FBI Disputing Rice testimony
Sat Apr 10, 2004 15:51
FBI Disputing Rice testimony
BY KNUT ROYCE AND TOM BRUNE
WASHINGTON -- The FBI on Friday disputed National Security Adviser
Condoleezza Rice's testimony that it was conducting 70 separate
investigations of al-Qaida cells in the United States before the
Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Rice, testifying before the Sept. 11 commission Thursday, said that
those 70 investigations were mentioned in a CIA briefing to the
president and satisfied the White House that the FBI was doing its
job in response to dire warnings that attacks were imminent and that
the administration felt it had no need to act further.
But the FBI Friday said that those investigations were not limited to
al-Qaida and did not focus on al-Qaida cells. FBI spokesman Ed
Coggswell said the bureau was trying to determine how the number 70
got into the report.
The Aug. 6, 2001, memo was prescient in its title, which she divulged
for the first time as "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the
She said the briefing memo disclosed that the FBI had 70 "full-field
investigations under way of cells" in the United States. And that,
Rice said, explained why "there was no recommendation [coming from
the White House] that we do something about" the flurry of threat
warnings in the months preceding the attacks.
But Coggswell Friday said that those 70 investigations involved a
number of international terrorist organizations, not just al-Qaida.
He said that many were criminal investigations, which terrorism
experts say are not likely to focus on preventing terrorist acts. And
he said he would "not characterize" the targets of the investigations
as cells, or groups acting in concert, as was the case with the Sept.
In addition to these investigations, Rice told the panel that FBI
headquarters, reacting to alarming but vague intelligence in the
spring and summer of 2001 that attacks were imminent, "tasked all 56
of its U.S. field offices to increase surveillance of known suspected
terrorists" and to contact informants who might provide leads.
That, too, is news to the field offices. Commissioner Timothy J.
Roemer told Rice that the commission had "to date ... found nobody,
nobody at the FBI, who knows anything about a tasking of field
offices." Even Thomas Pickard, at the time acting FBI director, told
the panel that he "did not tell the field offices to do this," Roemer
Two and a half years after the terrorist attacks, it remains unclear
why the FBI, given the general but dire warnings that preceded the
attacks, did not go on full alert.
The agency clearly believed something was afoot. On July 12 of that
year, Assistant FBI Director Dale Watson, chief of the
counterterrorism division, told the National Governors Association
that a significant terrorist attack was likely on U.S. soil. "I'm not
a gloom-and-doom-type person," he said. "But I will tell you this.
[We are] headed for an incident inside the United States."
The Aug. 6 CIA memo, called the president's daily brief, includes
this passage: "The FBI indicates patterns of suspicious activity in
the United States consistent with preparations for hijacking." This
line was read into the record by Commissioner Bob Kerrey, but the
memo itself remains classified. The White House said it may
declassify it as early as next week.
Asked to elaborate on the nature of the suspicious activities,
Coggswell, the FBI spokesman, said, "I can't speak to that classified
Some answers may come Tuesday, when Louis J. Freeh, the FBI's
director until June 2001, and Pickard, who then served as acting
director until a few days before Sept. 11, testify publicly before
Copyright © 2004, Newsday, Inc. | Article licensing and reprint
Claim vs. Fact: Rice's Q&A Testimony Before the 9/11 Commission
Results 1 - 10 of about 30,300 for MIND CONTROL Condoleezza Rice
Main Page - 04/10/04
Message Board by American
Patriot Friends Network [APFN]