Iran - Ready to attack
Dan Plesch
"Dan Plesch has achieved the unique feat of producing a book
that is serious ... Dan Plesch writes with the authority of
long experience but still brings to ...
http://www.danplesch.net/
Published 19 February 2007
http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190014
American preparations for invading Iran are complete, Dan
Plesch reveals. Plus Rageh Omaar's insights from Iran and
Andrew Stephen on fears George Bush's administration will
blunder into war
American military operations for a major conventional war
with Iran could be implemented any day. They extend far
beyond targeting suspect WMD facilities and will enable
President Bush to destroy Iran's military, political and
economic infrastructure overnight using conventional
weapons.
British military sources told the New Statesman, on
condition of anonymity, that "the US military switched its
whole focus to Iran" as soon as Saddam Hussein was kicked
out of Baghdad. It continued this strategy, even though it
had American infantry bogged down in fighting the insurgency
in Iraq.
The US army, navy, air force and marines have all prepared
battle plans and spent four years building bases and
training for "Operation Iranian Freedom". Admiral Fallon,
the new head of US Central Command, has inherited
computerised plans under the name TIRANNT (Theatre Iran Near
Term).
The Bush administration has made much of sending a second
aircraft carrier to the Gulf. But it is a tiny part of the
preparations. Post 9/11, the US navy can put six carriers
into battle at a month's notice. Two carriers in the region,
the USS John C Stennis and the USS Dwight D Eisenhower,
could quickly be joined by three more now at sea: USS Ronald
Reagan, USS Harry S Truman and USS Theodore Roosevelt, as
well as by USS Nimitz. Each carrier force includes hundreds
of cruise missiles.
Then there are the marines, who are not tied down fighting
in Iraq. Several marine forces are assembling, each with its
own aircraft carrier. These carrier forces can each conduct
a version of the D-Day landings. They come with landing
craft, tanks, jump-jets, thousands of troops and, yes,
hundreds more cruise missiles. Their task is to destroy
Iranian forces able to attack oil tankers and to secure
oilfields and installations. They have trained for this
mission since the Iranian revolution of 1979.
Today, marines have the USS Boxer and USS Bataan carrier
forces in the Gulf and probably also the USS Kearsarge and
USS Bonhomme Richard. Three others, the USS Peleliu, USS
Wasp and USS Iwo Jima, are ready to join them. Earlier this
year, HQ staff to manage these forces were moved from
Virginia to Bahrain.
Vice-President Dick Cheney has had something of a love
affair with the US marines, and this may reach its
culmination in the fishing villages along Iran's Gulf coast.
Marine generals hold the top jobs at Nato, in the Pentagon
and are in charge of all nuclear weapons. No marine has held
any of these posts before.
Traditionally, the top nuclear job went either to a
commander of the navy's Trident submarines or of the air
force's bombers and missiles. Today, all these forces follow
the orders of a marine, General James Cartwright, and are
integrated into a "Global Strike" plan which places
strategic forces on permanent 12-hour readiness.
The only public discussion of this plan has been by the
American analysts Bill Arkin and Hans Kristensen, who have
focused on the possible use of atomic weapons. These
concerns are justified, but ignore how forces can be used in
conventional war.
Any US general planning to attack Iran can now assume that
at least 10,000 targets can be hit in a single raid, with
warplanes flying from the US or Diego Garcia. In the past
year, unlimited funding for military technology has taken
"smart bombs" to a new level.
New "bunker-busting" conventional bombs weigh only 250lb.
According to Boeing, the GBU-39 small-diameter bomb
"quadruples" the firepower of US warplanes, compared to
those in use even as recently as 2003. A single stealth or
B-52 bomber can now attack between 150 and 300 individual
points to within a metre of accuracy using the global
positioning system.
With little military effort, the US air force can hit the
last-known position of Iranian military units, political
leaders and supposed sites of weapons of mass destruction.
One can be sure that, if war comes, George Bush will not
want to stand accused of using too little force and allowing
Iran to fight back.
"Global Strike" means that, without any obvious signal, what
was done to Serbia and Lebanon can be done overnight to the
whole of Iran. We, and probably the Iranians, would not know
about it until after the bombs fell. Forces that hide will
suffer the fate of Saddam's armies, once their positions are
known.
The whole of Iran is now less than an hour's flying time
from some American base or carrier. Sources in the region as
well as trade journals confirm that the US has built three
bases in Azerbaijan that could be transit points for troops
and with facilities equal to its best in Europe.
Most of the Iranian army is positioned along the border with
Iraq, facing US army missiles that can reach 150km over the
border. But it is in the flat, sandy oilfields east and
south of Basra where the temptation will be to launch a tank
attack and hope that a disaffected population will be
grateful.
The regime in Tehran has already complained of US- and
UK-inspired terror attacks in several Iranian regions where
the population opposes the ayatollahs' fanatical policies.
Such reports corroborate the American journalist Seymour
Hersh's claim that the US military is already engaged in a
low-level war with Iran. The fighting is most intense in the
Kurdish north where Iran has been firing artillery into
Iraq. The US and Iran are already engaged in a low-level
proxy war across the Iran-Iraq border.
And, once again, the neo-cons at the American Enterprise
Institute have a plan for a peaceful settlement: this time
it is for a federal Iran. Officially, Michael Ledeen, the
AEI plan's sponsor, has been ostracised by the White House.
However, two years ago, the Congress of Iranian
Nationalities for a Federal Iran had its inaugural meeting
in London.
We should not underestimate the Bush administration's
ability to convince itself that an "Iran of the regions"
will emerge from a post-rubble Iran.
Dan Plesch is a research associate at the School of Oriental
and African Studies
Articles from this issue on Iran
This, Mr President, is how wars start by Andrew Stephen
Sheer incompetence could be the trigger.
We are asking the wrong questions of Iran by Rageh Omaar
Rageh Omaar finds a country more complex than most in the
west have ever realised
Post this article to
http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190014
NEW STATESMAN INEX:
http://www.newstatesman.com/
"Dan Plesch has achieved the unique feat of producing a book
that is serious ... Dan Plesch writes with the authority of
long experience but still brings to ...
http://www.danplesch.net/