CONT'D - HOLOCAUST AT WACO
http://www.bigeye.com/pentwaco.htm
According to Novel, .44- and .45-caliber pistols were found
at the scene of the fire. But the government must have known
that the Davidians did not own these types of guns, because
they had a list of every weapons purchase the Davidians had
made. Although the government claimed many of the Davidian
deaths were demonic suicides, Novel says, "The Davidians
were totally nonsuicidal...very Christian in their
mentality."
The government's use of C.S. gas inside the house is one of
the most disturbing aspects of the entire tragedy. C.S. gas
is never supposed to be used inside a building. Used inside,
it can create fires, and it can produce cyanide, which can
immobilize and kill. Dave Hall, who has conducted his own
exhaustive investigation of the role of C.S. gas, believes
that the gas contributed to the mass casualties at Waco. He
talked with the manufacturer of C.S. gas, Aldridge
Chemicals. The company emphasized that this product was
intended for outdoor riot control only; it was not supposed
to be a weapon. In fact, the company says it stopped selling
C.S. to Israel in 1988 because the government there was
shooting the chemical into buildings occupied by
Palestinians. Many of those people subjected to the gas
became ill, and others died from the exposure in enclosed
quarters, as reported by Amnesty International's Chemical
Report on C.S. Agent #6.
Hall has learned that the C.S. gas played a large part in
the Waco tragedy. It both contributed to the very high
temperature fire and incapacitated its victims so that they
could not move to escape the building. In the autopsies of
Waco fire victims, cyanide--from breathing C.S. gas--was
found in the victims' blood. Also, Hall reports, "Our state
fire marshal says they aerated the building in such a way as
to create the fire and to contain the gas in there, which
was as flammable as coal dust. They knew all these things."
There was a very long delay before fire trucks reached the
site. Hall explains that the fire trucks were held back by
the A.T.F. because, had they shot water on that fire, the
gas present would have combined with the water to create a
hydrogen cyanide steam cloud that would have been deadly to
the agents surrounding the place.
Hall provides this chronology: Smoke was seen coming from
the complex at 12:05. Within minutes, fire was spotted in
four different locations. But fire trucks were not called
until approximately 12:30. They were held back under the
claim of danger from exploding ammunition.
Dr. George F. Uhlig is a professor of chemistry at the
College of Eastern Utah and a retired Air Force lieutenant
colonel. Here's some of what he had to say in a report for
KPOC-TV:
"In my opinion, the C.S. was diluted with either acetone or
ethanol, as the autopsies indicated both solvents were in
the lungs of the individuals killed at the Branch Davidian
complex.... The liquid aerosol...came into contact with a
flame, and the flame front traveled from particle to
particle rapidly to create the 'fireball' described by
survivors. We used a similar concept in designing fuel-air
explosive devices in the Air Force. An explosive device
would detonate, sending out an aerosol of either liquid or
solid material of the proper particle size. A second
explosion would then 'touch off' the aerosol mix, with
devastating results. While the flame front in the case of
the Branch Davidians' complex did not generate the
overpressure of the fuel-air explosive device, the results
were similar. The structure burned rapidly to the ground,
and the C.S. agent was burned in the process. Cyanide
radicals were generated as the C.S. burned, combining with
normal fluids in the lungs of the people to generate
hydrogen-cyanide gas....
"It was probably a good decision on the part of federal
agents on the scene not to attempt to put out the fire using
water. The resulting steam generated by the water coming
into contact with the hot structure would further generate
hydrogen cyanide, and the resulting cloud of cyanide gas and
steam could have been carried by the prevailing winds over
populated areas. This could have killed people not even
involved in the incident, or at least made them extremely
sick."
Dave Hall says that for six hours straight--from 6 AM to
noon on the day of the fire--massive amounts of the C.S. gas
were injected into the Davidians' home. This was despite a
previously agreed-upon plan to use "light doses" because the
children had no gas masks. At this point, Hall notes, we
must keep in mind that the F.B.I. and the A.T.F. were fully
aware that the Davidians were using kerosene lanterns inside
the compound both day and night. They knew this because they
had infrared surveillance equipment in the air and on the
ground at the complex. They were also, of course, aware of
the lethal capabilities of C.S. gas, because these were
spelled out in their manual.
A telling fact is that after the fire, the A.T.F. destroyed
everything that remained of the Branch Davidians' home and
its site. Usually, after a disaster, authorities take pains
to preserve evidence so that it can be studied to fully
understand what happened. So why would they immediately
level the evidence at Waco?
Texas state fire marshals were refused access to investigate
the fire scene. They were told it was the jurisdiction of
the A.T.F. (After the whole thing was over, the A.T.F.
raised its own flag over the ruins.)
A disturbing constitutional aspect of the events at Waco is
that helicopters from the Texas National Guard were
supplied, along with military tanks and manpower from Ft.
Hood, Texas, for a police action against civilians. This is
probably illegal. How did this happen? How did the military
get involved? The F.B.I., through the Department of Justice,
requested that Texas Governor Ann Richards allow the use of
helicopters from the Texas National Guard at Waco. Texas law
forbids the use of the National Guard in police action
against a citizen of the state, except when drugs are
involved in a criminal action. But the A.T.F. apparently
fabricated a drug charge to gain the use of the helicopters.
Later, Governor Richards stated publicly that she had been
lied to by the Department of Justice.
One other fact was not publicized. The Davidians would have
run out of water a week or two after the fire date. To
achieve their total subjugation, there was never really any
need to incinerate their home.
The survivors of the fire at Mt. Carmel have not had an easy
time. Clyde Doyle recalls his agony in the hospital after
the fire. "When I finally came to, the doctors and nurses
asked me to identify two females who were brought in who
were badly burned," he says. "They didn't want me to get of
bed, but they described them to me. The first woman they
described as tall, black, and around 30. The only tall black
woman I could think of was Marjorie Thomas. It turned out
that I was correct. She was badly burned on her face and
just about all over.
"Then they began to describe the other woman. All of a
sudden, I welled up, thinking that it might be my
18-year-old daughter. I wanted to see her, but they told me
I couldn't. They said they would get something and that I
might be able to identify her from that. I was thinking they
would bring me some clothing to look at. Instead, one of
them walked in with a great big hunk of hair, like a scalp.
They said, 'Do you think this is your daughter?' Looking at
the hair, I had the feeling it wasn't hers, unless the fire
had changed the color slightly. But I still wasn't sure.
"The next day, I was watching television when the news came
on and identified two of the bodies," Doyle continues. "One,
they said, was David Jones. The other was identified as my
daughter.... Usually on the news, names are withheld until
the next of kin is first notified. Here, my mother was never
told. My other daughter was never told. And I was never
told. We learned about my daughter's death from television.
To me, this was just another indication that we were not
considered normal people, and that anything was good enough
for us. They could do anything they liked and it would be
all right."
Sheila Martin was similarly mistreated by the authorities,
but she overcame her hardship through prayer and faith.
"With all our people dead," she says, "we didn't have a
normal life. We couldn't see family and friends. We couldn't
go anywhere. We had to stay in the correctional institution.
We were watching TV, seeing the building burn, hearing them
say there are 20 survivors, there are nine. We wondered what
was really going on.
"They asked us who died, and wanted to know their ages. It's
not like someone came and put their arms around you and
said, 'Oh, we're so sorry.' We had none of that. We had to
be strong. We didn't want to look like we were giving up or
that we hated anyone. At the same time, we wanted to cry our
eyes out. I had three children who still needed me, and they
were somewhere else. I only got to see them one hour a week
for three weeks."
THE TRIAL
The surviving Branch Davidians were sentenced harshly in the
aftermath of Waco. According to Doyle, "We've been accused
of killing four A.T.F. agents and wounding 15 other people.
I feel sorry that four agents died and that some of them are
badly wounded, but I went through a trial in San Antonio and
spent ten months in jail after the fire. I was one of three
who were eventually totally acquitted, although everyone was
found not guilty of any major crime, such as conspiracy,
murder, and aiding and abetting murder.
"[The judge] did not follow the recommendations of the jury.
In fact, during the sentencing, which was in July [1994], he
made a statement that he personally believed that we were
all guilty. He said the only reason some of us were not
being sentenced that day was that some of us had better
lawyers. He said we were all guilty of conspiracy and
murder.
"Back in February, when the verdict was handed down, we were
found not guilty on count one and not guilty on count two.
Then the jury turned around. It might have been due to a
confusion on their parts. We talked to a few of them, and
that seems to have been the case. There were so many
instructions and misconceptions that they basically made a
grave mistake as far as certain charges go....
"[But] I believe that as a result of the trial, for the
first time, the media began to have a different feeling
about this whole thing. During the 51-day siege, very few
people in the media bothered to question what was happening.
They never asked hard questions or rocked the boat in any
way. Instead, they just printed up whatever was told to them
in the morning briefings from the F.B.I. and the A.T.F.
"By the time this case came to trial, based on all the
evidence that was being compiled at the time, I believe they
began to see that there was a massive cover-up and a massive
injustice done."
Sheila Martin adds, "It's very sad. The people who put this
whole thing together have said that they're sorry. They've
taken the blame for it, but our people are still in jail.
How can you say you're the cause of it and that all this has
happened as a result of things you did wrong, but still keep
our people in jail?
"THE GOVERNMENT PROVED THAT IT COULD USE THE MAJOR MEDIA TO
TELL THE GOVERNMENT'S VERSION OF THE STORY TO THE PUBLIC. IT
WAS A VICTORY FOR MASS PROPAGANDA."
In his letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee asking for
an independent investigation, Dave Hall summarizes the
conclusions of his TV station's investigation of the
tragedy. Those conclusions read, in part, "The Branch
Davidians were shot upon without warning; subjected to
psychological warfare tactics; their children were killed
before their very eyes; and, finally, after 51 days, they
were cyanided, many to the point of incapacitation, others
to the lethal point. The building was set on fire with
pyrotechnic tear-gas shots to destroy the evidence of the
crimes the agents had committed. Within two days, bulldozers
were brought in to further complicate any further
investigation."
Why did this nightmare happen?
The government's confrontation with the Branch Davidians may
have started as a kind of public-relations ploy to show how
good the government was at maintaining law and order by
cracking down on cults with illegal arms caches and weird
ways. But then the publicity stunt got out of control.
Linda Thompson's opinion is that "Waco was merely one of the
first tests of using federal law enforcement with military,
and using military tactics. The government proved it could
use the major media to tell the government's version of the
story to the public. It was a victory for mass propaganda.
"They murdered 96 people in front of our eyes on national
TV, and the public bought it."
And Waco has one final, totally chilling message to the
people of America: "It is useless to resist.... Don't
confront your government, or you'll be dealt with." Anyone
who accepts without question the official version of the
government's war against the Branch Davidians has, in
reality, already surrendered.
Editor's note: Dave Hall, of KPOC-TV in Oklahoma, has been a
major investigator of the government's mishandling of the
Waco disaster and was of great assistance to us in preparing
this article. Hall and KPOC-TV have produced a documentary
entitled "The Waco Incident" that is available from
Southwest Video, (800) 284-7566.
Copyright © 1995 Penthouse International, Ltd. All Rights
Reserved.
http://www.bigeye.com/pentwaco.htm
End>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Waco Information: Chuck Harder, Sarah Bain, David Hall and
David Thibodeau (a Waco survivor)
#2
http://www.apfn.net/audio/L001I060306074756-WACO-INFO1.MP3
(9.26MB) 40Min 29 3Sec
APFN Waco Page
http://www.apfn.org/old/wacopg.htm
FBI didn't plan to fight Waco fire
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacofire.htm
From: Gary Hunt at the Outpost of Freedom in Waco, Texas
Date: MARCH 24, 1993
http://www.illusions.com/opf/opf0324a.htm
Waco Whitewash
http://www.radio4all.org/pfp/wacowhit.htm
PARDON THE SEVEN WACO PRISONERS
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/pardon.htm
FBI Special Agent (SA) R. Wayne Smith Waco Report
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fbiwaco_doc.htm
There is NO Statutes of Limitations on the Crimes of
Genocide!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/genocide.htm