Tom Beno
9/11 - Observations and Opinion
Tue Mar 30 19:04:47 2004
63.228.144.66

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 9/11 - Observations and Opinion
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:39:03 -0800
From: Tom Beno

OK to print, publish, or forward as needed.

by Tom Beno - 3/30/2004

I believe that neither bin Laden nor the Saudis are the ones most directly
responsible for 9/11. In fact, it's entirely possible that there wasn't a
"terrorist" on board ANY of the flights. If there were, they were simply pawns.
Window-dressing in a larger plot - a diversion.

There are reams of B.S. coming out of the White House and published as "fact"
by a weak and compliant U.S. media. However, just a small injection of
information that the U.S. media refuses to publish and a minor application of
common sense easily blows the "official" story right out of the water.

Middle-Easterners were simply tools (i.e. flight training, passports, etc.) in
a much more sinister 9/11 plot than what we've been told. Whatever their
involvement, they were only a few pieces of the puzzle. They were certainly not
the most important players.

For instance, the identities of at least seven of the alleged 19 "terrorists"
(as our government would have us believe) have been debunked. What ELSE is the
Bush administration telling us that isn't true? (That's a frequent question -
what is the Bush team going to lie about TODAY?)

For another example, al Quaeda is obviously pleased with the results, but
instead of announcing their "success" and blaring it from the rooftops, they've
only taken indirect responsibility for the attacks. They gladly accept the
blame and even encourage the belief because it fits their own needs...increased
recruitment, support, attack the "infidels" (us) on our own land. Al Quaeda is
responsible only because our government says so - without proof - and that
claim is supposedly "substantiated" by poor quality and very questionable tape
recordings allegedly by bin Laden - who might not even be alive. Tape
recordings supposedly "translated" by whom? By our government - and
regurgitated as "fact" by our poor imitation of "journalists" in a
Bush-compliant U.S. media.

Our government pinned "blame" on al Quaeda, and that's exactly what al Quaeda
wants. But the highjackings and attacks could not be and were not done by 19
"evildoers" with box cutters who somehow took over 3 huge airliners, put them
through extremely complex maneuvers (beyond the capabilities of the planes'
computer software) and flew them into pre-determined targets. Ridiculous - yet
much of America still buys that story.

The attacks simply could not have happened without extremely high-level support
from inside our gates. Powerful entities within our own government are
complicit in the events of 9/11 - and they're fighting like hell against being
exposed.

The implications are far more serious than Bush's unelected neocon
administration just "looking the other way", or not paying attention, or not
addressing the threat, or Bush going on an unexpected vacation for a full month
just prior to the attacks - the longest presidential vacation in U.S.history.

No, it wasn't sloppy intelligence or even criminal negligence or complacency.
Instead, there are people in the Bush administration - traitors at the highest
levels - who not only "allowed" the attacks to happen, but were directly
involved and controlled much - if not all - of what happened on 9/11.

Despite the serious and well-deserved attention being paid (finally) to Bush's
ongoing lies and obvious personal obsession with Iraq - that's just another
smokescreen - diverting attention away from the much more serious issue of
criminal complicity in 9/11.

I believe that sometime after the Twin Tower planes took off, powers within our
government took over controls of the planes electronically - which we certainly
have the capability of doing, and which has been done before. Our air
defenses - at the ready 24/7 with the fastest planes and the best pilots in the
world but a few short minutes from NYC and Washington DC - were not allowed to
take off. Who gave the order to "Stand down" - until it was too late? Bin
Laden? Saudi Arabia?

Of course not. Those orders - especially given the magnitude and severity of
the situation - came from people very high up in the military arm of the Bush
administration.

Why were our interceptors not in the air immediately? In fact - since it's now
been exposed that the Bush administration knew of the impending attacks MONTHS
ahead of time - why were our major cities left unprotected and fighter aircraft
not already patrolling the skies on elevated alert, all day and all night,
every day and every night until such time as the threat had been averted? So
why weren't they? Because bin Laden or the Saudis gave orders for our fighters
to not already be in the air, and to not take off when we were under attack?

Does that make sense to anyone?

I believe the Tower planes were guided by remote control from a ground location
and/or from an AWACS. (Airborne Warning and Control System). Again - this is
well-established technology and easily accomplished by our Air Force.

I believe the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers were guided to within a
few specific floors of the buildings. All passengers and crew were likely
already either dead or unconscious long before impact. I believe there were
demolitions already in place in the Towers both below ground-level AND on those
specific floors - which were then detonated to insure the Towers' complete
collapse.

What happened to the recording of the firefighters in Tower Two who stated "the
fires are under control up here"?

The towers' crumbling wasn't because airplanes crashed into them (why did
Bldg.7 collapse, too?). The Twin Towers AND Building Seven collapsed because of
pre-placed demolition charges. They didn't topple over - they collapsed
perfectly "within footprint". Expert, extremely sophisticated, professional
demolition. And why was the iron and steel from the collapsed buildings quickly
loaded aboard barges and shipped to Asia for meltdown, which prevented
inspection and investigation by explosives experts? Did bin Laden or the Saudis
make those arrangements?

Of course they did.

There are frame-by-frame videos showing the sequence of explosions - but the
footage has not been shown on American TV. Who is preventing the American
public from seeing those explosions? Bin Laden? The Saudis?

The U.S. government shot down Flt.93 over Pennsylvania. If any of the crew or
passengers were even alive or conscious at that point, they may have been
desperately trying to override electronic control by U.S.governmental forces or
to re-establish radio communications - thus the order to shoot it down. If it
wasn't shot down - why was wreckage found 8 miles from the crash site?

The plotters of these multiple disasters could not afford to have any
survivors. If passengers or crew had regained control and taken Flt.93 to a
safe landing, the real reasons behind 9/11 would have unraveled. Instead, over
2 years later, we're STILL fighting with our own president, vice-president and
his cabinet trying to get at the truth. We should have to fight with our
so-called "leader" to get at the truth about this disaster?

Who's preventing a legitimate and thorough investigation and hindering the
investigators? Bin Laden? The Saudis? No - the BUSH administration is trying to
prevent the investigation and questions about the attacks. Not because they
were sloppy and criminally incompetent about protecting our country from
attack - but because they were INVOLVED.

Flt.77 did NOT crash into the Pentagon. "Something" blew up there - likely a
missile - but it wasn't Flight. 77. Where are the videos of an aircraft (or
missile) striking the Pentagon? Our government has the videos - why can't we
see them? For the same reasons that all 4 "indestructible" flight recorders
from the planes in both Tower crashes were somehow "not found" - but the
"alleged" wallet from one of the "alleged" highjackers was "allegedly" found in
the rubble.

Right. Of course it was, because our government says so.

How is it possible that the Pentagon fires supposedly burned "so hot" that
every piece of infrastructure and fuselage of a huge airplane was melted beyond
recognition - but our government claims that the DNA of EVERY victim was
"positively identified"?

Of course it was. Our unelected government officials say so.

If the fires burned "so hot", how is it that an open book on a stool, and a
computer monitor on a bookcase but a few feet from the impact point were intact
and unscathed?

Why did Bush sign secret government document W-l99I, telling the FBI to stop
investigating the Bin Ladens?

When U.S. commercial airspace was still closed to our citizens, why did Bush
allow a jet to stop at 10 U.S. cities to pick up and fly home 140 prominent
Saudis, including relatives of bin Laden?

Why did Florida Gov. Jeb Bush declare martial law in his state on September
7th? (Four days BEFORE 9/11). Why did he say (overheard by a reporter), "Was it
the terrorists?" when informed about the WTC attacks?

Who were the investors of the PUT options who reaped immense profits when the
stock of those airlines plummeted in the days following the disaster?

We are all victims of the biggest and most deadly hoax and ongoing coverup in
history, perpetrated by very powerful factions within our own government. The
enemy is inside the gates. Traitors in our midst, at the highest levels.

I can't explain all these things - and the Bush administration is trying its
damnedest not to explain them either. But I'm an American citizen, and this is
my country. I want answers and accountability.

Tom Beno
Maple Valley, WA