'None of Us Have the Right To Avert Our Gaze'
Ralph Nader Interviews the Rev. William Sloane Coffin
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/nader3.html
Rev. William Sloane Coffin has been a leader against the war
in Vietnam, an advocate for civil rights and an opponent of
nuclear weapons. Coffin was an Army officer in World War II,
acting as liaison to the French and Russian armies. Upon
graduating from Yale University in 1949, Coffin entered the
Union Theological Seminary until the outbreak of the Korean
War when, in 1950, he joined the CIA and spent three years
in Germany fighting Stalin's regime. He earned his Bachelor
of Divinity degree from Yale in 1956 and was ordained a
Presbyterian minister.
Rev. Coffin became Chaplain of Yale University in 1958.
Early on he opposed the Vietnam War and became famous for
his anti-war activities and his civil rights activism. He
had a prominent role challenging segregation in the "freedom
rides." Coffin used his pulpit as a platform for like-minded
crusaders, hosting the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., South
African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela, among
others. Fellow Yale graduate Garry Trudeau has immortalized
Coffin as "the Rev. Sloan" in the Doonesbury comic strip.
By 1967, Coffin increasingly concentrated on preaching civil
disobedience and supported the young men who turned in their
draft cards. In 1968 Coffin, Dr. Benjamin Spock, Marcus
Raskin and others were indicted by a Federal grand jury for
conspiracy to counsel, aid and abet draft resistance. All
but Raskin were convicted, but in 1970 an appeals court
overturned the verdict.
Coffin remained chaplain of Yale until December 1975. In
1977 he became senior minister at Riverside Church in New
York City and became a leading activist, meeting with world
leaders and traveling abroad to protest U.S. policies. He
currently resides in Vermont.
Ralph Nader: With the majority of Americans in poll after
poll turning against the U.S. war and occupation in Iraq and
with many retired Generals, diplomats and intelligence
officials opposed to the invasion in the first instance, why
is the organized opposition not greater? What can be done to
turn this public support into organized opposition?
Rev. William Sloane Coffin: Sacrifice in and of itself
confers no sanctity. Even though thousands of Americans and
Iraqis are killed and wounded, the blood shed doesn't make
the cause one wit more or less sacred. Yet that truth is so
difficult to accept when sons and daughters, husbands,
friends, when so many of our fellow-citizens are among the
sacrificed.
Because her son was killed Cindy Sheehan is not called
unpatriotic. What the rest of us have to remember is that
dissent in a democracy is not unpatriotic; what is
unpatriotic is subservience to a bad policy.
The war was a predictable catastrophe and we've botched the
occupation. However, I sympathize with those who are
perplexed about what is best now to do. Soon I hope people
will heed the call to renounce all American military bases
in Iraq and to begin withdrawal of American troops. I think
Bush has it wrong: he says: "When Iraqis stand up, Americans
will stand down." More likely its: when Americans stand
down, then Iraqis will be forced to stand up. The question
is, "Which Iraqis and for what will they stand?"
RN: Why do you think most of the anti-war groups stopped
their marches in 2004 and became quiescent compared to 2003?
WSC: Wars generally mute dissent, and Bush is given to
silence criticism, to keep problems hidden and ignored. Now
that such tactics are no longer possible, given the many
setbacks to his war aims, the marches will soon begin.
RN: What do you think the churches and the National Council
of Churches should be doing that they are not now doing
regarding the war-occupation?
WSC: Bob Edgar, the General Secretary of the National
Council of Churches, has been an eloquent protester of the
war. Local clergy must brave the accusation of meddling in
politics, a charge first made no doubt by the Pharaoh
against Moses. When war has a bloodstained face none of us
have the right to avert our gaze. And it's not the sincerity
of the Administration, but its passionate conviction of the
war's rightness that needs to be questioned.
Self-righteousness is the bane of human relations. And the
search for peace is Biblically mandated. If religious people
don't search hard, and only say "Peace is desirable," then
secular authorities are free to decide "War is necessary."
RN: Any comparisons between the domestic opposition to the
Iraq War/Occupation with the domestic opposition to the
Vietnam War?
WSC: There are similarities. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
was based on a lie; so was the charge that Saddam Hussein
had weapons of mass destruction. And the lies continued: We
were winning the Vietnam War, Iraqi oil would pay for the
costs of the war and of the occupation.
I think the absence of a draft has much to do with the
present lack of student protest. On the other hand, I think
the colossal blunders of the Administration will quicken an
antiwar movement faster now than during the Vietnam War.
After all, it was only after the Tet Offensive in 1968, not
originally in '62, '63 or '64, that the American opposition
to the Vietnam War became massive.
RN: What should the U.S. government do now?
WSC: The U.S. government should realize that if we can't
defeat the insurgents, we have lost. The insurgents, on the
other hand, have only not to lose to declare victory. And to
defeat the United States and its allies might go a long way
to assuage, to offset the humiliation and rage so many
Muslims presently feel. All of which indicates we should
start to withdraw our troops. What we shouldn't do is to
believe President Bush when he says that to honor those who
have died, more Americans must die. That's using examples of
his failures to promote still greater failures.
RN: What do you think should be done strategically and
tactically by the peace movement?
WSC: I am very much in favor of well thought out non-violent
civil disobedience, of occupying congressional offices,
telling lawmakers, "You have to stop the slaughter, to admit
mistakes and to right the wrong."
Unfortunately, to get media attention, you have to
sensationalize the valuable. But town meetings, letters to
the editor, flooding Washington with protest letters and
marches – all that is still very important if the protest
continues and gains momentum.
RN: How is Vermont a model in this respect?
WSC: Representative Sanders, Senators Leahy and Jeffords –
Vermont is well represented by these sensitive, intelligent
people. The state is exceedingly environmentally friendly
which tends to make people more peace-minded. Actually some
Vermonters want to secede from the Union. I'm opposed.
Better to stay where the guilt is and try to improve things
throughout the country.
RN: What broader advice do you have for strengthening our
democracy and confronting the concentration of power and
wealth over the life-sustaining directions our country (with
its impact on the world) needs to take? Please address any
specific reforms that demand priority.
WSC: Something happened to our understanding of freedom.
Centuries ago Saint Augustine called freedom of choice the
"small freedom," libertas minor. Libertas Maior, the big
freedom was to make the right choices, to be fearless and
selfless enough to choose to serve the common good rather
than to seek personal gain.
That understanding of freedom was not foreign to our
eighteenth century forebears who were enormously influenced
by Montesquieu, the French thinker who differentiated
despotism, monarchy, and democracy. In each he found a
special principle governing social life. For despotism the
principle was fear; for monarch, honor; and for democracy,
not freedom but virtue. In The Broken Covenant, Robert
Bellah quotes him as writing that "it is this quality rather
than fear or ambition, that makes things work in a
democracy."
According to Bellah, Samuel Adams agreed: "We may look to
armies for our defense, but virtue is our best security. It
is not possible that any state should long remain free where
virtue is not supremely honored."
Freedom, virtue – these two were practically synonymous in
the minds of our revolutionary forbears. To them it was not
inconceivable that an individual would be granted freedom
merely for the satisfaction of instinct and whims. Freedom
was not the freedom to do as you please but rather, if you
will, the freedom to do as you ought! Freedom, virtue – they
were practically synonymous a hundred years later in the
mind of Abraham Lincoln when, in his second inaugural
address, he called for "a new birth of freedom." But today,
because we have so cruelly separated freedom from virtue,
because we define freedom in a morally inferior way, our
country is stalled in what Herman Melville call the "Dark
Ages of Democracy," a time when as he predicted, the New
Jerusalem would turn into Babylon, and Americans would feel
"the arrest of hope's advance."
RN: What about the Educational system as it relates to
democracy?
WSC: Higher education is doing fairly well. Universities are
only too expensive, and do too little to persuade students
to make a difference, not money, to be valuable not
"successful."
Lower education, on the other hand, particularly for the
urban and rural poor, cries for attention. And it's all
related – inadequate education, housing, jobs, day care,
lack of medical assurance. Our children need teachers and
doctors, not generals and wars. And they desperately need
the incentive only good mentors and a good nation can
provide.
RN: Are you writing another book?
WSC: Not that I know of.
October 20, 2005
To contact Rev. Coffin or Ralph Nader write the Director of
Democracy Rising, Kevin Zeese. You can comment on this
interview on Ralph Nader's blog at
http://www.DemocracyRising.US
Copyright © 2005 Ralph Nader
Find this article at:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/nader3.html
---------------------------
Repealing the 13th Amendment
Joseph Sobran on the draft
http://www.sobran.com/columns/2005/050922.shtml