GONZALES ADDED TO WAR CRIMES COMPLAINT IN GERMANY;
CCR
GONZALES ADDED TO WAR CRIMES COMPLAINT IN GERMANY;
Thu Feb 3, 2005 19:37
64.140.158.48

GONZALES ADDED TO WAR CRIMES COMPLAINT IN GERMANY; NEW EVIDENCE SHOWS FAY REPORT ON ABU GHRAIB PROTECTED OFFICIALS
CCR Says Attorney General Designate’s Testimony before the Senate Confirms His Rolein Abu Ghraib Torture
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=ci38xk7IHk&Content=509

Synopsis

CCR filed new documents on January 31, 2005, with the German Federal Prosecutor looking into war crimes charges against high-ranking U.S. officials including Donald Rumsfeld: one includes new evidence that the Fay investigation into Abu Ghraib protected Administration officials – it is a comprehensive and shocking opinion by Scott Horton, an expert on international law and the Chair of the International Law Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. The second is a letter that details how Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee confirms his role as complicit in the torture and abuse of detainees in Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq.

In a declaration filed with the prosecutor in Karlsruhe, Germany, Scott Horton, who was asked to consider whether or not the U.S. would conduct a genuine investigation up the chain of command for war crimes, unequivocally states that “…no such criminal investigation or prosecution would occur in the near future in the United States for the reason that the criminal investigative and prosecutorial functions are currently controlled by individuals who are involved in the conspiracy to commit war crimes.” One of the legal issues before the prosecutor is whether the German investigation should be dismissed or deferred so that the U.S. authorities have a chance to conduct their own investigation. The obvious answer from Horton’s affidavit is no. The impossibility of an independent and far-reaching domestic investigation of high-ranking U.S. officials coupled with the United States’ refusal to join the International Criminal Court make the German court a court of last resort.

Horton also reveals that a study he undertook of Major General George R. Fay’s investigation of the Abu Ghraib abuses (The Fay Report, spring 2004) shows that the investigation was in fact designed to cover up the role of high-ranking officials. He reports that “certain senior officials whose conduct in this affair bears close scrutiny, were explicitly ‘protected’ or ‘shielded’ by withholding information from investigators or by providing security classifications that made such investigation possible…in each case, the fact that these individuals possessed information on Rumsfeld’s involvement was essential to the decision to shield them.”

Horton cited appeals by leaders of the legal profession in the United States and by the American Bar Association for investigation and action on obvious war crimes, and noted that the Justice Department had failed to act. With the confirmation of Alberto Gonzales now looming, he states “any serious criminal investigation and prosecution would certainly involve Gonzales.”

CCR Vice President Peter Weiss said Gonzales’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee “demonstrates his involvement in setting policy where torture and inhumane treatment was authorized at the highest levels of the Bush Administration.” Weiss pointed to Gonzales’s claim that the prohibition on cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment does not protect aliens in U.S. custody overseas, stating “this makes clear that Gonzales and the Bush Administration continue to believe that non-citizens held outside the U.S. can be treated inhumanely.”

According to recent news reports, Rumsfeld has threatened to stay away from the annual Munich security conference because of possible investigation and prosecution in Germany. Commenting on this development, CCR President Michael Ratner said, “While we think this is nothing more than a tactic to bully the Germans into dropping the case, we also believe that Donald Rumsfeld cannot escape accountability for his alleged crimes.”

The German Prosecutor was asked on November 30, 2004, by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) to investigate the role of ten high-ranking U.S. officials, including Donald Rumsfeld, in the abuse of detainees in Iraq. Under the doctrine of universal jurisdiction, which is part of German law, suspected war criminals may be prosecuted irrespective of where they are located. In addition, at least three of the defendants, LTG Ricardo Sanchez, MG Walter Wojdakowski and Colonel Thomas Pappas, are stationed in Germany, providing the Prosecutor with another basis to investigate. Plaintiffs in this case are represented by German attorney Wolfgang Kaleck, and include three Iraqi citizens who were abused at U.S.-run detention facilities in Iraq including Abu Ghraib, and the following organizations who joined the complaint: the Federation Internationale des Droits de l’Homme (FIDH), Lawyers Against the War (LAW) and the International Legal Resources Center (ILRC).

The new letter to the prosecutor also cites the recent documents unearthed by CCR and the ACLU under the Freedom of Information Act, a report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, a confidential report by Colonel Stuart A. Herrington of the U.S. Army and numerous other reports that confirm the widespread character of the abuses and the knowledge of high-ranking U.S. officials.

To read more about the case, click here.
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/legal/september_11th/sept11Article.asp?ObjID=1xiADJOOQx&Content=472

===============

Alberto Gonzales Confirmed as US Attorney General
Civilrights.org (press release), DC - 29 minutes ago
... "Under the arguments put forth by Alberto Gonzales, our own servicemen and women would be subject to torture and we would have no recourse to the Geneva ...

more:


February 3, 2005

The Senate today voted (60-36) to confirm Alberto Gonzales as U.S. Attorney General.

Unconvinced that Gonzales "would independently enforce the law, rather than continue to simply rationalize it, as he did while serving then-Governor and now President Bush," the nation's oldest, largest, and most diverse civil and human rights coalition had called on senators to oppose confirmation of Gonzales as U.S. Attorney General.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines (10 to 8) last week to endorse Gonzales' nomination. A vote on Gonzales' confirmation is expected in the Senate as early as February 3.

Skeptical lawmakers and advocates had asked for another Committee hearing on the nominee, saying that some of Gonzales' answers to Committee members were not sufficient to allay doubts about his record on torture and human rights.

"LCCR cannot ignore Mr. Gonzales' questionable commitment to the rule of law, his refusal to answer key questions, and his failure during the confirmation process to clearly explain his positions on critical civil and human rights issues," said Wade Henderson, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR).

Since November 2004, dozens of civil and human rights groups, including religious leaders, military veterans, lawyers, and former judges, have expressed their concerns over Gonzales' nomination, citing his role in setting the current administration's policy on detention, interrogation, and torture.

Several groups have outright opposed Gonzales' nomination, and now his confirmation.

"We want American service members who are captured to be protected from torture under international and U.S. laws," said Charles Sheehan Miles, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. "Under the arguments put forth by Alberto Gonzales, our own servicemen and women would be subject to torture and we would have no recourse to the Geneva conventions."

Most troubling to some groups is Gonzales' record on torture.

"As a human rights organization committed to protecting the rule of law, we are compelled to take what is, for us, this unusual step. This is the second time in 27 years that Human Rights First has opposed a presidential nominee, and the first such action since 1981," Human Rights First stated. "But in a nation committed to observing the rule of law as it is, not as power finds it convenient to be, we cannot accept the President's decision here. We urge the Senate to reject Mr. Gonzales' nomination."

The civil rights community also addressed the importance of diversity in the President's administration.

"The Leadership Conference recognizes the historic significance of Mr. Gonzales' appointment as the first Hispanic American to serve as Attorney General," Henderson said.

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund expressed concerns about Gonzales's record, while the National Council of La Raza endorsed the nomination.
http://www.civilrights.org/issues/enforcement/details.cfm?id=27967

 

Main Page - Friday, 02/04/05

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)