Nine U.S. warships in Gulf for
show of force
Wed May 23, 2007 12:13
Nine U.S. warships in Gulf for show of force
Get Ready for another Gulf Of Tonkin Syle False Flag
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/ts_nm/gulf_usa_ships_dc;_ylt=AjqeRVgqCQwyyrccLNzOyOus0NUE
U.S. Navy Sends Carriers Near Iran
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070523/gulf-us-navy
First Iraq,then Iran
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070221&articleId=4888
CENTCOM Commander Admiral Fallon
The 2003 decision to target Iran under TIRANNT should come as no surprise. It is part of the broader military roadmap. Already during the Clinton administration, US Central Command (USCENTCOM) had formulated in 1995 "in war theater plans" to invade first Iraq and then Iran.
Documented by Global Research, extensive war games were conducted since last Summer by Iran and its allies of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, including Russia and China. In turn, the US has conducted war games off the Iranian coastline.
The Pentagon's Second 9/11
What is now being contemplated by Washington is an overwhelming use of military force in retaliation to Iran's alleged non-compliance. This of course is the pretext, the justification for waging war. The Pentagon has also contemplated retaliating against Iran in the case of a second 9/11 attack:
"A third plan sets out how the military can both disrupt and respond to another major terrorist strike on the United States. It includes lengthy annexes that offer a menu of options for the military to retaliate quickly against specific terrorist groups, individuals or state sponsors depending on who is believed to be behind an attack. Another attack could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets, according to current and former defense officials familiar with the plan.
This plan details "what terrorists or bad guys we would hit if the gloves came off. The gloves are not off," said one official, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject. (emphasis added, WP 23 April 2006)
The presumption of this military document, is that a Second 911 attack "which is lacking today" would usefully create both a "justification and an opportunity" to wage war on "some known targets [Iran and Syria]".
Nuclear War
Military planners are said to favor the use of conventional weapons. The use of tactical nuclear weapons, which are now part of the Middle East war theater arsenal, are not explicitly contemplated, at least in the first round of the US sponsored Blitzkrieg. However, the fact that nuclear weapons are acknowledged as a possible choice in the conventional war theater is indicative that their use is an integral part of military planning.
In November 2004, US Strategic Command conducted a major exercise of a "global strike plan" entitled "Global Lightening". The latter involved a simulated attack using both conventional and nuclear weapons against a "fictitious enemy" [Iran]. Following the "Global Lightening" exercise, US Strategic Command declared an advanced state of readiness.
In this context, CONPLAN is the operational plan pursuant to the Global Strike Plan. It is described as "an actual plan that the Navy and the Air Force translate into strike package for their submarines and bombers,'
CONPLAN 8022 is 'the overall umbrella plan for sort of the pre-planned strategic scenarios involving nuclear weapons.'
'It's specifically focused on these new types of threats -- Iran, North Korea -- proliferators and potentially terrorists too,' he said. 'There's nothing that says that they can't use CONPLAN 8022 in limited scenarios against Russian and Chinese targets.' (According to Hans Kristensen, of the Nuclear Information Project, quoted in Japanese economic News Wire, op cit)
CONPLAN8022
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
Osama bin Laden:
A dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html
"Al Qaeda" is not what it seems
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
Google Advanced Search on srael, Iran, Mossad and a Nuclear False Flag Attack
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=Israel%2C+Iran%2C+Mossad+and+a+Nuclear+False+Flag+Attack&btnG=Search
Nuclear False Flag?
http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/nuclearfalseflagmail.htm
By Way Of Deception Thou Shalt Do War
Mossad's Motto
AIPAC
Zionism Explained
http://zionismexplained.org/lieberman/lieberman.html
THE HIGH CABALS AGENDAS:PART5
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
BUSH & 'Al QAEDA' (CIA/MOSSAD) PLANNING NEXT TERROR ATTACK ON AMERICA
Dubya is, no doubt, planning the next terrorist attack on America When the attack(s) do occur, DOD troops will be deployed throughout America. [See Facism.MOV file (right click to save)] Then Cheney plans to Nuke Iran in response to those attacks.
http://www.nogw.com/media/fascism.mov
~Trinity~
Artificial Synchronicity.NO Coincidences!
http://www.myspace.com/thephantomoflibertyforum
My Blog URL
http://blog.myspace.com/thephantomoflibertyforum
THE HIGH CABALS AGENDAS:PART5
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
NO Coincidences!
Get Ready for another Gulf Of Tonkin Syle False Flag
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/ts_nm/gulf_usa_ships_dc;_ylt=AjqeRVgqCQwyyrccLNzOyOus0NUE
U.S. Navy Sends Carriers Near Iran
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070523/gulf-us-navy
First Iraq,then Iran
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070221&articleId=4888
CENTCOM Commander Admiral Fallon
The 2003 decision to target Iran under TIRANNT should come as no surprise. It is part of the broader military roadmap. Already during the Clinton administration, US Central Command (USCENTCOM) had formulated in 1995 "in war theater plans" to invade first Iraq and then Iran.
Documented by Global Research, extensive war games were conducted since last Summer by Iran and its allies of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, including Russia and China. In turn, the US has conducted war games off the Iranian coastline.
The Pentagon's Second 9/11
What is now being contemplated by Washington is an overwhelming use of military force in retaliation to Iran's alleged non-compliance. This of course is the pretext, the justification for waging war. The Pentagon has also contemplated retaliating against Iran in the case of a second 9/11 attack:
"A third plan sets out how the military can both disrupt and respond to another major terrorist strike on the United States. It includes lengthy annexes that offer a menu of options for the military to retaliate quickly against specific terrorist groups, individuals or state sponsors depending on who is believed to be behind an attack. Another attack could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets, according to current and former defense officials familiar with the plan.
This plan details "what terrorists or bad guys we would hit if the gloves came off. The gloves are not off," said one official, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject. (emphasis added, WP 23 April 2006)
The presumption of this military document, is that a Second 911 attack "which is lacking today" would usefully create both a "justification and an opportunity" to wage war on "some known targets [Iran and Syria]".
Nuclear War
Military planners are said to favor the use of conventional weapons. The use of tactical nuclear weapons, which are now part of the Middle East war theater arsenal, are not explicitly contemplated, at least in the first round of the US sponsored Blitzkrieg. However, the fact that nuclear weapons are acknowledged as a possible choice in the conventional war theater is indicative that their use is an integral part of military planning.
In November 2004, US Strategic Command conducted a major exercise of a "global strike plan" entitled "Global Lightening". The latter involved a simulated attack using both conventional and nuclear weapons against a "fictitious enemy" [Iran]. Following the "Global Lightening" exercise, US Strategic Command declared an advanced state of readiness.
In this context, CONPLAN is the operational plan pursuant to the Global Strike Plan. It is described as "an actual plan that the Navy and the Air Force translate into strike package for their submarines and bombers,'
CONPLAN 8022 is 'the overall umbrella plan for sort of the pre-planned strategic scenarios involving nuclear weapons.'
'It's specifically focused on these new types of threats -- Iran, North Korea -- proliferators and potentially terrorists too,' he said. 'There's nothing that says that they can't use CONPLAN 8022 in limited scenarios against Russian and Chinese targets.' (According to Hans Kristensen, of the Nuclear Information Project, quoted in Japanese economic News Wire, op cit)
CONPLAN8022
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
Osama bin Laden:
A dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html
"Al Qaeda" is not what it seems
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
Google Advanced Search on srael, Iran, Mossad and a Nuclear False Flag Attack
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=Israel%2C+Iran%2C+Mossad+and+a+Nuclear+False+Flag+Attack&btnG=Search
Nuclear False Flag?
http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/nuclearfalseflagmail.htm
By Way Of Deception Thou Shalt Do War
Mossad's Motto
AIPAC
Zionism Explained
http://zionismexplained.org/lieberman/lieberman.html
THE HIGH CABALS AGENDAS:PART5
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
BUSH & 'Al QAEDA' (CIA/MOSSAD) PLANNING NEXT TERROR ATTACK ON AMERICA
Dubya is, no doubt, planning the next terrorist attack on America When the attack(s) do occur, DOD troops will be deployed throughout America. [See Facism.MOV file (right click to save)] Then Cheney plans to Nuke Iran in response to those attacks.
http://www.nogw.com/media/fascism.mov
~Trinity~
Artificial Synchronicity.NO Coincidences!
http://www.myspace.com/thephantomoflibertyforum
My Blog URL
http://blog.myspace.com/thephantomoflibertyforum
THE HIGH CABALS AGENDAS:PART5
http://hometown.aol.com/phantomoflf/part5.html
NO Coincidences!
