Doug McIntosh
Cont'd - The Military Defeat of Imperial USA
Sun Jan 25 21:13:39 2004
64.140.158.48


Cont'd - The Military Defeat of Imperial USA
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89482

"Sum of all fears" they had a scene where the carrier is surprise attacked by Russian bombers. It will be like that. The fleet will be sailing ignorantly along until the final thirty seconds. And then they will die. In place, in treachery and instantly. Why do you think the Russians are building these weapons, and the Chinese buying them, if they do not intend to use them? Hasn't a Chinese General already said they will nuke Los Angeles if we try and help Taiwan? Like I said before, the attack may be surprise, but the decade long preparations for it are not. The information on the military buildup by both Russia and Red China is out there for anyone to see if they want to. Throw in North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Venezuela, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia(both will collapse in a few years) and a host of others, along with European apathy and you have the makings for the instant military defeat of the USA.

Ah, you say, we will do the "Red Dawn" routine. Irregular resistance requires three things. The first is a major power willing to supply the rebels for its own political purposes. The second is it needs a secure base of operations to regroup. The third is must have the support of 10% of the general population and the apathy of the other 90%. You have no idea how vicious, nasty, brutal and effective the Chinese and Russians will be against any "patriots." My view is the rest of the world will ignore us, most of the people in the United States will accept the new order and the few that resist will have limited ability to influence things on the ground.

So there you have it. My view of where everything we call the current situation is heading in the near to long term. The reason I despise Clinton so much is not he is a sexual predator and a boor. It is he allowed the Red Chinese to improve the accuracy of their missiles; gave them the computers to test their missiles and finally, gave them billions in free trade to buy the very weapons they will use to kill us down the road. As for Bush, his recon plane folly has given the Red Chinese the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle in terms of electronic warfare and communications. The West has consistently ignored clear evidence of a Russian military buildup in the nuclear area, the building of underground bases and the storage of vast amounts of military supplies withdrawn from Europe. People will ask where the Russian army will get ten thousand tanks in its present condition. I will say their present condition masks the money being spent to maintain the underground bases full of tanks. Won't we all be surprised when thousands of tanks, artillery pieces and armored troop transports suddenly supply the "collapsed" Russian army. Unlike the USA, they won't have to build them. These weapons of war already exist in the underground bunkers the USA doesn't admit the Russians have. It has been said of Russia, all it is capable of doing is destroy the world. We will find out later in the this decade or early next.

When I was younger I saw a comedy movie called, "Here Come The Russians." I'm not laughing now. The new version is Here come the Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans, the Cubans, the Venezuelans, the Syrians, the Pakistanis and the Saudis. One by one, we could take them. They will unify out of hatred for the USA. They will come. They will attack us. The only issue is whether enough Americans will bother to fight them after our military is destroyed in the first strike. George Washington and his dream come to mind. We shall see soon enough.
REPLY HERE:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89482

===========================

Folks:

This was sent to us from one of our researchers, Dennis Robertson. And, as
much as I hate to admit it, I think that the conclusion reached by "Doug
McIntosh" is "on target".
I have mentioned many times in my e-mails to all of you that the PTB are
deliberately sending our troops overseas inorder to get them "out of the way
(and in harms' way!)" which leaves the America that we all love dangerously
vulnerable to a foreign invasion of UN/NATO troops, that will be used to
patrol and control the streets and highways of America when once Martial Law
is fully implemented. I don't know what to do other than to tell it like it
is, and, to advise all of you that you simply must get yourselves prepared
to protect your property and the lives of your loved ones. End of story!!!
And thanks Dennis for bringing this poignant story to us.

Regards,

Cal - cals@kayserv.net
======================
"Yesterday the leader of the U.S. search for Iraq's alleged stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons said he didn't think there were any. Secretary of State Colin Powell now claims we went to war to find out whether such weapons existed.

"Senators Kerry, Lieberman and Edwards, Dr. Dean, and General Clark, all claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and, therefore, contributed to the political climate which falsely justified a war.

"In September of 2002, before five of my fellow candidates joined the President in claiming that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, I repeatedly and insistently made the point that no proof of that claim existed and as such that there was no basis to go to war. Six months later, even Dr. Dean was still claiming that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. "

The Institute for Public Accuracy has compiled the following quotes, [listed in chronological order]:

[August 4, 2002] Sen. JOSEPH LIEBERMAN: "Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States. " [See: http://www.counterpunch.org/wmd05292003.html>, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,59538,00.html

[Sept. 12, 2002] Rep. DENNIS KUCINICH: "Since 1998 no credible intelligence has been brought forward which suggests that Iraq is manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. . . " [See: http://www.house.gov/kucinich/press/pr-020912-avoidwar.htm>, http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/oh10_kucinich/030604WMDinqres.html

[Oct. 9, 2002] Sen. JOHN KERRY: "Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don't even try? & According to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons . . . Iraq is developing unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents. . . " [See: http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0826-03.htm> http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2002_1009.html >]

[Oct. 10, 2002] Sen. JOHN EDWARDS: "We know that he [Hussein] has chemical and biological weapons. " [See: http://www.senate.gov/~edwards/statements/20021010_iraq.html

[Jan. 18, 2003] Gen. WESLEY CLARK: "He [Hussein] does have weapons of mass destruction. " When asked, "And you could say that categorically?" Clark responded: "Absolutely. " (on CNN, Jan. 18, 2003). On finding the alleged weapons Clark said: "I think they will be found. There's so much intelligence on this. " (on CNN, April 2, 2003) [See: http://www.fair.org/press-releases/clark-antiwar.html>, http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0301/18/smn.05.html>, http://www-cgi.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0304/02/lt.08.html

[Jan. 31, 2003] Rev. AL SHARPTON: "I think that the present administration is bent on war. There has been no, in my judgment, evidence presented there has been any weapons of mass destruction. " (on NPR, Jan. 31, 2003)

[March 17, 2003] Dr. HOWARD DEAN: "[He and others] have never been in doubt about the evil of Saddam Hussein or the necessity of removing his weapons of mass destruction. " [See: http://www.wtv-zone.com/Morgaine_OFaery/HDean4pres/deantrpswar.html

Kucinich, who led the effort in the House of Representatives in challenging the Bush Administration's march toward war attempted repeatedly to warn America that there was no basis to go to war:

On Sep. 3, 2002, on The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, Dennis Kucinich said, "I don't think there's any justification to go to war with Iraq. There's no evidence that they have weapons of mass destruction. There's no. . . there's nothing that says that they have the ability to deliver such weapons, if they did have them. There's been no stated intention on their part to harm the United States. "

On Sep. 4, 2002, on Buchanan and Press, Buchanan asked "Congressman Kucinich, does not the President have a clear, factual point here? Saddam Hussein is developing these weapons of mass destruction, he agreed to get rid of them, he has not gotten rid of them. Kucinich replied: "Well, frankly we haven't seen evidence or proof of that, and furthermore we haven't seen evidence or proof that he has the ability to deliver such weapons if he has them, and finally, whether or not he has the intent. I think that what we need to be doing is to review this passion for war, that drumbeat for war, that's coming out of the White House, and to slow down and to let calmer heads prevail and to pursue diplomacy…. "

On Sep. 7, 2002, Dennis Kucinich gave a speech in Baraboo, Wisconsin, called "Architects of New Worlds," in which he said "There's no evidence Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, or the ability to deliver such weapons if it had them or the intention to do so. There is no reason for war against Iraq. Stop the drumbeat. Stop the war talk. Pull back from the abyss of unilateral action and preemptive strikes. " See: http://www.house.gov/kucinich/press/sp-020907-newworlds.htm

Please forward this to every Democrat you know.

Keep an eye on the media!