carlson.jon
9/11 Nutshell TOP SECRET:
Thu Jan 22 18:13:26 2004
64.140.158.97

Subject:
9/11 Nutshell TOP SECRET:Boeing 737 airliners replaced the 767 airliners (fwd)
From: carlson.jon@att.net
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:28:52 +0000

Subject: 9/11 Nutshell TOP SECRET:Boeing 737 airliners replaced the 767 airliners
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:19:17 +0000

EVIDENCE that the '9/11' Boeing 767 airliners were Boeing 737s:
http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/commercial/737-03.html
(1) Engines on 737 airliners are mounted on PODS, 767 airliners aren't on
pods.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/70087_boeing13.shtml
(2) Unlike a 767, a 737 is capable of 60-degree banking maneuvers (on one
engine!) View the 737 flying at a sharp angle as it crashes into the South
Tower.
(3) In an interview with a retired United aeronautical engineer, he said the
engine part seen in the documentary '9/11' on the street below the North
Tower after the first crash was not part of a 767 Platt & Whitney engine.
Thus ruling out a 767 airliner.
http://www.sftt.org/dwa/2002/12/18/3.html
(4) The FBI issued a federal grand jury subpoena to an airline pilot for
purchasing a CD-ROM of 737 technical information on EBAY. Trying to clean up
737 technical information on the Internet obviously. We know wky, don't we??



IN PHOTOS OF THE BOTH CRASHES INTO THE WTC TOWERS the imprints were like 'two
peas in a pod' so it is a safe assumption that both airliners were identical
737s.

The UA engineer also mentioned that fuel is loaded on an aircraft so 45
minutes of fuel is left at the end of a flight for safety purposes. In normal
use a 737 is NOT capable of flying from Boston to San Francisco ANYWAY but
including the safety fuel for an extra 45 minutes of flight it definitely
would not be scheduled for a transcontinental trip. United Shuttle uses 737s
for short haul flights. The UA engineer calculated a trip from Boston to New
York City would normally take about 20 minutes. On 9/11 we are told it took
45 minutes. Where was the airliner that left Boston during the missing 25
minutes? Was there a unscheduled change in aircraft?

http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2003/lavanguardia062203.html
A prominent Spanish newspaper scientifically analyzed the photos of the 737


airliner as it approached the South WTC Tower AND FOUND:
(1) A bulge on the body under the right wing and
(2) two cylindrical objects along the bottom of the
aircraft.

THE BULGE ON THE BODY UNDER THE RIGHT WING is similar to the bulge on the
remote-controlled Predator used in military operations. The UA engineer said
ON THE PREDATOR it is a cover for the radar antenna that receives signals
from a control station for guidance.
FOR THE NORTH TOWER CRASH a Saab Jet (attachment 1st) was the control
station, controlling the airliner as the Saab Jet flow directly above the
airliner in tight formation on the approach to the North Tower.
FOR THE SOUTH TOWER CRASH a military helicopter (attachment MilHel)
positioned in front of the South Tower but hidden from ground view in the
smoke plume used signals to remote control the airliner into the South Tower.
The Saab Jet function in this crash was to bring the airliner to Manhattan


Island and then turn over remote control to the Military Helicoper.

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/okx/climate/data/cpk0109.txt (NW wind=315,N=0 or
360) 6/16, 8/13,9/11,10/8,10/17 are the only NW wind days from June 1st to
Nov.1,2001.
IN FACT, THE PLOTTERS WAITED FOR A CLEAR DAY
WITH A NORTHWEST WIND TO BLOW THE SMOKE PLUME ACROSS THE SOUTH TOWER FROM THE
NORTH TOWER. ALL JUST TO HIDE THE MILITARY HELICOPER!! 9/11 WAS THE ONLY DAY
IN 9/01 WITH SUCH CONDITIONS. However, both the Saab Jet and the Military
helicopter were captured 'in the act' by the Naudet Brothers (The Firemens'
video), a NBC news helicopter, and numerous video cameras.

IN ADDITION, TWO CYLINCRICAL OBJECTS were observed along the bottom of the
aircraft body. Were these filled with napalm and explosives?
http://newssearch.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000/images/_716609_napalm300.jpg
Napalm in use. Notice the flame color. Compare to WTC crash photos.



The attached photo (hit2) shows an explosive charge (orange area) going off
BEFORE the plane contacts the wall. It made a large entry into the building.
Studies of the video of the wings at the point of contact shows the wings
blown to pieces allowing the plane body unattached to the wings to enter
unimpeded into the hole made by the explosive charge. Inside the building the
napalm is ignited and blown up. The wings probably were filled with
explosives and napalm also.

HERE IS MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON REMOTE CONTROL GROUND STATIONS. The 737,
757, and 767, being guided by 'fly by wire' instrumentation, which means
wires not hydraulic systems, could easily have their auto-pilot systems
compromised by a bolt-on remote control system such as the state-of-Art
Predator remote control system.

http://www.uav.com/home/index.html
General Atomics 'Remotely Operated
Aircraft Systems'
The Predator is the prime example.
http://www.uav.com/products/gcs.html

The Control Stations are of 3 types:
1. GCS Ground control station With satellite capability

2. High Mobility Ground control station
3. Portable GCS.
I quote:" A portable GCS is also available, providing mobile units the
ability to control the aircraft and receive valuable intelligence from the
field." It is reasonable to believe that THE SAAB JET and the MILITARY
HELICOPTER served as portable control stations on 9/11.