Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A.
Bush, Baker and Global Genocide?
Thu Apr 15, 2004 23:26
63.228.145.202

Bush, Baker and Global Genocide?
http://www.gulfwarillnesses.com/bush.htm 

Based on reputable sources, George Bush’s Secretary of State, James Baker III—the current President Bush’s Florida vote recount director, was said to have owned part of the vaccine manufacturer against whom ailing Gulf War veterans have filed suit. Moreover, Mr. Bush is said to have been a major shareholder in that company—Tanox Biosystems of Houston.

In fact, Bush became a director of the Tanox affiliated Baylor College of Medicine after leaving his CIA directorship. Tanox is also closely linked to Dr. Lo’s employer—The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Further, what would seem inconceivable without the documents reprinted in the figures above, Tanox tested their mycoplasma vaccines on Huntsville prisoners. As a result, the prisoners developed Gulf War Syndrome long before the Gulf War, by 1970. Thus, GWS could have been, and probably was, predicted and politically effected.

Additional victims, discussed in the book Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse by Horowitz and Puleo, were those with whom the prisoners made contact. This information was derived from a class action lawsuit ongoing at the time of the book’s writing. Due to the obviously urgent nature of this information bearing on public health, permission to reprint this documentation was granted by some of the plaintiffs.

Given the evolution of, in George Bush’s words, “a New World Order,” largely advanced by secret agents, and genocidal practices involving “modern medicine” for “dispensible” populations, Gulf War Illnesses and Gulf War Syndromes I and II, are best understood as politically-driven outcomes of “non-lethal warfare.” The U.S. military, generally comprised of nationalistic, sovereign-thinking, patriotic individuals who pledged to kill or be killed defending the U.S. Constitution against all foreign and domestic enemies, represented a risk to the evolving global governance and multi-national allegiance—the New World Order.

Thus, in reconciling the evidence presented above, it is not inconceivable that global industrialists, in collaboration with corrupt, even treasonous, politicians, have been working to cull, that is, kill, large numbers of military personnel and American civilians.

If this concept seems unrealistic to you, even resembling a “foolish conspiracy theory,” consider the document below from the July 2003 issue of HARPER’S (pg. 21)—a full page advertisement. Another one, much the same, had been placed in the March-April 1996, issue of Foreign Affairs—among the most prestigious political periodicals in the world. This ad/editorial discusses the urgent need to reduce the American population by at least 50 percent, down to 1940s levels. The paid opinion sources from Negative Population Growth, Inc. of Alexandria, VA, and its parent officials in the Rockefeller et. al. funded organizations and institutions that heavily promote global depopulation as the best way to manage environmental degradation and the depletion of natural resources—humans included.



Among our planet’s leading depopulation fund contributors is the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Merck Fund, representing the Merck Pharmaceutical Company. This, by the way, is the world’s leading vaccine maker. Their investments support ads and groups such as those cited above. Many people consider this behavior an outrageous conflict of interest—funding both “preventive” vaccinations, depopulation and “non-lethal warfare” as well, the concept of making vast fortunes from humanity’s suffering is discomforting to say the least. Particularly since this subject has been given no serious attention by any mainstream news provider in an industry reputed to follow all leads—another indicator of information control required to effect the observed outcome—“non-lethal warfare.”

This “higher form of [most profitable] killing,” technically termed “non-lethal warfare,” is evidenced in far greater detailed in Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare (See: www.DeathintheAir.com). Here you will learn more about secreted connections between global petrochemical–pharmaceutical cartel directors—controlling powers in the military–medical–industrial complex—and global genocide unfolding under the guise of “national security” and “world health.” You may be astonished to learn the origin of this contemporary socioeconomic/political direction resides in eighteenth century Europe, and later among the same banking families and political forces that promoted “eugenics” for “racial hygiene” in efforts to establish a “master race.” Again, this began long before Hilter’s rise to power.

In conclusion, this website on Gulf War Illnesses, is dedicated to the casualties of this particular genocide—initially the hundreds of people, prisoners and civilians alike, in Huntsville. Later, this American holocaust moved to affect Persian Gulf War veterans and currently millions of additional civilians who now find themselves at greater risk for infectious diseases, autoimmune maladies, and terminal cancers. Underlying these are iatrogenic mycoplasma infections, and medically mismanaged symptoms.

This public health and political crisis can only be stopped by a critical mass of informed citizens—“the hundredth monkey”—awakening to this nightmare, and alternatively choosing more natural and reliable, less state-controlled, methods of healthcare and conflict resolution. Without this—the mission of this Internet contribution—the unfolding histories of Gulf War Syndromes I and II will be nearly identical. Those who disregard this public health prophecy preordain a time in which Revelation’s dire predictions will come to pass.

This article was contributed and published on this website without copyright by Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. You are encouraged to disseminate this knowledge as widely as possible. For more background on the author see his official website at HTTP://www.DrLenHorowitz.com

=================================

The CIA, Deadly Vaccines, and Gulf War Syndrome Propaganda
http://www.gulfwarillnesses.com/propaganda.htm

http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
Baghdad Burning

... I'll meet you 'round the bend my friend, where hearts can heal and souls can mend...
Wednesday, April 14, 2004

Media and Falloojeh...

There has been a lot of criticism about the way Al-Arabia and Al-Jazeera were covering the riots and fighting in Falloojeh and the south this last week. Some American spokesman for the military was ranting about the "spread of anti-Americanism" through networks like the abovementioned.

Actually, both networks did a phenomenal job of covering the attacks on Falloojeh and the southern provinces. Al-Jazeera had their reporter literally embedded in the middle of the chaos- and I don't mean the lame embedded western journalists type of thing they had going at the beginning of the war (you know- embedded in the Green Zone and embedded in Kuwait, etc.). Ahmed Mansur, I believe his name was, was actually standing there, in the middle of the bombing, shouting to be heard over the F-16s and helicopters blasting away at houses and buildings. It brought back the days of 'shock and awe'...

I know it bothers the CPA terribly to have the corpses of dead Iraqis shown on television. They would love for Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabia to follow Al-Hurra's example and show endless interviews with pro-occupation Iraqis living abroad and speaking in stilted Arabic. These interviews, of course, are interspersed with translated documentaries on the many marvels of... Hollywood. And while I, personally, am very interested in the custom leather interiors of the latest Audi, I couldn't seem to draw myself away from Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabia while 700+ Iraqis were being killed.

To lessen the feelings of anti-Americanism, might I make a few suggestions? Stop the collective punishment. When Mark Kimmett stutters through a press conference babbling about "precision weapons" and "military targets" in Falloojeh, who is he kidding? Falloojeh is a small city made up of low, simple houses, little shops and mosques. Is he implying that the 600 civilians who died during the bombing and the thousands injured and maimed were all "insurgents"? Are houses, shops and mosques now military targets?

What I'm trying to say is that we don't need news networks to make us angry or frustrated. All you need to do is talk to one of the Falloojeh refugees making their way tentatively into Baghdad; look at the tear-stained faces, the eyes glazed over with something like shock. In our neighborhood alone there are at least 4 families from Falloojeh who have come to stay with family and friends in Baghdad. The stories they tell are terrible and grim and it's hard to believe that they've gone through so much.

I think western news networks are far too tame. They show the Hollywood version of war- strong troops in uniform, hostile Iraqis being captured and made to face "justice" and the White House turkey posing with the Thanksgiving turkey... which is just fine. But what about the destruction that comes with war and occupation? What about the death? I don't mean just the images of dead Iraqis scattered all over, but dead Americans too. People should *have* to see those images. Why is it not ok to show dead Iraqis and American troops in Iraq, but it's fine to show the catastrophe of September 11 over and over again? I wish every person who emails me supporting the war, safe behind their computer, secure in their narrow mind and fixed views, could actually come and experience the war live. I wish they could spend just 24 hours in Baghdad today and hear Mark Kimmett talk about the death of 700 "insurgents" like it was a proud day for Americans everywhere...

Still, when I hear talk about "anti-Americanism" it angers me. Why does American identify itself with its military and government? Why is does being anti-Bush and anti-occupation have to mean that a person is anti-American? We watch American movies, listen to everything from Britney Spears to Nirvana and refer to every single brown, fizzy drink as "Pepsi".

I hate American foreign policy and its constant meddling in the region... I hate American tanks in Baghdad and American soldiers on our streets and in our homes on occasion... why does that mean that I hate America and Americans? Are tanks, troops and violence the only face of America? If the Pentagon, Department of Defense and Condi are "America", then yes- I hate America.
- posted by river @ 8:10 PM

• Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered — Bruce Chesley, Thu Apr 15 23:47