"D"
Nick Berg: TWO Cameras, TWO Assassins, 6 Minute Paradox
Mon May 17, 2004 17:23
64.140.158.156

Nick Berg: TWO Cameras, TWO Assassins, 6 Minute Paradox

Here is something I found that I haven't seen anywhere else with regard to the Nick Berg video:

The first sentence(?) is filmed on a camera with a timestamp of 13:26. This immediately goes to a shot with a timestamp of 2:18. This camera is used for the rest of the identification statement by Nick Berg.

The shot of the five men behind Berg begins at a timestamp of 2:40. This means that there is about a 12-minute gap between the Berg statement and the statement read by the "executioners".

The statement lasts about four minutes. The timestamp on the camera is about 2:44 when screaming starts (it isn't Berg and he hasn't been touched yet.) Then they start to lay him down.

The image is blurry for several seconds and then the video is viewable by a camera with a new timestamp of about 13:46.

Now here is the critical part: Camera 1 (the 13:XX camera) starts at 13:26 and ends at 13:46 for an elapsed time of TWENTY MINUTES. This is the camera that shot the FIRST AND LAST shots.

Camera 2 (the 2:XX camera) has a first shot of 2:18 -- AFTER CAMERA 1 HAD BEEN USED -- and a last shot of about 2:44. Camera 2, therefore, had an elapsed time of TWENTY-SIX minutes.

Now if Camera 1 was the FIRST and LAST shots and Camera 2 was for shots in between, how was the timestamp range for Camera 2 SIX MINUTES LONGER than that for Camera 1?


REFINED TIME INFORMATION:
13:26:24 My name, my father is...
2:18:33 my mother is... (no break in continuity from above)
(12 MINUTES LATER)
2:40 Statement read
2:44:35 Scream -- they haven't touched him yet.
2:44:48 Laid down -- End of this camera filming
(Elapsed Time For 2:XX camera -- 26 minutes)
13:45:48 (+/- 20 minutes later than first image) decapitation

Also notice that in the picture most commonly used on the Internet, the timestamp is blurred out.

If you watch national TV, you will also notice that they never show shots from the 13:XX camera at all. That makes sense with regard to the last sequence but not the introduction.

=====================================

On another subject, WHO killed Nick Berg? Or rather is WHO singular or plural? The person holding up the head and the person who actually STARTED to cut it off are NOT the same person.

>From left to right, #3 OR SOMEONE WITH A BLACK MASK, started the process. The person who finished cutting off the head and then held it up was either #2 or SOMEONE WITH A WHITE MASK.

I have looked closely at the video and there does not appear to be an edit -- it just appears that the two people switch the knife quickly.

============================

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,680 for WHO killed Nick Berg.


3000 Prisoners Slaughtered in Afganastan
If you think that prisoner abuse in Iraq is bad - you haven't seen anything yet. I snagged this video off the Internet about a year ago and I think it's finally time I posted it.

White House Authorized Torture

Why did the tortue occur? Because Bush and Rumsfield ordered it - stating:

The United States recognizes that the Geneva Conventions outlawing prisoner abuse apply to the war in Iraq. But it has said al Qaeda "terrorism" suspects do not qualify as prisoners of war under the terms of the treaty.

Newsweek on Sunday disclosed a memorandum by White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales written in Jan. 25, 2002, that said "the war against terrorism is a new kind of war."

"In my judgment, this new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions," he said.
http://marc.perkel.com/
 

BERG BEHEADING IS A BUSH "PSY OP" — AFTERMATH NEWS, Mon May 17 17:05

 

Main Page -  05/19/04

    Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

    APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

    messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)