Sardar
sardar@spiritone.com wrote:
Ron Paul Says Elements of Government May Stage False Flag as
Pretext to Attack Iran
Prison Planet | May 25, 2007
Steve Watson
When Ron Paul told a packed TV studio and the watching world
that "They attack us because we attack them over there" he was
making an
extremely cogent and informed point about US foreign policy on
more than one
level.
Though it is clear Ron Paul was undermining the fallacy the
American people have been sold in the shape of the "war on
terror", Paul was
also repeating an assertion he has made many times before that
the agenda of
those in the White House now is a systematic continuation of
aggression
abroad as well as an exploitation of its fallout in order to
push for total
authoritarian global control.
While the media has attempted to spin his words and acuse him of
saying Americans are to blame for being hated, Paul was actually
making it
clear that it is the policy of the US government that is to
blame and that
has continued to stimulate hatred, sometimes even for its own
gain.
In his famed Neoconned speech a few years ago for example, Paul
outlined the fact that the self-proclaimed neo-conservatives are
not
conservative and there is nothing new about the disgraceful
philosophy to
which they adhere. Their philosophy of endless war and big
government really
finds its roots in Machiavelli's obsession with the “greatness
of the state”
along with Trotsky's belief in “permanent revolution.”
Paul has warned of a new world order based on this philosophy
many times.
In an Interview with the Alex Jones show last year Paul sternly
warned listeners of a push towards an authoritarian global
government:
"Who do we have at the UN? Bolton, the arch Neo-Con warmonger
and actually what they've done is taken the Neo-Con position on
intervening
on the internal affairs of other nations and regime change and
they've
institutionalized that in the United Nations, now the UN is in
the business
of regime change."
"I think the goal is one world government - we have not only the
U.N. - we have the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank, then we have
all the
subsidiaries like NAFTA and hemispheric governments, highways
coming in."
Most recently at a campaign stop in Austin Paul repeated this
warning :
Ron Paul responded, "The first President Bush said the New World
Order was in tune-- and that's what they were working for. The
U.N. is part
of that government. They're working right now very significantly
towards a
North American Union. That's why there's a lot of people in
Washington right
now who don't care too much about our borders. They have a
philosophical
belief that national sovereignty is not important. It's also the
reason I've
made the very strong suggestion the U.S. need not be in the U.N.
for
national security reasons."
Taken in this context, Paul's warnings on foreign policy become
a lot clearer. The Cabal that has seized control of America and
subverted
the constitutional values of the country by consistently
launching
preemptive military activity abroad, overtly and covertly, has
an agenda to
seize control of all nations across the globe in the same
manner.
Though Rudy Guiliani and an audience of Fox news goons seemingly
found it "absurd" that people do not like being waged war upon,
both the
vaunted 9/11 Commission Report and the CIA admit that American.
foreign
policy has endangered the U.S.
"The 9-11 Commission report detailed how bin Laden had, in 1996,
issued "his self-styled fatwa calling on Muslims to drive
American soldiers
out of Saudi Arabia" and identified that declaration and another
in 1998 as
part of "a long series" of statements objecting to U.S. military
interventions in his native Saudi Arabia in particular and the
Middle East
in general. Statements from bin Laden and those associated with
him prior to
9-11 consistently expressed anger with the U.S. military
presence on the
Arabian Peninsula, U.S. aggression against the Iraqi people and
U.S. support
of Israel," reported the Nation .
At a National Press Club conference held yesterday entitled
"Educating Rudy Guiliani on American foreign policy" Ron Paul
defended his
position.
In answer to those who have challenged his patriotism he quoted
Paul Wolfowitz, asserting that in a previous speech the arch
neocon
essentially confirmed exactly what Ron Paul is saying about US
foreign
policy:
"There are a lot of things that are different now (after 9/11),
one thing that has gone almost unnoticed but is huge is that by
complete
mutual agreement between the United States and the Saudi
governments, we can
now remove almost all our forces from Saudi Arabia."
Wolfowitz was acknowledging the fact that American forces in the
middle east were fomenting Islamic tensions and fostering
extremism.
Michael Scheuer, the former head of the Bin Laden unit at the
CIA, backed up Ron Paul and asserted that it is absurd to
believe that the
"war on terror" has anything to do with a preservation of
freedom or the way
of life of the American people.
He stated that it is solely fueled by a consistent aggressive
American foreign policy in the middle east and points out that
there is no
Presidential candidate other than Ron Paul who has even
addressed the issue.
He then outlined six primers that he believes have led the US
and the world into the precarious position it now faces:
a.. The ability to control the price of oil
b.. Unqualified support for Israel
c.. Presence on the Arabian Peninsula
d.. Military presence in Muslim countries
e.. Support for governments that are viewed across the world
as oppressing Muslims - Russia in Chechnya, india in Kashmir
f.. Fifty year plus support of Arab police states and
Tyrannies
It is clear however that the Bush Administration and the
Pentagon know exactly what the reaction and fallout will be to
and from
their actions and is all too willing to use this to its own
advantage to
further its foreign agenda, rather than wasting their time
analysing where
it has come from.
Documents such as P2OG , which outlined a vast operational
program of actually inciting extremism in order to widen the
unrest and
justify a more aggressive foreign policy have proven this.
The long policy of funding, equipping and training whichever
militant groups it sees fit in any given country for furthering
its own
goals abroad is also a clear indication that the war on terror
is nothing
other than a meal ticket to these people.
Ron Paul has also stated that he fears the controlling cabal may
even stage false flag events in order to further an aggressive
foreign
policy and achieve neocon goals outlined by the Project for the
New American
century's Rebuilding America's Defenses document.
Most recently Paul stated that he fears a staged incident may be
used to provoke air strikes on Iran as numerous factors collide
to heighten
expectations that America may soon be embroiled in its third war
in six
years.
Writing in his syndicated weekly column earlier this year, the
representative of Texas' 14th district warned of "a contrived
Gulf of
Tonkin-type incident (that) may occur to gain popular support
for an attack
on Iran."
The August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where US warships were
apparently attacked by North Vietnamese PT Boats, was cited by
President
Johnson as a legitimate provocation mandating U.S. escalation in
Vietnam,
yet Tonkin was a staged charade that never took place.
Declassified LBJ
presidential tapes discuss how to spin the non-event to escalate
it as
justification for air strikes and the NSA faked intelligence
data to make it
appear as if two US ships had been lost.
Make no mistake about it Ron Paul has given America a clear
warning about a new world order he stands firmly in opposition
to. The
people of America still have a choice and that choice should
emphatically be
Ron Paul.
=========================
Lindsey Williams - The Energy Non-Crisis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbakN7SLdbk