-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Making Martial Law Easier —New York Times
Editorial
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:06:25 -0500
From: Daneen
Daneen@frontiernet.net
To:
apfn@apfn.org
The following article was written by me: Two 'Acts' of
Tyranny on the Same Day! It covers the Military
Commissions Act of 2006 and the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007, both of which
were signed into law on the same day, October 17, 2006.
The article was published on the American Chronicle and
its 21 syndicated sites and has received more than 9000
'views' and is archived here:
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/articles/Fear.html.
I have also done more than 13 hours of cable TV and Talk
Radio on this very article.
One program allowed me to 'spread the word' on the two
'Acts' that have suspended habeas corpus and eliminated
posse cometatus by providing 3 continuous hours of
broadcast time. We have combined that into a SINGLE 128
minute MP3 found here:
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/Radio%20Show%20Appearances.html
EVERYONE you know should read that article and listen to
that broadcast with Jerry Hughes on his program
'Straight Talk' on Accent Radio. We are headed for
MARTIAL LAW when any of the following 'triggers' occur
as is spelled out in the re-written Insurrection Act,
now re-named 'Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public
Order' that is ALSO part of the NDAA which says the
following:
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies . .
. [such as] interference with State and Federal law . .
. the President may employ the armed forces, including
the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public
order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as
a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other
serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or
incident, or other condition in any State or possession
of the United States, the President determines that
domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that
the constituted authorities of the State or possession
are incapable of (”refuse” or “fail” in) maintaining
public order, “in order to suppress, in any State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination,
or conspiracy.”
ALL my articles have many pictures and graphics along
with clickable URL references to ALL the source
materials.
Please pass this information on to as many as you can.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com
----- Original Message -----
From: APFN
To: APFN GOOGLE GROUP ; APFN Yahoogroups ; LEAK-GATE
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:25 AM
Subject: Making Martial Law Easier —New York Times
Editorial
Making Martial Law Easier —New York Times Editorial, Tue
Feb 20 01:08
* "The Bill Maher Show" ‘User Generated Politics’ —
Radio Your Way, Tue Feb 20 01:16
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html
New York Times Editorial
Making Martial Law Easier
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/opinion/19mon3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Published: February 19, 2007
A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that
laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have
been passed in the dead of night. So it was with a
provision quietly tucked into the enormous defense
budget bill at the Bush administration’s behest that
makes it easier for a president to override local
control of law enforcement and declare martial law.
The provision, signed into law in October, weakens two
obscure but important bulwarks of liberty. One is the
doctrine that bars military forces, including a
federalized National Guard, from engaging in law
enforcement. Called posse comitatus, it was enshrined in
law after the Civil War to preserve the line between
civil government and the military. The other is the
Insurrection Act of 1807, which provides the major
exemptions to posse comitatus. It essentially limits a
president’s use of the military in law enforcement to
putting down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion,
where a state is violating federal law or depriving
people of constitutional rights.
The newly enacted provisions upset this careful balance.
They shift the focus from making sure that federal laws
are enforced to restoring public order. Beyond cases of
actual insurrection, the president may now use military
troops as a domestic police force in response to a
natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack
or to any “other condition.”
Changes of this magnitude should be made only after a
thorough public airing. But these new presidential
powers were slipped into the law without hearings or
public debate. The president made no mention of the
changes when he signed the measure, and neither the
White House nor Congress consulted in advance with the
nation’s governors.
There is a bipartisan bill, introduced by Senators
Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and Christopher
Bond, Republican of Missouri, and backed unanimously by
the nation’s governors, that would repeal the stealthy
revisions. Congress should pass it. If changes of this
kind are proposed in the future, they must get a full
and open debate.
More Articles in Opinion »
Tips
To find reference information about the words used in
this article, double-click on any word, phrase or name.
A new window will open with a dictionary definition or
encyclopedia entry.
Past Coverage
* THE REACH OF WAR; Pentagon Group Criticized for Prewar
Intelligence Analysis (February 9, 2007)
* NEWS ANALYSIS; Many Voices, But No Debate (February 7,
2007)
* THE REACH OF WAR; IRAQ PARLIAMENT FINDS A QUORUM HARD
TO COME BY (January 24, 2007)
* THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ; Anti-Buildup Measure to Have
Bipartisan Stamp (January 17, 2007)
Related Searches
* United States Armament and Defense
* Law and Legislation
* Bush, George W
* National Guard
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/opinion/19mon3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
PLAN TYRANT.....EXPLAINED!
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/A003I070219UF3.MP3
MSNBC: DANA PRIST... VET'S MEDICAL...WALTER REED HOSP.
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/L002I070219TD2.MP3