Published on Tuesday, February 14, 2006 by TruthDig
Cheney Shoots A Texas Liberal
by Molly Ivins
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0214-29.htm
Of course the jokes are flying all over Texas—what’s the
fine for shooting a lawyer?—and so forth.
Dick-Cheney-shooting-Harry-Whittington is fraught, as they
say, with irony. It’s not as though the ground in Texas is
littered with liberal Republicans. I think the vice
president winged the only one we’ve got.
Not that I accuse Harry Whittington of being an actual
liberal—only by Texas Republican standards, and that sets
the bar about the height of a matchbook. Nevertheless,
Whittington is seriously civilized, particularly on the
issues of crime, punishment and prisons. He served on both
the Texas Board of Corrections and on the bonding authority
that builds prisons. As he has often said, prisons do not
curb crime, they are hothouses for crime: “Prisons are to
crime what greenhouses are to plants.”
In the day, whenever there was an especially bad case of
new-ignoramus-in-the-legislature—a “lock ’em all up and
throw away the key” type—the senior members used to send the
prison-happy, tuff-on-crime neophyte to see Harry
Whittington, a Republican after all, for a little basic
education on the cost of prisons.
When Whittington was the chairman of Texas Public Finance
Authority, he had a devastating set of numbers on the demand
for more, more, more prison beds. As Whittington was wont to
point out, the only thing prisons are good for is
segregating violent people from the rest of society, and
most of them belong in psychiatric hospitals to begin with.
The severity of sentences has no effect on crime.
Texas still keeps the nonviolent, the retarded, senior
citizens, etc. locked up for ridiculous periods—all at
taxpayer expense. If we could ever get to where we spend as
much per pupil on education as we do per prisoner, this
state would take off like a rocket. In 2003, we spend nearly
$15,000 per prisoner, while average per-pupil spending was
just over $8,000.
I am not trying to make a big deal out of a simple hunting
accident for partisan purposes—just thought it was a good
chance to pay tribute to old Harry, a thoroughly decent man.
However, I was offended by the never-our-fault White House
spin team. Cheney adviser Mary Matalin said of her boss, “He
was not careless or incautious [and did not] violate of any
of the [rules]. He didn’t do anything he wasn’t supposed to
do.” Of course he did, Ms. Matalin, he shot Harry
Whittington.
Which brings us to one of the many paradoxes of the Bush
administration, which claims to be creating “the
responsibility society.” It’s hard to think of a crowd less
likely to take responsibility for anything they have done or
not done than this bunch. They’re certainly good at
preaching responsibility to others—and blaming other people
for everything that goes wrong on their watch.
Of course the Cheney shooting was an accident.
But is it an accident if your home and your life are
destroyed by the flood following a hurricane? Especially if
the flood was caused by failed levees, a government
responsibility?
Is it an accident if you are born with a clubfoot and your
parents are too poor to pay for the operation to fix it? Is
there any societal responsibility in such a case?
Is it an accident when your manufacturing job gets shipped
overseas and all you can find to replace it is a low-wage
job at the big-box store with no health insurance, and your
kid breaks his leg, and you can’t pay the bill, so you have
to declare bankruptcy under a new law that leaves you broke
for good, with no chance of ever getting out of debt? Or was
all of that caused by deliberate government policy?
Cheney is much given to lecturing us about taking
responsibility. When and where does societal responsibility
come in?
Cheney has a curious, shifting history on issues of blame
and responsibility. He was vice chair of the congressional
committee that spent 11 months investigating the Iran-Contra
affair and author of its minority report. As John W. Dean
highlights in a recent essay, the 500-page majority report
concluded the entire affair “was characterized by pervasive
dishonesty and inordinate secrecy.” But Cheney’s report said
the Reagan administration’s repeated breaking of the law was
“mistakes ... were just that—mistakes in judgment and
nothing more.”
Those of you who saw Cheney’s interview with Jim Lehrer last
week may recall the passage on Darfur that ended with this:
Lehrer: “It’s still happening. There are now 2 million
people homeless.”
Cheney: “Still happening, correct.”
Lehrer: “Hundreds of thousands of people have died, and—so
you’re satisfied the U.S. is doing everything it can do?”
Cheney: “I am satisfied we’re doing everything we can do."
His head still tilts over more to the right when he lies.
Molly Ivins is the former editor of the liberal monthly The
Texas Observer. She is the bestselling author of several
books including "Who Let the Dogs In?"
© 2006 TruthDig, LLC
###
The Raw Story | Third hunter revealed in Cheney hunting
party
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Third_hunter_revealed_in_Cheney_hunting_0213.html
--------------------------------------
Jim Lobe | Cheney's Law: Shoot First, Ask Questions Later
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0214-30.htm
Media Matters for America Study Reveals Conservative Slant
on Sunday Talk Shows; Study Finds Conservative Guests
Outnumbered Progressives
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0214-04.htm
Free Press: Thousands Demand Investigation into Covert
Propaganda
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0214-07.htm
National Security Archive: Department of Justice Concedes it
Can Begin to Release Internal Warrantless Surveillance
Records on March 3
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0213-18.htm
TODAY'S BEST TALK RADIO -- 40 MIN. THE CHARLES GOYETTE SHOW
http://www.charlesgoyette.com/archive/media/2006-02-14-Charles-03.mp3
Cheney shooting victim suffers heart attack
Briefing: Reporters fume, press secretary gets angry...
Jokes about Cheney - Pellets remain in victim's skin
http://www.rawstory.com/
http://www.hbo.com/billmaher/news/