Rep. Waxman
Rep. Waxman Lists 237 Lies On Way To Attack Iraq
Thu Mar 18 04:41:03 2004
64.140.158.41

Iraq on the Record
Address: http://www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/
Rep. Waxman Lists 237 Lies On Way To Attack Iraq

Background

On March 19, 2003, U.S. forces began military operations in Iraq.
Addressing the nation about the purpose of the war on the day the
bombing began, President Bush stated: "The people of the United States
and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw
regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder."
One year later, many doubts have been raised regarding the
Administration's assertions about the threat posed by Iraq. Prior to the
war in Iraq, the President and his advisors repeatedly claimed that Iraq
possessed weapons of mass destruction that jeopardized the security of
the United States. The failure to discover these weapons after the war
has led to questions about whether the President and his advisors were
candid in describing Iraq's threat.

The Report

The Iraq on the Record Report, prepared at the request of Rep. Henry A.
Waxman, is a comprehensive examination of the statements made by the
five Administration officials most responsible for providing public
information and shaping public opinion on Iraq: President George W.
Bush, Vice President Richard Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld,
Secretary of State Colin Powell, and National Security Advisor
Condoleezza Rice.

The Database

This database identifies 237 specific misleading statements about the
threat posed by Iraq made by these five officials in 125 public
appearances in the time leading up to and after the commencement of
hostilities in Iraq. The search options on the left can be used to find
statements by any combination of speaker, subject, keyword, or date.
Methodology

The Special Investigations Division compiled a database of statements
about Iraq made by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary
Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell, and National Security Advisor Rice. All of
the statements in the database were drawn from speeches, press
conferences and briefings, interviews, written statements, and testimony
by the five officials.

This Iraq on the Record database contains statements made by the five
officials that were misleading at the time they were made. The database
does not include statements that appear in hindsight to be erroneous but
were accurate reflections of the views of intelligence officials at the
time they were made.

Download the pdf detailing The Bush Administration's 237 lies leading up
to the War on Iraq here:

http://www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/


Disclaimer
Email This Article
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
======================

The Iraq on the Record database contains statements from the five Administration officials most responsible for providing public information and shaping public opinion on the Iraq war: President George Bush; Vice President Richard Cheney; Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld; Secretary of State Colin Powell; and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.
http://www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/

The statements in the database are drawn from 125 public statements or appearances in which the five officials discussed the threat posed by Iraq. The sources of the statements are 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53 interviews, 4 written statements or articles, and 2 appearances before congressional committees. Quotes from the officials in newspaper articles or other similar secondary sources were not included in the database because of the difficulty of discerning the context of such quotes and ensuring their accuracy. Statements made by the officials before March 2002, one year before the commencement of hostilities in Iraq, were also not included.

The database contains statements about Iraq from the five officials that were misleading based on what was known to the Administration at the time the statements were made. In compiling the database, the Special Investigations Division did not assess whether “subjectively” the officials believed a specific statement to be misleading. Instead, the investigators used an “objective” standard. For purposes of the database, a statement is considered “misleading” if it conflicted with what intelligence officials knew at the time or involved the selective use of intelligence or the failure to include essential qualifiers or caveats.

The database does not include statements that appear mistaken only in hindsight. If a statement was an accurate reflection of U.S. intelligence at the time it was made, the statement is excluded from the database even if it now appears erroneous.

To determine whether a statement was misleading, the Special Investigations Division examined the statement in light of intelligence known to the Administration at the time of the statement. The primary sources for determining the intelligence available to the Administration were (1) the portions of the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate that have been released to the public, (2) the February 5, 2004, statement by Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet entitled Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction, (3) the recent report of the nonpartisan Carnegie Endowment for International Peace entitled WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications, and (4) news and other reports quoting U.S. officials regarding the intelligence available to the Administration on Iraq.

In general, hypothetical and implied statements about threats posed by Iraq were not included in the database of misleading statements. A few such statements were included, however, where they implied a threat in evocative and frightening language. These statements were misleading because the effect was to instill in the public the perception that the threat actually existed.

To be conservative, the Special Investigations Division excluded hundreds of statements by the five officials that many observers would consider misleading. For example, the five officials made numerous claims that Iraq “had” stockpiles of chemical weapons. Many of these statements were misleading in that they implied that Iraq possessed these stockpiles currently and did not acknowledge the doubts of intelligence experts. Nevertheless, these statements were not included in the database when they were expressed in the past tense because Iraq did possess chemical weapons at least as late as the early 1990s and used them during the 1980s.[1]

Investigators also excluded scores of statements of certainty that Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction” prior to the war. To many observers, these statements would be misleading because they implied that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons without acknowledging the divisions among intelligence officials about whether this was the case. The Special Investigations Division excluded these general “weapons of mass destruction” assertions, however, because of the ambiguity inherent in the phrase.

The Special Investigations Division asked two leading independent experts to peer review this report for fairness and accuracy. These two independent experts are: Joseph Cirincione, senior associate and director of the Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and Greg Thielmann, former acting director of the Office of Strategic, Proliferation, and Military Affairs in the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. These experts judged that this report is a fair and accurate depiction of the Administration’s statements.

[1] United Nations Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission, Unresolved Disarmament Issues: Iraq’s Proscribed Weapons Programmes, UNMOVIC Working Document (Mar. 6, 2003).


http://www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/