ita anticona
It`s not “either-or”….it`s “BOTH-AND”
Thu Jun 10, 2004 03:26
64.140.158.65

It`s not “either-or”….it`s “BOTH-AND”

The current attempt to make the (OSP) and Chalabi into the evil bad-guy is a bullshit attempt to whitewash the CIA / FBI / British intelligence, and Mossad roles in 9-11, making baby Bush into scapegoat. The OSP was supposedly an open and largely unfiltered conduit to the White House specifically to “bypass the CIA which also forged close ties to a parallel, ad hoc intelligence operation inside Ariel Sharon's office in Israel “specifically to bypass Mossad” and provide the Bush administration with more alarmist reports on Saddam's Iraq than Mossad was prepared to authorise.

Even though it is clear that the CIA had a role in other actions against the American people, i.e. the Kennedy assassination , and the plans for Operation Norwood, not to mention Waco, Oklahoma City, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and of course 9-11. But in order to whitewash the fact, they are manufacturing conspiracy theories which point to part of the involvement, just as with Kennedy. With Kennedy, they wanted you to stay confused…the Cubans did it…no, the CIA did it…no, the Mob did it… but they were careful to never have you look at the Israeli role, because that would tie it all together…the fact that the Israelis were connected with the Mob via Lanskey, that the Mob IS the CIA which works for big banking interests…and the fact that the Cubans are utilized by the CIA is an open secret, along with the fact that daddy Bush was in on the whole thing.

And now almost the same thing is happening again, except this time both the CIA and Mossad involvement are already on the table, so they are trying to detract attention by saying that it wasn’t the CIA, it was the OSP. It wasn`t Mossad, it was Chalibi.

Bullshit. It was all of them. The OSP was set up for the sole purpose of layering the intelligence operation (CIA, FBI, MOSSAD, etc. ) to provide "deny-ability".

Anyone who thinks that the role of the President is anything other than a figurehead for the banking interests of the United States would probably still be investing heavily in the stock market in certain bridge building companies (hey buddy, wanna buy a bridge?).

W. Patrick Lang, the former chief of Middle East intelligence at the D.I.A., said, “The Pentagon has banded together to dominate the government’s foreign policy, and they’ve pulled it off. They’re running Chalabi…”

Remember, Cheney and daddy Bush are intimately connected with oil companies and the CIA, and are first class neo-con ass kissers. They did not NEED to bypass the intelligence agencies…they ARE the intelligence agencies! At least at the upper echelons…there is no doubt that loyal Americans exist in both the FBI and CIA, but they are not the real shakers and movers that report to the NWO bankers.

And by the way…the NWO bankers are not an “Anglo-American” conspiracy. The Rothschild clan is the mover and shaker, the power that be, and they are kabbalah Talmudic jews, all the way… and even before the rise of the Rothschild clan, the jews had a history of money-lending abuses and the resultant expulsions in country after country ( although they claim universal victimhood, stating that they were always persecuted due to their religion…). Simple references to the Magna Carta and Shakespeare`s "The Merchant of Venice" plays provide some insight as to the perceptions of England in former times.
-------------------------------------------------
The Lie Factory

Mother Jones
January 26, 2004
BY ROBERT DREYFUSS & JASON VEST
Mother Jones, January/February 2004
Only weeks after 9/11, the Bush administration set up a secret Pentagon unit to create the case for invading Iraq. Here is the inside story for how they pushed disinformation and bogus intelligence and led the nation to war.

IT'S A CRISP FALL DAY IN WESTERN VIRGINIA, a hundred miles from Washington, D.C., and a breeze is rustling the red and gold leaves of the Shenandoah hills. On the weather-beaten wood porch of a ramshackle 90-year-old farmhouse, at the end of a winding dirt-and-gravel road, Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski is perched on a plastic chair, wearing shorts, a purple sweatshirt, and muddy sneakers. Two scrawny dogs and a lone cat are on the prowl, and tne air is filled with swarms

So far, she says, no investigators have come knocking. Not from the Central Intelligence Agency, which conducted an internal inquiry into intelligence on Iraq, not from the congressional intelligence committees, not from the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. All of those bodies are ostensibly looking into the Bush administration's prewar Iraq intelligence, amid charges that the White House and the Pentagon exaggerated, distorted, or just plain lied about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda terrorists and its possession of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. In her hands, Kwiatkowski holds several pieces of the puzzle. Yet she, along with a score of other career officers recently retired or shuffled off to other jobs, has not been approached by anyone.

Kwiatkowski, 43, a now-retired Air Force officer who served in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia (NESA) unit in the year before the invasion of Iraq, observed how the Pentagon's Iraq war-planning unit manufactured scare stories about Iraq's weapons and ties to terrorists. "It wasn't intelligence-it was propaganda," she says. "They'd take a little bit of intelligence, cherry-pick it, make it sound much more exciting, usually by taking it out of context, often by juxtaposition of two pieces of information that don't belong together." It was by turning such bogus intelligence into talking points for U.S. officials-including ominous lines in speeches by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell's testimony at the U.N. Security Council last February-that the administration pushed American public opinion into supporting an unnecessary war.

Until now, the story of how the Bush administration produced its wildly exaggerated estimates of the threat posed by Iraq has never been revealed in full. But, for the first time, a detailed investigation by Mother Jones, based on dozens of interviews-some on the record, some with officials who insisted on anonymity-exposes the workings of a secret Pentagon intelligence unit and of the Defense Department's war-planning task force, the Office of Special Plans. It's the story of a close-knit team of ideologues who spent a decade or more hammering out plans for an attack on Iraq and who used the events of September 11, 2001, to set it into motion.

SIX MONTHS AFTER THE END of major combat in Iraq, the United States had spent $300 million trying to find banned weapons in Iraq, and President Bush was seeking $600 million more to extend the search. Not found were Iraq's Scuds and other long-range missiles, thousands of barrels and tons of anthrax and botulism stock, sarin and VX nerve agents, mustard gas, biological and chemical munitions, mobile labs for producing biological weapons, and any and all evidence of a reconstituted nuclear-arms program, all of which had been repeatedly cited as justification for the war. Also missing was evidence of Iraqi collaboration with Al Qaeda.

The reports, virtually all false, of Iraqi weapons and terrorism ties emanated from an apparatus that began to gestate almost as soon as the Bush administration took power. In the very first meeting of the Bush national-security team, one day after President Bush took the oath of office in January 2001, the issue of invading Iraq was raised, according to one of the participants in the meeting-and officials all the way down the line started to get the message, long before 9/11. Indeed, the Bush team at the Pentagon hadn't even been formally installed before Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of Defense, and Douglas J. Feith, undersecretary of Defense for policy, began putting together what would become the vanguard for regime change in Iraq.
FULL STORY:
http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/iraq/1448.html