Bush/CIA/NSA/Mafia Mind Control Victims
Skull & Bones Implemented World War III, part 2
Mon Feb 9 16:22:57 2004
67.171.32.6

http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm 
G.W. Bush: International Racketeer OIL ROBBER BARONS
By Ted Lang
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5506.htm 
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/saf-j03.shtml 
New York Times’ Safire predicts “major terror attack in the US” on eve of 2004 election By Barry Grey 3 January 2004
In a column published December 31, New York Times columnist William Safire blandly predicts that the “‘October surprise’ affecting our [2004] election” will be “a major terror attack in the US.”
This ominous prognostication is given in passing as one of 16 predictions about the new year, in a piece carrying the semi-jocular headline, “Office Pool, 2004.” Safire, Richard Nixon’s former speechwriter and political aide, and a consummate Washington insider, neither explains nor elaborates on his prediction, and gives no sources. But the off-hand manner in which he posits a major attack on US soil “affecting” the presidential election suggests he is merely echoing a common theme of discussions in the corridors of power of the American capital.
In the column, Safire lists 16 topics, ranging from “the next tyranny to feel the force of US liberation” to the winner of the Oscar award for best picture of 2004. Under each topic, he gives three or four alternatives, and in the concluding paragraph reveals his “picks.” In regard to Israeli policy in the new year—item number 16—he says of his prediction: “This last one is pure unsourced thumb-sucking; Sharon didn’t return my call.”
This remark, notwithstanding its sarcastic tone, implies that Safire’s other predictions, including the likelihood of a pre-election terror attack, are based on information provided by serious sources.
The alternatives given by Safire in item 13 on the “October surprise” are: (a) the capture of bin Laden in Yemen; (b) the daring escape of Saddam; (c) a major terror attack in the US; (d) finding a buried bag of anthrax in Tikrit. Safire’s pick is (c).
The column appeared in the midst of an unprecedented mobilization of the military in cities across the US, justified on the grounds of a heightened terror threat. It follows a series of commentaries in the American media suggesting that a major terrorist attack within the US could either shift the 2004 election in Bush’s favor, or lead to the election being suspended or cancelled outright. [See “The ‘war on terror’ and American democracy—some ominous warnings,” 27 November, 2003]
Given the record of lies, conspiracies and provocations of the Bush administration, and Safire’s well-known connections to the centers of power in Washington and the White House, several obvious questions arise from the New Year’s eve column: (1) Who are the sources and what is the information on which Safire bases his prediction of a major pre-election terror attack, and, (2) Is the perpetration, or at least allowance, of such an attack being discussed within government, intelligence or military circles as a serious option for keeping Bush in power in 2004, regardless the sentiment of the electorate?
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/98/387/11693_bush.html 
Bush vs. Hitler 01/03/2004 12:40
Although the quest for or preservation of "democracy" is often used as a justification for war, history has incessantly revealed that such a quest is often little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to install a puppet regime.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/392006.html 
Last Update: 09/02/2004 18:51
Report: Al-Qaida has obtained tactical nuclear explosives
By Yoav Stern, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service
(The Al-Qaida was created, funded, and still is a deep plant operation of the CIA/MOSSAD, just like Saddam Hussein was and now one of his more then twenty decoys is being paraded by the current U.S. Presidential Administration as being the real Saddam Hussein, for reasons of their extreme political cover-up, and the Bin Laden family who were still present in the U.S. at the time of the Elite's planned and carried out mass murder for their globalist profit and war agenda on 911 were secretly flown out of the U.S. by orders of the President Mr. Bush, whose father Bush Senior is a personal business partner of the Bin Laden Family as well as being a personal business partner of the real Saddam Hussein, through the The Carlyle Group, and the very secret all controlling Harris Group linked to the Rice Institute, who own more then ninety percent of all banks in the U.S. and Canada.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3995.htm 
Exposed: The Carlyle Group
Shocking documentary uncovers the subversion of Americas democracy.
I defy you to watch this 48 minute documentary and not be outraged about the depth of corruption and deceit within the highest ranks of our government and the first family.
----
Al-Qaida has possessed tactical nuclear weapons for about six years, the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper reported Sunday.
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/98/387/11693_bush.html 
(Who do you think set up the CIA-MOSSAD created and funded Al-Qaida to have these tactical nuclear weapons?)
----
Bush vs. Hitler 01/03/2004 12:40
Although the quest for or preservation of "democracy" is often used as a justification for war, history has incessantly revealed that such a quest is often little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to install a puppet regime.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/02/60minutes/main576332.shtml 
Skull And Bones Oct. 5, 2003
Skull and Bones is an elite secret society at Yale University that includes some of the most powerful men of the 20th century. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)
“They do have many individuals in influential positions. And that's why this is something that we need to know about.”
Alexandra Robbins, author "Secrets of the Tomb"
Apart from presidents, Bones has included cabinet officers, spies, Supreme Court justices, statesmen and captains of industry. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)
Ron Rosenbaum, author and columnist for the New York Observer, has become obsessed with cracking that code of secrecy. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)
(CBS) There are secrets that George W. Bush guards at least as carefully as any entrusted to a president.
He's forbidden to share these secrets even with the vice president -- secrets he has held ever since his days as an undergraduate at Yale.
G.W. Bush: International Racketeer OIL ROBBER BARONS
By Ted Lang
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5506.htm 
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/saf-j03.shtml 
New York Times’ Safire predicts “major terror attack in the US” on eve of 2004 election By Barry Grey 3 January 2004
In a column published December 31, New York Times columnist William Safire blandly predicts that the “‘October surprise’ affecting our [2004] election” will be “a major terror attack in the US.”
This ominous prognostication is given in passing as one of 16 predictions about the new year, in a piece carrying the semi-jocular headline, “Office Pool, 2004.” Safire, Richard Nixon’s former speechwriter and political aide, and a consummate Washington insider, neither explains nor elaborates on his prediction, and gives no sources. But the off-hand manner in which he posits a major attack on US soil “affecting” the presidential election suggests he is merely echoing a common theme of discussions in the corridors of power of the American capital.
In the column, Safire lists 16 topics, ranging from “the next tyranny to feel the force of US liberation” to the winner of the Oscar award for best picture of 2004. Under each topic, he gives three or four alternatives, and in the concluding paragraph reveals his “picks.” In regard to Israeli policy in the new year—item number 16—he says of his prediction: “This last one is pure unsourced thumb-sucking; Sharon didn’t return my call.”
This remark, notwithstanding its sarcastic tone, implies that Safire’s other predictions, including the likelihood of a pre-election terror attack, are based on information provided by serious sources.
The alternatives given by Safire in item 13 on the “October surprise” are: (a) the capture of bin Laden in Yemen; (b) the daring escape of Saddam; (c) a major terror attack in the US; (d) finding a buried bag of anthrax in Tikrit. Safire’s pick is (c).
The column appeared in the midst of an unprecedented mobilization of the military in cities across the US, justified on the grounds of a heightened terror threat. It follows a series of commentaries in the American media suggesting that a major terrorist attack within the US could either shift the 2004 election in Bush’s favor, or lead to the election being suspended or cancelled outright. [See “The ‘war on terror’ and American democracy—some ominous warnings,” 27 November, 2003]
Given the record of lies, conspiracies and provocations of the Bush administration, and Safire’s well-known connections to the centers of power in Washington and the White House, several obvious questions arise from the New Year’s eve column: (1) Who are the sources and what is the information on which Safire bases his prediction of a major pre-election terror attack, and, (2) Is the perpetration, or at least allowance, of such an attack being discussed within government, intelligence or military circles as a serious option for keeping Bush in power in 2004, regardless the sentiment of the electorate?

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/392006.html 

Last Update: 09/02/2004 18:51

Report: Al-Qaida has obtained tactical nuclear explosives

By Yoav Stern, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

(The Al-Qaida was created, funded, and still is a deep plant operation of the CIA/MOSSAD, just like Saddam Hussein was and now one of his more then twenty decoys is being paraded by the current U.S. Presidential Administration as being the real Saddam Hussein, for reasons of their extreme political cover-up, and the Bin Laden family who were still present in the U.S. at the time of the Elite's planned and carried out mass murder for their globalist profit and war agenda on 911 were secretly flown out of the U.S. by orders of the President Mr. Bush, whose father Bush Senior is a personal business partner of the Bin Laden Family as well as being a personal business partner of the real Saddam Hussein, through the The Carlyle Group, and the very secret all controlling Harris Group linked to the Rice Institute, who own more then ninety percent of all banks in the U.S. and Canada.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3995.htm 

Exposed: The Carlyle Group
Shocking documentary uncovers the subversion of Americas democracy.
I defy you to watch this 48 minute documentary and not be outraged about the depth of corruption and deceit within the highest ranks of our government and the first family.
----
Al-Qaida has possessed tactical nuclear weapons for about six years, the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper reported Sunday.

http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/98/387/11693_bush.html 

(Who do you think set up the CIA-MOSSAD created and funded Al-Qaida to have these tactical nuclear weapons?)
----
Bush vs. Hitler 01/03/2004 12:40
Although the quest for or preservation of "democracy" is often used as a justification for war, history has incessantly revealed that such a quest is often little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to install a puppet regime.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/02/60minutes/main576332.shtml 

Skull And Bones Oct. 5, 2003

Skull and Bones is an elite secret society at Yale University that includes some of the most powerful men of the 20th century. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)

“They do have many individuals in influential positions. And that's why this is something that we need to know about.”
Alexandra Robbins, author "Secrets of the Tomb"

Apart from presidents, Bones has included cabinet officers, spies, Supreme Court justices, statesmen and captains of industry. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)

Ron Rosenbaum, author and columnist for the New York Observer, has become obsessed with cracking that code of secrecy. (Photo: 60 Minutes/CBS)

(CBS) There are secrets that George W. Bush guards at least as carefully as any entrusted to a president.

He's forbidden to share these secrets even with the vice president -- secrets he has held ever since his days as an undergraduate at Yale.

Sen. John Kerry

Searched the web for Election Fraud 2004. Results 1 - 10 of about 282,000.

G.W. Bush: International Racketeer OIL ROBBER BARONS
By Ted Lang
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5506.htm 

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/saf-j03.shtml 

New York Times’ Safire predicts “major terror attack in the US” on eve of 2004 election By Barry Grey 3 January 2004

In a column published December 31, New York Times columnist William Safire blandly predicts that the “‘October surprise’ affecting our [2004] election” will be “a major terror attack in the US.”

This ominous prognostication is given in passing as one of 16 predictions about the new year, in a piece carrying the semi-jocular headline, “Office Pool, 2004.” Safire, Richard Nixon’s former speechwriter and political aide, and a consummate Washington insider, neither explains nor elaborates on his prediction, and gives no sources. But the off-hand manner in which he posits a major attack on US soil “affecting” the presidential election suggests he is merely echoing a common theme of discussions in the corridors of power of the American capital.

In the column, Safire lists 16 topics, ranging from “the next tyranny to feel the force of US liberation” to the winner of the Oscar award for best picture of 2004. Under each topic, he gives three or four alternatives, and in the concluding paragraph reveals his “picks.” In regard to Israeli policy in the new year—item number 16—he says of his prediction: “This last one is pure unsourced thumb-sucking; Sharon didn’t return my call.”

This remark, notwithstanding its sarcastic tone, implies that Safire’s other predictions, including the likelihood of a pre-election terror attack, are based on information provided by serious sources.

The alternatives given by Safire in item 13 on the “October surprise” are: (a) the capture of bin Laden in Yemen; (b) the daring escape of Saddam; (c) a major terror attack in the US; (d) finding a buried bag of anthrax in Tikrit. Safire’s pick is (c).

The column appeared in the midst of an unprecedented mobilization of the military in cities across the US, justified on the grounds of a heightened terror threat. It follows a series of commentaries in the American media suggesting that a major terrorist attack within the US could either shift the 2004 election in Bush’s favor, or lead to the election being suspended or cancelled outright. [See “The ‘war on terror’ and American democracy—some ominous warnings,” 27 November, 2003]

Given the record of lies, conspiracies and provocations of the Bush administration, and Safire’s well-known connections to the centers of power in Washington and the White House, several obvious questions arise from the New Year’s eve column: (1) Who are the sources and what is the information on which Safire bases his prediction of a major pre-election terror attack, and, (2) Is the perpetration, or at least allowance, of such an attack being discussed within government, intelligence or military circles as a serious option for keeping Bush in power in 2004, regardless the sentiment of the electorate?

Sunday February 8th, 2004

A Dark Future Remote viewing teacher Major Ed Dames (website), discussed his latest forecasts which include in the next few years, the start of WWIII (brought on by a nuclear strike in North Korea) and calamitous geophysical changes caused by the return of Nibiru (Planet... more >> Host: Art Bell
Guest(s): Major Ed Dames