Attacking habeas corpus
by margieburns at 10:45AM (CST) on January 5, 2006 |
http://www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/5/1603030.html
Republican Senator Lindsey O. Graham of So. Carolina is
not up for re-election until 2008, and I cannot find
that South Carolina has any provisions for a recall
campaign except for its statewide offices. Presumably
this is partly why Graham was picked to spearhead the
White House attack on habeas corpus.
"HABEAS CORPUS. Lat. (You have the body.) The name given
to a variety of writs, (of which these were anciently
the emphatic words,) having for their object to bring a
party before a court or judge."
"The sole function of the writ is to release from
unlawful imprisonment. . . The office of the writ is not
to determine prisoner's guilt or innocence, and ONLY
ISSUE WHICH IT PRESENTS IS WHETHER PRISONER IS
RESTRAINED OF HIS LIBERTY BY DUE PROCESS." (Black's Law
Dictionary, 4th ed., caps added)
Make no mistake. Current moves in our GOP-dominated
Congress regarding the "detention" of "terrorists" are
not security measures. They do not defend the American
people. They do not protect us from actual terrorists --
some of whose relatives may well have been shepherded
out of the U.S. right after 9/11 by this White House.
They do not attack terrorists. They attack the ancient
right of habeas corpus, which underlies our most
immediate freedoms, namely the everyday right NOT to
have our persons or property seized without reason, or
for unnamed reasons.
This point is so fundamental that it is impossible that
Sen. Graham fails to understand it. Lindsey Graham is an
attorney, and every law student is required to take a
Constitutional Law course in law school.
Only the most ignorant or gullible person, and Mr.
Graham is neither, could honestly believe that accused
terrorists should be treated differently from other
accused persons. An accusation is still an accusation.
Only to the abjectly ignorant, and Mr. Graham is not
that, does the word "terrorist" mean "someone with
magical powers." Only a pitiably ignorant, rabidly
bigoted or quasi- illiterate individual could seriously
believe that accused terrorists have such telepathic
powers, like Johnny Carson in his turban reading an
envelope through his forehead, that our security is
undermined by -- by what? By merely telling them the
charges against them.
Any infringement on habeas corpus is a straight-out,
cynical taking advantage of ignorance.
But worse than that, it is a practice that puts all of
us in danger of the same fate as accused terrorists.
Make no mistake. This is not a practice that can be
limited to one category of individuals. The basis of the
right of a writ of habeas corpus is humanity. You don't
have to be some special kind of person; you just have to
be a person. Therefore, since we are all people, any law
or procedure that takes it away, takes it away from all
of us.
If anyone can be detained without even being told the
charges against him -- then, anyone can be detained
without being told the charges against him or her.
It is small consolation that Sen. Graham himself could
become a "detainee." By the time things get so
horrendous, so overt, that even individuals like him
rebel, the damage will be irretrievable.
====================================
Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
"The Law"!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/thelaw.htm
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"Truth / True"
http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/bouvier/truth-.shtml
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"Oath"
http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/bouvier/oath-.shtml
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"(un)Lawful(ly)"
http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/bouvier/lawful-.shtml
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"God"
http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/bouvier/god-.shtml
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"Authority"
http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/bouvier/author-.shtml