COBRA II - Analysis: Iraq War History Hits Bush Hard
3/14/06 Hardball with Chris Matthews,
Marine Gen. Bernard Trainor & Michael Gordon NY Times
Inside the Iraq War
Cobra II - Analysis: Iraq War History Hits Bush Hard
http://www.apfn.net/audio/M001I060314153300-cobra.MP3
(3.43MB) 15 Min
Google News: Cobra II
-----------------------------------------------------
Mystery Solved
So, that's what was going on in Powell's intercepts.
By Fred Kaplan
Posted Monday, March 13, 2006, at 3:48 PM ET
Colin Powell
One of the great mysteries of the Iraq war has been solved.
The puzzler goes back to then-Secretary of State Colin
Powell's now-notorious briefing before the U.N. Security
Council on Feb. 5, 2003, the one where he laid out the best
case he could muster for the claim that Saddam had weapons
of mass destruction. In retrospect, the case was a shambles;
even at the time, much of it seemed dubious. But there was
one very persuasive section—playbacks of intercepted phone
conversations between Iraqi military officers that suggested
they were hiding WMD from the U.N. inspectors.
CLICK FULL REPORT:>>
http://www.slate.com/id/2137953/?nav=tap3
================================
Fascinating New History of Iraq War
NPR - 3 hours ago
... Marine Gen. Bernard Trainor have a fascinating new book:
Cobra II : The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation
of Iraq. It seems ...
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5279633
March 14, 2006 · New York Times reporter Michael Gordon and
former Marine Gen. Bernard Trainor have a fascinating new
book: Cobra II : The Inside Story of the Invasion and
Occupation of Iraq. It seems to be one of the first
definitive histories of some of the ins and outs of the Iraq
War. I haven't read the whole thing yet, but there are some
fascinating excerpts published in three articles in The New
York Times this week: on Saddam's secret strategy, on the
debate among U.S. generals and on Zalmay Khalilzad.
Trainor and Gordon will be on Talk of the Nation today to
talk about their book.
Part of Cobra II is based on a newly declassified official
history of the war by the U.S. Joint Forces Command. The
Command interviewed more than a hundred Iraqi officials
after the war and had access to hundreds and hundreds of
official documents. This excerpt in Foreign Affairs looks at
Saddam's lack of a connection with reality:
"As late as the end of March 2003, Saddam apparently still
believed that the war was going the way he had expected. If
Iraq was not actually winning it, neither was it losing --
or at least so it seemed to the dictator. Americans may have
listened with amusement to the seemingly obvious
fabrications of Muhammad Said al-Sahaf, Iraq's information
minister (nicknamed "Baghdad Bob" by the media). But the
evidence now clearly shows that Saddam and those around him
believed virtually every word issued by their own propaganda
machine."
Also, as Fred Kaplan points out in Slate, the report
highlights why the United States was so convinced Iraq had
WMD, and what turned out to be futile efforts of Saddam's
regime to finally come clean. Fred begins by quoting some
New York Times stories:
"To ensure that Iraq would pass scrutiny by United Nations
arms inspectors, Mr. Hussein ordered that they be given the
access that they wanted. And he ordered a crash effort to
scrub the country so the inspectors would not discover any
vestiges of old unconventional weapons, no small concern in
a nation that had once amassed an arsenal of chemical
weapons, biological agents and Scud missiles."
The tragic irony is spelled out in Foreign Affairs' excerpt
of the report:
"U.S. analysts viewed [intercepts] through the prism of a
decade of prior deceit. They had no way of knowing that this
time the information reflected the regime's attempt to
ensure it was in compliance with U.N. resolutions. What was
meant to prevent suspicion thus ended up heightening it."
And in the British paper, the Guardian, a series of memos
from British officials in Iraq laying out a number of
mistakes the U.S. made, including:
"· A lack of interest by the U.S. commander, General Tommy
Franks, in the post-invasion phase.
· The presence in the capital of the U.S. Third Infantry
Division, which took a heavyhanded approach to security.
· Squandering the initial sympathy of Iraqis.
· Bechtel, the main U.S. civilian contractor, moving too
slowly to reconnect basic services, such as electricity and
water.
· Failure to deal with health hazards, such as 40% of
Baghdad's sewage pouring into the Tigris and rubbish piling
up in the streets.
· Sacking of many of Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath party, even
though many of them held relatively junior posts."
Perhaps the most poignant quote the Guardian cites comes
from Maj. Gen. Albert who was the most senior Brit with the
U.S. land forces.
"We may have been seduced into something we might be
inclined to regret. Is strategic failure a possibility? The
answer has to be 'yes.'"
Okay… that one goes into the Baghdad bag as well.
UPDATE: Here's the full British memo from John Sawer, Tony
Blair's special envoy to Iraq. (via Andrew Sullivan)
1:14 p.m. EST | 3-14-2006 | permalink
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5279633
=======================
APFN POGO "RADIO YOUR WAY"
HTTP://WWW.APFN.NET/POGO.HTM
3/14/06 Hardball with Chris Matthews,
Marine Gen. Bernard Trainor & Michael Gordon NY Times
Inside the Iraq War
Cobra II - Analysis: Iraq War History Hits Bush Hard
http://www.apfn.net/audio/M001I060314153300-cobra.MP3
(3.43MB) 15 Min