from Raymond Karczewski
arkent3@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:28:26 -0800
Subject: WACO: THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPERIMENT!!
WACO: THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPERIMENT!!
By Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
This afternoon I picked up the video Tape, "WACO, Rules of Engagement"
at my local video rental store. Anita and I watched it for the first time.
Being a former law enforcement officer (Retired Sergeant with a
California Bay Area Police Department), I was ashamed of what I saw.
What jumped out at me, however, was something that apparently very few
others in our country and onlooking world picked up on.
I observed a Government Mind Control Experiment which attempted to
gauge the boiling point of the American People when Tyranny and Murder is
brought to an American neighborhood by our Servant Government.
The result of the experiment -- a great deal of simmering amongst the
populace, but no boil.
I observed an effective Government criminal cover up demonstrating
their proficiency in destroying evidence, thus preventing a true
accounting of the government personnel involved by the mere command of
their Public Relations language.
It was a mind control experiment, all right, designed to test the depth
of the trance state of the American People; an experiment to find their
action BUTTON.
From the Government's point of view, the experiment was a glowing
success. When all the publics' buttons were found and pushed, the American
People STILL lay INERT, IMPOTENT, unable to hold their official's
accountable, while an insidious fear was growing within the collective
public psyche.
No need for the American People to Act; after all, such Murderous
Tyranny was not happening to them. It is this mass malaise which, if not
stopped, accounts for a NAZI GERMANY and will destroy a nation from
within. Does anybody really want to repeat that?
The theme of Government cover up grows more and more obvious with each
mind control assault upon the lives of innocent people in our society. One
saw it in the JFK assassination; the Martin Luther King assassination; the
Bobby Kennedy assassination; Ruby Ridge; the assassination of Randy
Weaver's wife and baby. And most recently, 9-11, which brought about the
loss of our FREEDOMS under the guise of our government's declared war on
Terrorism.
All the while a great and growing body of evidence shows the same
"investigative" government's complicity to be present in the Murder of
American Lives -- the Destruction at the World Trade Center on 9-11 and the
attack on the Pentagon.
What jumped out at me in watching "WACO, the Rules of Engagement" was,
what does it take to move the American People into action, to generate a
life-enabling activism within lives shut down through unrelenting
conditioning which engenders fear and doubt? Here's an interesting
question for you to ponder: Why do people FEAR the government? Why does
the government NOT FEAR the people -- the SOVEREIGN People, the TRUE
GOVERNMENT?
What I saw in Waco was a high level government operation designed to
test just how far open, government televised, in-your-face mass murder can
be committed on a monumental scale, while the whole world looks on, and yet
no serious, substantive, effective public outcries are made for
accountability?
What's wrong with a system of government which allows and protects the
few, the corrupted, the biased, the criminal, from facing such
accountability?
What is wrong with a system of self-serving politicians who go through
the motions -- promising, promising, promising -- yet never fully
delivering on those promises while they decide the fate of millions? Are
we their property? Can they do to/with us anything they wish? Do they OWN
us? Are we human resources, merely looked upon as SLAVES? Anybody getting
the picture?
I can only view such self-destructive behavior by Slave-minded Americans
as the nonaction of the Living Dead. What do I mean by Living Dead? The
Living Dead no longer operate from a state of True Living Intelligence, but
are reduced, through Mind Control Conditioning, to stumble through life in
codependent fashion as mechanical, conditioned, spiritually blind,
Intellectually-driven automatons/entities. They have lost sight of their
True Spiritualiy, their wholeness. They have waived their gift of divine
Intelligence. They have bargained away their soul in worship of SATAN, the
petty "god" of Intellect.
Through unrelenting conditioning, they have been caused by their equally
SATANIC mind controlled leadership (the blind who lead the blind) to live
in fear. They can be made to surrender their God-Given SOVEREIGNTY, their
Unalienable God-Given Rights, their Freedoms, their Liberty, at the mere
prediction and often self-fulfilling threat of impending Terrorism by
government pointing the finger of blame outwardly at an enemy which can
never be found nor proven.
Words -- Just Words!! That's all that is necessary to control millions
of Sovereign People by SATANIC FORCE, a force which enslaves them to a life
of Hell. Just Words!
This Spirituality which is the resonance of atonement with the Living
Truth, is not to be confused with the dead religiosity of organized
religions, the SATANIC reverse of the double-sided (dualistic) coin of
power shared by government.
In this post, I have opened Pandora's Box. In doing so I have pointed
out that change must come in our country if we are to retain our
Constitutional Republic. I recognize the effects of long term
government/media mind control which creates self-doubt and inertia. If
changes are to come, they must come from us, the value-producing public,
not the value-depleting government.
BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT is the NONVIOLENT way to control government.
rk: Today, Feb 15th, 2005, is the Fifteenth day of the NATIONAL CONSUMER
BOYCOTT giving Americans the opportunity to take back control over their
country and their lives through participation. See:
http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch121.html#BOYCOTT
rk: FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS, THE TIME FOR TALK IS OVER! LET YOUR ACTIONS
COME FROM THE HEART, NOT your doubting SATANIC INTELLECT, and indeed, "The
Meek Shall Inherit the Earth."
rk: P.S.: Attach the following SIGNATURE to all of your Internet
Messaging. Let every person you know understand what is available to
him/her in this historical NONVIOLENT REVOLUTION.
rk: The Voting Booth HASN'T DONE IT. The Jury Box WON'T DO IT. Don't BET
YOUR LIFE on the CARTRIDGE BOX either.
RK: DO IT NONVIOLENTLY WITH: BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT!!
TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY -- STOP THE TALK, NOW WALK THE WALK!
NATIONAL CONSUMER BOYCOTT TAKE-BACK BEGINS FEBRUARY 1, 2005
Spread The Word Throughout America! IT'S NOW OR NEVER!!
http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch121.html#BOYCOTT
===========================
CLICK: WHY WACO!
Feds Probe Clinton's Ties To Riady
Monday July 24 8:43 PM ET
By SONYA ROSS, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal investigators looking into alleged
fund-raising abuses by Democrats questioned President Clinton extensively about his ties to Indonesian businessman James Riady, dating back to his 1992 White House campaign.
In testimony released Monday, Clinton said he did not remember a 1992 limousine ride in which Riady purportedly pledged to funnel $1 million in donations to his campaign.
``I don't have a specific recollection of what the conversation was,
or this fact of the car ride,'' the president said. He said he only remembered seeing Riady ``sometime in '92 after I became the nominee,'' and that Riady pledged to help his campaign.
When pressed as to whether he could specifically recall Riady's $1
million promise, Clinton replied: ``I don't. I don't. And I don't know whether he ever gave that much money. ... If he said a million, I'm surprised I don't remember it.''
A 155-page transcript of Clinton's four-hour testimony, taken April
21, was released late Monday by the White House without comment.
A Justice Department task force is looking into whether Riady, as
a foreign national, worked illegally to funnel campaign contributions to Clinton's presidential campaign.
According to an FBI summary released last year, Democratic fund-raiser John Huang, a Riady employee, said Riady ``rode in a limousine with ... Clinton,'' telling the then-Arkansas governor ``that he would like to raise $1 million.''
``Riady ... told Huang that President Clinton's reaction was one of
surprise when J. Riady said he would like to raise $1 million,'' the summary added.
Huang said that in the following weeks, Riady employees donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic Party. He said he assumed the donors had been reimbursed by Riady, as he had been.
In the testimony, Clinton flatly denied taking Riady into the White House Situation Room in 1993, on the day that federal agents raided the Branch Davidians compound near Waco, Texas. According to investigators, Riady used such anecdotes to give government ministers in Indonesia the impression that his family ``had a direct pipeline to the Oval Office.''
``I don't think I've ever taken anybody to the Situation Room,'' The president said. ``I think that's highly unlikely.''
But Clinton also said he did not remember anything that happened that day.
``I did my best to go through the day to do my job, do what I was supposed to do,'' he said.
Clinton and Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) were questioned by investigators as part of the government's ongoing investigation into alleged fund-raising abuses by Democrats.
In his testimony, released last month, Gore wrestled with the definition of ``fund-raiser,'' insisted there was no price tag placed on White House coffees and denied knowing that the event he attended at a Buddhist temple in California was actually a fund-raiser. The questioning focused on the 1996 campaign.
Clinton, however, was interrogated about his 1992 and 1996 campaigns, his first encounters with Riady and Riady's father, Mochtar, and his process of deciding whom to tap for administration jobs and commission posts.
When investigators asked about the size of Riady's pledged donation - and the fact that Clinton seems to have forgotten such a large contribution - the president said such activities are commonplace.
``Sometimes people give that much money. I know in an election or two ago that one of the Republicans got that much money from one source,'' Clinton said.
``So, it happens from time to time and it's not unlawful. But I, I just don't
remember.''
Clinton's testimony contained scant references to Gore, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee this year, and dealt mainly with whether he agreed that the coffees were his idea, not Gore's. ``If he said that, Iwouldn't disagree with that,'' the president said.
He defended the coffees as innocent activity, saying he saw nothing wrong with them because he also was holding issues-oriented coffees at that time.
``And I still do some of them, but mostly in the late afternoon, unrelated to
the (Democratic National Committee),'' Clinton said. ``I liked them and they were easy on me.''
The task force also questioned the president about a vacation he and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton took at Camp David, Md., during the July 4th holiday in 1993, approximately a week after aide Webster Hubbell purportedly accepted $100,000 from a Riady entity. Clinton denied that Hubbell mentioned anything about working for Riady.
``The only thing I remember about that vacation was that I took a long walk with him (Hubbell) and I asked him if he was in trouble,'' Clinton said. ``And he said no, he was having a billing dispute with a law firm and he would resolve it. That's the searing memory I have about that.''
Clinton hotly denied telling Riady of concerns about payments to Hubbell because Hubbell might end up as a witness in an investigation. Such a conversation ``would have made Mr. (independent counsel Kenneth) Starr happy,'' he said.
``Webb Hubbell was persistently persecuted by the independent counsel because he would not lie about me or Hillary,'' Clinton said. ``I never worried about what Webb Hubbell would say. If he wanted to say something bad about me, he'd have to make it up.''
=======================================================================================
Justice Department investigation should target UT campus
http://net.cs.utexas.edu/users/boyer/fp/texan-970317.html
Justice Department investigation should target UT campus
Clayton Vernon TEXAN COLUMNIST
According to The New York Times, former UT System Regents Chairman
Bernard Rappoport hired Webster Hubbell for a joint venture with the
Riady family in Indonesia during the brief time before Hubbell's federal
imprisonment. This shocker should end naive beliefs that the cozy and
profitable relationships between the individuals who ran this system and
Indonesian interests was above-board.
Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr is investigating these and other
enormous payments, totaling $400,000, to determine if they were
"hush money" related in any way to Hubbell's decision to not
cooperate with federal investigators. Appearances of impropriety
include frequent visits to Hubbell in prison by the Clintons'
close personal friends, to remind him the Clintons still "cared."
The Lippo Group, an Indonesian conglomerate run by the Riadys,
helped introduce since-disgraced fund-raiser John Huang to the
Clinton administration, which later endorsed Rappoport's $2 billion
Chinese real-estate project. Rappoport's public service to
Texas served his private interests well. Clinton has claimed
ignorance of these "indefensible" payments from his good friends
and his best friend.
We can no longer deny the coinciding of Rappoport's sudden
interest in hiring Hubbell as his lawyer, and the large consulting
compensation paid to UT System Chancellor William Cunningham by
Jim Bob Moffett and Freeport-McMoRan -- a large and
controversial corporate presence in Indonesia.
We now expect the Justice Department's investigation to shift south,
to the Democratic Leadership Council. This group was co-founded by
Sen. John Breaux of Louisiana, who helped Moffett intimidate our
faculty last year. This cozy relationship suggests our system
administration lacks integrity.
This sad possibility is supported by other events. Last year, we lost
a "whistle-blower" lawsuit in which a plaintiff alleged the University
deliberately undercollected royalties from oil and gas producers
with ties to administrators.
Now there are allegations of administrators being forced to
contribute to the DNC.
Students, faculty and staff are completely unaware of the alleged sleazy
machinations. Perhaps our traditional reliance on the Democratic Party's
support of higher education has left us vulnerable to its recent
indiscretions.
Perhaps UT President Robert Berdahl had some of these consideration in
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:28:26 -0800
Subject: WACO: THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPERIMENT!!
WACO: THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPERIMENT!!
By Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
This afternoon I picked up the video Tape, "WACO, Rules of Engagement"
at my local video rental store. Anita and I watched it for the first time.
Being a former law enforcement officer (Retired Sergeant with a
California Bay Area Police Department), I was ashamed of what I saw.
What jumped out at me, however, was something that apparently very few
others in our country and onlooking world picked up on.
I observed a Government Mind Control Experiment which attempted to
gauge the boiling point of the American People when Tyranny and Murder is
brought to an American neighborhood by our Servant Government.
The result of the experiment -- a great deal of simmering amongst the
populace, but no boil.
I observed an effective Government criminal cover up demonstrating
their proficiency in destroying evidence, thus preventing a true
accounting of the government personnel involved by the mere command of
their Public Relations language.
It was a mind control experiment, all right, designed to test the depth
of the trance state of the American People; an experiment to find their
action BUTTON.
From the Government's point of view, the experiment was a glowing
success. When all the publics' buttons were found and pushed, the American
People STILL lay INERT, IMPOTENT, unable to hold their official's
accountable, while an insidious fear was growing within the collective
public psyche.
No need for the American People to Act; after all, such Murderous
Tyranny was not happening to them. It is this mass malaise which, if not
stopped, accounts for a NAZI GERMANY and will destroy a nation from
within. Does anybody really want to repeat that?
The theme of Government cover up grows more and more obvious with each
mind control assault upon the lives of innocent people in our society. One
saw it in the JFK assassination; the Martin Luther King assassination; the
Bobby Kennedy assassination; Ruby Ridge; the assassination of Randy
Weaver's wife and baby. And most recently, 9-11, which brought about the
loss of our FREEDOMS under the guise of our government's declared war on
Terrorism.
All the while a great and growing body of evidence shows the same
"investigative" government's complicity to be present in the Murder of
American Lives -- the Destruction at the World Trade Center on 9-11 and the
attack on the Pentagon.
What jumped out at me in watching "WACO, the Rules of Engagement" was,
what does it take to move the American People into action, to generate a
life-enabling activism within lives shut down through unrelenting
conditioning which engenders fear and doubt? Here's an interesting
question for you to ponder: Why do people FEAR the government? Why does
the government NOT FEAR the people -- the SOVEREIGN People, the TRUE
GOVERNMENT?
What I saw in Waco was a high level government operation designed to
test just how far open, government televised, in-your-face mass murder can
be committed on a monumental scale, while the whole world looks on, and yet
no serious, substantive, effective public outcries are made for
accountability?
What's wrong with a system of government which allows and protects the
few, the corrupted, the biased, the criminal, from facing such
accountability?
What is wrong with a system of self-serving politicians who go through
the motions -- promising, promising, promising -- yet never fully
delivering on those promises while they decide the fate of millions? Are
we their property? Can they do to/with us anything they wish? Do they OWN
us? Are we human resources, merely looked upon as SLAVES? Anybody getting
the picture?
I can only view such self-destructive behavior by Slave-minded Americans
as the nonaction of the Living Dead. What do I mean by Living Dead? The
Living Dead no longer operate from a state of True Living Intelligence, but
are reduced, through Mind Control Conditioning, to stumble through life in
codependent fashion as mechanical, conditioned, spiritually blind,
Intellectually-driven automatons/entities. They have lost sight of their
True Spiritualiy, their wholeness. They have waived their gift of divine
Intelligence. They have bargained away their soul in worship of SATAN, the
petty "god" of Intellect.
Through unrelenting conditioning, they have been caused by their equally
SATANIC mind controlled leadership (the blind who lead the blind) to live
in fear. They can be made to surrender their God-Given SOVEREIGNTY, their
Unalienable God-Given Rights, their Freedoms, their Liberty, at the mere
prediction and often self-fulfilling threat of impending Terrorism by
government pointing the finger of blame outwardly at an enemy which can
never be found nor proven.
Words -- Just Words!! That's all that is necessary to control millions
of Sovereign People by SATANIC FORCE, a force which enslaves them to a life
of Hell. Just Words!
This Spirituality which is the resonance of atonement with the Living
Truth, is not to be confused with the dead religiosity of organized
religions, the SATANIC reverse of the double-sided (dualistic) coin of
power shared by government.
In this post, I have opened Pandora's Box. In doing so I have pointed
out that change must come in our country if we are to retain our
Constitutional Republic. I recognize the effects of long term
government/media mind control which creates self-doubt and inertia. If
changes are to come, they must come from us, the value-producing public,
not the value-depleting government.
BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT is the NONVIOLENT way to control government.
rk: Today, Feb 15th, 2005, is the Fifteenth day of the NATIONAL CONSUMER
BOYCOTT giving Americans the opportunity to take back control over their
country and their lives through participation. See:
http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch121.html#BOYCOTT
rk: FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS, THE TIME FOR TALK IS OVER! LET YOUR ACTIONS
COME FROM THE HEART, NOT your doubting SATANIC INTELLECT, and indeed, "The
Meek Shall Inherit the Earth."
rk: P.S.: Attach the following SIGNATURE to all of your Internet
Messaging. Let every person you know understand what is available to
him/her in this historical NONVIOLENT REVOLUTION.
rk: The Voting Booth HASN'T DONE IT. The Jury Box WON'T DO IT. Don't BET
YOUR LIFE on the CARTRIDGE BOX either.
RK: DO IT NONVIOLENTLY WITH: BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT!!
TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY -- STOP THE TALK, NOW WALK THE WALK!
NATIONAL CONSUMER BOYCOTT TAKE-BACK BEGINS FEBRUARY 1, 2005
Spread The Word Throughout America! IT'S NOW OR NEVER!!
http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch121.html#BOYCOTT
===========================
CLICK: WHY WACO!
Feds Probe Clinton's Ties To Riady
Monday July 24 8:43 PM ET
By SONYA ROSS, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal investigators looking into alleged
fund-raising abuses by Democrats questioned President Clinton extensively about his ties to Indonesian businessman James Riady, dating back to his 1992 White House campaign.
In testimony released Monday, Clinton said he did not remember a 1992 limousine ride in which Riady purportedly pledged to funnel $1 million in donations to his campaign.
``I don't have a specific recollection of what the conversation was,
or this fact of the car ride,'' the president said. He said he only remembered seeing Riady ``sometime in '92 after I became the nominee,'' and that Riady pledged to help his campaign.
When pressed as to whether he could specifically recall Riady's $1
million promise, Clinton replied: ``I don't. I don't. And I don't know whether he ever gave that much money. ... If he said a million, I'm surprised I don't remember it.''
A 155-page transcript of Clinton's four-hour testimony, taken April
21, was released late Monday by the White House without comment.
A Justice Department task force is looking into whether Riady, as
a foreign national, worked illegally to funnel campaign contributions to Clinton's presidential campaign.
According to an FBI summary released last year, Democratic fund-raiser John Huang, a Riady employee, said Riady ``rode in a limousine with ... Clinton,'' telling the then-Arkansas governor ``that he would like to raise $1 million.''
``Riady ... told Huang that President Clinton's reaction was one of
surprise when J. Riady said he would like to raise $1 million,'' the summary added.
Huang said that in the following weeks, Riady employees donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic Party. He said he assumed the donors had been reimbursed by Riady, as he had been.
In the testimony, Clinton flatly denied taking Riady into the White House Situation Room in 1993, on the day that federal agents raided the Branch Davidians compound near Waco, Texas. According to investigators, Riady used such anecdotes to give government ministers in Indonesia the impression that his family ``had a direct pipeline to the Oval Office.''
``I don't think I've ever taken anybody to the Situation Room,'' The president said. ``I think that's highly unlikely.''
But Clinton also said he did not remember anything that happened that day.
``I did my best to go through the day to do my job, do what I was supposed to do,'' he said.
Clinton and Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) were questioned by investigators as part of the government's ongoing investigation into alleged fund-raising abuses by Democrats.
In his testimony, released last month, Gore wrestled with the definition of ``fund-raiser,'' insisted there was no price tag placed on White House coffees and denied knowing that the event he attended at a Buddhist temple in California was actually a fund-raiser. The questioning focused on the 1996 campaign.
Clinton, however, was interrogated about his 1992 and 1996 campaigns, his first encounters with Riady and Riady's father, Mochtar, and his process of deciding whom to tap for administration jobs and commission posts.
When investigators asked about the size of Riady's pledged donation - and the fact that Clinton seems to have forgotten such a large contribution - the president said such activities are commonplace.
``Sometimes people give that much money. I know in an election or two ago that one of the Republicans got that much money from one source,'' Clinton said.
``So, it happens from time to time and it's not unlawful. But I, I just don't
remember.''
Clinton's testimony contained scant references to Gore, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee this year, and dealt mainly with whether he agreed that the coffees were his idea, not Gore's. ``If he said that, Iwouldn't disagree with that,'' the president said.
He defended the coffees as innocent activity, saying he saw nothing wrong with them because he also was holding issues-oriented coffees at that time.
``And I still do some of them, but mostly in the late afternoon, unrelated to
the (Democratic National Committee),'' Clinton said. ``I liked them and they were easy on me.''
The task force also questioned the president about a vacation he and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton took at Camp David, Md., during the July 4th holiday in 1993, approximately a week after aide Webster Hubbell purportedly accepted $100,000 from a Riady entity. Clinton denied that Hubbell mentioned anything about working for Riady.
``The only thing I remember about that vacation was that I took a long walk with him (Hubbell) and I asked him if he was in trouble,'' Clinton said. ``And he said no, he was having a billing dispute with a law firm and he would resolve it. That's the searing memory I have about that.''
Clinton hotly denied telling Riady of concerns about payments to Hubbell because Hubbell might end up as a witness in an investigation. Such a conversation ``would have made Mr. (independent counsel Kenneth) Starr happy,'' he said.
``Webb Hubbell was persistently persecuted by the independent counsel because he would not lie about me or Hillary,'' Clinton said. ``I never worried about what Webb Hubbell would say. If he wanted to say something bad about me, he'd have to make it up.''
=======================================================================================
Justice Department investigation should target UT campus
http://net.cs.utexas.edu/users/boyer/fp/texan-970317.html
Justice Department investigation should target UT campus
Clayton Vernon TEXAN COLUMNIST
According to The New York Times, former UT System Regents Chairman
Bernard Rappoport hired Webster Hubbell for a joint venture with the
Riady family in Indonesia during the brief time before Hubbell's federal
imprisonment. This shocker should end naive beliefs that the cozy and
profitable relationships between the individuals who ran this system and
Indonesian interests was above-board.
Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr is investigating these and other
enormous payments, totaling $400,000, to determine if they were
"hush money" related in any way to Hubbell's decision to not
cooperate with federal investigators. Appearances of impropriety
include frequent visits to Hubbell in prison by the Clintons'
close personal friends, to remind him the Clintons still "cared."
The Lippo Group, an Indonesian conglomerate run by the Riadys,
helped introduce since-disgraced fund-raiser John Huang to the
Clinton administration, which later endorsed Rappoport's $2 billion
Chinese real-estate project. Rappoport's public service to
Texas served his private interests well. Clinton has claimed
ignorance of these "indefensible" payments from his good friends
and his best friend.
We can no longer deny the coinciding of Rappoport's sudden
interest in hiring Hubbell as his lawyer, and the large consulting
compensation paid to UT System Chancellor William Cunningham by
Jim Bob Moffett and Freeport-McMoRan -- a large and
controversial corporate presence in Indonesia.
We now expect the Justice Department's investigation to shift south,
to the Democratic Leadership Council. This group was co-founded by
Sen. John Breaux of Louisiana, who helped Moffett intimidate our
faculty last year. This cozy relationship suggests our system
administration lacks integrity.
This sad possibility is supported by other events. Last year, we lost
a "whistle-blower" lawsuit in which a plaintiff alleged the University
deliberately undercollected royalties from oil and gas producers
with ties to administrators.
Now there are allegations of administrators being forced to
contribute to the DNC.
Students, faculty and staff are completely unaware of the alleged sleazy
machinations. Perhaps our traditional reliance on the Democratic Party's
support of higher education has left us vulnerable to its recent
indiscretions.
Perhaps UT President Robert Berdahl had some of these consideration in
