webhead
Can They Hear You Now?
How the FBI eavesdrops on Internet phone calls (and why it
sometimes can't).
By David S. Bennahum
Article URL:
http://www.slate.com/id/2095777/
The Federal Communications Commission* and the Justice
Department are at loggerheads over a new problem in the war on
terror: how to listen in on Internet phone calls. Thanks to the
blistering growth of VoIP-Voice over Internet Protocol-services,
which have been adopted by approximately 10 million people
worldwide so far, law enforcement officials now worry that
wiretapping may one day become technically obsolete. If
traditional phone lines go the way of the horse and carriage,
will the FBI still be able to listen in on Internet phone calls?
How would it go about tapping one? Is it even possible?
I contacted three of the leading VoIP providers in the United
States-Time Warner Cable, Vonage, and Skype -to ask them how
they would comply with a court order to permit a wiretap. As it
turns out, the Justice Department has good reason to worry.
Depending on the provider, tapping a VoIP call can be either
tricky or impossible.
For Jeffrey Citron, the CEO of Vonage, the critical problem is
this: The 1994 law that dictates how telecoms must cooperate
with the feds (it's known as CALEA) stipulates that government
agents can listen in on phone calls only in real time. They are
not permitted to record calls and play them back later to check
for incriminating information. But as Citron explained it, on
Vonage's system, it is technically impossible (for now) to
listen in on a live phone call.
Here's why: A VoIP call transforms your voice into digital bits,
then segments them into separate packets of data that are routed
through the Internet and reassembled upon arrival at the other
end. From an old-fashioned perspective, there is no actual
"sound" passing through the Internet at any time-the PC or other
device you use to place the VoIP call digitizes your voice in
your home. Of course, a huge amount of regular phone traffic is
also segmented into digital packets at some point, but such
calls are digitized and then reconverted into sound waves far
deeper into the telephone system, at points outside private
homes. Law enforcement can therefore listen in on your line
within the telephone system itself; the technology to do this is
already embedded in the phone company's switches.
In theory, Vonage could comply with a tap request by making a
copy of the call in real time and streaming that call to a law
enforcement agent. But that tack would violate CALEA, since
Vonage would still be making a copy of the original call. The
alternative, Citron says, is for Vonage to modify its VoIP
system so that its digital routers include analog-friendly wires
capable of producing a real-time sound wave. These could then be
linked to a law enforcement agency, permitting simultaneous
listening-in. Citron says making the shift would cost Vonage a
few million dollars-before taking any action, he's awaiting
further regulatory instructions from the FCC. The company has
already complied with between 10 and 100 requests from various
government agencies for general information (including call
records and billing history), but to date, he has yet to receive
a single request for a live tap into a Vonage call.
Time Warner Cable, which has announced that it will make VoIP
available to all its digital cable markets by the end of the
year, would have a much easier time wiretapping live phone
calls. That's because Time Warner owns the underlying
infrastructure its VoIP service relies on. So while Vonage could
offer government agents access only to the handful of routers it
uses to direct its calls over the wider Internet, Time Warner
can offer them direct access to the cables, routers, and
switches over which its VoIP calls travel. It could, in theory,
open a live channel for law enforcement at the place where Time
Warner's cable modem signals are routed onto the wider, public
Internet. This switch, known as the Cable Modem Termination
System, is a natural junction where a company like Cisco, which
already builds CMTS hardware, could easily and cheaply add in
CALEA-compliant technology.
Why, then, couldn't the feds tap any VoIP call by listening in
on the line at the CMTS? Because some VoIP calls are routed,
digitized, or encrypted in ways that law enforcement can't
decipher. Skype, which now boasts 7 million users, specializes
in such encryption. The company's system is designed to thwart
potential eavesdroppers, legal and otherwise. The difference
begins with how the networks are designed: Both Time Warner and
Vonage offer VoIP services that run through centralized
networks. For instance, when I place a call through Vonage, it
starts by going to a centralized Vonage computer, which in turn
looks up the phone number I am dialing and routes the call over
to the traditional phone system. This is a classic instance of a
"hub and spoke" network. But Skype, built by the same people who
brought us Kazaa, is a totally distributed peer-to-peer network,
with no centralized routing computers. (That's possible in part
because Skype calls can only be sent and received by
computers-you can't call a friend with an analog phone.) As a
result, the company's network looks more like a tangled spider
web, and the packets that make up your voice in a Skype call are
sent through myriad routes to their destination. Part of the
brilliance of the Skype software is that it has learned to use
desktop PCs as "supernodes," each sharing some of the load
needed to route Skype calls quickly to their destination. From
the caller's perspective, this is all invisible: The call just
works.
Since it's exceedingly difficult to follow the path that a Skype
call makes through the network, law enforcement agents would be
hard-pressed to figure out where to place a tap. But even if
they could, the company has built in such strong encryption that
it's all but mathematically impossible with today's best
computer technology to decode the scrambled bits into a
conversation. Here's how Skype explained it: "Skype uses AES
(Advanced Encryption Standard)-also known as Rijndel-which is
also used by U.S. government organizations to protect sensitive
information. Skype uses 256-bit encryption, which has a total of
1.1 x 1077 possible keys, in order to actively encrypt the data
in each Skype call or instant message." The point of all this
mumbo-jumbo is that Skype uses an encryption algorithm* known as
256-bit AES. The National Institute of Science and Technology
states that it would take a computer using present-day
technology "approximately 149 thousand-billion (149 trillion)
years to crack a 128-bit AES key." And that's for the 128-bit
version; Skype uses the more "secure" 256-bit standard. Since
computers have a way of quickly getting more powerful, the
institute forecasts that "AES has the potential to remain secure
well beyond twenty years."
Moreover, Skype says, the company does not keep the encryption
"keys" that are used to encode each Skype transmission-each one
is generated and then discarded by the computer that initiates
the call. So government agents couldn't force Skype to turn over
the keys needed to decrypt a call either.
Last Thursday the FCC held an open hearing on the future of VoIP
telecommunications. In a 4-1 decision, FCC commissioners,
supported by Chairman Michael Powell, voted that a VoIP provider
called Free World Dialup should not be subject to the same
regulations as traditional phone companies-including the
particulars of CALEA compliance. Instead, the FCC decided to put
off the issue, stating that it would initiate a proceeding "to
address the technical issues associated with law-enforcement
access to Internet-enabled service" and "identify the
wiretapping capabilities required." One commissioner, Michael J.
Copps strongly dissented, calling the postponement "reckless."
But even if the FCC had ruled differently on Thursday, mandating
specific rules for Internet phone calls and CALEA compliance, it
couldn't have been the definitive word on the subject.
VoIP technology is gaining ground so fast that it may be
impossible for any government agency to dictate what these
networks should look like. Skype, for instance, isn't even an
American company. It's legally based in Luxembourg. Increased
regulation on American carriers, which could lead to higher
costs for consumers, is likely to push people further toward
carriers like Skype, rewarding companies that seek permissive
legal jurisdictions and punishing those that try to comply with
domestic regulations. It's this scenario that the Justice
Department legitimately fears: Even though the Patriot Act has
increased its ability to eavesdrop on Americans, companies like
Skype are giving everyday people unprecedented freedom from
government monitoring.
Correction, Feb. 20, 2004: This piece originally stated that
Skype uses an encryption algorithm built by RSA known as 256-bit
AES. In fact, RSA did not build this algorithm. It was invented
by Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen. (Return to corrected
sentence.) Also, due to a copy-editing error, the Federal
Communications Commission was incorrectly referred to as the
Federal Communications Committee. (Return to the corrected
sentence.)
David S. Bennahum is a contributing writer with Wired and the
author of Extra Life: Coming of Age in Cyberspace.
Article URL:
http://www.slate.com/id/2095777/
====================================================
Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the
9/11 Oral Histories. Stories by Topic. Explosive Testimony:
Revelations about the Twin Towers ...