Bush/CIA/NSA/Mafia Mind Control Victims
Questions about the Microsoft Globalist controlled PC Empire
Sat Jan 31 19:32:02 2004
67.171.32.6

Questions about the Microsoft Globalist controlled Computer Empire?
Bush/CIA/NSA/Mafia Mind Control Victims

What is behind the Microsoft, IBM, Harris Group, and Rice Institute connection?

Bill Gates' mother Mary Gates who was of Jewish descent and who was married to Bill Gates Sr. whereas Bill Gates Sr. who is of Jesuit upbringing, was and still is a residing senior partner to one of the most established law firms in the Northwest, as that Mary Gates, now deceased, was for many years did serve on the IBM Board of Directors going way back before the creation of the Microsoft corporate monopoly.

Whereas, Mary Gates served as a senior board member of the IBM Corporation that is the largest global monolithic computer empire in history before the creation of the Microsoft global corporation that IBM directly funded into existence, where then back in the early 1980's and late 1970's, Mary Gates made sure that her son Bill Gates would receive key research and development grants from IBM, as well as lead project contracting directly from IBM that were key contracts and funding that was completely overlooked on the part of IBM to provide to other more capable firms and computer programmers at that time going back as far as the late 1970's and early 1980's?

Searched the web for Microsoft conspiracy. Results 1 - 10 of about 240,000

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Microsoft+conspiracy&btnG=Google+Search 

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/business/0,39023166,20279637,00.htm 

http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=346&sortorder=articledate 

http://news.softpedia.com/news/2/2003/October/5147.shtml 

http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/01/cov_29feature.html 

What was the full story on Microsoft having to be forced to undertake a closed court negotiation with the company named Seattle Software, who were the actual designer and creator of the MS-DOS system?

The Microsoft, Warren Buffet connection? What was and still is Bill Gates actual relationship to the known pedophile, Satanist, and highly connected Bush/CIA/NSA/Mafia infrastructure banking manager named Warren Buffet?

Read the book: The Franklin Cover-Up, by John DeCamp the former Attorney General of Nebraska.

Whereas it is known that Warren Buffet is the main personal banker for the Rothschilds, and the Bilderbergs, for the Western hemisphere, (remember Warren Buffets early morning breakfast celebration breakfast at Offutt Airforce Base located right outside of Omaha, Nebraska, where he had invited the heads of his main charity front organizations that included one of his trustees whose offices were located right where the first remote controlled airliner hit the first WTC building and whereas, this trustee had notified all of her employees and office workers to not show up for work on 911 by coincidence?) and whereas Warren Buffet's 300 foot yacht was parked right next to Bill Gates 300 foot yacht at Bill Gates Hawaii wedding whereas, Bill Gates spent the night before his wedding on Warren Buffet's yacht.

What about this: http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/RadDi251001.html 

http://www.unknownnews.net/cdd061002.html 

Who were the Globalist Elites that needed a monopoly over all operating systems world wide in order to be enabled to be able to keep and maintain everything that was and that is typed in, programmed in, and literally produced on a Microsoft created operating system world wide?

What is the IBM, Microsoft, Harris Group, Rice Institute connection to this? Anyone have some answers concerning this gigantic monopoly puzzle and what it really means to the future of the Elites overwhelming and current capability for their having complete control over all computer privacy versus, the reality that the Elites now have complete computer Globalist Elitist imperialism over all PCs world wide and they have had very secretly totalitarian control over all PCS world wide since the inception of the Microsoft Corporation?
----
Anonymous
All the "evidence" directly to the "RIGHT" location?
Fri Jan 30 20:32:14 2004
198.81.26.102

Wouldn't it be convenient to make sure that all the evidence is directed the "right" place by offering such a huge reward?

Microsoft explain to us just what this X-Win32 really is!

How does this translate to 'XO COMMUNICATION?'

How does this all connect to Harris Group (Trust)?

What does all of this have to do with CCSO?

What connection does this X-Win32 have to Rice 'Institute' (Unversity)?

The questions could go on and on, RIGHT Sir Bill Gates (as in knighthood? - see US Constitution Article 1 section 9)!

Let's have some ANSWERs!!!
-----
An IBM-Microsoft conspiracy?
By Bill Robins, Special to ZDNet
14 October 2003

COMMENTARY-- Gates Mills, Ohio, is an actual town--population 2,508. Some "Microsoft is evil" conspiracy theorists believe that in this town resides the software world's version of "The Truman Show."
They say Gates Mills is a small laboratory for Microsoft and IBM's insidious schemes--world domination via fiat.

As a result, the emerging proxy of Gates Mills is a place where normal folks run their lives on emerging "standards" that are focused on distributed computing. I have the utmost respect for Microsoft and believe that it has some of the world's most talented people. However, an event last month in New York City gave plenty of fodder for those who might not.

Bill Gates and Steve Mills, who runs IBM's software business, demonstrated progress on Web services standards. For the first time in 12 years (gasp!), Gates shared a stage with an IBM executive. He also shared the stage with a Linux box. What was so exciting that these two powerful men and the world's hippest operating system got on stage together? They ran a demo.

And analysts loved it. "It's a milestone," one said. "IBM's Steve Mills and Microsoft's Bill Gates pledged allegiance to software standards. Is their commitment to Web services standards real? Yes. In fact, you can bet your career on it," another stated. "Nobody has ever showed it's possible...to hook up anything together without having to recode everything--that will be totally amazing."

I beg to differ.

To me, the event seemed more like passing the Grand Canyon on your right from 30,000 feet than a major "milestone" event for the industry. But it carried significance because Microsoft is the master of realpolitik.

If the company felt comfortable with Gates taking front and center to say "mission-critical adoption" is happening, this bodes well for all from a market development standpoint. Gates' table pounding deserves the attention of information technology and business execs throughout the Fortune 1000; Chairman Gates moves markets.

It is so much more interesting to speculate, however, on conspiracy theories. No press release on the Microsoft site? That makes one think that the whole thing was thrown together rather quickly. Why Bill Gates and Steve Mills? Were their companies' product managers busy that day?

Microsoft's Steven VanRoekel, director of Web services at Microsoft, responded to any such theories, saying, "We recognize that customers are faced with the need to tie their multivendor systems together, and Microsoft, IBM and our industry partners are committed to addressing this problem by delivering interoperability through Web services."

What were the PR machines' goals? Here are five theories (in order of least to most probable):

Spite for Sun
Coincidentally (or not), Sun was running its annual customer event simultaneously. It was the first time Sun dedicated the show to software. Silicon Valley insiders like to say Sun is not a software company, but the company is fighting hard to beat back this notion.

Who needs the United Nations?
If the United States does not need U.N. approval to declare war, Microsoft and IBM may not need the Organisation for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, the World Wide Web Consortium or even the Web Services Interoperability Organisation to talk up Web services standards--that's at least what conspiracy theorists think.

Standards committees definitively have warts. I applaud the work these companies do and do not question their parallel path to developing standards. However, I am confused. Why this demo? Why here? Why now? And most importantly of all, why roll out the heavy hitters?

Pre-emptive strike
Perhaps this event was accelerated to beat someone else's demonstration that was scheduled to happen later in the fall. In this case, maybe first-mover advantage still plays a predominant role, but time will tell if Larry Ellison and Jonathan Schwartz, Sun's software chief, join a Windows 2003 server on stage.

Connect with developers
Microsoft has always been a great development marketing organization. Recently, the Java and open-source communities have out flanked Microsoft, often in the pursuit of the higher-end developers. Was this an attempt to rebuff the Java community, IBM notwithstanding?

Doth the lady protest too much?
During this event, Gates and Mills talked a big game about mission-critical activity that's happening in the Web services realm. Perhaps in Trumanville and in Gates Mills this statement is true today. Back on planet Earth, however, market uptake is not nearly as wide or deep as we would all like. But the tea leaves suggest that Microsoft is doing what it can to change that in 2004.

It strikes me that this (non-event) event first and foremost was targeted at pushing 2004 budgets over the edge. If Microsoft events in October such as the Professional Developers Conference and the Office 2003 release are to serve as bottom-up market catalysts, Gates' demo was the top-down fiat to complement the more organic market development work.

If your company was debating whether to create a specific Web services line item--be it development, management or infrastructure--the Sept. 17 event was crafted for you. "We're not declaring victory, but we're showing people the goal line," Mills said.

When IBM and Microsoft get people to the goal line, that will be one hell of a demo.

biography
Bill Robins is a co-founder of The Stencil Group, where he has shaped the firm's Web services consulting practice. The Stencil Group works with enterprise software vendors and develops "go to market" strategies for them.
----