. They feel that it is ok for
the United
States to become a third world country and that somehow, by us
becoming a
third world country, it will help improve the world. What a
total crock of
nonsense. The United States has already developed alternative
energy
technology that would just about reduce Green House gas in the
US to next to
nothing. This technology can be bought by affluent Americans in
the next
decade by replacing old cars with new cars just like we replaced
leaded gas
cars with unleaded gas cars. But instead, the lame brained, non
thinking
Sorros' of the world think that by the Western world becoming
another over
populated third world, somehow it will help the world? And
because these
non thinkers were somehow blessed with money, the Senate thinks
they need to
toe the line of every design of pure nonsense from these
ignorants, the most
disagreeable idea being an integration with Mexico to make the
United States
a dirty, poor, third world country where the uneducated rule by
the mob.
The whole notion of democracy, in fact, being mob rule. On the
other hand,
our forefathers supposedly guaranteed our states a Republican
form of
government ruled by laws. Laws which, ironically, the Senate
themselves
could careless if they were even followed.
I expect to see a commission set up by the Senate to investigate
these
actions of integration without representation and report to the
people the
logic of these actions by the Executive Branch and I expect a
note from my
elected officials explaining why they are allowing this to
happen.
I am allowed by the Constitution to demand answers from my elected
officials
and I expect these answers. I would also encourage my elected
officials to
read the Constitution and Bill of Rights, if they have not
already done so.
I have to throw that in, because I see no evidence that many
elected
officials are familiar with the documents that guide the rule of
law in our
country.
-------------------------------------
This trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not
submitted to
Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office
within the
Department of Commerce.
The SPP report to the heads of state of the U.S., Mexico and
Canada, --
released June 27, 2005, -- lists some 20 different working
groups spanning a
wide variety of issues ranging from e-commerce, to aviation
policy, to
borders and immigration, involving the activity of multiple U.S.
government
agencies.
The working groups have produced a number of memorandums of
understanding
and trilateral declarations of agreement.
The Canadian government and the Mexican government each have SPP
offices
comparable to the U.S. office.
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office within the NAFTA office of
the U.S.
Department of Commerce affirmed to WND last Friday in a
telephone interview
that the membership of the working groups, as well as their work
products,
have not been published anywhere, including on the Internet.
Why the secrecy?
"We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups
distracted
by calls from the public," said Word.
She suggested to WND that the work products of the working
groups was
described on the SPP website, so publishing the actual documents
did not
seem required.
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing
the SPP
working groups. The closest to enabling legislation was
introduced in the
Senate by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on April 20, 2005. Listed
as S. 853,
the bill was titled "North American Cooperative Security Act: A
bill to
direct the Secretary of State to establish a program to bolster
the mutual
security and safety of the United States, Canada, and Mexico,
and for other
purposes." The bill never emerged from the Senate Foreign
Relations
Committee.
In the House of Representatives, the same bill was introduced by
Rep.
Katherine Harris, R-Fla., on May 26, 2005. Again, the bill
languished in the
House Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and
Terrorism Risk
Assessment.
WND cannot find any congressional committees taking charge for
specific
oversight of SPP activity.
WND has requested from Word in the U.S. Department of Commerce a
complete
listing of the contact persons and the participating membership
for the
working groups listed in the June 2005 SPP report to the
trilateral leaders.
In addition, WND asked to see all work products, such as
memorandums of
understanding, letters of intent, and trilateral agreements that
are
referenced in the report.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving
specific
objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations
task force
report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP
agreement into a
North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and
Mexico into a new
governmental form.
Referring to the SPP joint declaration, the report, entitled
"Building a
North American Community," stated:
The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the
partnership
can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a
North
American community to enhance security, prosperity, and
opportunity. We
propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March
2005 Joint
Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity
are
mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be
defined by a
common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within
which the
movement of people, products, and capital will be legal,
orderly, and safe.
Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and
prosperous North
America.
The CFR task force report called for establishment of a common
security
border perimeter around North America by 2010, along with free
movement of
people, commerce and capital within North America, facilitated
by the
development of a North American Border Pass that would replace a
U.S.
passport for travel between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
Also envisioned by the CFR task force report were a North
American court, a
North American inter-parliamentary group, a North American
executive
commission, a North American military defense command, a North
American
customs office and a North American development bank.
