TRUTH NEWS REPORTS: Judith Goes To Court

Judith Goes To Court

TRUTH NEWS REPORTS
Dr Jay Reporting

June 1-2, 2006

It was a day like any other, except today Judith Pfeif
went to bat for America. Yes, she went to court and
lost her case, but not without a fight. We all knew
there was little chance of winning and we really had
no expectations that could have turned into a big let
down. It was actually a win-win day for average
Americans who are sick and tired of the lies and
deceit of the corporate Borg media and this countries
unholy leadership. This was the finest example of a
poor woman trying to do something to save her children
and our Country that anyone could have witnessed. The
sad part is that there was not enough coverage of this
story by more of the major TRUTH radio talk show
hosts, the only exceptions being Mr. Jack Blood and
Michael Wolsey of the Colorado 911 Visibility Project.
Those good 911 Visibility folks up north there have
been very positive and supportive of Judith’s efforts.
Big thanks for that.

Here below are links to previous reports.

http://thebloodreport.blogspot.com/

Jack show with Judith:
http://nw0.info/index.php?dir=Radio/Jack%20Blood%20Radio%20Archive/2006/May/17/

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/05/colorado-group-sues-local-paper-for.html

http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10066

http://www.boycottbush.org/nieuwsinh_en.php?blink=artikels&aid=58&begin=0&sel=0&order=datum

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101100;title=APFN

We see it as a very great success and we the People
won in several ways. The first good part of this story
was when several community members showed up and came
to support Judith. There were actually nine people
that came and two newspaper reporters who were there
for the Judith case. The reporters were from the
Durango Herald and the Denver Post. Being a small
town, that is considerable and the magistrate Douglas
Walker gave Judith a fair chance even as he basically
told her from the beginning that “this is a First
Amendment issue” and indicated he could not rule
against the constitution or the right of the Publisher
to print what they wanted to or not. The Publisher had
brought his high priced lawyer in at the last minute
and this forced Judith to proceed under duress. Mr.
Lawyer came into the case the day before the trial and
surprised everyone by giving Judith the defendants
response and his motion to dismiss just as the trial
began. Not quite cricket for sure. He surprised us all
so the judge recessed for five minutes to allow us all
to confer on what to do. In the previous article in
the Durango Herald, the Publisher said he would
represent the newspaper. He lied and at the last
minute brought in his lawyer. Another lie to become an
obstacle to overcome. We then decided to go forward
and marched back in ready to proceed.

One of the other good things to happen here was that
this writer got to meet a Sheriffs Investigator in the
hallway who took an interest in this case and the
information about 911. He asked for DVD’s to be
dropped off at the station for him to review. The good
part is that maybe we can tune in some of our local
law enforcement to this horrible cover up. Being that
the 911 incident was a crime against humanity, maybe
the next approach is to get the investigators to look
into the criminal aspect of this case. If the crime
was committed and these media people keep hiding the
truth, it would appear that they are complicit in the
cover up and therefore are accessories, or accomplices
in the crime itself.

When Judith went back into the court room she
specifically made mention of the rule that states no
attorneys are allowed in small claims court. The
magistrate said they could have one if timely notice
was given. Timely notice? As the trial is beginning is
timely notice? Oh, and the judge said she could have
an attorney too because they were having one. He even
offered to give her a continuance if she wanted to
consult an attorney herself. That all would be nice if
she could afford one. Poor Judith is on the near side
of poverty and barely gets by. Why is it only the poor
see the truth and try to do something about it. Are
there no rich people out there that care for their own
Country?

It is actually another positive thing to know that our
magistrate here is the kind of man that backs the
constitution. His Honor was actually very polite as he
explained many of his actions to Judith and the court
room full of people in layman’s terms. It was a good
thing that the People were there to see this historic
event. There was no fear knowing we had the strength
of numbers. He allowed her to speak her piece and
present all the evidence she had. This was the first
salvo. Five DVDs and about fifteen other exhibits
among which contained the petition and signatures,
previous news and magazine stories, 133 websites
proving govt’ complicity, the latest Zogby Poll, and
200 Smoking Gun Questions about 911 from the site
called 911 Review.
http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html

All this was presented to the court and the magistrate
accepted it into the official status of ‘court
evidence.’ Now there is some official evidence to
refer to in the future when people look back and
wonder why no one did anything about this horrible
event of 9/11, or for legal reference. This was the
crime of the century, so far, and it is an awful shame
that it is not being properly reported. The magistrate
give Judith the time she needed to read her brief
statement and it also was taken and recorded as
evidence.

This was the basic content of her brief statement:

Your Honor, I Judith Pfeif as a concerned citizen of
the United States of America, a widow, a mother of 2
sons and two daughters come before this Court for the
purpose of raising the standard of reporting of the
Durango Herald from negligence to responsibly
reporting the stories about 911 and the 911 cover up
that millions of people all over the world are
researching and finding out about. To be in a
‘position of trust’ as our local newspaper the Durango
Herald is in, it should be held accountable for the
malfeasant reporting it is doing by not choosing to
report the information about 9/11 and the 9/11 cover
up. They are covering up all the information provided
by myself and the five other concerned citizens in the
conference room of the Durango Herald on the date of
March 26, 2006. By not reporting the information given
to them that included five DVD’s, 133 websites about
9/11 and the cover up, other newspaper and magazine
articles, the Durango Herald is harming my family and
community by withholding information that could make
the difference between life and death for many
individuals. My daughter has joined the Army and more
than likely would not have had she been told the truth
about the 9/11 inside job and subsequent cover up. My
daughter could lose her life in the near future in a
war that is based on the big lie about 9/11. Since
September 11, 2001 all of our lives have been affected
in so many ways. Thousands of lives have been lost,
our constitutional rights are being taken away with
the Patriot Act to begin with and there is the
possibility of more rights and lives to be lost in the
coming future. By reporting all sides of the 9/11
story including the cover up and unanswered questions,
the Durango Herald could become the catalyst for a
positive change. Our community as well as other
communities deserve better attention to truth and more
responsible reporting of the facts and truths
surrounding the 911 story. Millions of Americans are
now asking and seeking to know what the 911 commission
has not reported to them or refuses to answer.

Please your Honor, I am here today to care for my
community and I can only hope and pray for all media
to be more objective and report truthful coverage that
encompasses real news that is beyond the spoon fed
propaganda. Let this be a new precedent for all media
to learn from and that they raise their standard of
reporting the truth to their readers. This is Caring
for Our Community.

Thank you your Honor.

It went short and sweet. Judith became very emotional
as she began to read, but came through it all OK. The
thought of her daughter dying for this huge lie is
very upsetting to her.

The newspapers lawyer offered his motion to dismiss
based on some case law evidence involving a
newspaper’s fight against being told what they can
print. The problem here is that his case history is of
a personal nature involving politics and whether the
paper should print rebuttals to stories that defame a
politicians character. In a way, this case is out of
character because Judith’s case involves mass murder
and those that are hiding the truth about it thus
making them accessories to the crime itself. (Miami
Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo, Jr. 418 U.S.
241 1974)

The publisher also asked if he could speak and the
magistrate let him as long as it was brief also. It
was an open and shut case, but he continued to go
through the formalities. The publisher Richard
Ballantine stepped up to the podium and said he
appreciated Judith’s concern for her community but it
was a small family owned newspaper and he felt they
had the right to print anything they wanted. He said
they jealously guard their First Amendment right to
print what they wanted to or not. It was pretty much a
lot of nothing and he knew they would win this case so
he was brief and sat back down to await the decision
which came thereafter. One wonders if the First
Amendment excuses the murderers and those that are
covering up the crime.

Then, after he spoke Judith offered up two more DVD’s
for evidence and they too were taken as ‘official
evidence.’ It kind of surprised everyone and so then
after that the magistrate quickly ruled against Judith
and Our Community, but also advised her that she has
15 days in which she could appeal.

Should Judith go forward with an appeal? What will be
the next strategy in this ongoing effort to bring out
the truth of the 9/11 cover up? Now that the court has
all that ‘official evidence,’ someone is going to have
to review it all for Judith to get a fair chance in
her appeal. Hummmm……let’s just ponder on this for a
spell. Maybe when that someone reviews all that
evidence, they will understand the gravity of this
situation in which the media is guilty. Guilty of
complicity, covering up the cover up, and being
accomplices and/or accessories to the mass murder
crime of the century committed on September 11, 2001.

Walking in Truth,

Dr Jay

Related news articles.

>From the Durango Herald:
http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bin/article_generation.asp?article_type=news&article_path=/news/06/news060602_7.htm

>From the Denver Post:
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_3889140

FYI:
mal·fea·sance

mal·fea·sance [mal fz’nss]
(plural mal·fea·sanc·es)
n (formal)
1. misconduct: wrong or illegal conduct, especially
in politics or the civil service. See also misfeasance
See also nonfeasance
2. unlawful act: an unlawful act, especially one
committed by a politician or civil servant

[Late 17th century. From Anglo-Norman malfaisance ,
from Old French malfaire “to do ill,” from Latin
malefacere .]

-mal·fea·sant, adj n
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004
==============================

The Power in Positive Patriotism!
By Tim Wingate
http://www.apfn.org/APFN/PATRIOTISM.HTM