Knight RidderEyebrows up as Bush sees lawyer in CIA leak caseFri Jun 4, 2004 03:3464.140.158.41June 3, 2004, 11:24PMEyebrows up as Bush sees lawyer in CIA leak caseBy RON HUTCHESON and STEPHEN HENDERSONKnight Ridder Tribune News http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2608525 WASHINGTON -- President Bush's decision to line up a defense lawyer indicates he's worried about becoming entangled in a grand jury investigation into the leak of a CIA officer's name to a newspaper columnist, legal experts said Thursday.Bush, who has put Washington lawyer James E. Sharp on standby, said Thursday that he wasn't sure if he would need legal help. His decision to contact a lawyer raised eyebrows in legal circles and led Democrats to suggest that he has something to hide.It was the first indication that the grand jury inquiry into the CIA officer's exposure could reach the highest levels at the White House. The panel, working under the direction of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, is trying to find out whether the Bush administration leaked the name of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame last July to columnist Robert Novak to retaliate for her husband's high-profile opposition to the war in Iraq. Novak won't say where he got the information.Top aides to Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney already have testified before the grand jury. The president has said he has no idea who was behind the leak and has pledged full cooperation with investigators. Deliberately revealing the identity of a CIA operative can be a federal crime in certain circumstances."This is a criminal matter. It's a serious matter. I have met with an attorney to determine whether or not I need his advice," Bush said before leaving on a trip to Italy and France. "If I deem I need his advice, I'll probably hire him."Sharp has declined to discuss his arrangement with the president and didn't return a phone call to his office. In the 1980s, Sharp represented retired Maj. Gen. Richard V. Secord during the Iran-Contra scandal.Criminal-law experts speculated that Bush turned to Sharp after receiving indications that he'll be asked to talk to the grand jury.Georgetown University law professor Paul Rothstein cautioned against "overstating" the possibility of Bush's personal involvement in the leak. But he said the president's decision suggested, at the very least, that Bush might be anticipating a grand jury appearance."My eyebrows went up when I heard about it," said Rothstein, an expert in criminal law. "I think we have to read this move as some kind of feeling that there's some chance, no matter how remote, that there may be some personal liability on the president's part, or that someone might try to suggest there is."Democrats said Bush's move called into question his pledges of full cooperation. "It speaks for itself that the president initially claimed he wanted to get to the bottom of this, but now he's suddenly retained a lawyer," Democratic Party spokesman Jano Cabrera said. "President Bush should come forward with what he knows and come clean with the American people." ============================== MSNBC - May 21, 2004 ... The grand jury, which was convened after MSNBC.com and NBC News reported in September that the CIA had requested a criminal investigation of the leak, has also ... LEAK-GATE: The White House Scandal Results 1 - 10 of about 603 for APFN CIA Leak. CLICK:
Main Page - 06/04/04
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES