Dr. Robert Morey
Pres. Bush Worships in Muslims Mosques and Buddist Temples
Sun Jan 23, 2005 04:11
64.140.158.75
President Bush Worships in Muslims Mosques and Buddist Temples
Dr. Robert Morey's 02-23-02d Intelligience Briefing #21
February 23, 2002
American Christians were both grieved and shocked when President Bush, professing Christian, went to a Mosque and joined in prayer with the Muslims to the “Universal God.” President Bush evidently assumes that all religions worship the same “Universal God” under different names. Thus any name of any deity will do. This is, of course, not acceptable to Bible-believing Christians because Allah and all other pagan deities are demon-gods according to I Cor. 10.
President Bush and his wife have now managed to alienate the Japanese and Korean Christian communities by going to a Shinto shrine and worshipping the demon spirit in the shrine. They both bowed to the demon and clapped their hands to awaken him. Then they signed the book of those who have worshipped the demon spirit who inhabits the Shrine - you can see the article from the Japan Times:
Bushes take in archery show at shrine
Koizumi takes in 'yabusame' but gives Meiji hall a miss
U.S. President George W. Bush and his wife, Laura, on Monday visited Meiji Shrine, a major venue for Shinto worshippers in Tokyo.
Bush and the first lady paid their respects by bowing in front of the main shrine hall before signing a registry book, including a brief comment on their visit.
Japanese Christian leaders confirm that the Bushes engaged in pagan worship and not just a show of respect. The Japanese news services used the religious term sanpei to describe the worship performed by the Bushes at the temple.
During WW II, Japanese and Korean Christians who refused to worship the demon-spirit at Shinto shrines were put to death. Now, their descendents see the Bushes making a mockery of those who, like Daniel and his three friends, refused to bow before a heathen idol.
According to the Japan Times, the Prime minister of Japan remained in the car because he could not join the Bushes in worshipping at the shrine. This was due to a wall of separation between temple and state set forth in the Japanese Constitution. It forbids the heads of state from participating in Shinto worship because that was the religion that motivated the carnage of WW II and the attack on Pearl Harbor.
American WWII veterans are particularly outraged at the Bushes worshipping the spirit of past Japanese Emperors as this was the motivating force behind the Japanese attack on America.
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bushshintoshrine.html
=================================================
Is Bush the Antichrist?
By Chuck Baldwin
April 12, 2002
During the eight years of Clinton's presidency, I was repeatedly asked, "Chuck, do you think Bill Clinton is the antichrist?" (Of course, I answered no.) Therefore, it is more than interesting to me that since G.W. Bush became president no one has asked if I thought he was the antichrist. Not one single person! Instead, many people attribute to Bush god-like qualities, which actually makes him a better candidate than Clinton was.
You see, one of the chief characteristics of the coming antichrist is that he appears "as an angel of light." Therefore, an obvious reprobate such as Bill Clinton is immediately disqualified. The antichrist, by very definition, is a master deceiver. He must be someone who appears as good and benevolent. The bite is in his tail not in his tongue. In reality, Bush's angelic persona makes him much more dangerous than bad boy Billy.
For example, while Clinton was in the process of appointing numerous homosexual activists to his administration, copious letters from Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy flooded America's Christian community. Appeals for protest and resistance were heard from pulpits throughout the country. A massive media campaign began against Clinton.
Today, however, President Bush is in the process of copying Clinton's numerous appointments of open homosexuals to high positions of government, but there are no letters, no warnings from pulpits, and no media campaigns opposing it. Just the opposite. Bush is being defended, lauded, and glorified for everything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or unscriptural it might be.
When Clinton only talked of legalizing embryonic stem cell research, he was castigated and condemned. Bush actually made the procedure legal, and yet, he was praised and honored. Clinton was denigrated when he tried to convince Israel to give up land for peace. Now, Bush is in the process of actually trying to create an independent Palestinian state for Israel's enemies (with Jerusalem as its capital, no less), yet continues to receive glowing adulation. If Clinton even suggested that America's immigration laws might need to be liberalized, he was denounced in the harshest terms; but Bush can actually grant limited amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens, and there is not the faintest whisper of protest.
Do you recall how Clinton was criticized for the "low lifes" he invited to the White House? Well, Bush recently invited wild man rocker, Ozzie Osbourne, to the White House. Have you heard any notable Christian leader take Bush to task for that?
You remember Ozzie Osbourne, don't you? He is the former front man for the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath. He is famous for stage antics such as biting the heads off birds and bats. His abuse of drugs and alcohol are also well known. Furthermore, Ozzie Osbourne desecrated The Alamo by pissing all over it. In spite of this, George W. Bush is said to be one of Osbourne's biggest fans. As such, Osbourne was recently invited to the White House for dinner. Have you heard any criticism of Bush for this?
Obviously, I do not believe President Bush is the antichrist any more than I believed Bill Clinton was. However, I do believe that Bush possesses more deceptive qualities than Clinton did and, therefore, is more dangerous. I also now understand more clearly how even "the elect" can be deceived. Bush' s acceptance by the overwhelming majority of Christian people proves the country is ready for the antichrist, whoever he is.
© Chuck Baldwin
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bush12apr02.html
==============================================
Christian Groups Disturbed by Bush's Choice of Homosexual to Head AIDS Office
By Chad Groening and Jody Brown
April 11, 2001
(AgapePress) - Christian organizations are reacting to the appointment of Scott Evertz to lead the White House Office of National AIDS Policy. Evertz is the first open homosexual to be appointed to such a high post by a Republican President.
One of those groups expressing their dismay in President Bush's decision to appoint Evertz is Wisconsin Christians United. Pastor Ralph Ovadal, the group's director, says he has debated Evertz several times and has known him on an adversarial basis for about seven years. He believes Evertz will bring the "sodomite agenda" to Washington.
"Scott Evertz is an out-of-the-closet homosexual," Ovadal says. "From what I've seen of him, he's going to promote the mainstreaming, the acceptance of homosexual behavior. This is what he's done ever since I've known [him]. He wraps it in a so-called 'conservative' facade, but the bottom line is he himself has been involved in this sort of behavior, he is promoting this sort of behavior, and it really doesn't matter if it's an elephant or a donkey -- sodomy is still wrong."
Ovadal says putting a homosexual activist in charge of the White House AIDS office makes no sense.
"Putting him in charge of finding a cure to AIDS ... is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house," he says. "[Making Evertz overseer of] the government department dealing with AIDS is like putting a drug addict in the office of the drug czar. It doesn't make any sense."
In a statement released by his group, Ovadal accuses Bush and Evertz of being "soul mates" who both know how to get what they want. "They are both using the influence of their positions to desensitize a nation to a lawless behavior which God calls a filthy, grievous abomination," Ovadal says. "Simply put, George Bush asked the sodomites to scratch his back and now he is scratching theirs."
Reaction From Other Christian Groups
Dr. James Dobson, President of Focus on the Family, is sharply critical of the Evertz appointment. He says given the fact that AIDS is primarily caused by rampant homosexual behavior, the appointment sends the message that the AIDS problem can be resolved without addressing that behavior.
Echoing that sentiment was Family Research Council President Kenneth Connor. In a press release, Connor says that promoting an openly homosexual person to lead the office suggests the White House is not prepared to deal with the root cause of the behaviors causing the problem. "If personal responsibility is off the table," Connor says, "it is unlikely that the White House's approach to solving the AIDS crisis will be effective."
Rev. Lou Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition says his organization will be closely monitoring Evertz' actions to ensure the post does not become "a bully pulpit for the advocacy of homosexuality."
Human Rights Campaign
Not surprisingly, the appointment is being praised by the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's preeminent homosexual advocacy organization, saying it shows the Bush Administration is "fully committed to fighting HIV/AIDS on a national and global scale." A spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign says Evertz' selection signals the Administration's desire for "active leadership" in the battle against HIV and AIDS. http://www.bushrevealed.com/
==================================================
Bush Uses Profanity About Reporter
The Associated Press
Monday, Sept. 4, 2000; 10:02 p.m. EDT
NAPERVILLE, Ill. –– George W. Bush made a disparaging remark Monday about a reporter from The New York Times that was picked up by a live microphone.
As Bush stood on the podium waiting for music to finish, he turned to running mate Dick Cheney and used an obscenity to describe reporter Adam Clymer in the nearby press area. Cheney agreed with Bush's assessment. Both men thought their remarks were off-mike.
When asked about the comment at a brief airport news conference in Allentown, Pa., late Monday, Bush said, "I regret that a private comment I made to the vice presidential candidate made it through the public airways."
Asked if he felt he owed Clymer an apology, Bush did not answer directly, only saying, "I regret everybody heard what I said."
Karen Hughes, Bush's spokeswoman, said the remarks were "a whispered aside to his running mate. It was not intended as a public comment."
Clymer said, "I'm disappointed in the governor's language."
Cheney refused to discuss it. "The governor made a private comment to me. It was a private comment, and I don't plan to say anything about it," he told reporters later in Chicago.
© Copyright 2000 The Associated Press
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000904/aponline220243_000.htm
===================================================
In Turnaround, Bush Says He'd Meet With Gay Republicans
'Log Cabin' group open to 'positive' overture
March 6, 2000
Stockton -- Texas Gov. George W. Bush -- who previously declined a meeting with the gay Log Cabin Republicans group because he said it would create a political "nightmare" -- said yesterday he is now willing to meet with them.
"I welcome their support," Bush said in an interview with The Chronicle. "I've got Log Cabin Republicans supporting me all across America."
Log Cabin spokesman Kevin Ivers said yesterday that no meeting had been scheduled, but that representatives of the group and the Bush campaign had discussed the possibility in the past several days.
"Some signals have been yes, some signals no," Ivers said. "If Governor Bush wants to reach out to our organization it would be a very positive development."
Bush made the statements during a stop in Stockton -- where he was met by an enthusiastic crowd of 2,000 -- during a final barnstorm of the nation's most populous state before tomorrow's primary.
The Texas governor, looking relaxed and confident, said he was upbeat about his California prospects. But he expressed tangible anger and outrage at yesterday's criticism from Vice President Al Gore, who accused Bush of being "in the pocket of special interests" after it was revealed that Texas supporters had spent millions of dollars in soft money on advertising attacking John McCain's environmental record.
"For the Democrats, and for Al Gore, to talk about campaign funding reform when they have violated every standard, it's beyond me," Bush told The Chronicle. "Maybe that's the way this guy's gonna run the campaign: hope people forget the last seven years," he said. "But we're not going to let 'em forget."
But Bush's most surprising comments came regarding the Log Cabin Republicans, the organization that has been running radio ads in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, accusing the governor of "pandering to the right" for refusing to meet with them.
Arizona Sen. John McCain -- who, like Bush, opposes most of the group's legislative agenda -- met with the group in November. At the time, he told them he is "unashamed, unembarrassed and proud to work with you."
Bush surprised Log Cabin officials last fall when he said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would "probably not" meet with them.
"It creates a huge political scene," Bush explained at the time. "I am someone who is a uniter, not a divider. I don't believe in group thought, pitting one group of people against another. And all that does is create kind of a huge political, you know, nightmare for people."
Bush later explained that he regards homosexuality as a "personal" matter that he did not wish to "politicize." Asked why he would meet with Jewish Republicans but not Gay Republicans, Bush responded: "I meant to say personal and private. It's private as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to politicize someone's private life."
The organization leaders said yesterday they now consider Bush's words to be a verbal commitment for a meeting. "I think he realizes his comments were a mistake," said Log Cabin executive director Rich Tafel.
Yesterday, Bush noted that "these are people who have made up their mind to be for my opponent," -- since they have endorsed McCain. But Bush added, "I've got Log Cabin Republicans throughout my campaign. I do. There's a lot of gay people who are supporting me. And I welcome their support."
Informed of their ads appealing for a more diverse Republican Party, Bush said, "Surely, they need to save their money."
"What I don't want to do is make meetings so darned political."
Asked whether he would vote for Proposition 22 if he were a state resident -- as John McCain has said he would -- Bush said, "I don't get involved in propositions in states. It's up to the people of California. I will just tell you I happen to believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I believe in the sanctity of marriage."
http://www.logcabinwa.com/archive/200003061333.shtml
=====================================================
Rapper's Inaugural Invite a Shocker, Say Family Advocates
By Fred Jackson, Bill Fancher, and Jody Brown
January 6, 2005
(AgapePress) - Christians who helped re-elect George W. Bush are in for a major shock. WorldNetDaily reports that organizers of this month's inauguration festivities have invited one of the most vile rock starts in the country to entertain Republican young people.
WorldNetDaily describes Kid Rock as "a popular vulgar rock-rapper whose lyrics wouldn't begin to pass muster with the Federal Communications Commission." But that is who Republican organizers have chosen to headline the entertainment at the inaugural youth concert, hosted by none other than the president's two daughters Jenna and Barbara.
For those who may not be familiar with Kid Rock, also known as Robert James Ritchie, he is a Detroit-based rapper wh
Dr. Robert Morey's 02-23-02d Intelligience Briefing #21
February 23, 2002
American Christians were both grieved and shocked when President Bush, professing Christian, went to a Mosque and joined in prayer with the Muslims to the “Universal God.” President Bush evidently assumes that all religions worship the same “Universal God” under different names. Thus any name of any deity will do. This is, of course, not acceptable to Bible-believing Christians because Allah and all other pagan deities are demon-gods according to I Cor. 10.
President Bush and his wife have now managed to alienate the Japanese and Korean Christian communities by going to a Shinto shrine and worshipping the demon spirit in the shrine. They both bowed to the demon and clapped their hands to awaken him. Then they signed the book of those who have worshipped the demon spirit who inhabits the Shrine - you can see the article from the Japan Times:
Bushes take in archery show at shrine
Koizumi takes in 'yabusame' but gives Meiji hall a miss
U.S. President George W. Bush and his wife, Laura, on Monday visited Meiji Shrine, a major venue for Shinto worshippers in Tokyo.
Bush and the first lady paid their respects by bowing in front of the main shrine hall before signing a registry book, including a brief comment on their visit.
Japanese Christian leaders confirm that the Bushes engaged in pagan worship and not just a show of respect. The Japanese news services used the religious term sanpei to describe the worship performed by the Bushes at the temple.
During WW II, Japanese and Korean Christians who refused to worship the demon-spirit at Shinto shrines were put to death. Now, their descendents see the Bushes making a mockery of those who, like Daniel and his three friends, refused to bow before a heathen idol.
According to the Japan Times, the Prime minister of Japan remained in the car because he could not join the Bushes in worshipping at the shrine. This was due to a wall of separation between temple and state set forth in the Japanese Constitution. It forbids the heads of state from participating in Shinto worship because that was the religion that motivated the carnage of WW II and the attack on Pearl Harbor.
American WWII veterans are particularly outraged at the Bushes worshipping the spirit of past Japanese Emperors as this was the motivating force behind the Japanese attack on America.
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bushshintoshrine.html
=================================================
Is Bush the Antichrist?
By Chuck Baldwin
April 12, 2002
During the eight years of Clinton's presidency, I was repeatedly asked, "Chuck, do you think Bill Clinton is the antichrist?" (Of course, I answered no.) Therefore, it is more than interesting to me that since G.W. Bush became president no one has asked if I thought he was the antichrist. Not one single person! Instead, many people attribute to Bush god-like qualities, which actually makes him a better candidate than Clinton was.
You see, one of the chief characteristics of the coming antichrist is that he appears "as an angel of light." Therefore, an obvious reprobate such as Bill Clinton is immediately disqualified. The antichrist, by very definition, is a master deceiver. He must be someone who appears as good and benevolent. The bite is in his tail not in his tongue. In reality, Bush's angelic persona makes him much more dangerous than bad boy Billy.
For example, while Clinton was in the process of appointing numerous homosexual activists to his administration, copious letters from Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy flooded America's Christian community. Appeals for protest and resistance were heard from pulpits throughout the country. A massive media campaign began against Clinton.
Today, however, President Bush is in the process of copying Clinton's numerous appointments of open homosexuals to high positions of government, but there are no letters, no warnings from pulpits, and no media campaigns opposing it. Just the opposite. Bush is being defended, lauded, and glorified for everything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or unscriptural it might be.
When Clinton only talked of legalizing embryonic stem cell research, he was castigated and condemned. Bush actually made the procedure legal, and yet, he was praised and honored. Clinton was denigrated when he tried to convince Israel to give up land for peace. Now, Bush is in the process of actually trying to create an independent Palestinian state for Israel's enemies (with Jerusalem as its capital, no less), yet continues to receive glowing adulation. If Clinton even suggested that America's immigration laws might need to be liberalized, he was denounced in the harshest terms; but Bush can actually grant limited amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens, and there is not the faintest whisper of protest.
Do you recall how Clinton was criticized for the "low lifes" he invited to the White House? Well, Bush recently invited wild man rocker, Ozzie Osbourne, to the White House. Have you heard any notable Christian leader take Bush to task for that?
You remember Ozzie Osbourne, don't you? He is the former front man for the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath. He is famous for stage antics such as biting the heads off birds and bats. His abuse of drugs and alcohol are also well known. Furthermore, Ozzie Osbourne desecrated The Alamo by pissing all over it. In spite of this, George W. Bush is said to be one of Osbourne's biggest fans. As such, Osbourne was recently invited to the White House for dinner. Have you heard any criticism of Bush for this?
Obviously, I do not believe President Bush is the antichrist any more than I believed Bill Clinton was. However, I do believe that Bush possesses more deceptive qualities than Clinton did and, therefore, is more dangerous. I also now understand more clearly how even "the elect" can be deceived. Bush' s acceptance by the overwhelming majority of Christian people proves the country is ready for the antichrist, whoever he is.
© Chuck Baldwin
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bush12apr02.html
==============================================
Christian Groups Disturbed by Bush's Choice of Homosexual to Head AIDS Office
By Chad Groening and Jody Brown
April 11, 2001
(AgapePress) - Christian organizations are reacting to the appointment of Scott Evertz to lead the White House Office of National AIDS Policy. Evertz is the first open homosexual to be appointed to such a high post by a Republican President.
One of those groups expressing their dismay in President Bush's decision to appoint Evertz is Wisconsin Christians United. Pastor Ralph Ovadal, the group's director, says he has debated Evertz several times and has known him on an adversarial basis for about seven years. He believes Evertz will bring the "sodomite agenda" to Washington.
"Scott Evertz is an out-of-the-closet homosexual," Ovadal says. "From what I've seen of him, he's going to promote the mainstreaming, the acceptance of homosexual behavior. This is what he's done ever since I've known [him]. He wraps it in a so-called 'conservative' facade, but the bottom line is he himself has been involved in this sort of behavior, he is promoting this sort of behavior, and it really doesn't matter if it's an elephant or a donkey -- sodomy is still wrong."
Ovadal says putting a homosexual activist in charge of the White House AIDS office makes no sense.
"Putting him in charge of finding a cure to AIDS ... is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house," he says. "[Making Evertz overseer of] the government department dealing with AIDS is like putting a drug addict in the office of the drug czar. It doesn't make any sense."
In a statement released by his group, Ovadal accuses Bush and Evertz of being "soul mates" who both know how to get what they want. "They are both using the influence of their positions to desensitize a nation to a lawless behavior which God calls a filthy, grievous abomination," Ovadal says. "Simply put, George Bush asked the sodomites to scratch his back and now he is scratching theirs."
Reaction From Other Christian Groups
Dr. James Dobson, President of Focus on the Family, is sharply critical of the Evertz appointment. He says given the fact that AIDS is primarily caused by rampant homosexual behavior, the appointment sends the message that the AIDS problem can be resolved without addressing that behavior.
Echoing that sentiment was Family Research Council President Kenneth Connor. In a press release, Connor says that promoting an openly homosexual person to lead the office suggests the White House is not prepared to deal with the root cause of the behaviors causing the problem. "If personal responsibility is off the table," Connor says, "it is unlikely that the White House's approach to solving the AIDS crisis will be effective."
Rev. Lou Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition says his organization will be closely monitoring Evertz' actions to ensure the post does not become "a bully pulpit for the advocacy of homosexuality."
Human Rights Campaign
Not surprisingly, the appointment is being praised by the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's preeminent homosexual advocacy organization, saying it shows the Bush Administration is "fully committed to fighting HIV/AIDS on a national and global scale." A spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign says Evertz' selection signals the Administration's desire for "active leadership" in the battle against HIV and AIDS. http://www.bushrevealed.com/
==================================================
Bush Uses Profanity About Reporter
The Associated Press
Monday, Sept. 4, 2000; 10:02 p.m. EDT
NAPERVILLE, Ill. –– George W. Bush made a disparaging remark Monday about a reporter from The New York Times that was picked up by a live microphone.
As Bush stood on the podium waiting for music to finish, he turned to running mate Dick Cheney and used an obscenity to describe reporter Adam Clymer in the nearby press area. Cheney agreed with Bush's assessment. Both men thought their remarks were off-mike.
When asked about the comment at a brief airport news conference in Allentown, Pa., late Monday, Bush said, "I regret that a private comment I made to the vice presidential candidate made it through the public airways."
Asked if he felt he owed Clymer an apology, Bush did not answer directly, only saying, "I regret everybody heard what I said."
Karen Hughes, Bush's spokeswoman, said the remarks were "a whispered aside to his running mate. It was not intended as a public comment."
Clymer said, "I'm disappointed in the governor's language."
Cheney refused to discuss it. "The governor made a private comment to me. It was a private comment, and I don't plan to say anything about it," he told reporters later in Chicago.
© Copyright 2000 The Associated Press
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000904/aponline220243_000.htm
===================================================
In Turnaround, Bush Says He'd Meet With Gay Republicans
'Log Cabin' group open to 'positive' overture
March 6, 2000
Stockton -- Texas Gov. George W. Bush -- who previously declined a meeting with the gay Log Cabin Republicans group because he said it would create a political "nightmare" -- said yesterday he is now willing to meet with them.
"I welcome their support," Bush said in an interview with The Chronicle. "I've got Log Cabin Republicans supporting me all across America."
Log Cabin spokesman Kevin Ivers said yesterday that no meeting had been scheduled, but that representatives of the group and the Bush campaign had discussed the possibility in the past several days.
"Some signals have been yes, some signals no," Ivers said. "If Governor Bush wants to reach out to our organization it would be a very positive development."
Bush made the statements during a stop in Stockton -- where he was met by an enthusiastic crowd of 2,000 -- during a final barnstorm of the nation's most populous state before tomorrow's primary.
The Texas governor, looking relaxed and confident, said he was upbeat about his California prospects. But he expressed tangible anger and outrage at yesterday's criticism from Vice President Al Gore, who accused Bush of being "in the pocket of special interests" after it was revealed that Texas supporters had spent millions of dollars in soft money on advertising attacking John McCain's environmental record.
"For the Democrats, and for Al Gore, to talk about campaign funding reform when they have violated every standard, it's beyond me," Bush told The Chronicle. "Maybe that's the way this guy's gonna run the campaign: hope people forget the last seven years," he said. "But we're not going to let 'em forget."
But Bush's most surprising comments came regarding the Log Cabin Republicans, the organization that has been running radio ads in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, accusing the governor of "pandering to the right" for refusing to meet with them.
Arizona Sen. John McCain -- who, like Bush, opposes most of the group's legislative agenda -- met with the group in November. At the time, he told them he is "unashamed, unembarrassed and proud to work with you."
Bush surprised Log Cabin officials last fall when he said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would "probably not" meet with them.
"It creates a huge political scene," Bush explained at the time. "I am someone who is a uniter, not a divider. I don't believe in group thought, pitting one group of people against another. And all that does is create kind of a huge political, you know, nightmare for people."
Bush later explained that he regards homosexuality as a "personal" matter that he did not wish to "politicize." Asked why he would meet with Jewish Republicans but not Gay Republicans, Bush responded: "I meant to say personal and private. It's private as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to politicize someone's private life."
The organization leaders said yesterday they now consider Bush's words to be a verbal commitment for a meeting. "I think he realizes his comments were a mistake," said Log Cabin executive director Rich Tafel.
Yesterday, Bush noted that "these are people who have made up their mind to be for my opponent," -- since they have endorsed McCain. But Bush added, "I've got Log Cabin Republicans throughout my campaign. I do. There's a lot of gay people who are supporting me. And I welcome their support."
Informed of their ads appealing for a more diverse Republican Party, Bush said, "Surely, they need to save their money."
"What I don't want to do is make meetings so darned political."
Asked whether he would vote for Proposition 22 if he were a state resident -- as John McCain has said he would -- Bush said, "I don't get involved in propositions in states. It's up to the people of California. I will just tell you I happen to believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I believe in the sanctity of marriage."
http://www.logcabinwa.com/archive/200003061333.shtml
=====================================================
Rapper's Inaugural Invite a Shocker, Say Family Advocates
By Fred Jackson, Bill Fancher, and Jody Brown
January 6, 2005
(AgapePress) - Christians who helped re-elect George W. Bush are in for a major shock. WorldNetDaily reports that organizers of this month's inauguration festivities have invited one of the most vile rock starts in the country to entertain Republican young people.
WorldNetDaily describes Kid Rock as "a popular vulgar rock-rapper whose lyrics wouldn't begin to pass muster with the Federal Communications Commission." But that is who Republican organizers have chosen to headline the entertainment at the inaugural youth concert, hosted by none other than the president's two daughters Jenna and Barbara.
For those who may not be familiar with Kid Rock, also known as Robert James Ritchie, he is a Detroit-based rapper wh
- Pres. Bush - Does he walk his talk? (Cont'd) —Dr. Robert Morey, Sun Jan 23 04:21
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
