The Scheme & Its Effect

The Scheme & Its Effect
Wed Mar 9, 2005 17:43
64.140.158.41

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: updated file
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:50:36 -0600
From: Steven Pattison stevenpattison@everestkc.net
To: American Patriot Friends Network APFN@apfn.org

The Scheme that was here when you were born and as it is happening today!



The following are a list of web pages that I believe will explain the scheme and are well documented. Email me with any questions. Understanding what really is going on made me feel better because I am no longer in a depressed state of mind! It can be corrected if enough people can just understand the following:



The Scheme & Its Effect

Governments of the United States, the Union of several States, and possessions of the United States are embroiled in a scheme known as Cooperative Federalism, sometimes identified simply as Federalism. The nonconstitutional scheme presumes that each of the several States is an instrumentality of the United States on a par with insular possessions of the United States{1}, rather than semi-independent State republics, (1) restricted only by constitutional prohibitions and mandates, and (2) subject only to constitutionally-enumerated powers of the United States.

http://www.svpvril.com/meador_it.html 

Please note if the links within do not work try to copy and paste them to the address bar and if any web pages have become inactive, do a search on www.dogpile.com and notify StevenPattison@everestkc.net  that they have become inactive.

My point:

"If it isn't established by law enacted in compliance with the constitutionally prescribed legislative process, an agency doesn't legitimately exist. It has no lawful authority. Whatever it undertakes is de facto -- it may do one thing or another in fact, but all acts are without lawful authority. from http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/AGENTS.htm  which is covered later in this document.

And I, Steven Pattison must add only the de jure congress has any authority within the de jure States of Union of the several States. Territories are under total jurisdiction of the de jure congress but not the de facto congress of the government de facto we have there now, which is explained later!"
Roots of Cooperative Federalism

by Dan Meador

The following Declaration of Intergovernmental Dependence was signed in Washington, D.C., by representatives of State and local governments on January 22, 1937. It is published on pages 143 & 144 in The Book of the States, 1937 edition, Volume II. This Declaration of Intergovernmental Dependence, along with versions signed in 1935 and 1976, laid the institutional foundation for what today is formally known as Cooperative Federalism (New York vs. United States, et al (1992) 505 U.S. __, 120 L.Ed.2d 120, 112 S.Ct. 2408), a system that employs a third, hidden government tier as the vehicle by which public servants of all stripes operate outside and beyond powers enumerated in applicable constitutions:

http://www.sweetliberty.org/staterights2.htm 

Senate testimony on May 11, 1955

Former American Bar Assoc. President, Carl B. Rix, in Senate testimony on May 11, 1955 summarized the destruction of our Constitution thusly; Congress is no longer bound by its Constitutional system of delegated power. Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human rights (not the inalienable rights secured for us by our Constitution) in these fields of endeavor. Civil, political, economic, social and cultural. These powers are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations. Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution.
http://magic-city-news.com/printer_1239.shtml

My point:

"If it isn't established by law enacted in compliance with the constitutionally prescribed legislative process, an agency doesn't legitimately exist. It has no lawful authority. Whatever it undertakes is de facto -- it may do one thing or another in fact, but all acts are without lawful authority." from http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/AGENTS.htm  which is covered later in this document.

And I, Steven Pattison, must add only the de jure congress has any authority within the de jure States of Union of several States. Territories are under total jurisdiction of the de jure congress but not the de facto congress of the government de facto we have there now, which is explained later!

Money, Credit & Banking Memorandum

Contrary to prohibitions in Article I § 10 of the Constitution of the United States, the defendants, as officers of the court and otherwise, charge fees, impose fines, sanctions and other penalties, make monetary awards, and accommodate federally chartered and/or regulated financial institutions in mediums other than gold and silver coin of the United States. They thereby defy the law of the land, and in so doing, compromise sovereignty and solvency of the People of Kay County and Oklahoma. Collectively, these acts constitute perjury, as defined by Article XV §2 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, and otherwise constitute criminal acts.

Article I § 8, clauses 5 & 6 of the U.S. Constitution impose duties on Congress: "[The Congress shall have Power] To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin.., [and] To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States."

Article I § 10 ¶ 1 then establishes prohibitions against the States:

Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation … coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…

http://www.svpvril.com/dm_MCBM.html 

Nationwide Banking Fraud (half way down the page you will find the following all about money and again the whole is great information and well documented):

Actually, the State common law court is created by the judicial portion of your State constitution. In the Oklahoma constitution, it's Article VII. The "statutory" court, a/k/a "private" court, is convened in the framework of the Uniform Commercial Code; the UCC proceeds "in the course of the civil law" where your constitutional State court, in law, proceeds "in the course of the common law."

http://www.svpvril.com/Money.html 

TO THE ALUMNI OF THE LAW DEPARTMENT OF COLUMBIAN COLLEGE, THIS EDITION OF A WORK, THE STUDY OF WHICH IS SO WELL FITTED TO SHARPEN AND INVIGORATE THE MIND OF THE LAWYER AND IMPART TO IT A PRACTICAL FACILITY, IS, WITH THE BEST WISHES FOR THEIR PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS, Respectfully Suscribed BY SAMUEL TYLER, LL. D., PROFESSOR IN THE LAW DEPARTMENT OF COLUMBIAN COLLEGE, WASHINGTON, D. C., AND AUTHOR OF THE MARYLAND SIMPLIFIED PLEADING, ETC., ETC.



INTRODUCTION OF THE CIVIL LAW AND THE COMMON LAW.

There have grown up in the history of nations only two great systems of law, the civil law of ancient Rome, and the common law of England. All the most civilized nations in the world are governed by either of these two great schemes of justice. Though the civil law and the common law have much in common, yet in many important particulars they are the opposites of each other. In the course of his studies, the student of law finds so much said, in an incidental way, about the civil law, that is calculated to mislead his judgment in regard to the true character of that scheme of justice, that it is important, at the outset of his walks over the fields of the common law, to give him some account of the civil law, and point out in what it differs essentially from the common law. This is a matter of much importance to every student who aspires to a comprehensive and enlightened knowledge of jurisprudence.

[break]

In all the various revolutions, with their dark and dreary scenes of violence and bloodshed, through which England has passed, the people have clung to their ancient laws with a devotion almost superstitious. When our forefathers established governments in America they laid their foundations on the common law. And when difficulties grew up between them and the mother country, they acted as their English ancestors had always acted in their political troubles - interposed the common law as the shield against arbitrary power. When the United Colonies met in Congress, in 1774, they claimed the common law of England as a branch of those "indubitable rights and liberties to which the respective colonies are entitled." And the common law, like a silent providence is still the preserver of our liberties.

From the book; A TREATISE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF PLEADING IN CIVIL ACTIONS: COMPRISING A SUMMARY VIEW OF THE WHOLE PROCEEDINGS IN A SUIT AT LAW.

BY HENRY JOHN STEPHEN, SERGEANT AT LAW.

http://www.svpvril.com/comcivlaw.html

You have to understand that at some point in time, THEY changed the law that we were operating under to a law that is used to control employees and slaves! I believe they caused the War of 1812 and the 'Civil War' so THEY could get what they wanted! But all these people are dead and all we have left is the system they built with a pen and paper! But as I see it we have nothing to lose and everything to gain!

Aren't employees kind a like slaves that are getting paid to work? Slaves were provided food and housing and we really don't have much more then that in our life today! Slaves were always told what they could and could not do which is a lot like being an employee today! If an employee would see something that the employer was doing illegally and wanted to report it then the employee would become a whistle blower and most whistle blowers become unemployed! The following is info on who controlling who!

Whistle-blower law doesn’t help federal doctors, judge rules http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Dec/20041226News019.asp

Federal Whistle Blower, files $3 Billion Dollar lawsuit against the U.S.Army. http://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/09/85398.php  Please note that this web page address may change but you can find them if you do a search with their titles.

The following is a story about what happened to a couple of Whisle-Blowers - JURY VERDICT OVERTURNED ON LEGAL TECHNICALITY http://www.foxbghsuit.com/

Agents of a Foreign Government:

One significant proof we had was that there are no implementing regulations for section 7621 of the Internal Revenue Code, which authorizes the President to establish revenue districts. Consequently, there are no revenue districts in States of the Union.

[break]

In his article, Cooper cited the Federal Register and the Internal Revenue Manual acknowledgement that Congress never created a Bureau of Internal Revenue. We have since located a decision where Supreme Court justices acknowledged that Congress never created a Bureau of Internal Revenue or Internal Revenue Service. Consequently, IRS has no lawful authority to enforce anything in the Union as Congress is charged with responsibility for establishing any government department or agency that the Constitution itself does not establish. If it isn't established by law enacted in compliance with the constitutionally prescribed legislative process, an agency doesn't legitimately exist. It has no lawful authority. Whatever it undertakes is de facto -- it may do one thing or another in fact, but all acts are without lawful authority.

http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/AGENTS.htm 

How did they do all of this? By creating a corporation known by the same name and operating as a government de facto.

Institutionalized Tyranny: The Character & Color of Authority

The United States of America currently responsible for Federal civil and criminal initiatives is not the original. It is a political coalition, compact or alliance of insular possessions of the United States subject to sovereignty of the United States via Congress' plenary power (near-absolute) in territory belonging to the United States under authority of Article IV, Sec. 3, cl. 2 of the Constitution.{13} By way of various sections of the United States Code, delegations of authority, treaties, etc., we know the substitute "United States of America" is territorial, it is a jurisdiction foreign to the United States, and it is defined as an agency of the United States (see notes following 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and 18 U.S.C. § 6, 1994 edition, derived from 18 U.S.C. § 80, 1940 edition). The entity is very probably classified or designated as a municipal corporation.

http://www.svpvril.com/meador_it.html 

They explained it in the Black's Law Dictionary and the following is just part of what is written there for all to see:

"There are several degrees of what is called "de facto government." Such a government, in its highest degree, assumes a character very closely resembling that of a lawful government. This is when the usurping government expels the regular authorities from their customary seats and functions, and establishes itself in their place, and so becomes the actual government of a country. The distinguishing characteristic of such a government is that adherents to it in war against the government de jure do not incur the penalties of treason; and, under certain limitations, obligations assumed by it in behalf of the country or otherwise will, in general, be respected by the government de jure when restored."

There is more but I want to talk about what I have copied here! While they may have 'expels the regular authorities from their customary seats' but I have never in my life every learned this in State Run Schools! What I learned to be true is that they walked out of congress but the States of 'Union of several States' did not expel anyone from their customary seats or did they and we just never knew (see the next info below the line)? Next, I never knew that there was ever a "war against the government de jure"? Did you? Weren’t we the victor in all the wars but the Civil War? If the de jure government lost that one, we would be speaking 'Southern'! What is written here and just about most of everything that is in 'Black's Law Dictionary' is misleading and is a law dictionary for the 'Government De facto'! But there is always some truth within and here is the part that I believe goes along with what I want to talk to you about, "government de jure when restored"! It says lawful government can be restored but when is the question! I believe because most all of the documents to restore the lawful government are there, we just have to understand which documents are de jure and which are de facto! And that should be easy! If it is against the People then it is de facto. If it is for the good of the People then it is 'de jure'!

Samuel J. Tilden was the 19th President of the United States

The following is printed in a book titled, "The Presidents of the United States" by John and Alice Durant published 1977:

"The country had something to be cynical about in the 1876 election. On the morning after Election Day the newspapers announced the results: Tilden, seemingly the winner, 4,284,020 popular votes and 184 undisputed electoral votes to Hayes’ 4,036,572 and 165. Apparently a Democratic victory, but the Republicans would not concede. They claimed that in the three southern states Tilden carried (Louisiana, South Carolina and Florida), Negroes had been unlawfully kept from going to the polls. Had they been allowed to vote, electors favoring Hayes would have been elected. Republican leaders and Southern Democrats met and made a deal: The three states (plus Oregon) would throw their electoral votes to Hayes, thereby giving him the elections 185 to 184, provided that federal troops would be withdrawn, and the states would be allowed to control their own affairs. The bargain made, it was kept. An Electoral Commission created by Congress decided in favor of Hayes on March 2, 1877, just fifty-six hours before the inauguration."

Please note - "provided that federal troops would be withdrawn, and th

Main Page - Wednesday, 03/09/05

    Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

    APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

    messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)