
US President George W. Bush, seen here 23 May 2007, has
warned that Iraq must repay the sacrifice of US soldiers
with real progress, as Congress got set to pass a new war
budget stripped of Democratic withdrawal timetables.
5/24/07 - President Bush Press Conf.
"FEAR" "FEAR" "FEAR" - IT'S HARD WORK!
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo2/A004I070524-1106D.MP3
=================================================
5/24/07 "The Charles Goyette Show"
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo2/A001I070524-532A.MP3
5/24/07 "The Charles Goyette Show"
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo2/A002I070524-479B.MP3
5/24/07 "The Charles Goyette Show"
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo2/A003I070524496C.MP3
ENJOY!!!
Radio Your Way
http://www.apfn.net/pogo.htm
Bush praises Democrats' compromise on Iraq funding
International Herald Tribune - 1 hour ago
By Brian Knowlton. WASHINGTON: President George W. Bush on
Thursday praised a Democratic Party compromise on funding the
war in Iraq, and he pointedly embraced the Iraq Study Group
recommendations for a reduced US role in the longer term.
Who Won The Iraq Spending Showdown? U.S. News & World Report
Bush: It's Naïve to Believe There is No War on Terror
CNSNews.com
Boston Globe - New York Times - Baltimore Sun - San Jose Mercury
News
all 1,881 news articles
President George W. Bush warned Thursday that Iraq must repay
the sacrifice of US soldiers with real progress, as Congress got
set to pass a new war budget stripped of Democratic withdrawal
timetables.
Bush also used a White House news conference to make clear that
the United States and its European allies would seek to toughen
sanctions on Iran over its defiance of UN demands to rein in its
nuclear program.
And he cautioned there would be more American and Iraqi
casualties in the bitter fighting raging in Iraq, acknowledging
the next few months would be critical for his new troop surge
strategy.
The House of Representatives is due to vote Thursday on a
120-billion dollar bill funding combat operations through
September, ironically, framed by Democratic leaders who disown
many of its contents.
The Senate will get its chance to vote, either late Thursday or
Friday, before the bill, if it passes as expected, is sent for
Bush's signature, after a bruising showdown over the bloody,
costly and increasingly unpopular war.
Bush said the bill thrashed out in compromise talks between
Congress and the White House "reflects a consensus that the
Iraqi government needs to show real progress in return for
America's continued support and sacrifice."
"We removed the arbitrary timetables for withdrawal and the
restrictions on our military commanders that some in Congress
had supported," he said.
The budget for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan will replace a
previous 124-billion-dollar version vetoed by the president
earlier this month because of withdrawal dates inserted by
Democrats who captured Congress on an anti-war platform last
year.
It is comprised of two measures, one limited to war funds for
Iraq and Afghanistan worth 108 billion dollars and a second
including a further 11 billion dollars in domestic spending
including hurricane relief and money for agriculture and
firefighting.
The compromise between Democrats and the White House contains
the first congressionally-imposed political and security
"benchmarks" the Iraqi government will be required to meet or
risk losing economic aid.
The 18 requirements include demands for a crackdown on militias,
the need to train to Iraqi troops, the launching of
constitutional review processes, and ensuring the fair
distribution of Iraq's hydrocarbon riches.
Since they lack the two-thirds majority needed to block a
presidential veto, Democrats admitted they had simply ceded to
the political reality, after a tense test of wills with
commander-in-chief Bush.
"This proposition is the best that we can achieve given the
votes that we have," said senior Democratic representative David
Obey.
In the end, Democrats appeared unwilling to enter the upcoming
Memorial Day weekend, when Americans remember their war dead,
risking being portrayed as unsupportive of troops braving a
cauldron of fire in Iraq.
But they argue they have laid down a marker, and signaled to
Bush that eventually, they will force his hand over the war.
"Weak as it is .... (the) amendment with its 18 new benchmarks
does at least end the totally blank check that previous
Congress's have provided," Obey said.
The Senate will cast just one vote on the whole package.
But in a sign of Democratic distaste over the climb-down,
several senior party figures in the House were expected to join
war opponents and vote against the measure -- meaning it will
need Republican votes to pass.
"I'm not likely to vote for something that doesn't have a
timetable or a goal of coming home," said House speaker Nancy
Pelosi.
Obey said he also would not vote for the funding package,
because it did not contain timelines for withdrawal and the
benchmarks the Iraqi government must meet were too weak.
It also calls on Bush to report to Congress on progress of his
surge strategy in July and September.
On Iran, Bush said meanwhile that the United States and its
European allies would seek to toughen sanctions on Iran over its
defiance of UN demands to rein in its nuclear program.
"We need to strengthen our sanction regime," Bush said. "We will
work with our European partners to develop further sanctions."