Making Martial Law Easier

New York Times Editorial

Making Martial Law Easier

Mon Feb 19, 2007 22:08

New York Times Editorial
Making Martial Law Easier
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/opinion/19mon3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Published: February 19, 2007

A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have been passed in the dead of night. So it was with a provision quietly tucked into the enormous defense budget bill at the Bush administration’s behest that makes it easier for a president to override local control of law enforcement and declare martial law.

The provision, signed into law in October, weakens two obscure but important bulwarks of liberty. One is the doctrine that bars military forces, including a federalized National Guard, from engaging in law enforcement. Called posse comitatus, it was enshrined in law after the Civil War to preserve the line between civil government and the military. The other is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which provides the major exemptions to posse comitatus. It essentially limits a president’s use of the military in law enforcement to putting down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion, where a state is violating federal law or depriving people of constitutional rights.

The newly enacted provisions upset this careful balance. They shift the focus from making sure that federal laws are enforced to restoring public order. Beyond cases of actual insurrection, the president may now use military troops as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack or to any “other condition.”

Changes of this magnitude should be made only after a thorough public airing. But these new presidential powers were slipped into the law without hearings or public debate. The president made no mention of the changes when he signed the measure, and neither the White House nor Congress consulted in advance with the nation’s governors.

There is a bipartisan bill, introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and Christopher Bond, Republican of Missouri, and backed unanimously by the nation’s governors, that would repeal the stealthy revisions. Congress should pass it. If changes of this kind are proposed in the future, they must get a full and open debate.
More Articles in Opinion »
Tips
To find reference information about the words used in this article, double-click on any word, phrase or name. A new window will open with a dictionary definition or encyclopedia entry.
Past Coverage

* THE REACH OF WAR; Pentagon Group Criticized for Prewar Intelligence Analysis (February 9, 2007)
* NEWS ANALYSIS; Many Voices, But No Debate (February 7, 2007)
* THE REACH OF WAR; IRAQ PARLIAMENT FINDS A QUORUM HARD TO COME BY (January 24, 2007)
* THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ; Anti-Buildup Measure to Have Bipartisan Stamp (January 17, 2007)

Related Searches

* United States Armament and Defense
* Law and Legislation
* Bush, George W
* National Guard

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/opinion/19mon3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

PLAN TYRANT.....EXPLAINED!
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/A003I070219UF3.MP3

MSNBC: DANA PRIST... VET'S MEDICAL...WALTER REED HOSP.
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/L002I070219TD2.MP3

C-SPAN HEARING ON BLACKWATER CONTRACTORS — C-SPAN, Fri Feb 23 18:29
Re: Making Martial Law Easier —New York Times — Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Tue Feb 20 19:21

Straight Talk with host Jerry — Accent Radio Network, Tue Feb 20 19:34

"The Bill Maher Show" ‘User Generated Politics’ — Radio Your Way, Tue Feb 20 01:16