Popular Mechanics staff
9/11: Debunking The Myths
Thu Feb 10, 2005 14:50
64.140.158.74
9/11: Debunking The Myths
PM examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
PM consulted more than 300 experts and organizations in its investigation into 9/11 conspiracy theories. The following were particularly helpful.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=9&c=y
We're eager to know your thoughts and answer your questions. E-mail for Popular Mechanics staff, PM.Zone staff, Letters to the Editor, subscription information, or anything else should be addressed as follows:
For inquiries about editorial articles past
or present, go to
popularmechanics@hearst.com
POPULAR MECHANICS EDITORIAL STAFF
James B. Meigs
Editor-In-Chief
David Dunbar
Executive Editor Jerry Beilinson
Deputy Editor
Sarah Deem
Managing Editor
Michael Lawton
Design Director
THESE FOLKS NEED A GOOD TALKING TO!!!!
==================================
PM... NOW GO TO...:
9/11 info and links:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm
==================================
CAN ANYONE BELEIVE THIS SNIP.....
Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide--not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
PM examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
PM consulted more than 300 experts and organizations in its investigation into 9/11 conspiracy theories. The following were particularly helpful.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=9&c=y
We're eager to know your thoughts and answer your questions. E-mail for Popular Mechanics staff, PM.Zone staff, Letters to the Editor, subscription information, or anything else should be addressed as follows:
For inquiries about editorial articles past
or present, go to
popularmechanics@hearst.com
POPULAR MECHANICS EDITORIAL STAFF
James B. Meigs
Editor-In-Chief
David Dunbar
Executive Editor Jerry Beilinson
Deputy Editor
Sarah Deem
Managing Editor
Michael Lawton
Design Director
THESE FOLKS NEED A GOOD TALKING TO!!!!
==================================
PM... NOW GO TO...:
9/11 info and links:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm
==================================
CAN ANYONE BELEIVE THIS SNIP.....
Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide--not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
- P.M. debunking the bunk ! —brad, Fri Feb 11 04:47
- # 9-11 on Trial —Lisa Guliani, Fri Feb 11 02:56
- US aviation officials received 52 warnings before 9/11 —New York Times, Thu Feb 10 17:58
- REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION.... —911 investigation, Thu Feb 10 16:06
- Virtual War Rooms and the 9/11 attack on America —David Hawkins - Foundation Scholar, Thu Feb 10 15:34
- THE PENTAGON: Big Plane, Small Holes —911research@wtc7.net, Thu Feb 10 14:56
- "The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" —Don Stacey, Thu Feb 10 15:17
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
