Justice Deputy Resisted Parts of Spy Program
By Eric Lichtblau and James Risen
The New York Times
Sunday 01 January 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/010206Y.shtml
Washington - A top Justice Department official objected in 2004
to aspects of the National Security Agency's domestic
surveillance program and refused to sign on to its continued use
amid concerns about its legality and oversight, according to
officials with knowledge of the tense internal debate. The
concerns appear to have played a part in the temporary
suspension of the secret program.
The concerns prompted two of President Bush's most senior aides
- Andrew H. Card Jr., his chief of staff, and Alberto R.
Gonzales, then White House counsel and now attorney general - to
make an emergency visit to a Washington hospital in March 2004
to discuss the program's future and try to win the needed
approval from Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was
hospitalized for gallbladder surgery, the officials said.
The unusual meeting was prompted because Mr. Ashcroft's top
deputy, James B. Comey, who was acting as attorney general in
his absence, had indicated he was unwilling to give his approval
to certifying central aspects of the program, as required under
the White House procedures set up to oversee it.
With Mr. Comey unwilling to sign off on the program, the White
House went to Mr. Ashcroft - who had been in the intensive care
unit at George Washington University Hospital with pancreatitis
and was housed under unusually tight security - because "they
needed him for certification," according to an official briefed
on the episode. The official, like others who discussed the
issue, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the
classified nature of the program.
Mr. Comey declined to comment, and Mr. Gonzales could not be
reached.
Accounts differed as to exactly what was said at the hospital
meeting between Mr. Ashcroft and the White House advisers. But
some officials said that Mr. Ashcroft, like his deputy, appeared
reluctant to give Mr. Card and Mr. Gonzales his authorization to
continue with aspects of the program in light of concerns among
some senior government officials about whether the proper
oversight was in place at the security agency and whether the
president had the legal and constitutional authority to conduct
such an operation.
It is unclear whether the White House ultimately persuaded Mr.
Ashcroft to give his approval to the program after the meeting
or moved ahead without it.
The White House and Mr. Ashcroft, through a spokeswoman,
declined to comment Saturday on the hospital meeting. A White
House spokeswoman, Jeannie Mamo, said she could not discuss any
aspect of the meeting or the internal debate surrounding it, but
said: "As the president has stated, the intelligence activities
that have been under way to prevent future terrorist attacks
have been approved at the highest levels of the Justice
Department."
The domestic eavesdropping program was publicly disclosed in
mid-December by The New York Times. President Bush, in
acknowledging the existence of the program in a televised
appearance two weeks ago, said that tight controls had been
imposed over the surveillance operation and that the program was
reviewed every 45 days by top government officials, including at
the Justice Department.
"The review includes approval by our nation's top legal
officials, including the attorney general and the counsel to the
president," Mr. Bush said, adding that he had personally
reauthorized the program's use more than 30 times since it
began. He gave no indication of any internal dissent over the
reauthorization.
Questions about the surveillance operation are likely to be
central to a Congressional hearing planned by Senator Arlen
Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who heads the Judiciary
Committee. Mr. Specter, like some other Republicans and many
Democrats in Congress, has voiced deep concerns about the
program and Mr. Bush's legal authority to bypass the courts to
order domestic wiretaps without warrants.
What is known is that in early 2004, about the time of the
hospital visit, the White House suspended parts of the program
for several months and moved ahead with more stringent
requirements on the security agency on how the program was used,
in part to guard against abuses.
The concerns within the Justice Department appear to have led,
at least in part, to the decision to suspend and revamp the
program, officials said. The Justice Department then oversaw a
secret audit of the surveillance program.
The audit examined a selection of cases to see how the security
agency was running the program. Among other things, it looked at
how agency officials went about determining that they had
probable cause to believe that people in the United States,
including American citizens, had sufficient ties to Al Qaeda to
justify eavesdropping on their phone calls and e-mail messages
without a court warrant. That review is not known to have found
any instances of abuses.
The warrantless domestic eavesdropping program was first
authorized by President Bush in the months after the Sept. 11,
2001, attacks, officials said. Initially, it was focused on
communications into and out of Afghanistan, including calls
between Afghanistan and the United States, people familiar with
the operation said. But the program quickly expanded.
-------
01/02/06 - THE CHARLES GOYETTE SHOW...
http://www.charlesgoyette.com/archive/index.cgi?2006-01-02-Charles
Feature Article • Voting: Vote Fraud
The Fraud of Voting
Ernest Hancock
"Does the next generation really have a voice? Will the attempts
to socially and economically engineer our society allow our
peaceful opposition? If you think you are going to vote yourself
free, then you have not been paying attention."
http://freedomsphoenix.com/
Domestic spying info used by other agencies for domestic spying
1-2-2006 • Washington Psot
The NSA has turned information over to the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA) and to other government entities. The DIA, has used
NSA information as the basis for carrying out surveillance of
people in the country suspected of posing a threat Read Full
Story
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/31/AR2005123100808_pf.html

http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/