Bob Mantz
Media Distorts Anthrax Vaccine Stats
Thu Jan 1 09:09:06 2004
68.38.145.126

In black and white:

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/gnxfan/vaccinesafety.doc



A big victory for anti-forced vaccines. A federal judge ruled soldiers cannot be forced to take the Anthrax Vaccine.

However, I found something very troubling. I searched Google News using the first few words from the article in my local paper "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs". It returned 81 pages where you could find the AP article on the ruling.

But there is an extremely important paragraph in this article. "A leaflet inserted with the product, which originally stated that adverse reaction occurred in 0.2 percent of cases, was recently revised to reflect a rate between 5 percent and 35 percent, the ruling said. It said there have been at least six deaths linked to the vaccine."

So it went from .2 to between 5 and 35 percent!!!!!!!

So I now took the term "saying soldiers should not be guinea pigs" and added "0.2" to it. And guess what? Several of the newspapers edited out that part. Completely gone. For instance, the LA Times:

http://www.sunspot.net/news/health/bal-te.court23dec23,0,5075044.story?coll=bal-health-headlines

No mention of it.

The Boston Globe:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/12/23/pentagon_cant_require_anthrax_vaccine_us_judge_rules/

Not there.

USA Today?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-12-22-military-anthrax_x.htm

No.

The New York Times edited it!

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/national/23ANTH.html?ex=1072760400&en=49a06d62063991b3&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

This is unacceptable, deceitful, and wrong.



Thankfully Foxnews has left it in:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106413,00.html



Article is below:

Bob Mantz
www.bobmantz.com
www.curezone.com