Ian Henshall
NEWSFLASH - 911 sceptics meet in London;
Mon Feb 16 12:28:41 2004
64.140.159.183

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: NEWSFLASH - 911 sceptics meet in London; Doctors: Hutton was wrong on Kelly death
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:47:07 +0000
From: crisis@pro-net.co.uk
To: inkchair@pro-net.co.uk

for subscription and unsubscription details, see the end

CRISIS NEWSLETTER: 2 NEWSFLASHES

1. Kelly Suicide - MI6 again in the frame

2. 9-11 sceptics meet this Thursday in London

3. The 9-11 official story has now collapsed in several key respects

1. KELLY `SUICIDE`: MORE DOUBTS RAISED, MI6 AGAIN IN THE FRAME

In a letter to The Guardian last week six doctors have again raised doubts
over the Hutton enquiry finding that Kelly committed suicide, saying
Hutton's account of Kelly's death is virtually unknown in medical archives.
This follows controversy in the British Medical Journal between
statisticians and the forensic establishment who argue that the Hutton
scenario is `possible` and anything else is a `conspiracy theory` therefore
Kelly committed suicide. `Conspiracy theory` is of course a misleading term
for anything the establishment does not want to hear.

As the statisticians put it: it has been known for people to survive plane
crashes, but if you met someone dischevelled near Dartmoor prison saying
they had just survived a plane crash, would you believe them?

With MI6 an obvious suspect in the likely murder of Kelly (motive: revenge
for breaking the omerta rule and drawing attention to the Bush/Blair/MI6 WMD
lies), this brings to four the allegations of high profile murders and
attempted murders involving MI6. The other three are 1. Hiring Al Qaida to
murder Colonel Ghadaffi as testified by ex-MI5 David Shayler. 2. Plotting to
kill Slobodan Milosevic using a laser blinding device in a road tunnel as
testified by ex-MI6 Richard Tomlinson. 3. The alleged murder of Princess
Diana when a witness saw a laser type flash in a road tunnel, as alleged by
Mohammed Al Fayeed.


2. 911 DOUBTERS MEET IN LONDON

911 sceptics are holding a preliminary meeting at 7.30pm, this Thursday 19
February downstairs at the Old Star public house on the junction of
Broadway/Tothill St, London, SW1, directly opposite St James tube station.

Deception Dollars will be available.

If possible, please email to confirm your attendance
or for more information.

All sceptics are invited but there is no general invitation to the corprate
media to attend this preliminary meeting, but genuine researchers will be
welcome if they contact us first.


3. 911 OFFICIAL STORY HAS COLLAPSED IN SEVERAL KEY RESPECTS.

THE ATTACKS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED - 911
Commission chief Thomas Kean

When George Bush used the 911 attacks as pretext for war, first against
Afghanistan and later Iraq, millions of people across the world felt a grave
disquiet. Within months it was clear: politically and financially Bush,
Cheney, the oil companies and US/UK securicrats seemed to have gained more
from the mass murders than the presumed mastermind Osama Bin Laden.

The WMD lies have wrecked the public credibility of Bush/Blair but the
official 911 story has also collapsed in many respects. We now know that,
far from coming out of the blue, the 911 attacks dovetailed into a sinister
pattern of decisions made well before the world supposedly changed in
September 2001.

Bush's ex-Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill has testified that contrary to the
911 legend Bush planned to invade Iraq from the first cabinet meeting of
2001. Wesley Clark has stated the Bush White House asked him to claim on TV
that Iraq was involved in the 911 attacks. A massive British task force was
dispatched to the far East on September 9th 2001. Was this for the invasion
of Afghanistan that (the BBC web site confirms) was announced to the
Pakistan government in summer 2001.

Their own public documents confirm that before Bush seized the White House
the neocons knew that they needed `a Pearl Harbour type event` to realise
their plan to seize the middle east oil fields.

There were suspicious circumstances from the start. Bin Laden was for most
of his career a CIA asset. The White House, though taking full political
advantage, was viscerally opposed to any sort of enquiry into the events of
that day while Cheney fought a bitter battle to keep secret his contacts in
the months preceding the attacks.
The FBI counterintelligence chief who blocked investigations that would have
foiled the attacks was rewarded with promotion. The anthrax attacks - aimed
at key Democrat Senators who questioned the preplanned constitution-busting
US Patriot Act - came not from Bin Laden, nor from Iraq (as claimed by
neocon David Rose in the Observer), but from US military grade supplies. The
inside share trades which indicated complicity in the 911 attacks were
`difficult to trace`.

As the shock has worn off the `strutting arrogance` (Piers Morgan) and
`corruption` (Ken Livingstone) of the `Bush Junta` (John Le Carre) has
become ever more apparent. 911 Doubters have begun to say it out loud: Bush
allowed the attacks to take place, maybe even helped: the Reichstag Fire for
- as Washington's neocon commentators now shamelessly admit - is a new world
empire.

The word has begun to spread into the mainstream. Gore Vidal can see no
innocent explanation for the extraordinary NORAD standown (The Enemy Within
- The Observer Nov 2002). Michael Meacher has produced a timeline and
believes it proves the complicity of the White House in the attacks
(Guardian Sept 2003). Michael Moore says Bush is `capable of anything`.
Outspoken US sceptic John Kaminski recently told 10 million radio listeners
that the attacks were a mass murder plot by the White House. Literally
millions of Deception Dollars have been printed and circulated in the US and
UK.

The Mariani lawsuit against Bush instigated by a 911 vitim's wife, alleging
conspiracy to mass murder, is receiving publicity across the US. Crisis
Newsletter's website, http://www.911dossier.co.uk, aimed at serious researchers,
has been metioned in The Independent and The Guardian and received nearly
20,000 visits.

Now 911 doubters in the UK have called a meeting in London, asking questions
like these...

Why was NORAD paralysed for a vital hour, while the interceptor jets that
should have been routine were scrambled only from a distant airbase on the
orders of a Canadian official. Why are these jets described as racing to New
York when they were flying at 30% of their top speed?

Why did Bush twice say he saw the first plane hit at around 8.55am when the
only known footage was not available to the public or the media for another
24 hours? Why did he linger and crack jokes for 40 minutes at a public
engagement within a few miles of an international airport in breach of all
security rules? Why did top Pentagon officials cancel flights from September
9th?

How could Blair and Rice claim the attacks were `unthinkable` when leaders
from around the world gave them warnings of an impending mainland attack,
when the use of hijacked planes to attack buildings was known to be a top Al
Qaida priority since Operation Bojinka was foiled during the Clinton
Presidency, and when the Genoa summit weeks before was surrounded with AA
batteries?

Was the `anti-hijacking exercise` running at the Pentagon on the day of the
attacks `an extraordinary coincidence` or a smokescreen for official
complicity in mass murder?

Some have expressed even more radical often science based doubts...

How could the supposed mobile phone calls be made from Flight 93, three
miles high cruising at 500 mph? Why did the phone operator who claims to
have received the only really long call fail to record it?

Why has the FBI seized all footage of the Pentagon attack (supposedly by
Flight 77) and threatened air traffic controllers with prison if they talk
to anyone. How did the inferno of Flight 77 leave barely a trace on the
Pentagon lawn? Different writers in Murdoch's The Times and the Sunday Times
both recently ran the extraordinary explanation that the entire plane was
`vapourised`.

Why is there no footage of the hijackers in any of the departure lounges?
Why do the flight manifests and autopsy reports make no reference to them?
Why do airline records state that Flight 77 and Flight 11 never flew?

--------------------------------------------
Subscribe/unsubscribe information.
It was intended to split this list into three but as only three people have
asked to unsubscribe from either of the lists all mailings will go out to
the whole list. To subscribe or unsubscribe, reply to crisis@pro-net.co.uk,
preferably with a few words of feedback. To unsubscribe remember to quote
the address to which the email was sent.

Crisis Newsletter is published by Ian Henshall with the help of Rowland Morgan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>From Ian Henshall, publisher of Crisis Newsletter, www.dumpblair.co.uk and
www.911dossier.co.uk. He is also proprietor of The Tea and Coffee Plant and
chair of INK, the trade organisation for the UK alternative print media
(www.ink.uk.com). Comment is written in a strictly personal capacity. To get
future Crisis Newsletters or be removed, email to crisis@pro-net.co.uk.
-----------------------------
The Best News Web Sites, updated daily or hourly
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
http://www.legitgov.org/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://english.aljazeera.net/
http://truthout.org

The Best Comment Sites
http://www.onlinejournal.com
http://www.medialens.org/
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/
http://globalresearch.ca
http://scoop.co.nz/
--------------------------------------------------

• Stewardess ID'd Hijackers Early, Transcripts Show — Gail Sheehy, Mon Feb 16 20:08
• CONT'D - Even more curious: — Gail Sheehy, Mon Feb 16 20:10
• 9/11 - Hmmm... I smell a rat somewhere! — Masterminds, Mon Feb 16 17:27