Costa Rican Legislative Assembly Special Commission
Appointed to Investigate the Acts Reported on Drug Trafficking Document 10.684 FINAL REPORT San Jose, July 10, 1989 CRS Congressional Research
Service ù The Library of Congress ù Washington, D.C. 20540
(Translation - Spanish)
1. PREAMBLE
From the beginning of its work, the Commission verified the appearance in Costa Rica, just as in other countries, of the phenomenon of the penetration by drug trafficking of the State branches, credit institutions, and many other public and private activities with the goal of procuring influence and assistance when ever they would be necessary for the transshipment of drugs or laundering of money.
It was thus established in our first report, and on that premise work has been continuing, not as police investigators, since that task corresponds to the respective authorities, whether it be the judicial police, the Narcotics Section of the Ministry of Public Security or the Rural Guard, according to the cases, and the necessary contact has been maintained with those bodies in order to learn if they have the resources and means that will allow them to act, and all the information that has been acquired, related to the possible commission of crimes in the framework of drug trafFIcking and money laundering has been forwarded to the appropriate police agency, according to the circumstances. The country has been able to appreciate the effectiveness of the investigation and examination groups, through the news and reports published on drug seizures or captures of persons, citizens or foreigners, involved in those illicit actions. Now we want to express to the Legislative Assembly our conviction that we must make every effort possible to contribute to the smooth operation of the State Branches and their institutions, in all orders and hierarchies. Part of the Commission's task in the area of political oversight is the responsibility to point out all the weaknesses that may appear in all the fields of public administration, such as for example air traffic (control of ports and airports), maritime transportation, and customs and border services, credit and banking institutions, political parties, the Legislative Branch and the Judiciary, and, of course, private activities, particularly in the field of exports and transportation, as well as the police and investigation services. If the whole system of government and the administration of justice, all public and private services that have been mentioned, have defenses against crime, if officials and individuals are kept in a constant state of alert against the scourge of drug and other related crimes, the country has better possibilities of avoiding the evils that come from those sources. That is why we have worked toward the review, investigation and judgment on a wide gamut of public and private activities that should be kept clean in order to prevent the penetration of the forces of corruption, not just in this area but in all public and private life, since an undisputable social fact is the contagion of some illicit activities of others. The poor operation of government agencies, or of political parties, business activities or those of public and private services in many fields can serve as a breeding ground for all types of crimes and such weaknesses are used by the drug traffickers or the money coming from their business. The premises set forth will serve for understanding the effort that we have put forth in learning in depth the realities inherent to many activities that need to be kept on-going if we want to preserve and strengthen the defenses against drug trafficking and the related crimes and those derived from it. The Commission reiterates its conviction that, in accordance with Article 121, para 23) of our Political Constitution and according to the doctrine of Political Control, it has the responsibility and obligation to discover the mechanisms through which the country may suffer the deterioration coming from the influence of drug trafficking and its pecuniary production, i.e. it has the responsibility for pointing out in what manner the delinquents of that type are penetrating the various bodies or instruments of the State to favor their interests, such as has occurred, unfortunately, in other countries; at the same time, we feel the great responsibility of proposing measures of an administrative nature, suggesting bills for new laws or reforms of those which exist, in order to offer the country more effective means of controlling these problems and strengthening the defenses of the country in general, of the State with its institutions and of the Costa Rican population in order to achieve an effective defense.1.1 The Power of Drug Trafficking
It is difficult to establish figures for the totals that are handled in drug trafficking. Some authors indicate that the drug trafficking industry is the fastest growing business in the world, and that it's annual revenues exceed 500 billion dollars. (Mills, Janet. The Underground Empire. Doubleday and Co., Inc., New York, 1986). According to estimates from the United Nations, drug trafficking is the most important market after that of weapons, representing 9% of the world trade. Drug addiction and drug trafficking have historic, economic, socio-cultural and political dimensions which we cannot overlook and which must be carefully considered at the time of attacking these evils that undermine our societies. To point to a few of them, it suffices to note that it is becoming necessary to invest more resources in the fight against organized crime; the diversion of clean resources toward illicit activities is being fostered; national loss of reputation is being generated; political corruption is encouraged and, seen from another perspective, drug trafficking may even become the generator of the economic reactivation of a nation.1.2 Change in Attitude
The report that has been prepared presents a series of facts that require a careful analysis in which Costa Rican conformism cannot prevail; that attitude was criticized by Mario Sancho, describing it in the following terms: "...and more discouraging than intellectual apathy, Costa Rican conformism began to appear, the willingness to accept things without examination and to take appearances for substance itself, to consider with suspicion, if not with indifference, any idea, especially of foreign origin, that can cause one to lose the beatific vision of this little piece of earthly paradise. Of Costa Ricans you could say what Bernard Shaw said of the 100% American. Three fourths of Costa Ricanism consists of believing that Costa Rica has reached the height of perfection with respect to laws and institutions, and those of us who find fault in them are bad citizens of an ideally organized republic....' (Sancho, Mario. "Memorias de Mario Sancho," Editorial Costa Rica Costa Rica, 1976, page 166.) The ideas that the illustrious Costa Rican thinker expresses may be very severe but it cannot be denied that he very astutely points out a dangerous attitude that at times the Costa Rican may adopt, especially regarding such a serious and dangerous problem as drug trafficking. With respect to this problem it is indispensable to distance oneself from that dangerous naivete and conformism that the author describes so exactly.
1.3 Money Laundering
One of the problems to which the Commission has given the most attention is the one related to money laundering, which in very simple terms can be defined as the attempt to clean dirty money in order to present it as legal or clean. Something fundamental about this should not be forgotten, which is that in this crime the intervention of metallic money is required, because "...a seller of drugs acting in the street does not collect through personal chits or credit cards; what he wants is metallic money. A supplier asks for metallic money. The reason why criminals work in metal is simple: people don't want a written record of illegal transactions, so it becomes necessary to launder the money..." (see Roberto Powis, "Hacia el final del dinero sucio, separata). The essential ides that should be tied to money laundering refers to the inevitable handling of large amounts of cash, generally in bills of that type. This is one of the most serious problems faced by the drug trafficker, especially because of the act of handling low-denomination bills, because, for example, two million dollars in 20-dollar-bills have a total weight of 112 kilograms, and if that same amount were in 10-dollar bills, the weight would be 224 kilos. (Ibid). Given this difficulty, the simple fact of exchanging those bills for others of a larger denomination is one of the simplest methods of money laundering.
There are various methods for "washing" the money, but among those used the most the following can be mentioned: a - The flow of dollars in cash comes from the U.S. to any country, among them Costa Rica. The important thing is that the drug trafficker evades U.S. laws with relative facility, because the mobilization of that money has no documentary backing. Later that money will reenter the U.S., generally, or other developed countries. What is interesting in this case is that the money was always in the possession of the same person, because when it reenters bank accounts in the U.S. or other countries, the legitimization of the money has been achieved through its mobilization. There was never really an authentic bank transaction. In Costa Rica, this method would operate as follows: the person comes from abroad on commercial flights, bringing in his luggage an important amount of dollars in cash. Once in the country, the dollars are deposited in a number of bank accounts, from which "cover companies" have accounts to be drawn upon, and from those accounts drafts are drawn on other accounts in the U.S., Panama or other countries. (See Posis - ob.cit. p. 51) b - It is also possible to create a more sophisticated method in which a network of companies is used as follows: "...the most frequent mode of operation, which is carried out by using commercial accounts, includes several companies,-- Corporation A, Corporation B and C, which begin to channel substantial amounts of cash to Bank D. Once in the bank, and through drafts /bills of exchange/ or telegraphic draft, the funds are assigned to the account of Company F in Bank E of Panama. Company F in a Panamanian fiduciary company subject to the laws of that country. Its real owners are the same individuals who control corporations A, B and C. However, Panamanian banking secrecy laws prevent the U.S. authorities or any other person from being able to learn their identity. When the money is now in Bank E of Panama, part of it is transferred by telegraph to Ochoa Investments in Bank G, located in Colombia. This transfer is for paying the drug suppliers. The rest of the funds available in Bank E are again transferred to bank accounts that corporations A, B, and C maintain in Bank H in the U.S..." (Posis, ob. cit., p. 51, 52.) This lengthy quote illustrates very well what an ideal type of "money laundering" would be. In this case the purpose of banking secrecy is perverted totally; on the other hand, the mobilization of such sums is only aimed at legitimizing money of illegal origin, which actually never changed owners. c - One can hide the earnings of drug trafficking and legitimize those revenues through the use of two or more fictitious companies with which legitimate commercial transactions &re conducted. According to the purposes of circulation of money, the drug trafficker can sell merchandise or services at artificially high or low prices, according to the case. In this procedure the money is hidden or legalized through double invoices. d - The mobilization of dollars in cash is one of the most serious problems of drug trafficking and laundering of dirty moneys as already stated; in this sense it is worth mentioning that one of the methods for mobilizing and laundering money consist of putting the money in cars entering the country illegally, in collusion with the Customs authorities. This money then enters money exchange shops that operate by violating the laws regulating bank operations. The person in charge of the money exchange shop uses bank accounts in the name of several firm names, from which he sends transfers to the U.S., usually to banks in Miami. In Costa Rica the police authorities have managed to establish the possibility that the fraudulent entry of vehicles has been used as an instrument for bringing into the country the dollars requiring full legalization. The vehicle allows easy hiding, the relatively ample space occupied by the amounts of money in bills in small denomination. It is also possible that dollars have been brought into Costa Rica through flights of small aircraft that land on landing strips located near the border with Panama. The fight against organized crime and its earnings has not been easy, it being recognized, for example, in Italy, that in this field repressive measures result in many disappointing cases; that is why alternatives have been suggested in which it is considered that strictly financial controls can play a more important role in depriving the drug traffickers of the economic instruments that give them so much power. (see Scotti, Luiga. "La lucha contra el crimen organizado: un informe financiero nacional e internacional) separata, p. 229). The strategy of the Italian State in this direction is so interesting that it has issued legislation of an administrative nature in which it is established that the authority can ask persons who possess well-defined characteristics to show the origin of their property. Here an inversion of the evidence takes place since it is not in a penal area, so it has been felt that it is not contrary to the principle that it is the State's responsibility to prove the facts. (Scotti, ob. cit. p. 229). These are simple thoughts that show the need to see that money laundering is a problem that should be faced from a tax and financial, and not strictly punitive, perspective. In any case, in all policies that the State must undertake against money laundering, the action of the banking authorities is fundamental, and they should create information systems that will make it possible to detect the typical money laundering schemes, with them being reported to the judicial and police authorities. It is for this reason that it is recommended that the banking authorities know their customers well, giving special attention when the following appear in banking operations: l) large cash deposits of dollars by a new customer; 2) large deposits and those in larger amounts than expected and normal for the customer and/or his business; 3) large cash deposits in U.S. dollars by customers who at the time of the transaction do not know how many dollars they have; 4) large electronic drafts in dollars coming from the U.S. to accounts of individuals or companies that do not normally receive such deposits for the purposes their business; 5) deposits of multiple cashiers checks issued or cashed in U.S. financial institutions and all payable to the same person or to the same legal entity in amounts of less than 10,000 dollars; 6) large electronic drafts to financial institutions in the U.S. or other countries made shortly after the same funds sent were deposited. All these indicators should be analyzed by banking officials, since otherwise State action against laundering of money coming from drug trafficking is almost invalid. The disinterest of the banking authorities concerning these acts can lead to impunity regarding these criminal actions. 1.4 Drug Trafficking and Politics The relationship between drug trafficking and politics is very old; however, currently a strange mixture is occurring between revolutionary groups and drug trafficking, the latter becoming a source of money for obtaining weapons and other resources. Evidence found in the complex of Tranquilandia, Colombia, where almost 1.2 billion dollars in drugs and equipment were destroyed, showed that the movement of Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, according to a document that had been given at the Sixth Conference of May 1982, had established a tax (weight) of 80 pesos (0.75 cents) per gram of cocaine proceeded in territories dominated by the guerrillas influence. Tranquilandia is where for the first time the term "narco-guerrilla" was heard. (Guigliotta, Guy and Jeff Leen; "Kings of Cocaine." Simon and Shuster, 1988). Another place where politics and drug trafficking mix is in the Golden Triangle where Burma, China, Laos and Thailand meet. The Mong Tai Revolutionary Army and its leader Khun Sa impose taxes on production of opium and its derivatives, having 16,000 soldiers at its disposal. (Lui Melinda, Burma's "Money Tree." Rev. Newsweek. May 15, 1989). Also, U.S. government officials have been seen to be involved in drug trafficking activities, as occurred in the famous Iran-Contra case, in which it was possible to determine that certain U.S. authorities had allowed the transhipment of cocaine to the U.S. in order to channel illegal funds to the Nicaraguan counterrevolution. So it is that drug trafficking can finance the left and the right, it can compromise governments, political parties, etc., so it is a multi-shaped phenomenon that can totally erode any society. This power of concentration can also be seen very clearly in political parties, especially when certain rules predominate in which only the criterion of effectiveness prevails, as when it ia said that you should not wonder about the origin of the money that the party receives, or that defeat ia the "only thing that is not accepted in politics." Behind this pragmatism is hidden a serious danger for the political system, because in the end the one that gives money to the party will in some way want to impose the domination of his interests, which will not always be those of the country, especially if it is a person tied into drug trafficking. Criminal organizations such as drug trafficking have a point of view about what financing of political parties means; it is a vision in which they are only interested in power lacking in values, it is a power that only serves the "organization." This vision is expressed very well by "Lucky" Luciano, head of organized crime in the U.S. (1940-1950), in the following terms: "...upon entering I set the standard that we would limit ourselves to Tammany Hall. For me that would have been like taking a position and the truth was that that didn't matter to me at all. We went with the Republicans, too. In my book, it was a three-party system, the two of them and us.." (Martin Gosch-Richard Hammer - "EI ultimo testamento de Lucky Luciano." Ed. Grijalbo, Espana, 1976, p. 105). Luciano's pragmatism makes it possible to understand very well what the penetration of drug trafficking means in the financing of political parties. But aid to politicians is not limited to the electoral campaign, but rather as Luciano expresses so well, there was a lot to offer the politicians, because they had "...money to finance any campaign, to make any politician that you could deal with rich; they had the contacts and knowledge for getting any politician willing to get involved in lucrative businesses, in the building of roads, real estate and other things, the list would be unending..." (ibid). This lengthy quote summarizes exactly the strategy of penetration by organized crime into the political system, which uses, evidently, public or private corruption. Of course, all this generosity is aimed at achieving the absolute domination of politicians, as Luciano mentions very well in astute terms, when he says that "...I helped elect more than 80 guys in a short period of time, all voted my way, city councilmen, counsels, mayors, congressmen and even senators. THEY BELONGED TO ME. I WOULD ELECT THEM. I WOULD GET THEM ELECTED. THEY BELONGED TO ME BODY AND SOUL, from their head to their feet.." (ibid. p. 106). This perspective of Luciano is still in full force, the interests that are aimed at defending drug trafficking require that dramatic possessiveness that he describes and which almost involves the collapse of the entire political system. The power of dirty money imposes the law, and the popular will expressed through the vote suffers a very serious deterioration. Caro Quintero's expressions fully agreed with Luciano's ideas when he said that "...by the year 2000 the governments of Latin America will be in the hands of the drug traffickers..." It cannot be doubted that Costa Rican society must foster the political and social changes that will make it possible to neutralize the influence of drug trafficking on politics. Every man or woman, officials or not, must be very alert to proposals that are aimed at producing "easy money" for them. "Business of great profit with small investment", or "gifts and unlimited attention," should be rejected; behind those attractive offerings is hidden, directly or indirectly, the action of the drug trafficker. Political parties should pay special attention when certain offers of economic assistance show up. The threat of the drug trafficker, not only as destroyer of lives and societies, but also as destroyer of the stability of the economic, political and social institutionality of countries, must be the source of an in-depth analysis because, unfortunately, it is a sad reality of a continental dimension and thus, in the same proportion defense preparations against it must be made. On financing of a foreign nature for political parties, the Commission received some reports and denunciations (1), which it was not able to investigate thoroughly, the reason why we have considered it appropriate, as is done in the recommendations, to establish a Legislative Commission to investigate everything related to the financing of political parties, the reason why we put at their disposal all the information that it was not possible to analyze in this report. In each of the sections examined below are evident, in some way, the direct or indirect ties of drug trafficking with the Costa Rican socio-political system. (1) Statements of Alberto Franco Cao, statements of Lic. Rafael Angel Calderon Fournier, Deputy Javier Solis, Deputy Federico Villalobos Villalobos, Dr. Miguel Angel Rodriguez Echeverria, Dr. Carlos Manuel Castillo Morales to the Commission; report of U.S. Senator John Kerry. 2.1 FERNANDO MELO FONTANILI 2.1.1 Introduction The background of Fernando Melo, as set forth below, can be seen in a note that Robert Nieves, DEA agent in Costa Rica, sent to Lic. Jose Martin Trejos Benavideg, prosecutor in the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic on February 27, 1989. According to reports from Interpol, Melo Fontanills was under criminal indictment in Dade County for breaking into a residence (burglary). This suit was dropped on December 5, 1986, through efforts made by legal representatives of don Fernando Melo. Information on this legal case was referred, by the latter, to Lic. Daniel Oduber Quiros (see Interpol document ref. 87-11 ref. 87-11- 10770-PLW)(l) The ties and political influence that Fernando Melo managed to accumulate in the last 10 years allowed him to become a person who, among other things, was dedicated to "...promoting and obtaining projects of a varied nature in the political aspect...' according to what was told to DIS by Mr. Manuel Barbatos Ramos ( statement of 10:10 a.m., June 29, 1989), adding that said activity had put Mr. Melo in a good economic position. The political influence that Melo Fontanills acquired can be seen in the following 2.1.2 Background Don Fernando Melo Fontaniel, also known as Fernando Melo Fontaniel, or Fernando Melo Fontaniel appears mentioned for the first time in the DEA files in December 1970. DEA at that time had an undercover agent in the organization of Cuban Elpidio Collazo, in Mexico. On December 17, 1970, that undercover agent met with Collazo to negotiate the purchase of a kilo of cocaine. It was later learned that the one accompanying Collazo in that deal was a subject named Fernando Melo Fontaniel. On that occasion both identified themselves as diplomatic officials of "ODECA" (Organization of Central American States). After this event, it was reported that Fernando Melo and Elpido Collazo traveled to El Salvador in order to buy six kilos of cocaine for their New York customers that were not identified and for the undercover agent. The delivery mentioned did not take place. 3) It was also reported that Fernando Melo was associated with Manuel Penabaz Tobio. Both were accused in a burglary of a residence in Miami in 1970. Manuel Penabaz Tobio was later convicted in Federal Court in a case of trafficking of eight pounds of cocaine. (In this same report it is indicated that Fernando Melo visited Costa Rica on January 10, 1966, in the company of a high-level official of the diplomatic corps of Costa Rica in the U.S., who had relations with the then Director of the Costa Rican Tourism Institute). 4) In January 1971 it was reported that Fernando Melo resided in El Salvador and that he was a partner in the foreign money exchange business called "Ital Cambio" which made it easy for him to travel often to Europe, Latin America, and the U.S. by forging false passports. 5) In July 1973, information was received that Fernando Melo, and other associates, traveled to Costa Rica from Mexico, through Guatemala, and that while he was in Costa Rica, he boarded the boat "Ciudad de Barranquilla, of the Gran Colombia line, in order to collect 10 kilos of cocaine and five of heroine. Later, he also traveled to Barranquilla, Colombia, where he bought another 5 kilos of cocaine. Concerning this act, reports were obtained that Fernando Melo was going to use a woman and a man to bring to Costa Rica a total of 15 kilos of cocaine. Said shipment, together with the 10 kilos of cocaine and 6 of heroin, was going to be transferred to Mexico hidden in a vehicle. The shipment was never detected and there was no seizure or arrest. Unfortunately, the information was not received before the events. ) In November 1974, it was reported that Fernando Melo, who then represented a Brazilian company, traveled to Costa Rica in order to sell a distillery to the Government of Costa Rica, thanks to his friendship with then President Daniel Oduber Quiros. In February 1975, it was reported that Fernando Melo had arrived in Costa Rica from El Salvador, and that he stayed in room 305 of the Hotel Presidente. 8) In early March 1975, it was reported that Fernando Melo was Vice-President of the "Compania Hondurena de Inversiones, SA." (CHISA), whose address was Avenida Republica de Chile 205, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. That company was an affiliate of "Overseas Pulp Paper" of New York. On May 18, 1975, it was reported that Fernando Melo arrived in Costa Rica, stayed at the Hotel Presidente, and that he frequented the restaurant and night club "EI Boruca," since its owner, Gustavo Lora Lopez, was a friend of his. It should be stated that Lora Lopez was known as a friend of Gallo Canessa Barrora and of Gustavo Lopez Alcantara, from whom three kilos of cocaine were seized in 1972. 9) In August 1975, it was reported that Fernando Melo was in Costa Rica from July 13 to 20, and then from July 30 to August 3. He stayed at the Apartamentos William in San Pedro de Montes de Oca, telephone 25 66 13. On August 18, 1975, Fernando Melo returned to Costa Rica and stayed at the Royal Dutch Hotel until August 20. 0) In February 1977 it was reported that Fernando Melo was residing in Apartment No. 1 of the Gonzalez Lahmann apartments, near the Supreme Court of Justice, located at Calle 25 and 21, Ave. 8. 11) According to the above reports, Fernando Melo identified himself as born in Oriente, Cuba on January 23, 1933 and bearer of Costa Rican diplomatic passport No. 20-846. This information was not confirmed in the Ministry of Foreign Relations, since there is no updated information in this department on diplomatic passports and service passports issued between 1974 and 1982 (see report of the Commission of July 5, 1989). >political campaign. (See 6) above) 20) The Ministry of Foreign Relations in 1981 issued him a service passport (No. 611-82) as a sports advisor (Commission Report of July 5, 1989). 21) Deputy David Fallas Alvarado took steps with the Ministry of Foreign Relations to have them issue Fernando Melo F. a service passport, as an economic advisor of that deputy as of June 1, 1984 (see Commission report of July 5, 1989). 22) The Ministry of Foreign Relations issued a service passport to Fernando Melo F.'s wife, Mrs. Rosa Maria Llanio de Melo. The service passport that she had was No. PS376-83 and was renewed until June 30, 1985. The steps for passport renewal were made through the use of a card of Juan Bonilla Ayub, Executive President of CODESA at that time and which Mrs. Jeannette M. Spence signed (see Commission report of July 5, 1989). 3) In the restricted access zones of the Juan Santamaria Airport it was well-known that Mr. Fernando Melo would often come to greet persons coming from abroad. Apparently he had a carnet to enjoy those privileges. His presence in the airport decreased as of 1986. (9) 24) On November 14, 1975 an application was filed in the Options and Naturalization Section of the Civil Registry to opt for Costa Rican citizenship, offering as witnesses, among others, Gustavo Lora Hernandez and Eduardo Flores Chacon. Mr. Flores Chacon strangely stated that Melo Fontanills had been living in our country 13 years, when actually he entered Costs Rica, according to official reports, on January 31, 1965, i.e., that it was not possible for him to have been residing in Costa Rica 13 years as Mr. Flores Chacon stated. 25) In a note dated December 4, 1975, Mr. Jorge Diaz Leal, Governor of San Jose at that time, opposed Mr. Melo Fontanills' application, claiming that he had owed him 1,300 dollars since 1969. This opposition was annulled by Mr. Diaz Leal through a note of January 3, 1976, stating that he had reached an amicable settlement with Mr. Fernando Melo (Page 10 and 14, Naturalization file of Fernando Melo). 26) On January 30, 1976, the General Director of the Civil Registry favorably resolved Melo Fontanills' application, granting him Costa Rican citizenship. 27) Upon consulting the resolution of the Civil Registry (Options and Naturalization Section), the Supreme Elections Tribunal revoked the decision in which Costa Rican citizenship was granted to Melo Fontanills, on the basis of the following arguments: i - "That both the Political Constitution and the Law on Aliens and Naturalization, with respect to efforts of foreigners aimed at acquiring through naturalization the status of Costa Ricans, make reference, among others, to the requirement of the applicant having resided in Costa Rica during the periods that are established according to the different nationalities of origin. In the case of Mr. Melo Fontanills' application, in his status as uban citizen, that period of residence, according to paragraph 3) of Article 14 of the Political Constitution, was two years immediately prior to the naturalization application. ii - That Article number 1155 of the Law on Aliens and Naturalization of 1950 and its amendments specifies the requirements that must be met by those who request naturalization, and with respect to having been domiciled in Costa Rica, it is stipulated that the statement of four witnesses should be offered, without prejudice to documentary evidence that the interested pq might contribute. In this case, that documentary evidence consists of a certification issued by the Mechanized Department of the Ministry of Public Security. It turns out from that document that even though Mr. Melo Fontanills entered the country for the first time on January 3, 1975, it is true that in the two years before the submission of his application for naturalization he spent little time in residence in the country, according to Article 11 of the Law on Aliens and Naturalization No. 1155 and Article 14 of the Political Constitution. The practice that the Tribunal has followed in analogous cases has consisted of evaluating the applicant's residence in the country, adding up his time of stay in order to establish if he meets the time requirements corresponding to the case according to the law. In this case, as can easily be observed, the respective computation made, it turns out that in the two years previous to the date of submission of the application of Mr. Melo Fontanills, which was on November 14, 1975, he had resided in Costa Rica less than five months instead of the two-year period required by the Constitution and law in order to grant Costa Rican citizenship through naturalization. iii. - From what has been set forth it turns out that the applicant had not resided the minimum time in Costa Rica before the filing of his application, in order to obtain Costa Rican citizenship through naturalization, the reason why this Tribunal is proceeding to revoke the resolution it has reviewed and that grants Costa Rican citizenship to Mr. Fernando Jose Melo Fontanills and in its place it rejects the application of the interested party." (Res. of 10:50 a.m. on March 2, 1986). 28) On March 13, 1978, Fernando Melo resubmitted his application for naturalization as a Costa Rican, filing that application with the Office of Options and Naturalization of the Civil Registry. On this occasion he offered as witnesses Eduardo Flores Chacon, Rodrigo Chavarria, Carlos Eduardo Munoz Salazar, and Fernando Salazar Quiros. 29) The witness Carlos E. Munoz Salazar, at the time of making his statement before the Civil Registry, was 19 years old, and he stated that he had known Fernando Melo F. for 10 years as a person of good customs, hard-working, honorable, responsible, etc.; it does not seem appropriate that in this case the testimony of such a young person should have been admitted, since it is logical to think that when he met Melo he was a child, so that it does not seem appropriate for such young persons to testify about such important aspects, when knowledge of the facts comes about during their childhood. 30) Witness Eduardo Flores Chacon said that he had known Melo Fontanills for 11 years. This is a curious fact, because when this person testified in the prior proceedings, he stated that he had known Melo 13 years (see first paragraph). In other words, even though two years had passed since the last statement, Mr. Flores Chacon stated that he had known Melo Fontanills less time than he had mentioned in the first testimony. Such glaring lack of precision takes away seriousness, without 8 doubt, from the naturalization procedure. 31) On April 21, 1978, Lic. Jorge Villalobos Dobles, representative of the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic, opposed Fernando Melo's application, arguing the following irregularity: "...When the residence card was issued to him, it was noted that in a period of six months he needed to verify his investment with the Immigration Council. So that the processing of his application can be continued, he must prove in these proceedings that he kept the obligation that was imposed on him with respect to the Council. When he does, a new hearing should be held. We are opposed for the moment to our citizenship being granted to him..." (Pg. 52, File, Naturalization of Fernando Melo). On this opposition the competent authorities made no statement, nor was the opposition even mentioned in the resolutions in which citizenship was granted to Fernando Melo F. (Reg. of Civil Registry-Section of Options and Naturalization of the Supreme Elections Tribunal). 32) By resolution of the Civil Registry of Costa Rica (Section of Options and Naturalization) (No. 963-21-4-1978), Costa Rican citizenship was granted to Fernando Melo Fontanills. In this decision the Commission has found a serious irregularity that should be investigated and which consists of the following: The Supreme Elections Tribunal had established the invariable standard that the person requesting naturalization must have resided in the country permanently during the two years prior to his application. In the case of Mr. Fernando Melo, he files with the competent authorities a certificate in which he seems to state that he has resided in the country uninterruptedly from September 11, 1975 to the date on which he filed the naturalization request, which was March 13, 1978. In this way Melo Fontanills meets the requirements that were legally in effect at that time for naturalization (see certifications--File Naturalization of Fernando Melo, Page 39). In appearance, Fernando was meeting the period of residence required by the Supreme Elections Tribunal, but this was not really true, since according to a study made of the migratory movements of Melo Fontanills, it has been possible to establish that in 1975, Melo was absent from the country 234 days, in 1976 his absence was 229 days and in 1978 it was 96 days (see note of the Commission of July 4, 1989). With these figures it could be stated that Fernando Melo was residing in the country, according to the standards that the Supreme Elections Tribunal was applying at that time. It is really almost impossible to be able to respond affirmatively to this question; and the possibility exists that in the processing of his naturalization, procedural fraud existed, since a certification was filed in which a fact that was really untrue was made to seem true. The Tribunal should have verified if the content of the certification filed by Fernando Melo was authentic (see naturalization file, Page 39, document of February 14, 1978). However, the Court presumed the good faith of the document and on that basis issued a verdict whose content could be very questionable. In other words, Fernando Melo's naturalization could have been granted on the basis of false facts, since it is not true that he resided in the country from September 11, 1975 until March 13, 1978, which is the date on which he filed his naturalization application. .1.3 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter: The facts and events that have been set forth again show the fragility and vulnerability of the Costa Rican political system, because a person of unknown origin such as Fernando Melo, about whom there are very serious suspicions that he is tied into drug trafficking, becomes an influential political figure, yet always very successfully avoided public notoriety. It cannot be thought that Fernando Melo is an idealist of politics, since in the best of cases, the political promotion of projects allowed him to have a comfortable economic status, as witness Manuel Barbatos Ramos said so well; however, serious questions exist with respect to his ties with drug trafficking. In addition, it is very difficult to establish the extent and content of such a peculiar work as the one Mr. Barbatos Ramos attributes to Melo Fontanills, when he says that he was devoted to the "political promotion of projects. Could this be legitimate promotion? It is difficult to know if we follow Mr. Melo's background, his influence is 90 important that he manages for such a prominent person as ex-President Oduber to provide him with his political support on an important project of the Costa Rican Institute of Aqueducts and Sewers. A person with Mr. Melo's past, who attains Costa Rican citizenship through a questionable process, acquires significant political influence, exercising his power to enter into personal deals. Fernando Melo's knowledge and characteristics seem to be exraordinary, if we take into account the positions that have been formally attributed to him, since while he was a sports advisor of the Ministry of Youth, Culture and Sports, almost at the same time he was the economic advisor of a Deputy. This versatility is not the result of wisdom and capability, but rather is the result of the close friendship and power that Fernando Melo knew how to manipulate skillfully. He possessed a clear knowledge of a political activity in which money and influence can be the sure passport in order to achieve a power that escapes the control required by a truly democratic State, and which shows, in addition, the fragility of the Costa Rican political system. 2.2 SHEIK KADIR TAJUDEEN 2.2.1 Introduction: Mohamed Ali, known as Sheik Kadir Tajudeen and also known as Baltodano Guillen Tajudeen, was born in Bombay, India on January 29, 1944, and was arrested on November 8, 1988 by members of INTERPOL. Mr. Tajudeen had news of Costa Rica in 1970, when he met with Lic. Nestor Baltodano Guillen during a trip he made to the U.S. (Los Angeles); and influenced by the information that Lic. Nestor Baltodano Guillen, a person with whom he had close economic and family ties, provided to him, he came to Costa Rica the first time as a tourist in 1978, and decided to move to our country in 1982. (10) Mr. Tajudeen was accompanied by his family and very close friends, in a group of about 25 persons, and he acquired the status of resident of independent means residente/ rentista. Lic. Nestor Baltodano Guillen, through a decree of February 16, 1982, adopted Mr. Tajudeen, who as of that date and in virtue of this adopted the last names Baltodano Guillen (see file 34 83, Second Family Court of San Jose). In 1987, Baltodano Guillen Tajudeen began the naturalization process in the Options and Naturalization Section of the Civil Registry, a process that was halted upon the recommendation of that department (No. 1261-87 and 1260-87, Civil Registry). Mr. Tajudeen, according to the extradition decree, is attributed with the following actions: it becomes clearly established that the defendants got together in order to carry out hashish transportation operations, urging an entire infrastructure of companies in several countries, and that the apparent goal wag the packaging of tobacco leaves, companies in which they were directly or indirectly interested...That this perfectly organized network of tentacles of companies made it possible to hide the real addressee of the shipments, as well as the shipper who was behind the shipment, but also to make a rotation of the tobacco leaves aimed at hiding the hashish...That the elements constituting the crime have been proven (essential elements) in this case far beyond the criteria expressed in Jurisprudence (...) according to which the fact that an individual may maintain constant relations with others that are known or that have been sentenced for drug trafficking is sufficient for defining the culpable alliance." (see verdict of the Second Penal Court of San Jose of 2 p.m. January 9, 1989.) According to reports found in the translated documentation of the files of the extradition cage that is being held in the Costa Rican courts (pages 81 and 81 of the document translated by Thomas Burke Maegsen, official translator of the Ministry of Foreign Relations and Worship), Mohamed Ali (Mr. Tajudeen) was arrested in Zurich on November 4, 1981, accused of having used accounts in Switzerland for depositing illicit earnings from two large imports of cannabis into Canada and the U.S., actions taken in the first quarter of 1981. Released on bail on March 16, 1982, Mohamed Ali (Mr. Tajudeen) was sentenced by the Supreme Court of the Canton of Zurich on October 28, 1982, to four years in prison, in addition, prohibition from remaining in Swiss territory for 16 years and the confiscation of the sums that, being in his account, according to what had been determined came from trade of cannabis, reached the sum of $172,788. 2.2.2. Background l) He was arrested in Switzerland for actions supposedly related to bank transfers (11) 2) When he was arrested in Switzerland, when the authorities asked him about the origin of his money, he refuged to answer their question. On the basis of this he was expelled from Switzerland. (12) 3) In addition to other reasons for the adoption, it was reported, incorrectly, that foreigners could not own land in Costa Rica; therefore he thought that if he were adopted by a Costa Rican, such a problem would be resolved easily (13), so for this reason he was adopted by Lic. Nestor Baltodano Guillen. 4) When the extradition request was received from the French Government, the authorities arrested Tajudeen at the Juan Santamaria International Airport,since he was leaving for the U.S. (14) 5) Mr. Tajudeen always had himself accompanied by a group of persons that protected him zealously. These security measures were, as he once said,because of his fear of the vengeance that might come against him because of a sentimental matter. (15) 6) A large part of Tajudeen's fortune comes from the business of jewels,precious metals and foreign currency. Some of these activities were illegal in the countries where they were carried out. (16) 7) He dealt in the illegal foreign currency market in Costa Rica in an amount that exceeds a million dollars, approximately. (17) 8) The activities related to his shipping companies have only led to losses for him. Tajudeen himself stated that it had been predicted that his shipping companies would produce losses in the first years. Nor were there significant profits in the agricultural activities. (18) 9) The investments made by Tajudeen in Costa Rica reach some 12 million dollars approximately. (19) 10) The Yazdani group financed some of Tajudeen's companies, especially the shipping activities. The Grupo Agroindustrial Costarricense S.A. (Costa Rican Agroindustrial Group), a company tied to Tajudeen, issued mortgage securities to the banking companies of the Yazdanis. (20) 11) Some of the companies linked to Mr. Tajudeen are the following Inversiones Juno S.A., which is the most important; Grupo Agroindustrial Costarricense S.A.; Ruiselares SA.; Timarco; Juno SA. (automotive);Curridabat S.A. Shipping Line; Turrialba Shipping Line; Parismina Shipping Line; Chirripo Shipping Line; ATMOS Corporation. (21) 12) The legal representative of Mr. Tajudeen's companies, Lic. Nestor Baltodano Vargas, did not consider it prudent for the Commission to examine the accounts, transfers and deposits of Tajudeen's companies. (22) l) According to Mr. Tajudeen's statement before this Commission, he did not make any contributions to political parties, either inside or outside of the political campaign. (23) This statement is also backed by Lic. Baltodano Guillen. (24) 2) That for the celebration of the Nobel Prize awarded to the President of the Republic, Dr. Arias Sanchez, Tajudeen, at his own initiative, donated 50,000 colons, 90 that with that sum of money the orchestras for those celebrations could be financed. This donation was arranged through Mr. Dionisio Miranda. (25) l) Mr. Nestor Baltodano Guillen, Mr. Tajudeen's adoptive father, acquired bonds whose total amount was some million colons of the PUSC political debt for the PUSC 85-86 campaign. This purchase assured the payment of the politic debt. Lic. Baltodano Guillen calls this contribution a loan to the Party. 2) Lic. Nestor Baltodano Vargas filled a diplomatic post in Italy in 78-81, when the post of Foreign Minister was being filled by Lic. Rafael Angel Calderon, during the Presidency of Lic. Rodrigo Carazo Odio. (27) 3) When Lic. Rafael Angel Calderon F. and Lic. Carlos Monge Rodriguez were students, they shared expenses and office facilities in the law office of Lic. Baltodano, and they left it when they graduated. (28) 4) Lic. Nestor Baltodano Vargas witnessed the conversations related to the donation for the celebration of the Nobel Peace Prize and about which Mr. Dioniso Miranda had knowledge. (29) 5) Lic. Baltodano Vargas recalls that his father bought bonds in the amount of a million colons, from the PUSC campaign (85-86). Of this sum, 800,000 or 850,000 were returned to him, plus interest. This meant that he contributed 200,000 colons, approximately, in that campaign. In other campaigns, he had contributed 20,000 or 50,000 colons. (30) 2.2.3 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter: According to the facts set forth above, Mr. Tajudeen's presence and ties make it possible to state: That the activities that Sheik Kadir Tajudeen undertook in the years in which he resided outside of Costa Rica, according to the extradition sentence, show a dangerous and inappropriate tie with the international transshipment of drugs. Tajudeen himself admits that he was expelled from Switzerland, a fact that coincides with the sentence of the Swiss tribunals which is referred to in the files. Part of his fortune may have originated in illicit activities. He is a person who ca}ne to Costa Rica in order to evade the action of justice of another country, as shown by the fact that the French Government requested his extradition. 2.3 LIONEL JAMES CASEY BROTHERS 2.3.1 Introduction LIONEL JAMES CASEY BROTHERS was born in North Carolina, U.S., on May 4, 1930. Mr. Casey Brothers uses several dates of birth, according to the case, but this seems to be the most probable one. He arrived in our country in 1982 with intentions of locating here, and on September 14, 1982 he asked the Costa Rican Tourism Institute to grant him the status of resident of independent means based on law 4812. He also went before the Center for the Promotion of Exports and Investments (CENPRO) in order to obtain the status of resident of independent means, and, to that effect, CENPRO opened file No. 10483 in order to analyze that request. On September 28, 1982, he bought property No. 133820 of the District of San Jose from Mrs. Gladys Madrigal Mora de Lacayo in the amount of $30,000, according to the document issued before notary Lic. Carlos Alberto Paniagua Quiros. On October 25, 1982 he acquired the Certificate of Time Deposit No. 32280, in the amount of $30,000 to return 12% annual interest. This investment guaranteed him an income of $300 a month; he thus managed to meet one of the requirements established to acquire the status of resident of independent means. He also filed with the ICT two certificates of good conduct issued by the U.S. authorities. The first was issued by the Office of the Clerk the Supreme Court of the District of Pamlico, Bayboro, North Carolina, September 29, 1982, which included from December 2, 1968 until September 29, 1982. The second was issued by the Police Department of Virginia Beach on October 12, 1982. On November 3, 1982, the Costa Rican Tourism Institute granted Mr. Ca Brothers the status of resident of independent means. Later Mr. Casey Brothers requested, through CENPRO, that he be issued a Costa Rican passport on the basis of Law 4812, which was issued to him for a period of 10 years, under passport number 1362-175-7229-1300, since his resident card was 175-7229-1300, as can be seen in Mr. Casey Brothers' file, number 5279, of the ICT. It must be renewed each year, and has an expiration date of 1992. On the basis of the tax exemption to which his status as resident of independent means entitled him, he bought a Rural Toyota, Model 83, plates 118502. On November 1, 1982 before the Notary Public, Lic. Carlos Alberto Paniagua Quiros formed the company Sociedad Agricola Ganadera Tenorio de Guanacaste, S.A., of which Mr. Alvaro Baez Hernandez, a Colombian, was appointed President; vice president, Mrs. Marty Isbelia Castro Hernandez, Venezuelan, Casey's companion, who owns most of the stock; Secretary, Mrs. Lucia Penaloza Castro, Colombian and wife of Baez Hernandez; attorney, Mr. Abe Jack Kalfus, American; and manager with power of attorney, Mr. Casey Brothers In April 1983, Mr. Casey Brothers asked the National Radio Control Office to grant him authorization to install radio equipment that would transmit on 247.68 mz and would receive on 242.67 mz for the farms of the Sociedad Agricola Tenorio de Guanacaste S.A. The authorization would be for three radio bases, one in Tenorio, another in Altamira and another at the company offices, a repeater that would be located at the Rodrigo Paniagua post in Santa Elena de Guacimal de Puntarenas, and a mobile radio that would be installed in the Toyota mentioned above. On April 28, 1983, the National Radio Control Office authorized the installation of the equipment, and through an agreement of July 3, 1985, published in La Gaceta No. 181 of September 24, 1985, the frequencies requested were granted to him. Later, in July 1986, Mr. Casey Brothers asked for authorization to install radio equipment on the frequency of 6890 KHz, with bases in Altamira, Tenorio and the company offices. On July 18, 1986 the National Radio Control Office authorized his installation of that equipment. On July 29,1985 Mr. Casey Brothers asked the ICT Board of Directors to authorize the change in guarantee /security/ from a Costa Rican Bank, the Bank of Costa Rica, to the Continental Bank of Panama, S.A., in which he had an account, in order to invest the money in Costa Rica. It was impossible to evaluate in the ICT file if that request was accepted. The Trial Court of Canas decreed a warrant for the arrest of Mr. Casey Brothers for the presumed crime of Usurpation of Waters, where the State was the offended party, as well as another, but it canceled it on May 20, 1988. In addition, the Second Prosecutor's Agency of San Jose issued a summons against Mr. Casey for the presumed crime of Usurpation of Waters against Gaston Edmond Mauritius and another, but canceled it on June 2, 1988. Mr. Gaston Edmond Mauritius was a Belgian citizen who was murdered near the entrance to Upala. On October 10, 1988, officials of the Office of Narcotics and Intelligence of the Ministry of Government together with officials of the Judicial Investigative Office (OIJ) arrested Mr. Casey Brothers, since he was accused of being a fugitive from U.S. justice. According to the arrest warrant issued on January 23, 1986 by a District Court of Florida, Mr. Casey was accused of belonging to a criminal organization, according to the definition of the ~Rico" Law, being accused of the crime of possession with intent to distribute controlled substances and graft, in violation of Titles 18 and 21 of the U.S. Code. - As the unofficial translation of the extradition request filed by the U.S. authorities states, "James Lionel Casey is sought by the U.S. Government for the purchase, importation and sale of narcotics and other dangerous drugs, as well as for other federal offenses. The facts in the case indicate that Casey was associated with a corrupt and blackmailing organization that existed in Colombia, North Carolina and Florida, from July 1979 until April 11, 1983. As that translation specifies, Mr. Casey is the subject of an accusation in a District Court in Florida. During Mr. Casey Brothers' detention and as a result of the searches made of his house of residence, and his offices and in Tenorio, it was possible to seize, among other things, the following: a 12 calibre rifle, a rifle with a telescopic lens, a 30.06 rifle, a 38 calibre revolver, 5,000,000 colons in letters of exchange, US $27,000 in cash and various documents. Among the documentation the following were included: an Irish passport in the name of Philip Fosc, born March 5, 1929, Irish citizenship, issued on January 6, 1988 with a photo of Mr. Casey Brothers, as can be seen in the DEI file; a Panamanian driver's license issued in the name of Mr. Philip Fox of Irish citizenship, with Mr. Casey's photo (DEI file); a driver's license from the State of Florida, issued in the name of Jessie James Messick, with Mr. Casey's photo (FII file); as well as documentation in his true name. It should be noted that on December 19, 1988, Mr. Casey Brothers tried to flee from room 406 of the Llorente House in the Hospital San Juan de Dios, where he was under medical treatment, with the supposed assistance of Tulio Alberto Giraldo Castro, son of Mary Isbelia Castro Hernandez, Mr. Casey's companion. In addition to the information above, there is some personal information on Mr. Casey that should be noted, it being shown that: 2.3.2 Background l) He came to Costa Rica for the first time in 1974, and established his residence in our country, as a resident of independent means, beginning in 1982. (31) 2) He owned a small air company in the U.S. This company had commercial relations with LACSA. (32) 3) He has broad experience as a pilot and has a U.S. license for exercising that profession, although when he testified before this commission he tried to hide his knowledge or skill as an aircraft pilot. (33) 4) He owned no stock in the companies which owned the farms that he administered. (34) 5) He said that he did not know the details on the acquisition of the farms, nor the agents and intermediaries. (35) 6) One of the farms acquired by Casey--although he may not appear as the owner or purchaser formally-was the Altamira Hacienda, which was sold by Alberto Gonzalez Figub (owner of 50% of the property). Also the Trujillos, among them Gabriel Orlando Trujillo Restrepo, of Colombian citizenship, sold Casey what they had in the Hacienda Altamira (36) 7) He would receive money from abroad and did not receive a salary for the farms that he administered. For those services he was only paid expenses. 8) His income could have come from securities that he said he had in the U.S. (38) 9) He emphatically refused any authorization to examine the income statements of the companies that he administered, saying that he could "lose his job." 10) He received a loan from the Bank of Costa Rica in the total amount of five million colons, with a one-year grace period, at a recent date having a total of one million seven hundred forty five thousand colons, approximately. Mr. Casey's companion, Mary Castro, also obtained with that bank institution a loan in the total amount of five million colons, without that debt having been amortized so far, for which initially a one-year grace period was granted, and later it was extended for sis more months. (40) 11) In the Bank of Costa Rica there is a current account in the name of Ganadera Los Tijos S.A. (No. 82-796-7) for which Mr. Lionel Casey was authorized to sign; his appointment as manager of that company was not found registered, but in spite of that irregularity, Mr. Rodolfo Ulloa Antillon, Manager of the Bank of Costa Rica, authorized the current account agreement. It should be mentioned that in the Public Registry the document of the date of registration of Ganadera Los Tijos does not appear. Nor could the application for opening the current account be found (confidential information in the hands of the Commission). 12) At the farms that he administered he had several employees of Colombian nationality. He claims that he had to hire these persons, since he said he had not found people with enough experience and preparation to carry out the tasks demanded by the agricultural enterprises that he was administering. 13) One of the Colombian employees that he hired had recently come to the country, having resided in Panama the last 15 years. Through this person, they managed the hiring of another individual of Colombian nationality. Concerning his political ties, direct or indirect, it is shown that: a) Some relationship existed between Mr. Casey and Lic. Daniel Oduber, who, because the first gave the second 8 contribution for the 85-86 political campaigns issued 8 receipt in which one reads, among other things: From Daniel Oduber for James Casey, matter: contribution. I received the sum of a million colons as his contribution to our cause. Thank you. Daniel Oduber, January 29~ 1988.~ (43) Casey states that Lic. Oduber did not ask him for the contribution, but rather that it was solicited by a person that he could not identify. Such economic collaboration was requested three days before the elections, and he was informed that it would be used for gasoline and transportation of voters. (44) - In handing over the money to Lic. Oduber, Casey asked him for a receipt ant upon receiving it felt great satisfaction since, as Mr. Casey himself stated to this Commission, it was an interesting document to keep. (45) c - When he handed over such a contribution to the political campaign, they did not ask for any assistance but "...they hoped that it would not cause any damage...," according to what Casey stated before this Commission. (46) Also the contribution was aimed at strengthening his relations with the community, thus fostering a good atmosphere for his public relations. On this point, Mr. Casey said in his statement that "...it would be advantageous, but we do not request any specific favor. I have never met the gentleman that was elected and I have never asked him for any favor whatsoever. I don't even know his name..." (47) d - According to what Mr. Mary Castro Hernandez, Casey's companion, said, she called Lic. Oduber from Panama when Mr. Cagey was arrested. Lic. Oduber's private number was provided to her by Mr. Antonio Pereira Sevilla. Mrs. Castro Hernandez stated that although she was not a friend of Daniel Oduber, it seemed to her that he was the most important person that could help her at that moment. (48) e - Because of a conflict that had arisen over the use of some sources of water on the Tenorio Farm, between Mr. Rodrigo Cubero and Casey, Lic. Daniel Oduber called Victor Mesen Salazar, Rural Assistance Guard assigned to Canas, in order to arrange a meeting between Cubero and Casey 90 that the problem would be resolved. In the statement provided by Lic. Daniel Oduber to this Commission, he admits that it is probable that he made that call, although he does not remember the act exactly. (49) Casey had a permit to operate a landing strip in Altamira. Both in Altamira and in Tenorio there were strips in good operating condition. On this aspect, Casey stated that because of the problem of weapons in the northern zone, he ordered the closing of the landing strips that existed on the farms that he administered. However, the Commission has verified that the obstacles that he put on the runways could be removed and set up with relative facility (report on Casey's airstrips in the possession of the Commission). 15) On one occasion, one of the strips on his farm was used for activities of the Nicaraguan Counterrevolution. This event could have occurred in 1984 or 1985. According to what Casey said, in this case the airstrip was used without his permission. (51) 16) He had a good radio communications system on the farms and at his house. For the radio communications equipment he requested the corresponding frequencies from the competent authorities. In this aspect he had the collaboration of Antonio Pereirs Sevills. According to what he told the Commission, he needed the radio equipment in order to be able to satisfactorily resolve the emergencies that arise when a worker suffers an accident, since there is no phone line in Altamira. (52) 17) He owned a small yacht with which he could make trip on the Costa Rican Pacific Coast, especially to Playas de Flamingo (Guanacaste). (53) 18) In one of the rooms of Casey's house, which was not used by any of the members of his family, some air navigation charts appeared on some regions of Colombia, among them La Guajira On these charts are indicated the sites at which some airports are located. On this point, Casey stated that he was unaware of the existence of those maps, also refusing to answer other questions, since his responses could prejudice him in the trial underway against him in the U.S. (54) 2.3.3 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter: The facts that have been stated above about the presence and ties of Mr. Casey make it possible to point out certain considerations and specify some of the actions described as follows: 2.3.3.1 - Mr. Casey owned farms with runways that allowed the landing of regular-sized aircraft. (55) 2.3.3.2 - He had radio equipment that allowed him easy communication with the aircraft. (56) 3.3.3 - At his house he had air navigation charts of Colombia, on which some points related to landing strips are market. 2.3.3.4 - According to confidential reports of the police authorities, pilots who would pass through Costa Rica used to stay at Mr. Casey's house. 2.3.3.5 - When Mr. Casey was captured, an important sum of dollars in cash ($27,000) was fount in his possession. 2.3.3.6 - At the time of Casey's detention, in his possession was found a forged Panamanian license and a photo, on which false information appears. 2.3.3.7. - All the events and circumstances pointed out above make it possible to deduce that Mr. James Casey had an appropriate infrastructure in Costa Rica for undertaking activities related to the international transshipment of drugs. It should be noted as part of this deduction that Mr. Casey's economic activities were not especially lucrative, this circumstance in keeping with a characteristic of the drug trafficker, which is that generally the legitimate enterprises operate only as an instrument for covering up the illicit activities. 2.3.3.8. - Mr. Casey tried to gain political influence by using different means and persons, a procedure that becomes very clear in the contribution that he handed over to Lic. Daniel Oduber Quiros. Mr. Casey's penetration of the political system is also seen clearly in the fact that he got himself invited to some of the social activities that took place during the inaugural activities for Mr. President Oscar Arias Sanchez. All these social activities were not irrelevant for Mr. Casey, and he even came to have at his house of residence the photos of former Presidents Monge Alvarez, Oduber Quiros and Figueres Ferrer. 2.3.3.9 - The valuable ties that Mr. Casey Brothers managed to establish allowed him to have easy access to important banking officials, as occurs with Lic. Rodolfo Ulloa Antillon, General Manager of the Bank of Costa Rica. 2.3.3.10 - The contribution that former President Oduber received from Mr. Casey is a fully proven fact. This action shows that Casey tried to gain political influence through Lic. Oduber Quiros, achieving that goal, at least partially, as has been abundantly indicated. 2.4 RICARDO ALEM LEON 2.4.1 Introduction. One of the situations that has required a lot of the Commission's time is the one referring to the presumed crime of foreign money laundering, which became evident when US $750,000 was seized at the Juan Santamaria International Airport. It was brought into the country by citizen Mario Valverde Zamora, and through a series of circumstances, this action has been attributed to the activities that citizen Ricardo Alem Leon has been able to carry out in that area. Since it is a case being tried in the Tribunals of Justice, the work of the Commission has been carried out within the strict framework of our competence, since there is no effort to interfere with the duties of the Judiciary. An effort is also being made to avoid the possibility of one being able to think that in the area of political control there is some interest that is trying to influence or compromise the courts. Therefore, the inquiries and work performed by the Commission in this matter have occurred through channels removed from those within the jurisdiction of the courts; information of a banking nature has been used, without the corresponding legal structure being violated; also a large number of witnesses have been summoned, as will be seen further on. 2.4.2 Background 2.4.2.1 Through the reports that the Commission has received, it has been possible to establish Mr. Alem Leon direct ties with the following persons: l) Luis Alberto Cortes Chaves, former Chief of Security and Oversight ant of Freight Inspectors at the Juan Santamaria Airport (Ministry of the Treasury), has on several occasions visited Ricardo Alem Leon at the Heredia Admissions Unit (note of Jose J. Quesada Zuniga April 14, 1989); and on the basis of the facts that led to the arrest of Mario Valverde Zamora at Juan Santamaria Airport, he was dismissed as a State official. 2) Juan Carlos Campos Barrantes, former official of the Ministry of Public Security. At the time of his removal he was the Chief of the Immediate Action Unit. He had very good preparation as a police official. His dismissal carne about from the loss of trust that his officious intervention caused, because of the arrest of Mario Valverde Zamora. After his dismissal he was put in charge of security of Mr. Ricardo Alem Leon's family. Tobias Chacon Ramirez. He was vice president of the Tempisque Ferry Boat (1983-1986). After that he was the Consul of Costa Rica in San Diego, California (1987-1989). He has 33 recorded trips abroad in 85-86. The reason for these trips could not be established with exactness by Mr. Chacon Ramirez, when he testified before the Commission. (57) 2.4.2.2 Political Background l) He entered as a leader of the National Liberation Party in 1983, when Tobias Chacon introduced him to the pre-candidate Dr. Oscar Arias Sanchez, without being given any position in the party that year. (58) 2) He was the Chief of External Relations /?/ at the national level in the last political campaign of Dr. Oscar Arias Sanchez. (59) 3) According to what he testified before this Commission, Alem Leon donated approximately three million colons to the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign (8485). (60) About this aspect one should add that Alem Leon stated to the Sixth Fiscal Agency of San Jose (document of May 4,1989), that he handed over important sums of money to the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign. Those sums of money were later repaid to him, but if such an advance had not been made, "the Party would never have been able to take part in an electoral contest of such magnitude...," according to Alem Leon in the judicial office mentioned (see document submitted on May 4, 1989 before the Sixth Fiscal Agency of San Jose, investigation of the political debt of the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign). 4) In 1985, through the Aguila Dorada Travel Agency, Ricardo Alem Leon financed the airline tickets for a trip to Mexico made by Leonel Villalobos Salazar and Tobias Chacon, who had been invited by the Institutional Revolutionary Party. (61) 5) At the beginning of the Arias Sanchez Administration, Ricardo Alem Leon aspired for an important government post, such as the Ministry of Public Works, the Executive Presidency of ICT, showing great interest in the latter; however, for various reasons, he was placed in the Central American Bank for Economic Integration. (CABEI) According to what Ricardo Alem stated to the Commission, at no time did he request that post. (62) 6) Ricardo Alem Leon was Costa Rica's representative to the CABEI from January 1987 to March 1988. (63) 7) The day of Mario Valverde Zamora's arrest (June 25, 1988 at Juan Santamaria Airport), a few minutes before the arrival of the plane carrying Valverde Zamora, Alberto Cortes had asked Nolan Campos Quiros, Customs Inspector at the Juan Santamana Airport, if he could give preferential treatment to a passenger coming in on that flight. Nolan Campos did not agree to that suggestion, so that when he decided to send the boxes that Valverde Zamora was bringing to Customs of Las Canas, Cortes Chaves expressed to him his annoyance and disagreement with the decision. (64) Shortly after the facts narrated above occurred, Cortes Chaves went to where Alem Leon was, who at that time was in the Juan Santamaria air terminal, and he told him that there was a problem in Customs with a passenger who was bringing propaganda for the National Liberation Party, without a doubt referring to don Mario Valverde. (65) It should be added at this point, that according to what Alem Leon stated to this Commission, he knew Valverde Zamora because he had been an employee of Tobias Chacon and also because he had rendered him various services in relation to the payment of the registration fees for some of his vehicles. (66) 9) With respect to the fact related in the previous paragraph, the possibility exists that Ricardo Alem Leon called Cortes Chaves before Valverde Zamora arrived, in order that he appear at the right time at the airport 90 that Valverde Zamora's luggage would pass through Customs without any problems (secret session of the Commission). 10) On the basis of Mario Valverde's arrest (June 25, 1988) at Juan Santamaria Airport, Juan Carlos Campos appeared before the police authorities on three occasions to inquire or gather information on Valverde's detention, without having any official relationship with the case. (67) Also at that time he telephoned the authorities to gather some information on the same case. (68) This behavior of Campos was what led to his dismissal as an official in the Ministry of Public Security. (69) 11) During the arraignment proceedings in the criminal case underway against Valverde and Alem, Cortes Chaves has implicated Nolan Campos through statements that he has gi en before the judicial authorities who are hearing the facts. (70) 12) Mr. Tobias Chacon did not answer the questions referring to his relations with Mr. Ricardo Alem Leon because he felt that those questions had a close relationship with the criminal case underway against Alem Leon. (71) 13) Ricardo Alem Leon on various occasions has sold supporters of Rolando Araya Monge property aimed at the political promotion of the latter. These acquisitions began after the middle of 1987. (72) Inspectors at the Juan Santamaria Airport (Ministry of the Treasury), has on several occasions visited Ricardo Alem Leon at the Heredia Admissions Unit (note of Jose J. Quesada Zuniga, April 14, 1989); and on the basis of the facts that led to the arrest of Mario Valverde Zamora at Juan Santamana Airport, he was dismissed as a State official. 2) Juan Carlos Campos Barrantes, former official of the Ministry of Public Security. At the time of his removal he was the Chief of the Immediate Action Unit. He had very good preparation as a police official. His dismissal came about from the loss of trust that his officious intervention caused, because of the arrest of Mario Valverde Zamora. After his dismissal he was put in charge of security of Mr. Ricardo Alem Leon's family. 3) Tobias Chacon Ramirez. He was vice president of the Tempisque Ferry Boat (19831986). After that he was the Consul of Costa Rica in San Diego, California (1987-1989). He has 33 recorded trips abroad in 85-86. The reason for these trips could not be established with exactness by Mr. Chacon Ramirez, when he testified before the Commission. (57) 2.4.2.2 Political background l) He entered as a leader of the National Liberation Party in 1983, when Tobias Chacon introduced him to the pre-candidate Dr. Oscar Arias Sanchez, without being given any position in the party that year. (58) He was the Chief of External Relations 1?/ at the national level in the last political campaign of Dr. Oscar Arias Sanchez. (59) 3) According to what he testified before this Commission, Alem Leon donated approximately three million colons to the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign (8485). (60) About this aspect one should add that Alem Leon stated to the Sixth Fiscal Agency of San Jose (document of May 4,1989), that he handed over important sums of money to the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign. Those sums of money were later repaid to him, but if such an advance had not been made, "the Party would never have been able to take part in an electoral contest of such magnitude...," according to Alem Leon in the judicial office mentioned (see document submitted on May 4, 1989 before the Sixth Fiscal Agency of San Jose, investigation of the political debt of the National Liberation Party in the last political campaign). 4) In 1985, through the Aguila Dorada Travel Agency, Ricardo Alem Leon financed the airline tickets for a trip to Mexico made by Leonel Villalobos Salazar and Tobias Chacon, who had been invited by the Institutional Revolutionary Party. (61) 5) At the beginning of the Arias Sanchez Administration, Ricardo Alem Leon aspired for an important government post, such as the Ministry of Public Works, the Executive Presidency of ICT, showing great interest in the latter; however, for various reasons, he was placed in the Central American Bank for Economic Integration. (CABEI) According 14) In mid-1986, when Juan Carlos Campos was an official of the Ministry of Public Security, he invited Ricardo Alem to visit the facilities of the Metropolitan Police, in order to promote donations by him to the Ministry of Public Security. (73) On the basis of this visit, Ricardo Alem donated 25,000 colons, approximately, for the construction of a dormitory at the Metropolitan Police. That donation was received by Juan Carlos Campos. (74) In addition, Alem Leon facilitated the use of a vehicle for the Immediate Action Unit, under Juan Carlos Campos Barrantes. At the same time, Mr. Santiago Leinton, employee of Alem Leon, made available land for the training of dogs needed by the Ministry of Security. (75) 15) Mr. Ricardo Alem paid the rental of a microcomputer that was used for several months at the Central Regional Office of Poas (Rural Assistance Guard)--located in Aurora de Heredia. The rental was for an approximate amount of 140,000 colons (report No. 182 signed by Silberth Soto, General Director of Supervision of Authorities). This donation allowed Mr. Alem Leon to be given a Rural Assistance Guard carnet, issued by Mr. Antonio Espinoza, General Director of that group at that time. 16) The good relations that Ricardo Alem Leon maintained with the Ministry of Public Security allowed him to obtain two documents that identified him as- an authority or as a collaborator of that institution. In this aspect it should be noted that the Deputy Minister of Public Security, Mr. Rogelio Castro Pinto, issued a carnet in the name of Alem Leon, in which he was accredited as an authority of that Ministry. (76) Ricardo Alem, Santiago Leiton, and Felipe Cantillano, the latter two employees of the first, had documents that allowed them to enter restricted areas of the Juan Santamaria Airport. Those documents were issued by the Civil Aviation authorities, due to the position occupied by Ricardo Alem in the CABEI. (77) 2.4.2.3 Commercial and financial background l) Ricardo Alem operated with the following companies: Importaciones Alsa, S.A.; Alefon S.A.; Distribuidora Alem S.A.; Plasticos Alem S.A.; Inversiones Chiri S.A.; Kasirina S.A.; El Buen Tono S.A.; Grupo Alem; Condominio Rical S.A.; Maquinaris Real S.A.; Inmobiliaria Alem; Propiedades San Pablo S.A.; Quinta Michelle S.A. The National Bank of Costa Rica, in light of the huge transactions in dollars that Ricardo Alem was making, closed his current account in foreign currency in that banking institution. (78) 3) In the Bank of Costa Rica, Ricardo Alem also had current accounts in foreign currency. In this banking institution, in spite of the controversy that arose over his transactions in dollars, the current account contracts were kept in effect. (78) 4) According to Alem Leon's testimony before this Commission, it was a known fact that he, during the time that he occupied the position in the CABEI, was devoted to the illicit sale and purchase of dollars. (80) The Commission obtained information in banking sources, according to which the companies owned by Mr. Ricardo Alem, e.g., the companies that according to the Public Registry have Mr. Alem or persons very close to him listed as the principal partner, carried out an international movement of foreign currency between 1984 and 1988 in such high volume that they led to the concern of officials of the National Bank of Costa Rica, who put the matter in the hands of the President of the Republic. 6) President Arias asked Mr. Alem to resign the position of representative of our country in the CEBEI under the following circumstances: In November 1987, on the basis of the reports that President Arias Sanchez had received on the important amounts of dollars that Mr. Alem Leon had deposited, the latter explained to the President-of the- Republic and to his brother, Lic. Rodrigo Arias S., Minister of the Presidency, the way that he operated in the illicit foreign currency market. (81) In view of these reports, Dr. Oscar Arias Sanchez asked Ricardo Alem for his separation from the CABEI. The latter acted on the suggestion and submitted his resignation the same day, in the afternoon, to the President of the Republic. Mr. Alem Leon's definitive separation from the CABEI took place in March 1988. (82) 7) It is important to remember that when President Arias received the reports of the National Bank and brought up the matter with don Ricardo, the latter answered that he was not trying to launder money through his foreign currency operations, since he was devoted to the business of purchase and sale of dollars, and that everything that the bankers had observed corresponded to that commercial action which, just like him, other persons and commercial firms carry out, although it may not be a business appearing within Costa Rican legislation. 8) Mr. Alem supposedly had been acquiring dollars at retail, buying bills on the black market coming basically from tourism and hotels, as he told the Commission, as well as from other sources in the black market, and later he would sell them to other persons who would pay for them in colons. Mr. Alem's companies involved in this activity are the following Maquinaria Real S.A. Inversiones El Buen Tono Imnobiliaria Alem Condominio Rical S.A. Inversiones Chiri S.A. Distribuidora Alem Propiedades San Pablo S.A. Importaciones Alsa S.A. Quinta Michelle S.A. 9) The Commission asked Mr. Alem if he would be willing to show his accounting books and records of checks and deposits in order to verify the accounts that had been affected by his movement of foreign currency, but he said it would be of no use whatsoever because he always carried out his transactions in cash. He was also asked if to verify his operations he could submit to the Commission copies of income tax statements filed with Direct Taxation, to which he answered that those transactions had not been registered in the accounting books of his companies. 10) The Commission considered it proven that in the period from October 1985 to December 1987 some of Mr. Alem's companies (Propiedades San Pablo S.A., Quinta Michelle S.A. and Importaciones Alsa S.A.) deposited in U.S. bills and in current accounts of such firms in the National Bank of Costa Rica, altogether, more than 12 million U.S.; also some of those companies acquired bank drafts against foreign banks, paid with cash in dollars delivered to the National Bank, in the amount of 3.5 million U.S. in the same period. 11) In the same way, the companies Condominios Rical S.A., Inversiones Chiri S.A., Inversiones El Buen Tono S.A., and Finca Michelle S.A. deposited, from 1984 to 1987, in their accounts of dollars in the Bank of Costa Rica, a total of more than 14 million U.S. in cash; on the other hand, they also bought from the Bank of Costa Rica bank drafts payable in foreign banks, through direct purchases with U.S. bills in the amount of more than 3 million dollars. In short, the transactions thus described from 1984 to 1987 totalled U.S. $32,551,519 (see attached report of the Banks). 12) The banks cited in 2.4.3 (see below) accredited the sums remitted in that way to the current accounts that the same commercial firms of the Group operated, at times directly and at times in cross operations, from one company to another (see Condominios Rical to Distribuidora Alem, from Quinta Michelle to Inmobiliaria Alem or vice-versa). 13) In all of that movement are also some persons in whose name drafts for large amounts were issued, and who on the other hand had current accounts in the banks to which the money was sent abroad; those persons are Patricia Vega, Jose Antonio Alem Leon, Jose Maria Madriz Castro and Felipe Cantillano, all tied to Ricardo Alem through businesses or labor relations. .4.3. In Relation to the Essence of the Matter l) If it was true that the financial movement of Mr. Alem's company was made in cash, then it would have occurred that after depositing that money in those account, disbursements would have had to have been made through drafts or checks against those accounts in the name of the persons that acquired U.S. currency against the payment in colons, funds that could later serve the Alem Group for acquiring more dollars. But it was not 90; actually, after depositing the dollars in the current accounts mentioned in the National Bank and the Bank of Costa Rica, the firms that we have cited would transfer them abroad, issuing checks against their totals in dollars and completing them with dollars in cash (the purchases of drafts already mentioned in this section and in the above), in order to make transfers abroad, mainly to the following banks: Banco Cafetero-Panama. Banco Ganadero-Panama Algemene Nederlsnd N.V.-Panama First National Bank of South-Miami Banco del Istmo - Panama Banco Internacional de Costa Rica SA. - Panama Laredo National Bank - Texas Deutsche Sudamerikanische Bank - Panama Banco de Iberosmerica - Panama Banco de Occidente - Panama Citizens and Southern International Bank Republic National Bsnk - Miami Southeast Bank N A. Sun Bsnk Florida 2) Again the Commission believes that if the business had been as he presented it, it would have been logical that later it would have been necessary to draw checks against those bank accounts to sell them to customer_q who would pay for them in colons; however, when we asked don Ricardo for the proof of that movement, for which he could show the check books or copies of the checks he had written, he refused to do so. 3) All the above leads to presuming that the money remitted to foreign banks that we have referred to did not return to the country. Logically it would have been in don Ricardo's interest to show the Commission the complete truth of his operations, in order to clear up the suspicion already present in the area of dealings for some time, before he was warned by the directors of the National Bank. This was accentuated when Mr. Alem was forced to resign from the CABEI as the representative of Costa Rica, and the suspicion took on more strength when the apparent ties of Mario Valverde arose the day that this man tried to bring the US $750,000 into the country from abroad, at the moment in which Mr. Alem was also arriving at the Santamaria Airport and the other events that are of public knowledge took place. 4) Mr. Ricardo Alem Leon, before the 85-86 political campaign, never occupied a politically significant position. It was after the last electoral contest that he became a well-known political figure, assuming a relevant position as the party's chief of foreign relations. Mr. Alem's generosity with his party, to which he says he donated at least 3 million colons, allowed him to become an important figure in his political party, even though he really had no background in this field, as usually required. 5) It cannot be doubted that political parties are particular sensitive and vulnerable to the generosity of some persons, Mr. Ricardo Alem being a good example in this aspect, because the money allowed him to easily offset the lack of a political career. The generous contributions and the custom of not asking about their origins have been factors that have favored a political phenomenon such as Ricardo Alem, whose meteoric political rise hag come about basically through economic power. This fact can be particularly dangerous in the case being analyzed, because serious judicial questioning exists on the origin of Mr. Alem Leon's fortune, which in any ase is criminal, since he himself admitted to this Commission that he was dedicated to the illicit trafficking of foreign currency. 6) Just with participating generously in a campaign, Mr. Ricardo Alem managed ta be offered a very important position in the current government, and he finally got himself assigned as representative of Costa Rica to the CABEI. The anonymous power of money became a dangerous and questionable procedure for achieving the political power that he boasted of until a recent date. 7) The donations also allowed Mr. Alem to obtain influence in the.Ministry of Public Security and in the Rural Assistance Guard (GAR), as is deduced from the following i He was issued a carnet as a GAR financial advisor, with the rank of 1st Commissioner. ii The Ministry of Public Security issued him a carnet that accredited him as a police authority. 8) In addition to the documents mentioned above, Mr. Alem and some of his employees had others that allowed them to enter restricted access zones at the Juan Santamaria Airport. These documents were issued to Alem Leon in his capacity as representative of Costa Rica to the CABEI. 9) Mr. Alem's influence becomes very clear in the ties that he had with some public officials, such as occurs with Luis Alberto Cortes Chaves and Juan Carlos Campos. In the first case, Mr. Cortes received a call from Mr. Ricardo Alem, to show up at the Juan Santamaria Airport the day that Mario Valverde was entering the country with thousands of dollars in his luggage, to offer his collaboration to a person bringing merchandise with political propaganda aimed at Rolando Araya political group. Mr. Cortes Chaves agreed to carry out the errand asked of him by Mr. Alem, showing up at the airport, even though it was not a work day for him. The collaboration that Mr. Cortes Chaves could provide in this case was not irrelevant, since he was the Chief of the Control and Security Section of Juan Santamaria Airport. The close tie between Cortes Chaves and Alem Leon also becomes evident in the aggressive attitude the first has had with one of the witnesses figuring in the legal case underway against Alem Leon in the Tribunals of Alajuela 10) With respect to Juan Carlos Campos, former Chief of the Immediate Action Unit of the Public Security Ministry, Mr. Alem Leon's influence is also evident, not just from the fact that he is currently providing valuable services to him in the area of security, but also because during the weekend that Mr. Mario Valverde was being detained, Juan Carlos Campos was the public official who inexplicably and officiously showed up on three occasions before Mr. Rodolfo Jimenez, the authority in charge of investigating and interrogating Mario Valverde, to ask for information or reports on Valverde's detention. This inexplicable meddlesome behavior of Mr. Campos is only explained by the influence that was exercised over him by Alem Leon, since on the three occasions that he appeared before investigator Rodolfo Jimenez, he did 90 in the company >of Mr. Santiago Leiton, an employee of Ricardo Alem. 11) Ricardo Alem's generosity was not limited just to the National Liberation Party, but also benefitted some persons tied to that group, as occurs with Mr. Tobias Chacon and Deputy Leonel Villalobos Salazar, to whom he gave airline tickets to Mexico. 12) This Commission has analyzed Ricardo Alem's claims about his businesses with dollars in cash, that according to him showed the movement that alarmed the banks, in light of a reality that we have been able to verify through information obtained in the commercial and stock market sector of our country. In the first place, the movement in dollars (bills) within the market is not of such a magnitude that it can make up for the sums that Mr. Alem was depositing in the National Bank and Bank of Costa Rica, since the Commission has proved that most of the payments that tourism makes to the hotels is done with credit cards and "vouchers" from the travel agencies of other countries that the hotels receive and that are subsequently paid through other means that are not cash, as well as travelers' checks. In fact, the dollars in the market coming from tourism do not amount to such high sums as those that Mr. Alem deposited, and other sources of entry of foreign money in bills are not known enough to justify the high sums that were taken by the banks to be deposited in account of Mr. Alem's companies, or in order to purchase drafts that are then transferred to account of such firms in banks abroad, as we have said. 13) Nor was it evident in the free foreign currency market of Costa Rica that Mr. Alem had a movement in colons in cash as heavy as to be paying in that way for the dollars that he was buying in bills, according to what he claimed. Everything seems to indicate that there was an extraordinary source of income that was not of the normal course of domestic businesses and that therefore dollars were brought into the country in bills, which began a route that continued to the accounts of the Alem group company account in our banks, to then leave in drafts to accounts of the same group, not exactly in every case the same companies, which remitted them, as has been explained, to banks abroad. As long as Mr. Alem does not show to whom he later sold the dollars deposited in the Panamanian banks and in some of the U.S., though showing his accounting receipts, there is a very clear presumption that those dollars left there for other beneficiary, a claim that could be rectified if Mr. Alem showed the "checkbooks" of his accounts in the foreign banks in order to be able to verify what he told the commission, and which has left very serious doubts with its members. One does not want to issue a final opinion about a matter that is pending with the Tribunals with Justice, but we are in a position of stating that as long as the tribunals do not establish the exact verification that Mr. Alem was operating in the foreign currency business, as he explained, and as long as it is not clearly determined whom he was buying the dollars from, hotels or other persons, the indications are very clear and concordant in the sense that it is very probable that the money that entered in bills into the account of the Alem group was of illegal origins, and the destination given it after being remitted to other banks abroad was also illegal (this connotation of illegal should refer expressly to drug trafficking). About this aspect Mr. Alem Leon refused to supply the documentary evidence that would back his claims, by showing the vouchers or evidence of checks and deposits in all his accounts, both that the Costa Rican banks maintain as well as those they maintained in banks abroad /sic/. This attitude of Mr. Alem, although it is legitimate, leaves in effect the conclusions that are deduced from the reasoning of probability recently explained. 3. GENERAL OFFICE OF CIVIL AVIATION 3.1 Introduction This Commission, aware of what aviation represents to drug trafficking, and fully convinced of the need to establish strict controls that obstruct or, at least, make difficult the transshipment of illicit drugs, has considered it its duty to become familiar with the irregularities and anomalies which have been permeating Costa Rican civil aviation in recent years. From this perspective, it has focused its attention on a concrete fact: the case of Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur. 3 Background l) Before the Trial Court of Santa Cruz of Guanacaste, and under file number 1095-87, the case against Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur is underway for the supposed crime of international cocaine trafficking to the detriment of public health, with the degree of participation as an accomplice (Civil Aviation file pp. 252-253). 2) Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur is one of the three agents of the National Helicopter Service SRL, named according to its statutes. He is a minority stockholder in that company and owns eight shares out of a total of 80 which form the capital. He is one of the two agents of Taxi Aereo Centroamericano S.A. and a partner with five shares out of 50 in the capital stock He is the agent of Taxi Aereo SA. (Civil Aviation File, pp. 354 and 368). 3) On November 28, 1988, a group of pilots, among them Rafael Oreamuno Brenes, George Stewart, Ovidio Segura and others, submitted a document to the General Director of Civil Aviation, Carlos Viquez Jara, in which they asked that a total and exhaustive investigation be ordered of the activity undertaken by all the aviation companies in which Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur has juridical representation as a general agent. The above since Guerra Laspiur is considered a direct participant in the execrable business of drug trafficking..." (Civil Aviation file, pp. 254-256). 4) In that letter also the pilots suggest the possibility that for the realization of their acts contrary to morality and the legal order, Mr. Guerra Laspiur acted through his companies, with the nature of general agent." (Civil Aviation File, pp. 254256.) 5) On December 2, 1988, the Civil Aviation Technical Council, through its assistant secretary Jimenez Chinchilla, made known to Lic. Javier Vargas Barguil, Chief of the Departments of Legal Assessment and Aeronautic Register, the agreement of the Technical Council made in session 70-88 dated November 29, 1988 which in its article 8 states: that in view of the seriousness of the facts denounced, the document submitted by the pilots be transferred to the Legal Counsel's Office of the General Office of Civil Aviation so that it would be evaluated and recommendations given on the actions to follow from the aeronautical point of view and so that a copy of the document signed by the pilots for the investigation of the areas of their competence would be forwarded to the competent authorities, such as the Ministry of Government and Public Security (Civil Aviation File, p. 258). On the same date, December 2, 1988, Lic. Vargas Barguil forwarded a copy of the above agreement of the Technical Council to the Ministries of Government and Public Security (Civil Aviation File, pp. 259 and 260). 7) On December 6, 1988, the Minister of Government, Lic. Antonio Alvarez Desanti, sent a letter to Lic. Vargas Barguil in which he thanked him for the information supplied and said that he had forwarded that information to the Office of Investigations, Narcotics and Intelligence (DIEI) so that they would conduct an investigation (Civil Aviation File, p. 8) On December 16, 1988, the Director of Legal Affairs of the Ministry of Public Security, Lic. Ronald Arce Umana, in a letter addressed to the Minister of Public Security, don Hernan Garron, recommended that, given the connotations of the possible crime for which Guerra Laspiur is being prosecuted, it would be in the competence of the Ministry to oversee the aight in which said person participates by himself or through a company or person interposed through the General Office of Narcotics..." (Civil Aviation file, p. 266). 9) On December 20, 1988, the Civil Aviation Technical Council, through agreement No. 51, resolved to issue to the company Aviones Taxi Aereo S.A. the renewal of the certificate of operation for the provision of national and international transportation services under the modality of special flights, for a term of five years (Gaceta No. 15, Friday, January 20, 1989, p. 15). 10) To date that renewal agreement of the Technical Council has not been ratified by the Executive Branch (according to reports in the possession of the Commission). 11) Said Certificate of operation was originally issued through session No. 463 held on June 23, 1972, ratified through Executive Branch Resolution No. 244 of October 13, 1972 of the then Civil Aviation Board, and issued for operating for a term of 10 years (Gaceta No. 15, Friday, January 20, 1989, p. 15). 12) Through an official document of April 6, 1982, the company Aviones Taxi Aereo S.A. requested, at the proper time and in the proper manner, the renewal of the Certificate of Operation (Gaceta No. 15, Friday, January 20, 1989, p. 15). 13) Through an announcement published in "LQ Gaceta" number 202 of October 7, 1987, the public hearing referred to in Art. 141 of the General Law on Civil Aviation was convened, which was held on November 13, 1987 (Gaceta No. 15, January 20, 1989, p. 15). 14) From the date of expiration of the certificate of operation until the time of its renewal, the company Aviones Taxi Aereo SA. continued operating on the basis of temporary permits issued by the Civil Aviation Technical Council, the last one being issued according to Art. 14 of session No. 65- 88, held on October 20, 1988 (Gaceta No. 15, January 20, 15) On December 23, 1988, the Minister of Public Security, don Hernan Garron, sent Lic. Vargas Barguil a copy of Lic. Arce Umana's letter, in which the latter recommends the surveillance of the flights (Civil Aviation File, p. 272). 16) On January 9, 1989, pilots Cecil Murray, Rafael Oreamuno, Oidio Segura and George Stewart submitted a document to the Civil Aviation Technical Council through which the cancellation of the certificates of operation was requested for the companies in which Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur figures as the agent, as well as the denial of any extension of time for the operation or expansion of rights and/or any other form of undertaking that might require the approval of the Technical Council (Civil Aviation File, pp. 282-286). 17) Through agreement number 3 of the Civil Aviation Technical Council, of January 12, 1989, it was decided to extend an eight-day period to the applicants so that they could accredit the legitimate interest and status that enabled them to make the request (Civil Aviation File, pp. 291 and 292). 18) On January 13, 1989, the Technical Council, through the intermediary of Assistant Secretary Jimenez Chincilla, made known to Lic. Javier Vargas Barguil the agreement of the Technical Council taken in session No. 03-89 held on January 10, 1989, and which in its article 8 stated that: "given the document submitted by several entrepreneurs, representatives of companies related to air operation activity in thetransport of persons and agricultural fumigation through
which they request the cancellation of the certificates of
the companies represented by Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur,
as well as refusing any effort for extension or deadlines for
the operation or expansion of rights and/or in any other form
of undertaking that requires the approval of this Council or
of the General Office of Civil Aviation, it is agreed: to
remit the document to the Legal Counsel's Office of the
General Office of Civil Aviation so they will evaluate it ant
give us the recommendations on the actions to follow from the
aeronautic point of view, and that it forward a copy of the
document to the competent authorities, such as the Ministry
of Government and the Ministry of Public Security" (Civil
Aviation File, p. 296).
19) On January 20, 1989, the pilot applicants submitted the
document of correction of the defeat of form requested by the
Civil Aviation Technical Council relative to legitimation
(Civil Aviation File, p. 2sn).
CRS-37
20) On April 20, 1989, through agreement No. 13, the
Technical Council agreed to allow Guerrs Laspiur a period of
10 days to execute his right to defense (Civil Aviation File,
pp. 324-327).
21) On May 12, 1989, Guerra Laspiur presented to the Civil
Aviation Technical Council the document of reply to the
request for cancellation of the certificates of operation of
the companies in which he appears as agent (Civil Aviation
File, pp. 335-347).
22) On May 18, 1989 the Civil Aviation Technical Council
received in a hearing Mr. Manuel Enrique Guerra,
representative of the companies affected by the cancellation
procedures, in the company of two lawyers (Civil Aviation
File, pp. 302-317).
23) As stated in the minutes for those purposes, that hearing
was granted in the understanding that there is going to be a
hearing under what is provided by Article 309 of the Public
Administration Law (sic) i.e. the formal hearing, oral and
private, of the administrative procedure that has been
initiated because of this denunciation..." (Civil Aviation
file, p. 317).
24) On May 29, 1989, Lic. Vargas Barguil made known to the
Director of Civil Aviation, Carlos Viquez Jara, for the
knowledge and subsequent approval of the Technical Council,
the draft resolution of the final document on the
administrative procedures for cancellation of the
certificates of operation of the companies questioned.
25) To date, that draft resolution has not been taken up by
the Technical Council, the procedure not concluded. (Civil
Aviation file, pp. 371-375).
26) The companies Servicio Nacional de Helicopteros SRL,
Aviones Taxi Aereo S.A. and Taxi Aereo Centroamericano S A.
dominate the activities dedicated to special services with
65% of the flights; and, in those for fumigation, 80% of the
areas under cultivation at the national level.
27) The companies Servicio Nacional de Helicopteros SRL and
Taxi Aereo Centroamericano S.A. have been operating since
1987 on the basis of temporary permits.
3.3. In Relation to the Essence of the Matter:
The facts that have been stated above about the request for
an investigation of the activities undertaken by the
companies tied to Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur, as well as
about the proceedings to cancel their operating certificates,
make it possible to point out certain considerations and
specify some of the acts described, as follows:
l) It is a public fact that said person is extensively tied
to the companies "Taxi Aereo S.A.," Taxi Aereo
Centroamericano S.A. and "Servicio Nacional de Helicopteros
S.R.L. in which, according to information obtained from the
Costa Rican Aeronautical Registry, he serves as vice
president in the first two and as manager in the latter one,
the reason why,
CRS-38
if the commission of the crime is shown to be true (see 4.2.1
supra) using the recourse and facilities of his companies,
they cannot go without the corresponding legal sanction,
independently of the penal one that may correspond to their
representative.
2) A same act or human conduct may have repercussions on
diverse jurisdictions since the penalizing procedures in the
administrative and penal areas are independent; therefore the
concept of "pending case" does not seem appropriate but
rather only when the administrative sanction depends on the
fact being declared a crime. In this respect it should not be
forgotten that the failure to comply with the obligations
contained in the General Civil Aviation Law and its
regulations, or in the certificates of operation, are
sufficient cause for the cancellation of the certificate when
in the judgment of the Civil Aviation Technical Council there
should be justification for that (Art. 294, d)). It being
clearly established in the law cited above that the
application of that sanction will not prejudice the exercise
of the corresponding penal actions (Art. 297). This provision
through which our legislator tried to establish the
independence of the penalizing procedure.
3) Even though a formal document of denunciation was filed
(see 4.2.3) in which an investigation is requested, and even
though, in the opinion of this Commission, "sufficient merit"
exists to consider that possible infractions of seriousness
were committed against the General Civil Aviation Law and its
related ones, the Technical Council omitted ordering the
General Office of Civil Aviation to issue the corresponding
administrative information to which Article 299 of said law
refers.
4) According to what was established by Art. 299 of the
General Civil Aviation Law, in order to request the
administrative information, it is sufficient to have "a
written denunciation or a request of any party that has
competency to obligate itself or take responsibility
according to the law." In this respect, and even though a
total and exhaustive investigation was requested of the
activities of the companies in which Jose Angel Guerra
Laspiur is a partner, the Technical Council limited itself to
considering the facts denounced to be very serious and to
forwarding the document submitted by the pilots to the Legal
Counsel's Office of the institution for its evaluation and
subsequent forwarding of the recommendations on the actions
to be followed "from the aeronautical point of view."
5) Even though the Technical Council asked the Legal
Counsel's Office for its evaluation and recommendation of the
actions to follow from the aeronautical point of view, that
department never issued a judgment on the legal basis or
correctness of the investigation requested, or on the legal
basis of the administrative information to which Article 299
of the Civil Aviation Law refers. And it limited itself,
exclusively, in the execution of what was decided at session
70-88 of November 29, 1988, Article 8, to sending the
competent authorities (Ministries of Government and
Security), a copy of the document signed by the pilots for
the investigation in the area of their competence.
6) Information exists, referring to the case of Mr. Werner
Lotz, according to which the Civil Aviation Technical
Council, under the powers granted it in that respect by
Article 152, through resolution 22 of April 22, 1985, decided
to suspend "the operation of the company Servicio Aereo
Costeno Sociedad Anonima (SACSA) (Coastal Air Service), until
the
CRS-39
conclusion of the investigation being carried out by the
respective authorities, on the acts committed by this
company," a resolution that was approved by the Executive
Branch through agreement No. 164 of October 10, 1985 (Gaceta
No. 222, of November 20, 1985).
7) Although sufficient elements of judgment existed so as to
presume that possible infractions of the Civil Aviation Law
and its related laws had been committed, the Technical
Council, ignoring those elements of merit, the existence of a
document asking for a "total and exhaustive" investigation,
the background of the Lotz case and the communique of the
Ministry of Government of December 6, 1988, in which the
remittance of the documents of the pilots to the Office of
Investigations, Narcotics and Intelligence (DEI) was clear,
with the object of an investigation being carried out,
decided, through agreement No. 51 of December 20, 1988, to
renew the certificate of operation of the company Taxi Aereo
S A., of which Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur is its vice
president.
8) Said company, whose certificate of operation had expired
in 1981, the time from which the corresponding application of
renewal also dates, had been operating through provisional
permits issued every three months and "officially
extendible," the last being issued on October 20, 1988.
9) The Civil Aviation Technical Council, basing itself only
on Article 10 par 1), has been issuing to companies, with a
certificate of operation in the process of renewal,
provisional permits 90 that the companies can continue
offering the public service, thus turning an act lacking in
true legal and regulatory regulation into a reiterated
administrative practice, as a means of offsetting the lack of
diligence of the administration in the certificate renewal
process.
l) Even though that renewal had been requested through the
document of April 6, 1982, it was not until December 10, 1988
that the Technical Council resolved the question, thus taking
more than 6 years to resolve it. An agreement of the
Technical Council that to date has yet to be ratified by the
Executive.
11) Even though the General Law on Civil Aviation is clear
with respect to the procedure for granting and renewing
certificates of operation, the General Directorate of Civil
Aviation has been repeatedly failing to comply with that
procedure. In this respect, and in the concrete case of the
renewal of the certificate of operation of the company "Taxi
Aereo 5" there is a period of more than 13 months between the
public hearing and the resolution of the Council, when
article 141 of the Law points out that it shall resolve each
application and grant or deny the certificate requested, in
all or in part, within the 30 days following the hearing.
12) Even though a document exists requesting a total and
exhaustive" investigation of the companies to which Jose
Angel Guerra Laspuir, since it is presumed that he, "for the
realization of his acts contrary to morality and the legal
order, has been acting through his companies, the Civil
Aviation Technical Council, without taking into consideration
the gravity, if true, of the acts, decided to renew the
certificate of operation for a period of five years.
CRS-40
13) On January 9, 1989, a group of pilots filed a document
addressed to the Civil Aviation Technical Council through
which they asked for the cancellation of the certificates of
operation for the companies in which Jose Angel Guerra
Laspiur figures as, the attorney, as, well as the denial of
any extension of time for the operation or expansion of
rights, and of any other form of activity that may require
the approval of the Council.
14) The applicants, not having their legitimate interest and
the status that enabled them to petition accredited, they
were granted a term of 8 days to correct the defect of form,
which was, corrected through a document filed by the
petitioners on January 20, 1989.
15) It was, not until April 20, 1989, that is, 3 months after
having filed the document of correction, that the Technical
Council granted a hearing on the cancellation procedure to,
Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Saspiur, granting him a period of 10
days for exercising his rights of defense, which he did
through a document of response filed with the Council on May
12, 1989.
16) On May 18, 1989, the Civil Aviation Technical Council
received in hearing persons, from the companies, affected by
the cancellation efforts, the person appearing at it, as, a
representative of the companies affected, being Mr. Manuel
Enrique Guerra Velazquez in the company of two attorneys. A
hearing granted in accordance with Article 309, para 1), of
the General Law on Public Administration, which establishes
an oral and private appearance before the administration, in
which all of the evidence and allegation., of the parties
that were pertinent are admitted and received. An appearance
where, in spite of the above, the pilots petitioning were not
summoned.
17) To date, although the procedure has not been concluded, a
draft resolution has already been prepared that decrees the
final act of the cancellation procedure, in which the
denunciation aimed at the cancellation of the certificates of
operation in which Mr. Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur is a
representative is decreed dismissed, under the inadmissible
argument that the imposition of administrative sanction would
go against Art. 15, of the Magna Carta. In that respect the
Legal Counsel's Office forgets that at NO time was, an effort
made by the petitioners to obtain a judgment on penal
aspects,, but rather just on administrative aspects that fall
to the competence of the Technical Council and that, as has
been mentioned above, a same act may have repercussions in
various jurisdictions since the sanction procedures are
independent in the administrative and penal areas, one not
being the obstacle to the other, but just when the first
depends on the second, since it is founded on the fact of
being the punishment in virtue of a crime existing.
18) With respect to the companies Servicio Nacional de
Helicopteros SRL and Taxi Aereo Centroamericano SA, the
General Office of Civil Aviation once more is failing to
follow the procedure for renewal of operational certificates
with respect to the time between the public hearing and the
resolution of the Technical Council (Art. 141). In this
respect, andùaccording to information supplied by the same
General Office of Civil Aviation, the public hearings for the
renewal of the operational certificates of the companies
Senricio Nacional de Helicopteros SRL and Taxi Aereo
Centroamericano S.A. were held May 25, 1988 and
CRS-41
November 13, 1987 respectively.
19) Civil Aviation cannot protect itself behind the argument
that since it is being heard by the courts, it cannot be
heard by the administration in order to determine the
possible infraction of norms relative to the sphere of their
competence. This Commission does not affirm that such
infractions have been effectively committed; but it toes
consider of sufficient merit the elements that at the time
the Civil Aviation Technical Council had in its reach in
order to consider the possibility of their commission.
20) Even though those elements were of sufficient merit in
order to consider the possible commission of infractions of
the General Law of Civil Aviation and its related ones or, at
least, to create a reasonable doubt in the mind of the
members of the Technical Council on their feasibility, they
did not order administrative information as was appropriate,
according to what to that effect Article 299 of the Law
establishes. It should be kept in mind that the document
filed by the pilots was not limited to denouncing the
judicial case pending against Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur, but
rather, in addition, it expressly requested a "total and
exhaustive investigation of the activities undertaken by the
companies to which Mr. Guerra is tied, considering that "for
the realization of his acts contrary to morality and the
legal order" he is acting through them.
21) If at some moment the Technical Council felt that the
information at its disposal did not offer sufficient elements
of judgment for being able to evaluate the existence or not
of infractions of the General Law on Civil Aviation, the
logical thing was to order the administrative information
requested, or rather, to await the result of the
investigation ordered by the Ministry of Government and on
which Civil Aviation was duly informed on December 6, 1988.
Before any renewal of the certificates of the companies
questioned it was the unavoidable obligation of the Technical
Council, for the sake of the public interest, to totally
clear up the facts denounced as the only proper means for
determining the correctness of the renewal.
22) The procedure followed in the renewal of the certificate
of operation of the company "Taxi Aereo S.A." is censurable,
not only because of its duration, which is six years, but
also because of some of the procedures used which are totally
contrary to the Law.
23) The provisional permits through which the companies
continuing operating with a certificate of operation in the
renewal process have become an administrative vice through
which the administration has tried to palliate its own
negligence and lack of celerity in the processing of the
renewal application. Censurable is the fact that such permits
are granted without having a true regulation in the General
Civil Aviation Law, or in its regulations. In addition, no
less censurable is the fact that they are renewed officially,
without allowing third parties to oppose it, and that it is
done in an indefinite form as long as the administration does
not make a resolution.
24) Finally, this Commission does not agree with the
procedure followed in the proceedings to cancel the
certificates of operation, but rather, states deep
reservations both related to the length of time between the
document of initiation and the granting of the hearing to the
affected party, and regarding the hearing questioned,
according to article 309 of the
CRS-42
General Law on Public Administration.
4. CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRANSFER OF ARMS IN COSTA RICA
4.1 On International Relations
4.1.1 Introduction
In 1982, the Monge Alvarez Government took over the country
in difficult economic conditions. This made his government
ask for financial aid from the traditional sources. From data
in the possession of the Commission, it is confirmed that
some U.S. Government officials exercised pressure on the
Costa Rican Government so that it would help the Nicaraguan
resistance to operate from our territory, and that was how an
operational space opened up for this organization.
From the above it turned out that a group that had
transported weapons for the Sandinista guerrillas against the
government of General Somoza later operated to the benefit of
the Nicaraguan resistance and against the Sandinista
government.
In 1983, the problem of consumption of psychotropic drugs in
the U.S. reached levels that turned it into a very lucrative
business. In concomitance with this peak in the drug
business, that organization whose original purpose was the
transport of weapons for the Sandinista guerrillas became an
organization in the service of the transportation of weapons
for the Nicaraguan resistance and of drugs for the U.S.
market.
This organization had drug traffickers among its members,
who, making use of the situation, took Costa Rica as a bridge
for the transshipment of drugs headed for Mexico and the U.S.
market.
It is possible that the Costa Rican citizen, ignorant in
security matters, does not know of the relationship existing
between drug trafficking and terrorism; but it is
unjustifiable that it not be known by those that are the ones
that agree to assume positions with responsibilities over the
control of these problems.
4.1.2 Background
(l) In March 1984, a DC-3 crashed into a mountain in a place
near the border with Nicaragua. Days later, according to
versions of residents, unidentified men arrived at the place
of the accident and burned the crews' bodies. The aircraft
was found by Mr. Bruce Jones, together with John Hull, Joe
Fernandez, who was acting as Chief of the CIA in Costa Rica,
two more agents, and members of the group of Mr. Eden Pastora
Later, Mr. Hull, Mr. Fernandez, and staff of the U.S. Embassy
returned to the place and gathered up the remains, which were
finally sent to El Salvador. This incident was known, a few
days after it occurred, by at least one of the police
authorities who testified privately before this
CRS-43
Commission. (83)
2) In early May 1985, in Liberia a camouflaged plane was
found with the registration number erased. According to
statements of former Minister of Security Benjamin Piza, it
was presumed that the plane was being used for drug
trafficking. (84)
3) In December 1986, Floyd Carlton Caceres, a Panamanian
pilot, was arrested in Costa Rica and extradited to the U.S.
In his testimonies he offered ample information on the
transshipment of weapons and drugs at the northern border of
our country, and on General Noriega's participation in that
field.
4) On June 25, 1984, the U.S. National Security Planning
Group /sic/, including President Reagan, Vice President Bush,
Secretary of State Shultz, Secretary of Defence Weinberger,
CIA Director Casey, Admiral Poindexter and others, discussed
the support of the Contras by third countries. Casey
suggested that the U.S. Government increase economic aid to
Costa Rica as an incentive for this country to support the
Nicaraguan resistance. (85)
5) On July 10, 1986, Lewis Tambs was named U.S. Ambassador in
Costa Rica His mission was the creation of the southern
front, according to his own statements. It has been stated
that the idea of building a landing strip for supplying the
Contras arose at a meeting between Mr. James Tull, Deputy
Chief of Mission of the Embassy, Ambassador Tambs, and Joe
Fernandez. Ambassador Tambs commented that a private group of
Americans wanted to open or reopen an old airstrip so that it
would serve the Contras in cases of emergency, and Ambassador
Tambs was given the task of finding out if the Costa Rican
Government would agree. In his statements before this
Commission, Mr. Piza stated that the idea of the airstrip had
been his, without the intervention of any foreign official.
6) Former President Monge Alvarez has indicated that he
authorized the construction of an airport in Potrero Grande,
in exchange for the U.S. helping Costa Rica in matters of
security and defence, in the case of Nicaragua attacking our
country. That same month, the Minister of Security, Mr.
Benjamin Piza, authorized the construction of a landing strip
in Potrero Grande. In addition, payments were made to Colonel
Ramon Montero Quesada, for official services in the vigilance
of the airstrip. (86)
On March 23, 1986, Joe Fernandez, Colonel North, Admiral
Poindexter, and Minister Piza and his wife had a hearing with
President Reagan, which they obtained through Admiral
Poindexter, on the basis of a memorandum from North, who
pointed out that Piza had been "instrumental" in the
organization of the Southern Front. It is explained that Piza
had collaborated, together with another high-level Costa
Rican official, in the development of a logistical support
base for the resistance forces located in the north of Costa
Rica. In his appearance before this Commission, Mr. Piza
denied that he had offered any type of support for the
Contras and he indicated that he never attended any meeting
with Poindexter. The latter hag indicated that during his
visit to Central America, he met with Piza to discuss future
plans for the Resistance and support of it through Costa
Rica. In the afternoon of the same day of the hearing with
President Reagan, a meeting was held at which were present
General Richard Secord (one of the persons in charge of the
Contra
CRS-44
supply network), Mr. Rafael Quintero (supervisor of the
construction of the landing strip in Potrero Grande) and Joe
Fernandez, at which they discussed the ownership of the land
and airstrip. From the statements of Mr. Fernandez it ia
deduced that Mr. Piza was present, a fact that he denied to
this Commission. (87)
8) On April 10, 1986, an L-100 plane unloaded 20,000 pounds
of lethal material in some part of the Southern Front. Joe
Fernandez stated that from to April to September 1986, nine
flights were made with lethal cargo, under the supervision of
General Secord. Two of these flights, made with a C-123,
loaded fuel at the Juan Santamaria Airport, passing
themselves off as planes of the Panamanian Air Force. (88)
9) In early June 1986, a plane loaded with weapons for the
Contras got stuck in Potrero Grande. This led to concern on
the part of Ambassador Tambs and Mr. Joe Fernandez, since
days before, President Arias had been guaranteed that the
airstrip would not be used. The Ambassador and Mr. Fernandez
got in touch with Colonel North so he would resolve the
situation. This was achieved by bringing two additional
aircraft: to one was transferred part of the cargo that the
grounded plane was carrying, with which it was managed to
decrease its weight, and another so that it would push it,
since the motors would no longer start up. (89)
10) William Haskell, known as Robert Olmsted, who negotiated
the land for the airstrip, stated that in June 1986 he was
called by the U.S. Ambassador in Costa Rica, since Mr. Guido
Fernandez, Minister of Government, wanted a letter "with an
official appearance," with a retroactive date to December 19,
1985, in order to make it clear that the decision to build
the strip had been made during the Monge Alvarez
Administration; in addition, use of the land should be ceded
to the Costa Rican Government, in order to justify the
security that was being offered to it. (90)
11) On September 30, 1986, Colonel North indicated that from
July 1986 to February 1986 (sic) the airstrip had been used
for the supplying of the Contras and that ag of that date,
for the aborting of flights of damaged planes. He added that
the Minister of Security, Mr. Hernan Garron, had divulged the
existence of the Potrero Grande landing strip, and that
President Arias had failed to comply with his agreement with
the American government. (91)
12) Mr. Benjamin Piza, before the Legislative Commission that
investigated matters related to Caro Quintero, stated that at
the time at which the negotiations were undertaken for the
use of the land, he wag unaware of any tie on the part of
Colonel Oliver North with the matter. In addition, he
indicated that he believes that on two occasions aircraft of
the Ministry of Public Security landed on that strip, and
before this Commission, he denied having knowledge of the
landing of airplanes on the strip, including those of the
Ministry of Security. (92)
13) On November 24, 1987, the Prosecutor's Office drew up
charges against former Minister Benjamin Piza, for the
supposed crime of failure of performance of obligations in
relation to the construction of the airstrip in Potrero
Grande, since he did not have the
CRS-45
permits from Civil Aviation and the Municipality. (93)
14) On November 24, 1987, the Prosecutor's Office drew up
charges against the former Commander from Liberia, Jose Ramon
Montero, for the supposed crimes of contradictory
transactions and embezzlement, in relation to the
construction of the airstrip in Potrero Grande, since he was
a partner in the company building the landing strip. In
addition, it is presumed that Montero made a change of
destination of resources, assets and labor force that
belonged to the Command of Liberia. (94)
15) Mr. Edwin Viales Rodriguez stated before the Criminal
Court of Santa Cruz that the Government policy was totally
open aid (sic) the Nicaraguan counterrevolution and from the
time that I began as Canton Delegate of Santa Cruz until the
position of Regional Director that I received later, I had
higher orders for direct aid to everything that was
humanitarian supplies for the Contras, in the sense of
obtaining for it and even...letting pass unperceived what
they were doing in the zone since I had higher orders'' which
came from Mr. Enrique Chacon, Deputy Minister of Public
Security. (95)
16) On July 4, 1989, before this Commission, Mr. Piza
Carranza stated the following
a) He said that he did not know that the landing strip was
used for Contra support activities;
b) He denied any coordination with U.S. authorities for
purposes of utilization of the landing strip;
c) He said that he was not interested in revising the juridic
status of the company that had rented the land, (Udall
Research Corporation);
d) He indicated that in the period during which he exercised
the post of Minister of Security (end of 1984 to April 30,
1986), the transshipment of weapons was not an important
problem;
e) He stated that Colonel Montero, Mr. Johnny Campos (former
Deputy Minister of Public Security, the Office of
Intelligence and National Security), Mr. Luis Carlos Araya
(person from Civil Aviation), knew about the landing strip,
about the aid that was being received, and, above all, what
was being done by the Ministry of Public Security in terms of
security of the country.
4.1.3 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter
l) The facts that have been referred to show on the one hand,
the lack of respect of national and foreign citizens for our
decreed policy of neutrality and, in addition, an evident
relationship between the interests of the U.S. and the
respect for those interests
CRS-46
by some of our political authorities.
2) In statements given to the press and privately, Mr. Luis
Alberto Monge Alvarez has admitted his approval of
construction of the landing strip in Potrero Grande,
justifying this fact with the danger that an invasion by the
Sandinistas could represent for Costa Rica.
3) Mr. Piza's statement is surprising in the sense that from
1984 to 1986 the main problem of contraband in the northern
zone was of livestock, adding that the transshipment of
weapons was after the dates cited; it is incomprehensible
that the Minister has not been informed, since it was
precisely in that period when the transshipment of weapons
and drugs in our country grew.
4) Mr. Piza Carranza's explanations given to this Commission
concerning the deal to use the lands in Potrero Grande are
weak. It seems incredible that one negotiates the use of the
land simply through just one phone call to a supposed
representative of a Panamanian company whose legal status was
not verified; since if this had been done it would have been
learned that it only has management corresponding to the
lawyer that registered it and who said that he did not know
about the company. (96) Mr. Piza indicated to us that the
land where the strip would be widened had been rented, with
an option to buy, by a company that wanted to do tourist
development of the zone. It does not seem strange to the
former Minister of Security that this company would give up
its rights without asking for any indemnization, and in
addition, according to what he himself described, the
characteristics of the land and its access made a touristic
proposal in that place far from feasible.
5) Mr. Piza denies any knowledge of Colonel North's plans and
objectives or those of Ambassador Tambs, Mr. Joe Fernandez,
or Admiral Poindexter. The facts pointed out contradict this
position, especially since there is public knowledge of a
series of attitudes and statements of politicians of the
nation of the north. In addition, in Case No. 1022F-87, there
is testimony on meetings held between Mr. Piza, former
Colonel Montero and Joe Fernandez, in relation to the Potrero
Grande strip. There are also contradictions from Mr. Piza
when the statements he has given to this Assembly are
compared to those to the two Special Commissions that have
investigated drug trafficking in Costa Rica, and today's
situation shows that knowledge and collaboration did exist.
4.2 Private Support for the Contras
In the previous section, the existence of a private network
of support to the Contras was pointed out; it operated in
northern Costa Rica, under the leadership of Colonel Oliver
North. The amount and frequency of the transshipment of drugs
that passed through that zone were the causes that led this
Commission to proceed to the study of the organization of
that mechanism.
CRS-47
4.2.11 Background
l) Mr. John Floyd Hull Clark, after living in Costa Rica for
approximately 20 years, in 1983 applied for Costa Rican
citizenship, which was granted to him on June 22, 1984, under
resolution No. 968 of the Options and Naturalization Section
of the Supreme Elections Tribunal. This date coincides with
the period in which the "Boland Amendment" was issued in the
U.S., which prohibits the government and any citizen of that
nation from offering military support to the Contra movement.
It is important to note that his naturalization was carried
out after renunciation of his U.S. citizenship, a fact that
apparently Mr. Hull has not had any interest in divulging in
his country of origin, and much less to the Congressmen that
interceded for him with the Costa Rican Executive Branch,
with evident lack of respect for our sovereignty and the
independence of branches that exist in our homeland.
2) In Costa Rica John Hull devotes himself to agriculture,
administering his own and others' lands, owned by Americans
residing abroad. As of the time of the struggle of the
Contras to overthrow the Sandinista Government Junta, Mr.
Hull devoted himself, with other persons, to organizing the
so-called Southern Front, a mission for which Ambassador
Lewis Tambs was sent to Costa Rica, according to what Mr.
Tambs himself testified.
3) Now Mr. Hull denies that his collaboration was of a
military nature, a statement that contradicts others given in
the past by him himself, and public and private information
in the hands of this Commission. (97)
4) In Colonel North's personal book (in which the name of Mr.
Hull appears at least on 10 occasions), and in statements
given by Mr. Robert Owen, there is talk of the need to give
protection to Mr. Hull, at the same time that in that
document there is an annotation of June 26, 1984, indicating
that "John now has a private army of 75 to 100." (98)
5) About the suspicion that Mr. Hull is a CIA agent (by
contract)--a statement that Mr. Hull has denied repeatedly
during recent years, just like he denies any special
relationship with officials of that agency in our country--
Mr. Joe Fernandez confirms it in his statements; and in
addition in documents of the U.S. Department of Justice, it
is indicated that John Hull was recruited by the CIA as one
of their operatives in the fight against the
Sandinista government. In addition, Mr. Hull himself has agreed that the
CIA financed his
bodyguards.
6) Mr. Hull's public statements on his support for the
Contras also led the then Minister of Security, Mr. Benjamin
Piza Carranza, to call their attention, not to the activities
that he was carrying out, but rather to the ostentation that
Mr. Hull was making of them. (100)
7) Mr. Hull has maintained close relations with persons
closely tied in to the creation of the so-called "Southern
Front," some of them being
a) Robert Owen, who, after working under the orders of Adolfo
Calero, was hired by the Office for Humanitarian Aid to
Nicaraguans (NHAO), an organization created by the
CRS-48
Department of State, whose objective is the channeling of
funds for the Contras. Being under Mr. Calero's orders, and
when he was working for NHAO, Mr. Owen acted as emissary and
informer of Colonel Oliver North. (101)
b) Thomas Posey, organizer of the group of Civil Military
Assistance (CMA), whose objective was to help the Contras.
Mr. Posey coordinated with John Hull the arrival in the
country of 8 series of soldiers of fortune and mercenaries.
(102)
c) Jesus, a Nicaraguan Contra, expert in logistics. Detained
on April 25, 1985 by the Rural Guard, and accused of hostile
acts. (103)
8) Even though Mr. Hull now says that the assistance that he
provided was only of a humanitarian nature, in a letter dated
April 1, 1985, signed by Colonel North, reference is made to
two camps, one of which is under the immediate orders of
"Jesus" (see 7c above), the other under the alias of "Pape,"
who is identified as Hull; in the same letter it is said that
"Pape" has divided the camp into four, thus managing to
disperse the men, and that he is awaiting the arrival of the
equipment from El Salvador. (104)
9) In an interview with Newsday, Hull admitted he was the
"owner of lands that have served as secret landing strips for
the Contras, that he has flown airplanes for the Contras and
that he has helped to supply them and that he helped a
mercenary group that was carrying out attacks inside of
Nicaragua." In relation to this group, he said that "I (Hull)
invited them here.' He gave similar statements to the Wall
Street Journal, in which he said that he had "orchestrated
deliveries of U.S. arms coming from El Salvador, supplying
camps for the supplying of the Contras, provided to troops
before and after the battles.
(105)
10) Mr. William Crone stated that both he and Mr. Hull
militarily helped the Contras. Other persons have testified
on the support that Mr. Hull provided to members of the
resistance movement. One of the declarants has indicated that
in 1983, John Hull was participating in the logistical
planning of a great offensive that was going to be carried
out against the Sandinistas. (106)
11) On April 25, 1985, 15 persons were arrested on a farm
supposedly administered by John Hull; they were accused of
hostile acts. Among them were five foreign mercenaries, with
special ties to Mr. Hull:
Steven Carr and Robert Thompson, Americans; they arrived in
Costa Rica in March 1985 with the purpose of training
Contras. John Hull paid Thompson's bail and he and Carr fled
the country.
John Davies and Peter Glibbery, British, arrived in Costa
Rica with John Hull in March 1985 in order to train Contras,
the plane ticket of the second one being paid by John Hull.
Mr. Davis' bail was paid by Mr. Hull; Davies fled the
country.
Claude Chafford, French, came to Costa Rica with Mr. Hull in
March 1985 in order
CRS-49
to train Contras. Hull paid his bail; he was sentenced to
five years in prison.
12) Mr. William Crone stated that Peter Glibbery gave him a
note for Hull, whose contents indicated that John Hull was
the supervisor of the group. Hull told a reporter from
Channel 7 that he had only seen them on one occasion on which
they passed by his farm asking for directions; however, he
himself contradicts this statement on other occasions. (107)
13) On August 9, 1984, a plane crashed on the landing strip
of Muelle de San Carlos, property of Mr. Hull. It was piloted
by Octavio Barrera (Condorito) and it was bringing military
tools and medicines from El Salvador. Bruce Jones (declared a
persona non grata by the Costa Rican Government in 1986 for
his military activities with the Contras), got in touch with
Mr. Hull, who told him to obliterate the plane registration,
empty it and leave it there, saying that he knew nothing of
its origin; Jones opted to cut up the plane and throw it into
the river. (108)
14) Mr. Hull's secretary received from Felipe Vidal Santiago
a list of telephones numbers for the case that something
happened to them or if in an emergency he needed to contact
them; the phone numbers were of the following persons and
places: Felipe Vidal, Moises Dagoberto, Nunez Ruiz, Frank
Chanes, Rene Corvo, Sandra Corvo, Pedro Gil, Hotel Galilea,
Porfirio Bonet, Jose Macias and Rene Corvo's parents-in-law.
The first four have been formally accused of drug trafficking
in the U.S. (109)
15) Many people have stated that on occasions weapons were
kept, excluding those referring to personal protection, on
Mr. Hull lands, but that they were never discovered by the
authorities because every time that a raid was going to be
conducted, Mr. Hull was warned. In turn, Mr. Crone said that
arms were not stored at Hull's farm, but it was used as 8
point of transit. (110)
16) On March 9, 1985, Jesus Garcia and Steven Carr helped to
load weapons and to transport them to the Fort Lauderdale
Airport, from which they were taken to Ilopango, El Salvador.
The weapons had been stored in the house of Francisco Chanes,
one of the owners of Ocean Hunter Seafood Inc. Once in
Ilopango, they were unloaded by Salvadoran soldiers and
stored in nearby warehouses. At the end of a week, the
weapons were taken to John Hull's farm. Thomas Posey was also
involved in the shipment of the cargo, a fact
that can be proved since the serial number of a weapon
corresponds to one owned by Mr. Posey and it had been included in that shipment. Part of the weapons were later confiscated by the Costa Rican authorities from a group of mercenaries (see 11 above).
The plane was rented by Rene Corvo. An FBI report indicates that the plane was piloted by Daniel Vasquez m, and passengers were his son, Steven Carr, Rene Corvo and Robert Thompson. (111)
4.2.1.2 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter
The series of facts cited fully ratifies (62) Mr. Hull's
direct and permanent participation in the network of military
support to the Contras was organized by Colonel Oliver
North. In addition, a series of persons whose activities
related to drug trafficking have been proven. What interests
this commission is that these illicit acts were committed
during the period in which said subjects were collaborating
with John Hull, the reason why it is not acceptable that Mr.
Hull was unaware of what was happening around him. However,
this Commission has not been able to find evidence of any
kind that Mr. Hull had notified the authorities about these
acts.
4.3 Transshipments of Drugs
4.3.1 Introduction
At the beginning of this section of the report, reference was
made to the collaboration existing between drug trafFIckers
and guerrilla groups. In Latin America the cartels that move
the drug have established different types of ties with
movements such as the M-l9, Shining Path, Cinchoneros, etc.
In Central America, that ominous relationship between
organized crime and military and political authorities has
been seen through the Noriega-Medellin Cartel relationship.
Costa Rica, as will be seen further on, has been the victim
of this clandestine action, favored precisely by the support
that some Costa Ricans gave to the network established in our
country by Colonel North. On the other hand, some Costa
Ricans, without necessarily participating in the
transshipment of arms, did make use of the organization that
it led to in Costa Rica for the transshipment of drugs.
4.3.2 Werner Lotz Artavia
l) Mr. Werner Lotz Artavia admitted to the U.S. Senate that
he had participated in the illicit transshipment of drugs,
especially of cocaine coming from Bolivia. (112)
2) This Commission has reliable information that complements
and expands upon the statements by Mr. Lotz. Both Mr. Lotz'
statements to the Senate and the additional information in
the possession (63) of the Commission will be placed at the
disposal of the respective authorities so that they will
decide what is pertinent.
3) The study of the files of the General Office of Civil
Aviation and of the Judicial Investigative Office referring
to the arrival of Rafael Caro Quintero in Costa Rica and the
appearance of witnesses before this Commission (113) clearly
establishes that:
a) The port of embarkation for Rafael Caro Quintero and his
companions at the time of heading for Costa Rica was not
Mazatlan, as Mr. Lotz has insistently reiterated.
b) Some type of complicity existed between officials of the
Juan Santamaria Airport, which allowed the undocumented entry
of Caro Quintero and the persons who accompanied him.
CRS-51 Once in the Juan Santamaria Airport, Mr. Lotz piloted
his aircraft with the passengers aboard to his hangar, where
they were transferred to Quinta California, in the personal
car of Mr. Lotz and a vehicle belonging to an employee of Mr.
Lotz.
4.3.3. Relationship of the Network of Support for the Contras
and Drug Trafficking 1) Since 1970 the American authorities
had suspected General Noriega's participation in
international drug trafficking, suspicions that were
reinforced over the years. (114)
2) In 1985, Colonel Oliver North asked General Noriega for
his collaboration in the fight against the Sandinista
Government.(115)
3) In early 1985, Teofilo Watson mistakenly used one of Mr.
Hull's runways to land, carrying a shipment of 553 kilos of
cocaine coming from Pereira, Colombia. Watson was under the
orders of Floyd Carlton Caceres, who was the person
responsible for the shipment; the merchandise got lost and at
the beginning the cartel believed that John Hull had been
involved, the reason why they kidnapped his daughter; later
it was learned that Mr. Hull had no participation in the
matter and they released his daughter. Mr. Carlton was
General Noriega's pilot and was devoted to the transshipment
of drugs for the General.(116)
4) George Morales, arrested on June 12, 1986 in Miami for
drug trafficking, stated that he had entered into
arrangements, supposedly with the CIA, to collaborate with
the logistical and financial support of the Contras, in
exchange for a reduction of his sentence he would receive,
since at the time this agreement was made, he was awaiting
the trial in which he was accused of international drug
trafficking. The agreement consisted of sending weapons to
the Contras, transporting drugs from Colombia to the U.S. and
seeing they reached the "wholesalers." Supposedly the benefit
generated by the drug sale would be used to finance weapons.
Mr. Morales had the money, planes and the pilots that were
required for this operation, since he directed an extensive
narcotics network.
5) Mr. Morales stated that in December 1984, 8 flight was
made from Costa Rica (Tamarindo) to Great Harbor, taking 163
kilos of cocaine. The following one, with the same route as
the above, was planned for the 27th of the same month, but
due to some problems that came up in overflying Nicaragua he
had to return and departure was postponed to January 1985,
the date on which he left with a shipment of 421 kilos. For
this flight, he inadvertently hired an undercover DEA agent
as the pilot, since Gerardo Duran Ayanegui, one of the
regular pilots of George Morales, was unable to do it. (117)
Part of what Morales said in relation to the transshipment of
weapons is verified by pilot Francisco Ugalde Varela, who
stated before the OIJ that he had made flights for the
Contras and that Hull's strip was used for these purposes; in
addition, evidence exists that he flew to Hull's farm to the
U.S., and to San Andres, on these last two occasions in the
company of John Hull. (118)
CRS-52
7) With respect to what Morales says of Duran's
participation, Mr. William Crone stated that Hull knew
Gerardo Duran quite well. (119)
8) Mr. Rene Corvo, accused in the U.S. in 1986, frequented
Mr. Hull's office and farm. He sought financing and recruited
mercenaries for the Contras. (120)
9) Felipe Vidal Santiago, known as "Morgan," accused of drug
trafficking in the U.S., is currently a fugitive. Together
with Mr. Hull and other Cubans, he devoted himself to
organizing the "Southern Front." Mr. Vidal also had close
relations with the syndicated company Frigorificos de
Puntarenas, from which he received money in order to make
purchases for the Contras. He frequented John Hull's office
and farm. (121)
10) November 28, 1988 is the beginning of the case for
International Cocaine Trafficking against Edwin Lorenzo
Viales Rodriguez, Fernando Loaiciga Delgado and others in the
Superior Court of Liberia, file No. 282-88, a case that has
already had a verdict in the lower courts. The presumed
events occur in Guanacaste and it is indicated in that
document that from October 1984 until the end of 1985, in our
country an organization operated made up of Panamanians,
Colombians, Costa Ricans and citizens of other nationalities,
who dedicated themselves to international cocaine
trafficking, using Costa Rica as a bridge for refueling of
planes that came from Colombia. (122)
11) In case 282-88 it is pointed out that the cocaine
trafficking had the collaboration of Colonel Edwin Viales
Rodriguez, former Department Chief of the Rural Assistance
Guard in Guanacaste, who offered security for the flights
that were made from and to our air trips. The landing strips
of Tamarindo, Sardinal, Ciruelas, Coyolar, Las Loras and
Llano Grande were used.
12) From October 1984 to the end of 1985, an international
organization of drug traffickers operated in our country
headed by Panamanian Floyd Carlton Caceres, and which was
responsible for at least 10 shipments of cocaine, with a
total approximate amount of 5,000 kilos. In the
transportation of these Costa Rica was used as a bridge for
the subsequent distribution of the drug in the U.S. and
Mexico. (123) Precisely, use was made of the same landing
strips and the collaboration of the same Costa Rican
authorities that had aided the Contras. (124)
13) Among the pilots that formed part of the group headed by
Floyd Carlton were: Miguel Alemany Soto, Spanish; Rodrigo
Ortiz, Colombian; Alejandro Benitez and Cecilio Saenz,
Mexicans; Teofilo Watson and Anibal Antonio Aizprua,
Panamanians. (125)
14) In the Viales case, reference is made to Colonel Jose
Ramon Montero Quessda, about whom doubt seems to be expressed
on his participation in this case, since according to
testimonies that appear in the file, it was the then Colonel
Montero who recommended that there be a conversation with
Colonel Viales, in order to obtain landing strips that would
meet the necessary security conditions for the transshipment
of the drug. It is indicated that Colonel Montero bought a
vehicle from a former U.S. Embassy official for the
CRS-53
An approximate sum of US $18,000, which was paid in cash and
by check. The same questions about the origin of Mr. Montero
Quesada's income as of 1985, which bear no relation to his
salary, are set forth in the case cited in point 4.1.2, para
14, above.
15) The gasoline that was used for refueling the planes of
the organization located in Costa Rica and directed by Floyd
Carlton Caceres, was obtained through Mr. Jose Angel Guerra
Laspiur, who has been accused in a separate case of the
illicit act of drug
trafficking, together with Mr. Gerardo Duran Ayanegui. (126).
16) On January 23, 1986, Floyd Carlton Caceres was accused in
the South District of Florida of several infractions of
federal laws, including importation and possession of
marihuana. (127)
l4.3.4 In Relation to the Essence of the Matter
In August 1988 Mr. Hull requested a hearing with this
Commission, in order to have the opportunity, according to
his own words, to leave his name clean. The response was
that he would be invited at the appropriate time, which was
done at the moment corresponding to the Commission's agenda.
When he was summoned, Mr. Hull excused himself for reasons of
health, being given another opportunity, which he did not
attend.
Finally, under the order that he would be brought by public
force if he did not respond to the third summons, he appeared
and through the advice of his counsel, he refused to take
the oath and to testify, even about aspects unrelated to the
penal case being pursued against him. This Commission
believes that Mr. Hull lost the opportunity to clear up
several of the facts described.
Many of the persons that were related directly and indirectly
for the effects of Mr. Hull's participation in the network of
support to the Contras have been accused and sentenced for
drug trafficking: Steven Carr (accused, in his statements he
involved Mr. Hull in the military aid to the Contras, Carr
died from an overdose of cocaine in December 1986); Rene
Corvo (accused in the U.S.), admitted before a Grand Jury to
his participation in the military support to the Contras and
he implicated Mr. Hull); Felipe Vidal Santiago (accused of
drug trafficking, currently a fugitive); Octavio Barrera
"Condorito" (accused, deceased); Moises Dagoberto Nunez Ruiz
and Francisco Chanes (accused in Miami of drug trafficking
and dollar laundering, using as a means of operation the
company Frigorificos de Puntarenas); Teofilo Watson (member
of the group of pilots of Floyd Carlton Cacereras, who had a
network in the service of General Manuel Antonio Noriega and
was also
working for a Costa Rican network); Gerardo Duran Ayanegui
(accused by the Costa Rican courts of drug trafficking);
Marcos Aguado (accused of drug trafficking by the Costa Rican
courts); Sebastian Gonzalez "Guachan" (sentenced for cocaine
trafficking in Costa Rica); Felix Roberto Guillen "Bodington"
(accused, with a record of drug trafficking in the Dominican
Republic).
On the other hand, General Noriega's participation in the
anti-Sandinista struggle resulted in the entry into Costa
Rica of a series of pilots who, under the General's orders,
CRS-54
had been devoted to the transhipment of drugs; and who under
the circumstance of support to the Contras, did not in any
way give up their habitual illicit activity; they simply
added a new source of income through the transshipment of
arms. Thus Floyd Carlton Caceres, Miguel Alemany Soto,
Teofilo Watson, Gerardo Duran Ayanegui, Jose Angel Guerra
Laspiur, Marco Aguado Arguello and Sebastian Gonzalez used
Costa Rica as a bridge for refueling and storage of drugs
corning from South America.
The facts cited reiterate the evidence of the use by drug
trafficking of the organization established to aid the
Nicaraguan resistance. Even more serious, the infiltration of
international rings in Costa Rica is noticeable; they make
use of this organization. Beginning with the requests for
help from Colonel North of General Noriega, the door is
opened for Noriega's cohorts to use national territory for
transshipment of arms and drugs. Rapidly, this mafia finds
the collaboration of Costa Ricans, some perhaps of good
faith, but others who simply make use of the excuse that they
want to aid the Contras, and they find a cornucopia whose
abundance makes them ignore the evil consequences of this
traffic. The first in joining in this infamous activity are a
series of national pilots whose participation in the
transshipment of arms was broadly known.
l5. COMMENTS ON THE REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC
5.1 Introduction
In the first report that was submitted to this Commission,
the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic and the
Prosecutor's Office were asked for an analysis of some
legal files in which, according to reports received by this
Commission, some irregularities or distortions could have
come about that would show very serious deficiencies in the
Administration of Justice.
The opinion of the Office of the Attorney General was
received by the Commission on June 11, 1989, with some
comments and evaluations that require a thorough and slow
study, since the deficiencies that the Office indicates point
to the need to foster reforms that will allow transforming
the Judiciary.
With respect to the facts and comments contained in the
report of the Office of the Attorney General, the Commission
accepts that opinion, transcribing it as an annex to this
report (see Annex c).
5.2 Background
In the cases that the Office of the Attorney General
analyzes, it points to serious irregularities that could
constitute, in some of them, the crime of prevarication,
since officials of certain political importance and persons
with family ties very close to certain
CRS-55
magistrates benefitted unjustifiably.
Thus, in the case against Mario Torelli V., it is a person
with close blood ties with former magistrate Lic. Eduardo
Ching Murillo.
In files 477-V87, 294-2-85 and 2151-84, in all of them a son
of former magistrate Alvarado Carvajal Lozano was favored.
With respect to the judicial cases 909-3-83 (against Jorge
Sanchez) and 124-Q-84 (against William Malavassi), the
accused benefitted in those cases with decisions that were
very questionable juridically speaking and which were decreed
by the Tribunal presided by Lic. Jesus Ramirez Quiros. They
were proceedings in which one very seriously questions the
correctness and impartiality required by the administration
of justice. These deviations may be the result of multiple
factors that, in some cases, come from structural defects in
the Judiciary; in others, they may derive from an
inappropriate concentration of powers and authority and, in
other circumstances, they are but the consequence of human
weaknesses.
All these deficiencies call for a profound transformation of
the Judiciary. It is an urgent task, because a weak,
vulnerable, deficient administration of justice will be easy
prey to the subtle influences of powerful criminal
organizations, as occurs with drug trafficking.
The Judiciary needs an administrative transformation which
will allow the magistrates to exercise their genuine function
better, which is that of administering justice and not that
of becoming overburdened administrators of the Judiciary. In
this process it is urgent to institute the Council of the
Magistracy /i.e. the Bench/, in which a part of its members
are elected by the vote of all judges of any hierarchy, and
another formed with university professors, named by the
Parliament, or by the latter and other institutions. This
system has the advantage that it encourages a reciprocal
control among diverse sectors of the Magistracy and also
allows pluralist membership.
It is a system that is already known in Italy, Spain,
Portugal and Peru and about which the majority opinion is
that its operation favors a much more democratic atmosphere
in the Judiciary (See "Penal Systems and Human Rights in
Latin America," Editorial De Palma, p. 132 and following /in
Spanish/).
The Council of the Magistracy does not administer justice;
this function, the most important one of the Judiciary, is
reserved, as is logical, to the judges and magistrates. The
Council of the Magistracy would be no more than a body that
would be in charge of the administration of the Judicial
System. However, it is a political decision that introduces a
healthy and interesting transformation in the Judiciary.
It is also important to point out an attitude of concern that
has been adopted by some judiciary officials, since they do
not dare to refer, publicly or privately, to the insinuations
or pressures that, in come cases, high-level officials of the
Judiciary could have had. This fear, this insecurity, shows
very clearly that the independence of Costa Rican judges is
not guaranteed satisfactorily. The weakness of the Costa
Rican judiciary, in relation to this aspect, is clearly seen
in two senses: in the first place, there is no judicial
CRS-56
career system that substantially reduces the discretionality
that currently exists in the designation and promotion of
judges. It is appropriate to cite, with respect to this
aspect, the recommendation of the Inter-American Institute on
Human Rights, when it suggests the implantation of
"...rational systems of selection and promotion of judicial
magistrates, with evidence of sufficiency or open proceedings
in all instances...'' (Ibid, p. 134). If the judge does not
have the guarantee that his promotion does not depend on
predominantly discretionary criteria, it is very difficult
for him to dare to refer to the pressures to which he has
been subjected on the part of an official of higher rank,
since he knows perfectly well that his promotion would be
seriously threatened, especially if the officials that
pressure him are also the ones who decide it.
Another aspect exists that may also weaken the independence
of the judges within the Judiciary; this is disciplinary
jurisdiction, since in this procedure there is a failure to
comply satisfactorily with the principle of legality and with
some of the guarantees characterizing due process. These are
not defined clearly, thug creating a series of questions and
imprecisions that may turn the disciplinary procedure into an
arbitrary instrument that infuses terror in the judge and may
limit his autonomy unjustifiably.
If one better defines the content of the infractions, as well
ag the rules of procedure, adjusting them to due process, no
official will be able to think that disciplinary jurisdiction
can be turned into a potential instrument of pressure, as
occurs currently. This perception may not be real but, in
these situations, perceptions, although they may be
imaginary, produce the game effects as real acts.
About this aspect, it should be noted that the attitude of
Lic. Luz M. Bolanos has been exceptional, as she is the only
official that dared, privately, to refer to an inadmissible
intervention of a magistrate; however, it should be pointed
out that said official, in view of the deficiencies already
noted, has the conviction that she suffers from persecution
on the part of the Judicial Inspection, the body in charge of
disciplinary jurisdiction inside the Judiciary.
It should be recognized that the reaction that the Judiciary
has had to its errors and deficiencies has been satisfactory.
However, the Legislative Assembly should be vigilant to this
process of revision and renovation of the Judiciary. If the
procedure is not that way, it will be necessary to form a
Legislative Commission that investigates it in depth. The
Legislative Assembly being the one to designate the
magistrates, such authority demands, ag a,n inevitable
corollary, the political control over the Judiciary. It is a
control that is not secret, but rather public and express.
The positive law on checks and balances should function not
only from the Judiciary to the Parliament, but also from the
latter toward the administration of justice. In the State no
power can exist that is exempt from a healthy political
control that in the end is no more than the legitimate
exercise of popular sovereignty. Judges cannot escape this
control. No sector of the State can be above the dialectic
imposed by the famous law of checks and balances.
In the text of our Political Constitution which regulates the
legislative investigatory commissions, in no form is it
established that the Judiciary is excluded from the
CRS-57
investigative action of these Commissions. In comparative
law, one should cite Article 76, first paragraph of the
Spanish Constitution and 82 of the Italian Political
Constitution. In both texts it is established that
legislative commissions shall be able to investigate any
matter of "...public interest..." At no moment do these
constitutional norms, just like our Political Constitution
establish exceptions in relation to the competence of the
commissions.
Dusuit, famous Dean of the Law School of Burdeog, stated that
"...Chamber may, perfectly, appoint an investigative
commission so that it will examine how a judicial service
operates..." (See Garrido Falla, Fernando and others.
"Comments on the Constitution." Ed. Civitas Espana -1985 -
pp. 1174-1175). The quoting of this opinion is timely, since
it confirms the interpretation that hag been made in relation
to the competence of the legislative commissions, respect to
the Judiciary.
It is difficult to state that the investigation of a
legislative commission of the Judiciary is an interference of
powers and, at the same time, not question the election by
the parliament of the magistrates of the Supreme Court of
Justice; because by applying the same argument, it would be
necessary to state, also, that the election of the Supreme
Court Justices by the Legislative Assembly is an inadmissible
invasion of the Legislative Branch with respect to the
Judiciary. It is difficult to uphold this statement but, if
one tries to be consistent, it would be necessary to admit it
in case that it is also stated that the legislative
commissions are to the detriment of the separation of powers
when they investigate the Judiciary. However, even in the
case that the Legislative Assembly does not elect
magistrates, their competence exists for exercising the
political control that corresponds to the legislative
commissions over the Judiciary, because as a public service,
the Judiciary does not differ from the Executive, and about
this there is no questioning with respect to the competence
of the legislative commissions for investigating it, even
though it does not designate its officials.
The Judiciary should not fear the investigation of a
parliamentary commission because it is a legitimate action
and one of public knowledge. What it should fear are the
surreptitious interventions, the cliques and the complete
gamut of underhanded interference that is not of public
knowledge and which works against the independence of the
Judiciary.
The Commission reiterates its gratitude to the Judiciary for
the positive reaction that it hag had, but this fact does not
exclude the undeniable competence of the parliament in
relation to the possibility of investigating the
administration of justice.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. We endorse in all their details the recommendations
contained in the First Report of this Commission, presented
to the Legislative Assembly on November 23, 1988.
2. That Mr. Ricardo Alem Leon not be named to any public
position in the future.
CRS-58
3. That Luis Alberto Cortes Chaves, Juan Carlos Campos
Barrantes, Tobias Chacon Ramirez, and Mario Valverde Zamora
not be named to any public position in the future.
4. That the status of retiree of independent means of Mr.
Lionel Casey Brothers be canceled and that he not be allowed
entry into the country subsequent to his extradition. In cage
the latter is not executed, he should be expelled from Costa
Rica.
5. That Mr. Rodolfo Ulloa Antillon should reign from his
position as General Manager of the Bank of Costa Rica, and
should he not do so the Board of Directors should not reelect
him to his position when the term for which he was elected
expires (See corresponding Annex).
6. That file number 963-21-4-1978, drawn up by the Options
and Naturalization Section of the Civil Registry
(naturalization of Mr. Fernando Melo), be the object of an
investigation by the Office of the Attorney General of the
Republic and of the Public Prosecutor /or Defender/, and
should there be cause, action be taken according to the law
against the responsible officials.
7. That former President Lic. Daniel Oduber Quiros must
return to Mr. Lionel Cagey Brothers the million colons that
he received under conditions already analyzed.
8. That former President Oduber Quiros should resign from the
public posts that he fills.
9. That Mr. Tajudeen's status of retiree of independent means
be canceled and that he not be allowed entry into the country
subsequent to his extradition. In cage this is not executed,
he should be expelled from Costa Rica.
10. That Mr. John Hull's naturalization be canceled, that he
be expelled from the country--when appropriate under law--and
his entry into the country be prohibited.
11. That former Minister Benjamin Piza Carranza be censured
for his acts ag minister, and if in the pending cage for
"failure to fulfill duties" he should be found guilty, that
he not be appointed again to public positions.
12. That Ramon Montero Quesada and Edwin Viales Rodriguez not
be named to any public position.
13. That Mr. Lewis Tambs, Joe Fernandez, Oliver North, John
M. Poindexter, and Richard V. Secord not be allowed entry
into the country.
14. That the administrative file on certificates of operation
issues by the General Office of Civil Aviation, to companies
which Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur represents, be handed over
with the files and proceedings to the Prosecutor's also
Defender's Office and the Office of the Attorney General of
the Republic, and if there should be liability on the part of
officials in charge of their handling and resolution, that
action be taken according to law.
CRS-59
In addition, the Board of Directors of Civil Aviation, as
long as the investigation lasts, should suspend the director
of Civil Aviation, Carlos Viquez Jara, and Mr. Javier Vargas
Barguil, Chief of the Legal Department from their positions.
15. That the General Office of Civil Aviation suspend the
aircraft pilot's license of any person who is taken to trial
for violation of the Law on Psychotropics, and if he should
be convicted, his license be revoked definitively.
16. That the permit and certificates for air operation be
canceled or revoked for companies whose managers, partners or
general agents are convicted of infractions of the Law on
Psychotropics.
17. That the General Office of Civil Aviation apply the
recommendations of points 15 and 16 above to Werner Lotz
Artavia, Jose Angel Guerra Laspiur, Gerardo Duran Ayanegui
and any others in the same conditions.
In the case of Werner Lotz Artavia there is no case taken to
trial, nor sentenced for any infraction whatsoever of the Law
on Psychotropics. The recommendation is made on the basis of
the statements made under oath by Mr. Lotz before the U.S.
Senate on August 8, 1988, where he admits his participation
in the transhipment of arms.
18. That we deputies immediately return one of the two sets
of plates that were delivered to us. The other will be used
exclusively by the Deputy on the vehicle he owns.
19. That the Judiciary initiate the proceedings for the
respective legal Casey, if in law there is a basis, of the
files numbers 909-3-83, 1011-1-86, 477-V-87, 2230-86, 294-2-
85, 21-184, 124-Q-84.
20. To take testimonies and send them to the Prosecutor's
Office so that he will initiate the respective suit for the
presumed crime of perjury that Magistrate Lic. Jesus Ramirez
Quiros may have committed in his appearance before this
Commission.
21. That the Legislative Assembly, with the regulatory
exemptions of the case, remit the file on constitutional
amendments that prohibits deputies from legislating to their
own benefit. (This file is pending legislation.)
22. That with the exemptions of the case, the file that
creates the Council of the Magistracy be forwarded in order
to guarantee the Costa Rican people that their judges are
going to decree justice and are not going to use their time
in administrative functions.
23. That the Regulations on Order, Management and Internal
Discipline of the Legislative Assembly be reformed, in order
to create a Permanent Special Commission to study the entire
problem related to drug trafficking, corruption and
parliamentary ethics, which should be named by 38 votes, in
secret voting.
24. Remit, with the exemptions of the case, the following
reforms, according to the annex;
CRS-60
a) Family Code, chapter on adoption.
b) Penal Code, chapter referring to swearing in of witnesses,
according to the Annex.
25. Reform Article 19 of the Political Constitution,
according to the judgment proposed in Legislative File No.
10776.
26. Remit, with the exemptions of the Cage, file no. 10339,
referring to the issuance of diplomatic passports.
27. That the Law on the General Office of Civil Aviation be
reformed with the exemptions of the case, according to what
is established in the annex.
28. That in the organic law of RECOPE the necessary clauses
be established in order to establish proper control over the
sales of fuel for airplanes. The General Office of Civil
Aviation should inform the Minister of Transportation of any
anomaly that it discovers after the corresponding audit.
29. That through the necessary reform of the law, there be
exclusion from banking secrecy of the current accounts which
receive deposits in cash in foreign currency for more than US
$5,000 or its equivalent in other currency, which shall be
examined by any competent authority, without the necessity of
authorization by a judge. Said reform shall include, also,
points 31 and 32 below.
30. The representative of any banking or financial
institution shall report to the General Auditor's Office of
Banks any operation or transaction of foreign currency in
cash whose value is more than US $5,000, or its equivalent in
other currencies. Failure to comply with this obligation
shall be a crime whose punishment will be 20-100 days fine.
This information shall state the total of the operation and
the identity of the persons participating in it.
31. Prohibit the banks and other financial institutions from
the receipt of deposits in foreign currently through third
parties, and especially from subsidiary or parallel companies
abroad, according to the bill presented as an annex to this
report.
32. That among other reforms of the Electoral Code the
following should be made:
a) Companies of any nature, both national and foreign, shall
not be able to contribute to political parties.
b) Costa Rican physical persons shall be able to contribute
to political parties up to the sum of 500,000 colons a year.
The parties shall hand over to the Supreme Elections Tribunal
and the Office of the Comptroller General of the Republic the
list of contributors ag well ag the complete records on
revenues. The donors shall, through sworn testimony, point
out that the funds donated are of their private property.
CRS-61
c) Political parties shall not be able to channel the payment
of the political debt advanced through companies to which a
assignment of the political debt has been made.
33. That this report be forwarded to the Prosecutor's Office
for the proper action.
FINAL OBSERVATIONS
The reaction shown by broad sectors of Costa Rican opinion to
the task that we undertook through mandate of the Assembly,
and the encouragement that has been given us in such a
generalized manner, allow us to conclude this report with a
fervent invitation to the Costa Rican people so that we will
view the future of our homeland with optimism and hope. The
task of discovering and pointing out our bad habits and vices
has been disagreeable but we sincerely believe that we should
see tomorrow with hope and optimism. We believe that there is
no space for a defeatist attitude, because Costa Rica is
repudiating the forces of drug trafficking. There are moral
reservations and there is national will to say 'stop' to that
scourge. There is awareness that the country is on its feet
and alert to prevent the moral and social deterioration that
some sister nations already show. There is an awareness that
we can lose the best of our Christian and democratic
traditions, if we lower the guard toward a powerful and
unscrupulous enemy. There is a broad and deep national
solidarity for defending the health of our population,
honesty in the public operations, and moral cleanliness in
all the activities of our public and private life.
GIVEN IN THE SESSIONS CHAMBER OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION, AT
ONE THIRTY P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989.
ALBERTO FAIT LIZANO, PRESIDENT
LUIS ML. CHACON JIMENEZ, SECRETARY
OSCAR AVILA SOLE, DEPUTY
JOSE MIGUEL CORRALES BOLANOS, DEPUTY
LUIS FISHMAN ZONZINSKI, DEPUTY
JORGE ROSSI CHAVARRIA, DEPUTY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 Oduber, p. 14
2 Oduber, p. 15
3 Oduber, p. 15
4 Oduber, p. 37, 42, 57
CRS-62
5 Rolando Araya Monge, p. 37-38
6 Ibid., p. 39
7 Oduber, p. 16
8 Mauricio Martinez-La Nacion, 6/1/89
9 Nolan Campos, p. 28
10 Baltodano Guillen, p. 30
11 Tajudeen, p. 8 and 9.9.
12 Tajudeen, pp. 12 and 13
13 Tajudeen, p. 17
14 Nestor Baltodano Guillen, p. 53
15 Secret session of the Commission
16 Tajudeen, pp. 11-14
17 Tajudeen, pp. 31 and 32
18 Tajudeen, p. 40
19 Baltodano Guillen, p. 5
20 Baltodano Guillen, p. 10
21 Baltodano Guillen, p. 15, 16, 17, and 18
22 Baltodano Vargas, No. 59, p. 35 and 36
23 Tajudeen, p. 25 and p. 38
24 Baltodano Guillen, p. 14
25 Baltodano Guillen, p. 14, 47, and 48
26 Baltodano Guillen, p. 136
27 Baltodano Vargas, No. 59, p. 4
28 Baltodano Guillen, pp. 38-39
29 Baltodano Vargas, session No. 59, p. 24
30 Baltodano Vargas, session No. 59, p. 25
31 Casey, p. 2
32 Casey, p. 4
33 Casey, pp. 40-41
34 Casey, p. 5
35 Casey, p. 8
36 Gonzalez Figuls, p. 3-4-5. Casey-p. 27
37 Casey-p. 11-65
38 Casey-p. 11
39 Casey-p. 12
40 Casey-p. 6465-Ulloa Antillon-p. 5
41 Casey-p. 10
42 Casey-p. 14
43 Casey-p. 21-22
44 Casey-p. 31-32
45 Casey-p. 32
46 Casey-p. 43
47 Casey-p. 45
48 Mary Castro-p. 7
49 Oduber-p. 13 and information received by the Commission in
secret session
50 Casey-p. 38
CRS-63
51 Casey-p. 63 52 Casey-p. 66-67 53 Casey-p. 52-Castro
Hernandez-p. 30 54 Casey-p. 38-42 (see seizure papers from
DEI 55 See Commission report of June 27, 1989 56 See verdict
on Casey's radio communications system--of May 10, 1989--
Warren Murillo Martinez 57 Chacon-pp. 31-32-33 58 Alem, p.
34-Chacon, p. 38-Miranda, p. 2 59 Alem, p. 34.35 60 Alem, p.
35 61 Chacon-p. 57-58 62 Alem, p. 36 63 Alem, p. 37 64 Nolan
Campos, p. 3 and 6; Hidalgo Vindas, p. 39 and 40. 65 Alem, p.
42 66 Alem, p. 43 67 Campos-No. 66-p. 25 68 Campos-No. 66-p.
15 69 Campos-No. 66-p. 20 70 Nolan Campos-p. 6 71 Tobias
Chacon-p. 19 72 Rolando Araya-p. 5 73 Campos-No. 66-p. 6 74
Campos-No. 66-p. 8 75 Hernan Garron-p. 24 76 Campos No. 66-p.
41-Alem-p. 32 77 Alem-p. 37 78 Alem-p. 38 79 Alem-p. 41 80
Alem-p. 41 81 Alem, p. 42 82 Alem, p. 71 and 84 83
Legislative Assembly, Commission investigating drug
trafficking, sworn statements, secret sessions; The National
Security Archive, The Chronology, Warner Books., Inc.,
Washington, DC, 1987, p. 54; sworn statement of Bruce Jones
Bradford, before the South District Court of Florida,
December 3, 1987; sworn statement of William Crone before the
South District Court of Florida, January 7, 1989, pp. 340-
345. 84 La Nacion. Plane Discovered in Liberia was
camouflaged by crew, May 6, 1985, p. lOA. 85 District of
Columbia Court, U.S. vs Oliver L. North, criminal case No.
88-008-02-GAG,
certain facts according to the U.S. Government, pp. 3-4.
86 Statements of Luis Alberto Monge Alvarez to the Tico Times, January
16,198 7;
confidential information handed over to this Commission; Legislative
Assembly,op. cit.,
Document No. 96, July 4, 1989, p. 6; Court of District of Columbia, op.
cit.,pp. 27-
28.
87 Legislative Assembly, op. cit., Document No. 96, July 4,
1989; sworn statement of Joe
CRS-64
Fernandez (Tomas Castillo) before the Senate Committee that
investigated the Iran-Contra affair, April 20, 1987, pp. 396-
399; May 4, 1987; 468-469; May 29, 1987, pp. 91 and 94; the
Nations' Security Archive, op. cit., p. 349; Court of the
District of Columbia, op. cit., p. 35.
88 Sworn statement of Joe Fernandez (Tomas Castillo), op.
cit.
89 Idem; April 20, 1987, pp. 475-478; May 4, 1987, pp. 475-
478; May 29, 1987; pp. 88-90. The National Security Archive,
op. cit., p. 393.
90 Court of the District of Columbia op. cit., volume 36A, p.
6564-6569.
91 The National Security Archive, op. cit., p. 491; U.S.
Senate, Tower Report, pp. 11 and 12; District of Columbia
Court, op. cit., pp. 40-41.
92 Legislative Assembly, Special Caro Quintero Commission,
Document No. 30, March 26, 1987, pp. 10-12; Legislative
Assembly, Special Committee to Investigate Drug Trafficking,
Doc. No. 96, July 4, 1989.
93 File of Case No. 1022-F-87.
94 Idem.
95 Superior Court of Liberia, File No. 282-88.
96 File of Case No. 1022-F-87.
97 Private statements under oath before this Commission;
sworn statement of William Davis to this Commission;
statements of John Hull to the Wall Street Journal, May 21,
1988 and to Newsday, May 19, 1988; statements under oath of
William Crone to the District Court of Florida and the U.S.
Senate; voice Only Foot Soldiers Take the Rap, January 18,
1989, pp. 23ss.
98 Statements of John Hull to Channel 7, March 1989; to the
Wall Street Journal, May 21, 1987 and to Newsday, May 10,
1987; sworn statement of Robert Owen to the South District
Court of Florida, May 19, 1988, pp. 721-711, 724. Book of
Col. Oliver North.
99 Statements of John Hull to Channel 7, March 1989; The
National Security Archive, op. cit., p. xvii; Statements of
Joe Fernandez (Tomas Castillo) before the Senate, op. cit.,
Los Angeles Weekly. The Miami Network, October 7-13, 1988.
100 Sworn statement of Benjamin Piza Carranza before this
Commission. Doc. No. 96, July 4, 1989.
101 Statements of John Hull to Channel 7, March 1989;
Statement of Robert Owen, Florida, op. cit., February 8,
1988, pp. 50, 75, 82-83, 176.
102 Sworn statement before this Commission, private session;
statement of Robert Owen, idem., p. 289.
103 Sworn statement before this Commission, private session;
sworn statement of William Crone-Florida op. cit., p. 260,
sworn statement of Sheila Ugalda, op. cit., pages 103108.
104 Statements of John Hull to Channel 7, March 1989,
interview and report on John Hull by Ron Arias. Semanario
People, John Hull, once Oliver North's man in Costa Rica, is
now accused of running guns and drugs. May 1, 1989, p. 53;
sworn statement of Robert Owen-Florida, op. cit., February 9,
1988, pp. 519, 533, 537, 547 and May 19, 1988, p. 734; book
of Col. Oliver North.
105 Wall Street Journal, Contra Connection, by Jonathan
Kwitny, May 21,1987; Newsday, The Private War of John Hull,
by Sandra Peddie and Brian Donovan, May 10, 1987.
106 Sworn statement before this Commission-Secret Session;
sworn statement of Sheila
CRS-65
Ugalde, op. cit., p. 89; sworn statement of W. Crone-Florida,
op. cit., pp. 309 and 365 and before the Subcommittee on
Terrorism, Narcotics and international Communications and
International Economic Policy, Trade, Oceans and the
Environment, of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
October 30, 1987, p. 148.
107 Sworn statement before this Commission-private session;
statements of John Hull to Channel 7, March 1989; interview
of John Hull with the Wall Street Journal, op. cit.,
Statement by R. Owen-Florida, op. cit., February 8, 1988, pp.
10, 171, 220, 22, and before the Senate, op. cit., October 1,
1987, p. 10; statement of W. Crone, Florida, op. cit., pp.
263-269.
108 Investigation of the OIJ: rep. 052-DV-89, January 12,
1989, p. 3; sworn statement of Sheila Ugalde Sanchez, op.
cit., pp. 135-139; statement of W. Crone-Florida, op. cit.
109. Statement under oath by William Davis to this
Commission; statement under oath before this Commission-
private session; statement of Sheila Ugalde-Florida, op.
cit., Voice, op. cit.
110 Statements under oath before this commission-private
sessions; statement of Sheila Ugalde, op. cit., pp. 117-120,
117; Statement of R. Owen, Florida, op. cit., February 8,
1988, pp. 184-185.
111 The National Security Archives, op. cit., pp. 88-89; Log
Angeles Weekly, The Miami Network, by Murray Waas, October 7-
13, 1988.
112 Statement under oath by Werner Lotz Artavia before the
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International
Operations of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
April 8, 1988, pp. 664-715.
113 Appearances of Willy Alvarez and Hugo Miranda.
114 Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International
Communications, U.S. Senate, February 8, 1988, p. 46.
115 Court of the District of Columbia, op. cit., pp. 38-39.
116 Statement under oath before this Commission-private
session; statement under oath by Floyd Carlton Caceres before
the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International
Communications, U.S. Senate, February 8, 1988, pp. 1050106.
117 Statement under oath of George Morales before the
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International
Communications of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, July 15, 1987, pp. 83-83, 92-93.
118 OIJ investigation: Rep. 052-DV-89, January 12, 1989.
119 Statement of W. Crone-Florida, op. cit., p. 337.
120 Idem, p. 223; Statement of Sheila Ugalde, op. cit., p.
47.
121 Statements of Robert Owen, op. cit., Statement of Sheila
Ugalde, op. cit.
122 File 282-88, Superior Court of Liberia
123 Idem.
124 Document No. 006-E-87, of the OIJ, p. 6.
125 File 282-88, Superior Court of Liberia
126 Idem.
127 File 282-88
Translated by Deanna Hammond, CRS, Language Services, April
26, 1990
PUBLIC PROSECUTORS
INVESTIGATION ON "LA PENCA" CASE
SAN JOSE, COSTA RICA 26 DECEMBER 1989
1
there is a printed 1000
THE JUDICIARY (For official use.
REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA No.______________1
INTRODUCTION
Taking into consideration that, in appearance, the primary
objective of the criminal assault that took place on May 30 of
1984 in the camp known as "La Penca". was the physical
elimination of Eden Pastora Gomez. Commander of the "ARDE"
forces. in the Southern Front of the Nicaraguan Counter
Revolution, we took upon ourselves the task of analyzing, based
on the investigations of the Sub-Committee on Terrorism.
Narcotics and International Communications and of the U.S. Senate
Committee named to investigate the lran-Contra affair. the
context of the facts surrounding the crime. trying to verify and
complement said investigations with our inquiries in Costa Rica.
From the study of the file prepared by the Officina de
Asuntos Especiales <Office of Special Affairs> of the Organismo
de Investigacion Judicial <Organization of Judicial
Investigation>, we consider as a certainty that the perpetrator
of the criminal assault was a subject publicly known under the
false name of PEER ANKER ANSEN, for this reason, our inquiries
were directed towards establishing the possible participation of
mediate perpetrators, accomplices and accessories after the fact
as well as the true identity of the perpetrator of the crime.
The investigation is not over, but in view of the complexity
of the matter and the conjunction of events that merit a seParate
investigation, we decided to present this preliminary report.
1
I- CONTEXT OF THE EVENTS
A- The Medellin Cartel
1.- Generaiities
At the beginning of the decade of the eighties, the so
called "Medellin Cartel" is formed in Colombia made up of, among
others, by Pablo Escobar Gaviria, Gustavo de Jesus Gaviria, jorge
Ochoa Vasquez and Fabio Ochoa Engacha (1).
The founding of this criminal organization comes out of an
agreement between these drug "barons" and the M-19 Colombian
guerrilla movement after having carried out a hard and bloody
armed fight with serious loss of life on both sides (2).
Around 1983 the Medellin Cartel already has a sophisticated
organization, with specialized personnel in the different
production areas, which cover the cultivation, the manufacture,
the transport, the distribution and the money laundering. In that
year, the production zones of the coca leaf are located in the
jungles of Bolivia, Peru, Brazil and Ecuador from where it is
transported to Colombia already processed as coca paste. In this
country the paste is refined, obtaining the cocaine which is
shipped to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Bahamas,
Panama, Jamaica and the Cayman Islands, where it is stored for
later shipment to the United States. For the unworried use of
the monies obtained from the sale of the cocaine, the Medellin
Cartel has a staff highly specialized in finances, bank
strategies, stock exchanges, etc. that are in charge of the
laundering of the cash, and for the safe
(1) Jose Blandon's statement before the U.S. Senate SubCommittee
on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Relations. (2) Ibid.
2
development of its activity, the Medeliin Cartel.by this time.
has established areas of influence through the recruiting of
officers of the armies and even popularly elected functionaries
of Bolivia, Peru, Brazil, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Bahamas. Panama
and Jamaica to whom are paid sums that range from hundreds to
millions of dollars according to the level of their positions in
the government (3).
2- The Medellin Cartel and the Latin American armed
conflicts.
Floyd Carlton Caceres, who bossed an organization made up of
more than 25 persons dedicated to the cocaine traffic among
Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama, Mexico and the United States
between 1983 and 1986 (4). participated, together with pilots
Richard Belonick, Cesar Rodriguez, Teofilo Watson and Enrique
Pretel. beginning in 1978 in the supplying of arms to various
armed Latin American groups, among whom were the Frente
Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional in the war against Somoza, the
Frente Farabundo Marti para la Liberacion Nacional de El Salvador
(5), the M-19 and the Frente de Liberacion Nacional de Colombia.
This arm traffic, as he stated, was managed from Panama by
General MANUEL ANTONIO NORIEGA (6) for whom he made 17 flights
beginning in 1980, carrying arms to the F.M.L.N.
In 1982, Pablo Escobar Gaviria and Gustavo Gaviria, through
Carlton Caceres, established a commercial relation with General
Noriega so that he would provide security to the flights in which
(3) Milian Rodriguez and Jose Blandon, Op.cit.l. (4) Floyd
Carlton Caceres's extradition proceedings. Case No.
284-J-2-86. Criminal Court of Heredia.
(5) Floyd Carlton Caceres and Jose Blandon. Op.cit.l.
(6) Ibid.
3
cocaine was being transPorted. The deal was started with the
carrying out of three flights from Colombia to previously
selected runways controlled by the Panamanian government, and
each flight carrying more than 400 kilos of cocaine. Manuel
Antonio Noriega was paid, through Carlton. $100,000; $150,000 and
$200.000, respectively for each one of the trips (7).
General Manuel Antonio Norieca also made himself a basic
part for the protection of the Medellin Cartel in the money
laundering through the Panamanian banking and finance systems.
The cash money would come in through Panamanian airports in boxes
that were picked up by vehicles of the Defence Force, a task for
which he was paid millions of dollars. (8).
Simultaneously, General Noriega was maintaining a close
commercial activity with the Cuban government through two
entities controlled by him, call "Reciclaje Agency" and "Simone".
Using these entities he sold advanced American technology to Cuba
and at the same time introduced Cuban shrimps and lobsters in the
American market, evading, in this manner, the economic blockade
established by United States laws. Manuel Antonio Noriega's
relations with the Cuban regime are so close that towards the end
of the month of June, 1984 Fidel Castro made possible a meeting
in Havana between the representatives of the Medellin Cartel and
him, accompanied by Jose Blandon (9).
(7) Floyd Carlton Caceres, Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Jose
Blandon Op.cit.l
(8) Floyd Carlton Caceres, Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Jose
Blandon Op.cit.l
(9) Jose Blandon. Op.cit.l
4
The meeting was originated by a discord between the Cartel
and Noriega on account of the capture of a laboratory in the
Darien Province by one of his subordinates. apparently without
his authorization, for the installation of which he has been
given five million dollars. This originated a plot, propitiated
by the Cartel, to murder Noriega, that was detected by the Israel
intelligence service while he <Noriega> was on a trip through
Europe. Alerted about the plot, Noriega proPitiated the meeting
in Havana, where the return of equipments, helicopters and
captured planes, the freeing of 23 prisoners and the return of
the five million dollars were agreed upon in exchange for his
life (10).
3- The Medellin Cartel and the Southern Front: General
Manuel Antonio Noriega also supplied arms to the
Brigada Internacional Simon Bolivar (11), whose commander, Dr.
Hugo Spadafora, joined the Southern Front in the anti-Sandinista
struggle. Before his murder, which took place on November 13,
1985, Dr. Spadafora had talked with Floyd Carlton Caceres and
Cesar Rodriguez and he had a notebook in which he had noted all
the details in connection with the involvement of General Manuel
Antonio Noriega in the drug traffic, telling Carlton that he was
going to "make a bomb explode" in Panama by divulging this
information (12). After the murder, Noriega commented to Jose
Blandon that the homicidal was a subordinate of his named
(10) Jose Blandon and Floyd Carlton Caceres. Op.cit.l
(11) Jose Blandon. Op.cit.l.
(12) Floyd Carlton Caceres, Op.cit.l; Jose Rodrigo Ortiz Leiva
before the Prosecutor's Office. Case No.282-88 T.S.P. from
Liberia for cocaine international trafficking c/Edwin Viales
and others.
5
cordoba. with the rank of Major who was in charge of a military
unit (13) in Chiriqui. Noriega and Niraido Madrinan. Chief of
the D.E.N.I., also commented, in Jose Blandon's presence, about a
prepared statement through Amantillo Cordoba, officer of the
D.E.N.I., that would be given by a witness named Manfred Hoffman
Wittemberg, German resident of Costa Rica, affirming that the
murder had been carried out by the F.M.L.N. of El Salvador (14)
Alfredo Caballero, who was in charge of laundering money from
the narcotrafficking and the plane purchases for Floyd Carlton
Caceres, gave his help to Eden Pastora between 1983 and 1984
(15). In addition he participated, through a company of his, with
office in Miami, called SIACSA. as middleman in the purchase of
planes for A.R.D.E. (16).
George Morales, sentenced in the U.S. for illegal imports of
drugs and connected to the Medellin Cartel, had under his
control, close to thirty pilots dedicated to the drug traffic.
Among them was Richard Healey, who was Chief of Pilots, married
to the former wife of Adolfo "Popo" Chamorro, commander of
A.R.D.E. (17).
On June 25, 1983, John Hull left the Tobias Bolanos Airport
accompanied by Jose Robelo Gonzalez, member of A.R.D.E., on board
plane N-91 CB bound for the United States. Accompanying them
(13) Jose Blandon. Op.cit.l
(14) Ibid.
(15) Floyd Carlton Caceres, Op.cit.l. See extradition
proceedings for Carlton Caceres. Op.cit 12.
(16) Eden Pastora Gomez before the O.I.J.
(17) George Morales & Gary Setzner. Op. cit. 1.
6
on board Plane N-666P.F., were Marcos Acuado. Emiciio Prado.
Roberto Esoinoza and Gerardo Duran Ayanegui, all also members of
A.R.D.E. (18..
On leaving Costa Rica they reported as their destination to
the Civil Air authorities the United States, nevertheless, they
landed at San Andres. where they took on fuel, reporting as their
next destination Cozumel, in Mexico, and Miami, Florida. In this
last place they took lodgings at the Quality Inn Airport Hotel on
the 26 of June, 1983 at 15:47 hours (19).
On that occasion (June of 1983), John Hull, Marcos Aguado
and George Duran, taking with them a Colombian friend of George
Morales, named Gustavo Velez, visited the office o+. the former
located in Building 415 next to Hangar No. 1 at the Opa-Loca
airport, requesting his help to take 40 grenade launchers
illegally out of the United States to Ilopango, El Salvador.
destined for the Contras. Morales lent his cooperation. the 40
grenade launchers being transferred to a warehouse of his located
at 135th Street, 17th Avenue in Miami and he designated pilots
Gary Betzner and Richard Healy to effect the clandestine flight,
which was carried out, leaving from the Opa-Loca Airport, Miami,
with a stop at Boca Chica, where anti-vessel mines were loaded,
to finally deliver the cargo at Ilopango, El Salvador, guarded
(18) Marcos Aguado before the O.I.J. Proceedings for Various
Crimes case against John Hull for Hostile Acts. Trial Judge
of San Carlos.
(19) Marcos Aguado, invoices in hearing against John Hull. Op.
Cit. 18.
7
by military <personnel>. There they were supplied with fuel and
they continued their trip to Rio Hacha in Colombia. from where
they returned to the United States with a cargo of marijuana
(20). The plane in which the flight was made was a C-47 that
later Morales gave to A.R.D.E. in 1984 (21).
As George Morales affirms, before this occasion in which he
is visited by John Hull, he had heard about his person <sic>.
since 1981. when speaking with Colombian narco-trafficker friends
of his, they discussed about stopping points to store merchandise
and to refuel (22).
Between April and May of 1984, Adolfo "Popo" Chamorro,
Marcos Aguado and Octaviano Cesar got together with George
Morales requesting his collaboration for A.R.D.E., talking to him
about the need for cloth for uniforms and the transportation of
40 thousand pounds of armaments and military implements to the
South of Nicaragua. Octaviano Cesar and Marcos Aguado said that
they were connected with the C.I.A. and offered to help him in
connection with the charge that he faced for illegal importation
of drugs in the Federal Court of the United States. In exchange
he should provide money, planes, boats and other implements.
Also, they indicated that the flights that would be made would
have the protection of agents of the United States government.
Morales accepted the deal and they took him to see the weapons
(20) George Morales before the O.I.J. and before the U S Senate.
Gary Betzner before the U.S. Senate. Op.Cit.l.
(21) George Morales before the Senate. Op.cit. 1.
(22) George Morales before the Senate. Op.cit. 1.
8
that had to be transported to Costa Rica in one of his planes.
The first flight was going to be made by Morales and Aguado.
returning with cocaine. but at the last moment Marcos Aguado told
him that he could not run the risk of being caught with drugs as
he was a pilot connected with the C.I.A., so eventually who flew
was Gary Setzner in July of 1984, carrying M-60 machine guns. M16
rifles and some C-4 explosives. The flight originated in Fort
Lauderdale and its destination was a runway located on John
Hull's farm in Muelle de San Carlos. There it was met by John
Hull. with a blond fellow and two Latins, the plane was unloaded
and was loaded again with 7 suitcases and 56 boxes all containing
cocaine. This load was taken to Fort Lauderdale to an airport
controlled by United States authorities (23).
Some ten days later Gary Betzner carried out another flight
leaving from the Opa-Loca airport with armaments, landing on a
runway located in Los Llanos, San Carlos where John Hull with two
Latins waited for him. There the plane was loaded with 15 small
suitcases containing 30 kilos of cocaine each (24).
George Morales gave the A.R.D.E. a C-47 plane that was
picked up in Haiti by Gerardo Duran and Marcos Aguado, as well as
another plane, a 404, that was delivered to Adolfo Chamorro. The
C-47 was based in El Salvador and the 404 in Costa Rica at the
service of Gerardo Duran Ayanegui (25). In addition, he donated
(23) George Morales. Op.cit. 1.
(24) Gary Betzner and George Morales. Op.cit. 1.
(25) Carol Prado before the O.I.J. Op.cit. 18.
9
between 4 and 5 million dollars in cash from the drug traffic and
he trained pilots for them (26).
In September of 1984, Sebastian Gonzalez Mendieta. alias
"Guachan". leader of a group of A.R.D.E. known as the M-3,
Pastora's dissidents (27) and Alberto Albaunza participated in a
drug trafficking in Liberia, Guanacaste, a case that is pending
before the Superior Court of that place, because Gonzalez
Mendieta ran away to Panama where, until 1988, he was working for
former President Del Valle in a stable that belonged to him (28).
Ramon Milian Rodriguez lent his services as an accountant
for the Medellin Cartel between 1979 and 1982, designing an
ingenious system for the laundering of money from drug
trafficking through the use of the Panamanian banking system and
the creation of "shell" companies in the United States as well as
in Panama, with the protection of Noriega. This allowed him, only
in the year 1980, to handle a flow of cash for more than two
million millions dollars and to have access to eleven million
millions dollars of investments of the mentioned Cartel (29).
<Translator's note: A "billon" (in Spanish) is one million
millions; a "billion" (in English) is one thousand millions>.
(26) George Morales before the O.I.J. Op.cit. 18 and before the
U.S. Senate. Op.cit.l; Octaviano Cesar, Adolfo Chamorro
Cesar, Carol Prado Hernandez before the O.I.J. Op.cit. 18.
Eden Pastora before the O.I.J.
(27) Case against Ernesto Albaunza and others. Superior Court of
Liberia; Jose Blandon before the Senate. Op.cit.l.
(28) Jose Blandon. Op.cit.l.
(29) Ramon Milian Rodriguez before the Senate. Op.cit.l and
before the FBI.
10
Among the traffickers to whom Milian Rocrquez lent his money
laundering services were Ubaldo Fernandez, Carlos Soto and Luis
Rodriguez (30). who, in 1982 participated in an importation of
marihuana to Massachussets (31).
Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Luis Rodriguez founded and
established for money laundering the entities A.K.A.B.A.S.A. and
AHOREMUSA HOLDING S.A.. Ubaldo Fernandez and Carlos Soto lent and
used for the same purpose Wong Fat Chin Farms S.A., and Carlos
Soto and Ramon Rodriguez foundeo KARACHI International S.A. (32).
Luis Rodriguez, Ubaldo Fernandez and Carlos Soto, founded in
Panama, Inversiones DEVISA S.A., which at the same time made
investments with money coming from the narcotraffick, in
Frigorificos de Puntarenas S.A., in Costa Rica. Frigorificos de
Puntarenas S.A. operated with an agent representative in Miami
called Ocean Hunter, omened by Luis Rodriguez (33).
Ramon Milian Rodriguez was the link for the money laundering
through all the entities mentioned (34). Luis Rodriguez named
Moises Dagoberto Nunez to be in charge of the management of
Frigorificos de Puntarenas S.A. as a man of his complete trust.
Through Ocean Hunter Inc. and Frigorificos de Puntarenas, monies
coming from the narcotrafficking were delivered to the Nicaraguan
"Contras" (35).
(30) Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Carlos Soto before Special Agents
of the Federal Grand Jury in Florida on 4-3-87.
(31) Carlos Soto. Op.cit.30.
(32) Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Carlos Soto. Op.cit.30.
(33) Ramon Milian Rodriguez and Carlos Soto. Op.cit.30.
(34) Ramon Milian Rodriguez before the Senate Op.cit.l.
(35) Carlos Soto. Op.cit.30. Ramon Milian Rodriguez. Op.cit.l.
11
Frank Chanes. identified as a narcotrafficker with economic
interests in Ocean Hunter Inc.. supplied financing to A.R.D.E.
and to Cuban anti-Castro grouPs with money coming from the drug
traffic (36).
According the Public Property Record, on 22 June 1982.
Moises Nunez Ruiz. sPecially commissioned for it. records the
following agreements taken in General Assembly of partners (37).
FIRST: The resignation of the previous Board of Directors is
accepted.
THIRD: Named are Carlos Soto Collado as President, Moises
Nunez Ruiz as First Vice President and Ubaldo Fernandez
Monterules as Second Vice President.
On 2 July 1985 the statutes are changed, establishing that
the Board of Directors will be made up by three partner members
or third parties and Moises Nunez Ruiz is named as President,
Luis Rodriguez Morales as Secretary and Luis Rodriguez Mesa as
Treasurer.
Frigorificos de Puntarenas S.A. also had granted ample power
to Francisco or Frank Chanes which was revoked on 5 May 1988
(38).
(36) Jose Coutin before the F.B.I.
(37) Certification of the Statutes of Frigorificos de Puntarenas
S.A.
(38) Ibid.
12
Ocean Hunter and Frigorificos de Puntarenas S.A. were also
used by Robert Owen and Oliver North to channel clean resources
coming from the N.H.A.O.. an office established for the
management of humanitarian aid approved by the Congress of the
United States towards the end of 1984, with the approval of the
"Boland Amendment" (39).
Moises Nunez also entered in contact with the Department of
Narcotics of the Ministry of Public Safety through Gilberth
Jimenez Retana, an official in that department, who introduced
him to Sr. Luis Barrantes, at that time the director. A close
friendship sprung between Luis Barrantes and Moises Nunez to the
point that he <Barrantes> gave him an I.D. that accredited him
as an officer of that department. Nunez collaborated at the same
time with the Department of Narcotics, providing money and
vehicles to carry out drug operations. Nunez got to be known by
our authorities as a collaborator of the D.E.A. and of other
police bodies (40).
Alfonso Cruz Corrales, D.I.S. agent in San Carlos, relates
that on one occasion in which he took John Hull to a meeting of
the directors of that dependency, when he was returning to San
Carlos, Hull went to the offices of Frigorificos de Puntarenas,
where he introduced to him Moises Nunez, who identified himself
with a badge of the Public Safety narcotic police. Later Nunez
(39) Robert Owen before the U.S. Senate Iran-Contra Committee.
Facts taken from the records of the Sub-Committee on
Terrorism, Narcotics and International relations of the
U.S. Senate.
(40) Gilbert Jimnez Retana and Rodolfo Jimenez before the O.I.J.
13
called him telling him that he was at Hull' s house and that he
wanted to talk with him. Cruz went to the meeting in which Nunez
tried to obtain information on the drug cases that were being
investigated in the zone (41). Later, in command of a narcotic
patrol of Public Safety, in which Gilberth Jimenez was going
along, he carried out the premature arrest of a Colombian named
Echeverri, which caused the failure of an operation which the
delegation of the O.I.J. of San Carlos had been carrying out from
four months back on this individual and a band of
narcotraffickers (42).
At present Moises Nunez Ruiz appears in the anti-druqs
international registries, registered as a narcotrafficker that
passes himself off as an intelligence agent to cover his activity
(43).
Moises Nunez used to say that he belonged to the 2506
Brigade that fought in Bahia Cochinos, Cuba and, in 1983,
received training (44) in a camp located in Naples, Florida in
which anti-communist Cubans and Nicaraguans were trained, that
later were sent to the Southern Front. The camp which was named
"Comandos 307" (45), was helped economically in Miami by Frank
Castro and Lilli Mestre and in Costa Rica by Francisco Chanes
(46).
(41) Alfonso Cruz Corales before the O.I.J.
(42) Fausto Rojas, Edgardo Alpizar, Alfonso Cruz before the
O.I.J.
(43) Cable from C.I.C.A.D.
(44) Rodolfo Jimenez before the O.I.J., Rene Corvo before the
F.B.I.
(45) Rene Corvo, Frank Castro before the F.B.I. (46) Rene Corvo
before the F.B.I.
14
That training camp that was opened in january 1983 on land
belonging to Gerardo Silva. ex-combatant of the "2506
Brigade"(47), came about as a result of a Cuban movement that was
formed with the participation of several groups united under the
idea of overthrowing the sandinista government and later.
Nicaragua freed, use its territory as a base to overthrow Fidel
Castro, idea that was promoted by Fernando "El Negro" Chamorro.
commander of the Southern Front and Adolfo Calero, leader of the
A.R.D.E. (48).
Some of Cubans that enrolled in the movement were
excambatants of Bahia de Cochinos and others were immigrants that
arrived to the U.S. coasts on board of the vessel "Mariel" (49)
and they came from groups identified as "Brigada Cubana 2506",
"Legion Cubana", " Cuba Independiente Democratica (CID)", "Omega
7" and "Alfa 66" (50),
In the recruiting of these persons took part Fernando "El
Negro" Chamorro and an individual known as Ernesto Cruche, who
was pointed out as an agent of the C.I.A.(51) and who, in Costa
Rica had the backing of Colonel Rodrigo Paniagua Pacheco,
director of the O.P.E.N. (52).
(47) Frank Castro, Rene Corvo, Rafael Tower before the F.B.I.
(48) Juan Jose Parra, Wilfredo Leiva before the D.I.J., Thomas
Posey before the F.B.I.
(49) <missing>
(50) Thomas Posey, Jose Coutin, Jose Sossa, Rafael Torres
Jimenez, Marcelino Rodriguez before the F.B.I.; Juan Parra
Garcia before the O.I.J.
(51) Juan Jose Parra Garcia before the O.I.J.
(52) Ibid.
15
the militay chiefs were Rene Corvo and Feiipe Vida. .53)
and the economic backing was furnished by Frank Castro or Eulaiio
Francisco Castro. Francisco or Frank Chanes and Moises Nunez (54)
through Ocean Hunter and Frigorificcs de Puntarenas S.A. with
money coming from the drug traffic (55).
At the beginning of 1983, Armando Looez Estrada. Cuban. who
promoted the economic aid to this group (56). Frank Castro, John
Hull, Bill Crone and Adolfo Jimenez got together at a farm of the
latter in Guanacaste where they discussed the help needed by
Fernando "El Negro" Chamorro. Later. at the Balmoral Hotel,
Frank Castro met with Bill Crone, who resides in San Carlos and
was John Hull'=- partner. with the purpose of contacting Pastora
and Robelo to integrate to their forces the Cuban group that was
in Miami. Crone travelled a month later to the camp in Florida
where he met Felipe Vidal and Rene Corvo, nevertheless, he did
not lend any aid as he was informed at the U.S. Embassy in Costa
Rica, that Frank Castro was being investigated for trafficking in
arms (57).
John Hull became the link of the Cubans in Costa Rica and
finally assumed the command over them (58).
The first group of Cuban elements arrived at Costa Rica in a
commercial flight on 5 June 1983 being met by Colonel Rodrigo
Paniagua Pacheco, who furnished transportation to them
(53) Rene Corvo
(54) Frank Castro, Francisco Hernandez.
(55) Carlos Soto, Ramon Milian Rodriguez before the F.B.I. and
the U.S. Senate.
(56) Jose Coutin before the F.B.I.
(57) Bill Crone before the O.I.J.
(58) Rene Corvo, Francisco Hernandez, Frank Castro, Jose Coutin,
Jose Sossa before the F.B.I.; Peter Glivery before the
O.I.J.; report of Special Affairs.
16
to La Chaiupa" farm belonging to Ciimaco Daiazar (59). At the
beginning some of these elements were integrated as
combatants of A.R.D.E. (60), but finally they were based between
the indicators 9 and 10 where they established a camp called
"Comando Saturnino Beltran" (61). it being known by the Costa
Ricans as the camp of the "Cubiches" (62).
B- THE ANTAGONIC POSITIONS OF PASTORA AND HULL As told by
Eden Pastora, in 1983, the Central Intelligence
Agency of the United States (C.I.A.), was interested in that the
North Front, controlled by the F.D.N., and the South Front. would
unite. To that effect the Agent Duke Klarich. known as Mr.
Maroni. who was the Chief of the C.I.A.for Latin America.
convoked Fernando Chamorro. Broklin Rivera, Alfonso Robelo and
Pastora to a meeting in Panama where General Manuei Antonio
Noriega proposed the unification of all forces opposed to the
Nicaraguan government. This proposal was turned down by Pastora,
who refused to fight together with former Somoza guards,
sheltered under the F.D.N. (63).
John Hull was in Costa Rica an operative agent of the C.I.A.
who was under Philip Holtz, known as Felipe, who was accredited
in Costa Rica as Second Secretary and official of the Economic
Section of the U. S. Embassy in our country. Holtz would
(59) Wilfredo Leiva, Juan Jose Parra before the O.I.J.
(60) Ibid.
(61) Rene Corvo, Frank Castro before the F.B.I.
(62) Fausto Rojas and Alfonso Cruz before the O.I.J.
(63) Eden Pastora Gomez before the O.I.J.
17
coordinate with Hull, or with Luis Rivas. who was his contact.
the dates on which the arms or other type of assistance would
arrive. and. through Margarita Acosta Baidomero, Hull's
companion, he rented various safe houses for periods of from four
to six months. where meetings of interest to him were carried
out. These houses were used by Hull and Robert Owen when they
travelled to San Jose. Holtz in his role of linkage with Hull
was later substituted by Joe Fernandez, known as Thomas Castillo
(64).
As it was pointed out previously. as indicated by the
witness, the Cubans that arrived at Costa Rica were recruited by
Fernando "El Negro" Chamorro and an individual who, it was said.
was from the C.I.A., named Ernesto Cruche. who coordinated the
arrival of these people with Colonel Paniagua (65).
Eden Pastora, in addition to being opposed to the
unification of his military forces with those of the F.D.N.,
fostered by the C.I.A. through Noriega, was also opposed to the
Cubans being integrated into his ranks, which were the ones that
practically dominated the Southern Front (66). To outwit this
opposition the Cuban went so far as to pass themselves off as
Puerto Rican so as to be accepted as combatants (67).
In view of Comandante Pastora's attitude, John Hull, in
partnership with Felipe Vidal, started a campaign to recruit
(64) Eden Pastora, Bill Crone and Margarita Acosta before the
O.I.J.
(65) Juan Jose Parra Garcia before the O.I.J.
(66) Bill Crone, Miguel Urroz Blando and Eden Pastora before the
O.I.J.
(67) Frank Castro before the F.B.I.
18
the commanders near him. trying to convince them to abadom him
and to join their group (68).
John Hull not only tried to recruit Pastora's commanders.
but he also made a trip to Washington, D.C. in June of 1983 in
the company of Bill Crone and Luis Rivas, commander of A.R.D.E.,
where he met with Robert Owen. assistant to Senator DAN QUAYLE,
who took charge of making the contacts so that the situation of
the Southern Front could be explained. Hull lobbied against
Pastora, whom he pictured as a communist at the service of the
sandinistas, also indicating that the Southern Front was
disorganized and the troops were without food and medicine (69).
Robert Owen put John Hull in contact with Oliver North.
Colonel of the N.S.C., it being decided that Owen would go to the
Southern Front with the purpose of determining the prevailing
condition (70). In September of 1983 Owen arrived at Costa Rica
and visited John Hull, Luis Rivas taking him to various meetings
with some of the leaders of the Southern Front, among them
Alfonso Robelo and Eden Pastora (71).
Owen also met in Costa Rica with Leonel Poveda Siles, Carlos
Coronel, Guillermo Mendieta, Luis Rivas, Alejandro Martinez
Saenz, Harold Martinez Saenz and Juan Zavala, who
(68) Miguel Urroz Blanco, Eden Pastora before the O.I.J.
(69) Bill Crone before the O.I.J. and before the U.S. Senate;
Robert Owen before the Senate (Iran-Contra Commission).
(70) Robert Owen before the Iran-Contra Sub-Committee; Bill
Crone before the U.S. Senate Sub-Committe on Terrorism,
Narcotics, etc.
(71) Bill Crone before the O.I.J.
19
offered him to organize and structure a new Southern Front.
claiming to represent the camp of "Neoro" Chamorro and the group
of Cubans. According to them. Calero was in agreement with the
organization of a new Southern Front, which should be under the
command of U.N.O. and the Resistencia Democratica Nicaraouense.
They would keep far away from Pastora and would not infringe into
his territory. They also affirmed that some of Pastora s
commanders. that did not have food nor medicine, were willing to
abandon him. They were Leonel, San and Naveoante (72).
About that time (the end of 1983. beginning of 1984), John
Hull met with Adolfo Calero. President of F.D.N., which was the
organization that was fighting in the North Front, and told him
that he was disappointed with Pastora and that he wanted to
organize the Southern Front, helping the F.D.N. At that meeting
John Hull was opposed to "El Negro" Chamorro being the one to
reorganize the Southern Front. The leaders of the F.D.N. then
named "Comandante Jesus" as their representative in the
reorganization (73) and placed the Cuban group under his command.
Jesus, whose full name was Jesus Garcia, kept his center of
operations in John Hull's offices in San Carlos, from where he
coordinated the logistic help to the Cubans (74).
(72) Department of State document in the Kerry Report.
(73) Adolfo Calero before the court of the Southern District of
Florida, case against John HUll and Others brought by Tony
Avirgan.
(74) Fausto Rojas, Edgardo Alpizar, Alfonso Cruz before the
O.I.J.
20
it is important to indicate here. as narcotraffickers George
Moraies and Gary Betzner said. that it is at this precise time in
which Hull is confronting Pastora. when he. Adolfo "Popo"
Chamorro and Marcos Aguado begin to associate with them and the
flights are started, which are prolonged in 84, carrying stores
and ammunition to Hull and returning to the Unites States with
cocaine.
As per Miguel Urroz Blanco, Pastora's Chief of Security, he
<Pastora> considers that to accept help originating from
narcotrafficking means the political death of A.R.D.E. and his
own, reason for which he was opposed to this type of financing
(75). Carol Prado, ARDE commander, states that when Eden Pastora
realized that George Morales was a narcotrafficker, in an
aggressive manner, he forbade his help, ordering the return of
the 404 plane that had been based in Costa Rica under the command
of Gerardo Duran Ayanegui (76).
As can be observed from what has been stated by the
mentioned witnesses, between mid 1983 and 1984, John Hull became
Pastora's principal opponent, backed by Oliver North, the F.D.N.,
Adolfo Calero, the Cubans and the narcotraffickers.
That dislike for Pastora was even discussed in the presence
of national authorities. In the investigation we have established
that in the law office of Licenciate Carlos Manuel Coto Alban,
(75) Miguel Urroz Blanco before the O.I.J., Carol Prado before
the O.I.J., case against John Hull for Hostile Acts, Trial
Court of San Carlos.
(76) Carlos Prado before the O.I.J., Trial Court of San Carlos
case against John Hull for Hostile Acts.
21
there were meetings. with certain frequency. of anti-communist
groups, to some of which. the then Minister of Interior and
Police <Gobernacion y Policia>, Dr. Alfonso Carro. attended. In
one of those meetings, at the beginning of 1984. attended by the
Sub-Director of the Rural Assitance Guard. Sr. Carlos Alvarez
Camacho Araya, John Hull, Juan Jose Saborio, aka Carlos Sanchez
and others, the latter one stated that Eden Pastora was harmful
to the "Contra" as he was a henchman or accomplice of the
sandinistas, reason for which he had to be eliminated or taken
out of the Southern Front (77).
II- THE COSTA RICAN SITUATION
In our country John Hull was affiliated with Asociacion
Democratica Huetar Norte, with residence in the city of San
Carlos. This association organized paramilitary training that
were carried out in Hull's and other farms at Muelle and Buena
Vista de San Carlos. Even officials of the Organismo de
Investigacion Judicial attended those trainings, it being at one
of those military practices that one of these officials
accidentally killed a person that was participating in them (78).
John Hull, in turn, kept a close relationship with Colonel
Rodrigo Paniagua Salazar (79), who was the director of the
O.P.E.N., from 1 July 1982 to 25 April 1984 (80). Paniagua was
the person who met the Cubans that arrived from Miami and took
(77) Carlos Camacho Araya and Victor Wolf before the O.I.J.
(78) Rodolfo Alvarado Rosales before the Judicial Inspection.
(79) Eden Pastora Gomez before the O.I.J.
(80) Certification of the Personnel Office of the Ministry of
Public Safety.
22
them to "La Chalupa farm (81), helped to introduce the exPlosives
that were brought illegally into the country. through the Juan
Santamaria Airport. in L.A.C.S.A. commercial flights (82):
used his influence to free Rene Corvo, one of the Cuban leaders
in Costa Rica that was detained (83) and negotiated the return of
weaPons seized from the Contras by the Direccion de Inteligencia
y Seguridad (84). Paniagua recommended Felipe Vidal to the
Ministry of Public Safety so that he would be allowed to register
and carry 5 light weaPons (85). Vidal was being introduced by
Paniagua as his friend and he was seen with him at the offices of
the Ministry of Public Safety (86).
Hull's trust in some of our authorities was such that, as it
has been seen, at a meeting in which he and the Sub-Director of
the Rural Assistance Guard participated, the problem that Pastora
represented to the Southern Front and the need to eliminate him
or to take him out, was even discussed. Also discussed at that
meeting were the differences that existed between the Ministry of
Public Safety and the Ministry of Interior and Police on account
of the way they were focussing the anti-sandinista war. They
also spoke of the problem that National Security <Seguridad
Nacional - DIS> represented due to the "chumminess" that
supposedly was taking place between that department and the
sandinista regime (87).
(81) Wilfredo Leiva, Juan Parra, Climaco Salazar before the
O.I.J.
(82) Jose Sossa before the F.B.I.
(83) Rene Corvo before the F.B.I.
(84) Guillermo Marin Ulloa before the O.I.J.
(85) Weapons Registry Card of the M.S.P.
(86) Luis Fernandez Quiros before the O.I.J.
(87) Carlos Camacho Araya before the O.I.J.
23
Indeed. by that time the frontier posts in the North part of
the Country were under the control of the Rural Assistant Guard
but they were Placed under the responsibility of the National
Security (DIS) in charge of Carlos Monge Quesada. Monge and the
Minister of Public Security, Angel Edmundo Solano Calderon, who
were trying to put into effect the neutrality decree, issued 17
November 1983, were accused of being communist at the service of
the Sandinista Army, which had caused serious differences in the
Headquarters of Intelligence and Security (D.I.S.) (88).
Don Angel Edmundo Bustillo had maintained the thesis that
for the benefit of Costa Rican political stability and peace it
was necessary to appeal to the dialogue and political negotiation
with our neighboring countries, but as it has been pointed out,
another sector of the government, represented by the Ministry of
Interior and Police, considered, as of national interest, to
offer backing to the Nicaraguan counter-revolution (89)
Within the guidelines drawn by Minister Solano. in his
office was that of strengthening the corps of intelligence agents
(D.I.S.), as Costa Rica was a country without an army. For that
purpose, it was appealed mainly, among other countries, to
Israel, training personnel in that field and another that shaped
an anti-terrorist unit (90).
(88) Carlos Monge Quesada, Angel Edmundo Solano, Carlos Camacho
Araya, Jose Rafael Gomez Aguilar before the O.I.J.
(89) Angel Edmundo Solano Calderon before the O.I.J.
(90) Angel Edmundo Solano and Johnny Campos Loaiza before the
O.I.J.
24
The U.S. Embassy offered to the Ministry of Public Safety to
form a group of agents in pure intelligence to give them a high
level of professionalism (91). an offer that the government of
Costa Rica accepted and 15 agents of the Headquarters of
Intelligence and Safety were selected to receive the training
(92). That group, that was called "The Babies" was placed under
a U.S. instructor called "Dimitrius Papas", who was pointed out
as a C.I.A. agent (93) and who was known as "Papi". "PaPi"
transferred "The Babies" out of the offices of the Ministry,
renting a building that was financed by the U.S. Embassy, which
also gave them desks, telephones, typewriters and two vehicles
(94).
This group of officials although supposedly answering to the
orders of Vice-Minister Johnny Campos Loaiza, practically lost
all connections with that authority. obeying the direct command
of "Papas" and of Francisco Tacsan (95).
"The Babies", who lost loyalty to their superiors, were used
in pursuit of the President of the Republic, Don Luis Alberto
Monge, of Minister Fernando Berrocal, of Vice-Minister Manuel
Carballo and of the Minister of Public Safety himself, don Angel
Edmundo Solano (96).
(91) Juan Campos Loaiza, Angel Edmundo Solano before the O.I.J.
(92) Angel Edmundo Solano, Juan Campos Loaiza, Rodolfo Jimenez
Monge before the O.I.J.
(93) Rodolfo Jimenez before the O.I.J.
(94) Rodolfo Jimenez, Angel Edmundo Solano, Juan Campos Loaiza
before the O.I.J.
(95) Ibidem.
(96) Angel Edmundo Solano, Juan Campos Loaiza before the O.I.J.
25
Dimitrius Papas in addition established a relation with the
Organization o+ Judicial Investioations in 1982 through a
training program on anti-terrorism that was given to the
personnel of this police <force> (97).
Immediately after these courses organized by Paoas, a close
bond emerged between the Officina de Asuntos Esoeciales <Office
of Special Affairs> of the O.I.J., which was created to handle
all crimes connected with State Security and the Agents trained
by PaPas in the D.I.S. That relationship turned into a true
economic dependency on the Office of Special Affairs, to such a
degree that, through the D.I.S. that office was furnished not
only telephone tapping equipments, recorders and photographic
equipments, but also money in cash that was used for the purchase
of supplies, payment of vehicle rentals, rentals of apartments
for surveyance and per diem (98).
The liberality with which the D.I.S. managed its resources
took us to inquire about which was its budget.
It was detected in the investigation that to the agents and
to the administrative personnel of D.I.S. a monthly or
fortnightly bonus in cash was being delivered, a totally
irregular situation and in contradiction to the payment system of
the State that is controlled by the Ministry of the Treasury. As
such a matter could constitute the crime of Illicit Enrichment as
described in Article 344 of the Penal Code, an investigation
(97) Allan Solano, Albert Llorente, Fernando Centeno before the
O.I.J.
(98) Edgar Monge Luton, Allan Solano, Albert Llorente, Fernando
Centeno, Jose Mo. Machado Ramirez, Olman Alvarado, Guillermo
Marin Ulloa, Mario Murillo Salazar before the O.I.J.
26
was made in that respect, it being established that the
SubDirector of the office was delivering, monthly or fortnightly,
to the person in charge of a petty cash. a list with the names
of the persons to whom the bonus would be given, this person
being in charge of the cash payment (99).
The funds of that petty cash originally were between 30 and
40 thousand colones, and its flow increasing to a million or a
million six hundred thousand colones per month. The person in
charge of cash was Sra. Vera Arguedas Serrano, member of "The
Babies". who would prepare a monthly liquidation of which she
would deliver a copy to a U.S. Embassy official and then she
would go to the law offices of Zurcher, Montoya, Zurcher. in the
neighborhood of the I.N.V.U. in San Jose, where she would present
the liquidation and would be given a new amount in cash (100).
As it can be seen, the procedure followed contradicted not
only the principles of the financial administration of the State.
but also the established legal controls.
According to testimonies received, those funds were supplied
by a private organization called U.N.O. (101), that in 1985
transformed itself into the "Asociacion de Asistencia Civica
Costarricence" <Costa Rican Civic Assistance Association>, which
until this date has been supplying funds to the D.I.S., from,
among other sources, a private organization with offices in New
York, called "The Cardenal Association" (102).
(99) Vera Enid Serrano,, Olman Alvarado, Johnny Campos before the
O.I.J.
(100) Vera Enid Serrano before the O.I.J.
(101) Harry Zurcher, Jose MoMachado before the O.I.J.
(102) Harry Zucher before the O.I.J.
27
Dimitrius Papas maintained a relation of great
camaraderie with the personnel of the Office of Special Affairs
and of other dependencies of the Organization of Judicial
Investioation. but in particular this relationship was closer
with Sr. Albert Llorente, who at his request, even named him
baptism Godfather of one of his children (103).
Sr. Albert Llorente became. in this manner, first
de facto and later by appointment by Lic. Mainor Calvo, the
Director of O.I.J. at that time, the person in charge of
coordinating the relations between the Organization of judicial
Investigation and the U.S. Embassy (104).
The Llorente's relationship with PaPas got to be of
such trust, that the latter would give to the former the monies
that would be used for per-diem (105).
The trust of U.S. Embassy representatives with
Llorente goes on until 1988. Thus we verified that he chose and
paid in cash, in the offices of the O.I.J. (106), for a
photocopier and an electronic typewriter that said diplomatic
delegation donated to Special Affairs (107). The cash payment
made was for C274.244.00 on 19 April 1988 to a bill collector
from Lachner and Saenz, entity with which the purchase was
contracted (108).
(103) Rodrigo Castro, Albert Llorente before the O.I.J.
(104) Fernando Centeno, Allan Solano, Albert Llorente before the
O.I.J.
(105) Edgard Monge Leiton, Jose MoMachado before the O.I.J.
(106) Fernando Centeno, Albert Llorente before the O.I.J.
(107) Magaly Patricia Scott, Albert Llorente, Luis F. Centeno,
income of goods documents.
(108) Manuel Emilio Valverde Zuniga before the O.I.J. and
purchase invoices.
28
That donation was not informeo neither to the Pienarv
Court nor to the Administrative Office of the Judicial Power. it
provoking Lic. Randall Granados Arias, through writ No. 1375, to
inform the Administrative Sub-Director, on 2 May 1988, that as
the Purveyor's office did not have an agreement or higher
authorization in connection with the donation, he was unable
to processes the corresponding exoneration (109).
III-FACTS RELATED TO THE CRIME
1- The Convocation to the Press Conference. On 7
November 1983, the Judicial Power. through decree,established the neutrality of Costa Rica in Central American conflicts. Tnis policy of President Luis Alberto Monge provocked serious reactions in wide private sectors and within the
government, above all, as it has been seen, in the security forces (110).
On the other hand, the Nicaraguan government was engaged
in a campaign to discredit Costa Rica, above all, in Europe,
that picturing the government as a "puppet of the United States",
trained men and directed operations against Nicaragua (111).
President Monge then took the decision to make a trip
through Europe that was called "Mission of Truth" with the
purpose of counteracting the aggresive Nicaraguan diplomacy
(112).
(109) Writ 1375 from the Judicial Purveyor.
(110) Angel EDmundo Solano, Johnny Campos, Carlos Alberto
Camacho before the O.I.J.
(111) Johnny Campos, Angel E. Solano before the O.I.J.
(112) Ibid.
29
Immediately after this trio, the deputies of the Communist
Fraction in the Legislative Assembly said that "Mission of Truth"
was a farce. as. while the President was travelling through
Europe. Pastora and his men were promenading in San Jose. with
the complacency of the national authorities (113).
The denunciation was commented in the Security Council and
the decision was taken to ask Pastora to leave the national
territory and to make some public statement that would reflect
the fact that he was in Nicaraguan territory (114).
Vice-Minister Johnny Campos was assigned the mission to
locate Pastora and to force him out of the country. For that
purpose Sr. Campos telephoned Alfonso Robelo. director of
A.R.D.E. and communicated to him the decision of the Costa Rican
government so that he would transmit it to Pastora. Robelo
answered by saying that he could not help him as he had broken
off relations with Pastora, but eventually he said he would do
it.
In the evening hours of that day, Sr. Campos asked Col.
Rodrigo Paniagua to make contact with Pastora and to tell him
about the order of the government. Paniagua told him that
Commander Pastora wanted to talk personally with him about a very
important matter, interview that don Johnny Campos refused (115).
That day Paniagua insisted several times on the interview
and finally, while at a farewell party for the Chief of Personnel
(113) Ibid.
(114) Ibid.
(115) Johnny Campos before the O.I.J.
30
of the Ministry of Public Safety. Don Johnny Campos decided to
attend the interview (116).
Around one in the morning, Paniagua took Vice-Minister
Campos to a house in Ronmorser, where he talked with Pastora,
telling him of the order to leave the national territory and
asking him to publicly make the world see that ne was in
Nicaragua (117).
Eden Pastora accepted the request of Vice-Minister Campos
and gave instructions to "Popo" Chamorro and to Carol Prado so
that Orion Pastora would convoke the national and international
press and that same morning he went over to the San Juan river
(118).
On 29 May 1983, around eleven at night, Orion Pastora
telephoned the international newspapermen, convoking them for the
30th at six in the morning at the Irazu Hotel, and indicating
that A.R.D.E. was going to supply the transportation (119).
The press conference was organized by Orion Pastora without
telling Miguel Urroz Blanco, Pastora's Chief of Security,
anything about it (120).
On 30 May 1983, Orion Pastora picked up the newspapermen at
the Irazu Hotel and took them to the San Juan river. Among them
was PEER ANKER HANSEN, who had been in the country for a month
before this (121).
(116) Ibid.
(117) Johnny Campos, Eden Pastora Gomez before the O.I.J.
(118) Ibid.
(119) Antony Avirgan.
(120) Miguel Urroz Blanco before the O.I.J.
(121) Tony Avirgan and investigation of Special Affairs.
31
2- John Hull. FeliPe Vidal, Robert Owen and the Crime: On
the morning of 30 May 1983, John Hull was called by
Robert Owen, who was in Costa Rica and went in the early morning
hours from San Carlos to San Jose. to one of the houses rented by
Philip Holtz, through Margarita Acosta (122).
On the night of that day, when the bomb explosion took
place, Hull, Owen and several pilots of the Southern Front were
together in that house. Hull, in spite of a falling out with his
ex-partner Bill Crone, called him on the phone and told him that
if anyone would ask him for the small plane to help the wounded,
not to lend it (123).
That same night, Chepon Robelo, Carol Prado and others
arrived at Hull's house in San Carlos looking for help and
requesting the small plane that he possesed, with the purpose of
taking out Pastora and the other wounded. Margarita Acosta
Baldomero, Hull's companion, put them in contact with his office
by radio but no help was given (124).
The following day, 31 May 1983, Robert Owen left the country
on SAHSA Flight 416 bound for Tegucigalpa, Honduras (125).
Approximately a month before this date, at a meeting in
which Hull, Juan Jose Saborio, Mariano Montealegre and Marcos
Aguado participated, at El Higueron, at Muelle de San Carlos,
Juan Jose
Saborio stated that it was imperative to kill Pastora, a
(122) Margarita Acosta B. before the O.I.J.
(123) Robert Owen before the U.S. Senate Iran-Contra Committee;
Alvaro Arroyo Rojas and Bill Crone before the O.I.J.
(124) Margarita Acosta B. before the O.I.J.
(125) Shipping card and passenger list of the M.S.P.
32
remark that caused the indignation and the withdrawal of Marcos
Aguado from the place (126).
After the crime was committed, in December 1984 to be
precise, at a meeting that took place at the Shamrock Hilton
Hotel in Houston, Texas, John Hull accompanied by Robert Owen,
commented to Jack Terrel that Eden Pastora was a communist, that
he had become a problem for them in the consolidation of the
Southern Front, for which reason he had to be killed, a point of
view that would be discussed later in another meeting that would
take place three days later in Miami. In this last meeting, at
which Adolfo Calero, Enrique Bermudez, Robert Owen, John Hull and
other persons were present, another person was present who was
introduced as Amac Galil. Adolfo Calero, talking about the
necessity of unifying the Southern Front and the obstacle that
Pastora represented, pointed with his hand to John Hull and told
him that he <Pastora> had to be eliminated. At this moment
Felipe Vidal turned towards John Hull and told him that they had
placed the bomb to Pastora but that it had been detonated ahead
of time, Hull assenting with his head. At this same meeting, at
lunch, Felipe Vidal commented to Terrel that Amac Galil carried
the bomb to Pastora's camp in a metallic box, that the bomb was
made up C-4 plastic explosive and that it was remote controlled
operated. He also commented that Galil went out to urinate and
that a Pastora security guard surprised him, so thinking that he
had been discovered, he detonated the bomb (127).
(126) Marcos Aguado before a public notary.
(127) Jack Tenel before the Fourth Trial Court of San Jose.
33
At that meeting. Adolfo Calero. President of the F.D.N.
presented a new plan to eliminate Pastora. which consisted in his
traveling to San jose and inviting Pastora to attend a meeting.
When Pastora would leave his camp and arrived at Chiles de Uoala,
thirty men, dressed as sandinista soldiers would kidnap him and
take him to John Hull's farm. During the night he would be
transferred to El Castillo, Nicaragua, where he would be publicly
hanged, in the presence of neighbors, who would be told that in
case that they would help the "Contra", they would suffer the
same punishment. Later the thirty men would be taken to John
Hull's farm, where they would burn the uniforms and a plane from
Ilopango, El Salvador, would pick them at that place to be
transported to "El Aguacate" in Honduras and from there they
would be transported in cars to Las Vegas, in the same country, a
place where the principal base of the F.D.N. was located. There
they would be dispersed in small groups that would be integrated
in the armed struggle (128).
Without being able to be precise as to the date, but also
after the crime, Thomas Castillo, aka Joe Fernandez, CIA chief in
Costa Rica, visited Eden Pastora and indicated to him that he
would make him responsible for anything that could happen to John
Hull, as he <Hull> feared for his life (129).
(128) Ibid.
(129) Carol Humberto Prado Hernandez before the O.I.J. in errands
carried out in the cause for hostile acts against John
Hull. Trial Court of San Carlos.
34
3-The Escape of Peer Anker hansen, Amac Galii or Ahmed
Khalil:
After the explosion, the Costa Rican government
ordered that humanitarian aid be given to the wounded, sending
launches to La Penca. These were taken to the Hospital of San
Carlos, where they were given medical attention (130).
Among the wounded were Peer Anker Hansen or Amac
Galil who presented trauma on the lower thigh, with wounds in the
dermis and lineal superficial wounds on the external lateral side
of the left arm that did not merit hospitalization (131).
That night, Dr. Maximo Pacheco Paniaoua, Chief of
Emergency of the Hospital of San Carios, personal friend of John
Hull (132) and fellow member in the Asociacion Huetar Norte (133)
and who is also pointed out as a Hull collaborator in the traffic
of arms (134), showed up at the house of Sheila Ugalde, Hull's
secretary. and asked to be put in contact with him, as he wanted
to go to take the wounded out. Sheila called Hull by phone and
Pacheco talked with him (135).
In the morning hours of the 31st Peter Thorbinson and Peer
Anker Hansen, requested that a taxi be called for them to leave
the hospital, a matter in which they were helped, putting them in
(130) Johnny Campos and Angel E. Solano before the O.I.J.
(131) <Patient> Entry Sheet and medico-legal opinion.
(132) Maximo Pacheco before the O.I.J.
(133) Rodolfo Alvarado Rosales before the Judicial Inspection.
(134) Luis Fernando Chacon Leon before the O.I.J.
(135) Rodolfo Alvarado before the Judicial Inspection and Sheila
Ugalde before the O.I.J.
35
contact with Sr. Napoleon Lopez Robleto. Chief of tne Medical
Reoistry at the hospital, who was the owner of a public service
vehicle. Dr. Pacheco does not remember whetner it was he or
anotner oerson who made tne request to Lopez Robleto, but he does
remember having accompanied Thorbinson and Peer Anker Hansen up
to the Emergency exit (136).
As Sr. Lopez's taxi was in bad condition, he called an
inlaw of his, Jorge Aguilar Mena around eight in the morning.
Thorbinson, who left in hospital oarb, and Peer Anker
boarded the taxi headed for San Jose accompanied by Don Napoleon
Lopez, who stayed in San Carlos center (137).
Jorge Aguilar took Peer Anker and Thorbinson to the Hotel La
Gran Via, located in Avenida Central, where he left them,
returning to San Carlos (138). That same day Anker Hansen or
Amac Galil, left the hotel without the knowledge, to this date.
of his whereabouts (139).
4- The Intervention of the Office of Intelligence and
Security
<D.I.S.>.
When the first news of what had taken place were received,
Sr. Alfonso Cruz Corrales, agent of the D.I.S stationed in San
Carlos, called the central offices requesting instructions and he
was ordered, by the officer on guard, to go to the hospital to
wait for the wounded to arrive so as to identify them and gather
information (140).
(136) Maximo Pacheco and NApoleon Lopez before the O.I.J.
(137) Napoleon Lopez and Jorge Aguilar before the O.I.J.
(138) --missing---
(139) Investigation of the Office of Special Affairs.
(140) Alfonso Cruz Corrales before the O.I.J.
36
Cruz complied with the order and hours later delivered that
information to Sr. Carlos Monge Quesada, Director of the D.I.S.
who went to the place, in the company of Jose Martin Castro
Jimenez, to obtain the first information on what took place
(141).
On 31 May, around eight in the morning, Sr. Alfonso Cruz
received a call from the Hospital of San Carlos in which he was
asked whether the wounded that had been medically discharged
could leave the hospital. Cruz called the central offices and
there the officer on guard told him that on superior orders he
should allow the wounded to leave the hospital and that they, in
San Jose. would interrogate them on their arrival. Cruz went to
the hospital, gathered the names of the ones that had left and
reported them to base.
Consigned on the list was the name of Peer Anker Hansen, who
was not awaited in San Jose as was said to Cruz (142).
Sres. Carlos Monge and Jose Martin Castro deny having been
the ones who gave the order in the way stated, indicating that
their function was only to gather information, the O.I.J being
the one that had the competence to act (143).
(141) Alfonso Cruz, Carlos Monge, Jose M. Castro before the
O.I.J.
(142) Alfonso Cruz before the O.I.J.
(143) Carlos Monge, Jose M. Castro before the O.I.J.
37
For his part, Dimitrius Paoas ordered the Chief of
Operation of "The Babies", Guillermo Marin Ulloa, to verify
whether Eder Pastora was in the Clinica Biblica, matter with
which he was not able to comply because the Officials of the
D.I.S. prevented it (144).
5- Preliminary proceedings of the Organization
of Judicial Investigation:
On the day of May 30th, between 10 and 11 in the
evening, the Sub-Delegation of the O.I.J received information
from the Hospital of San Carlos in that city, about the
admittance of wounded persons as the result of the bomb that had
exploded in "La Penca (145).
Sr. Fausto Rojas Cordero, Chief of the Sub-
Delegation communicated with Lic. Mainor Calvo, Director of the
Organization, who ordered him to keep out of the situation as it
was an event that took place in Nicaraguan territory, but to
verify the admission of the wounded to the hospital (146).
It was done so and the officials of the
delegation showed up at the Hospital of San Carlos where they
complied with the task of identifying the wounded and taking note
of the injuries suffered (147).
As a precautionary measure, the vigilance
personnel of the hospital was ordered not to allow the exit of
anyone until the resolution of the situation, but in view of the
issued order, pressure began to grow on the part of the
newspapermen
(144) Guillermo Marin Ulloa before the O.I.J.
(145) Fausto Rojas before the O.I.J.
(146) Fausto Rojas, Minor Calvo before the O.I.J.
(147) Ibid.
38
that covereo the event anc some reiatives of the wounded. among
them. those of tne newspaperman Vargas Gene. As a result of tnese
oetitions and the criticism being maoe. It was pecided to let go
the persons that had already been attented and those that were
going to be transferred to arother hospitai center. Among the
first persons that left was Peer Anker Hansen. who as it has
been seen went towards San jose (148).
In the dawn hours Fausto Rojas went to the southern margin
of the San Juan River, in front of "La Penca", inquirying furtner
into what happened, running on the road into Comandante "Adrian"
of the A.R.D.E., who informed him that the perpetrator of the
criminal attempt was one of the newspapermen, possibly Tony
Avirgan or Peer Anker Hansen. Fausto Rojas gathered other
versions about the event and from part of the members of A.R.D.E.
he was given several bags containing equipment belonging to the
newspapermen and evidences of the explosive artifact, among them
pellets and "chaneles" that had been inbedded in the wall, triple
A bateries without a brand name, and others, which were sent to
the office of Special Affairs and to the laboratory in San Jose
(149).
6- The Investigation of the Office of Specail Affairs: As
Lic. Mainor Calvo Piedra, at that time Director of the
Organization of Judicial Investigation, affirms, in view of the
fact that the wounded had been transferred to San Jose, and that
(148) Ibid.
(149) Ibid.
39
political structure of the Nicaraguan "Contra" was at the
capital, the decision was taken of opening another investigating
front, ordering the Office of Special Affairs to take charge of
the matter(150).
Taking into consideration that the investigation of this
office has been publicly questioned, that Albert Liorent & Allan
Solano were the directors of the case and that these persons, as
it was seen, were under the sphere of influence of Dimitrius
Papas, who showed interest in the matter when he ordered "The
Babies" to verify whether Eden Pastora was confined at the
Clinica Biblica, it was decided to review the investigation
obtaining the following result:
a) In spite of an intelligence report received in the Office
of Special Affairs that indicated that the event could have been
carried out by the Ejercito Popular Sandinista or by the C.I.A.,
it was appealed, through the Director of the Organization, Lic.
Mainor Calvo, to contact Dimitrius Papas so that he would procure
through the embassy of the country to which the C.I.A. precisely
belongs, the sending of a technician in explosives (151).
b) The evidence obtained on the scene of the crime was under
the free handling of the U.S. expert that was sent (152).
ci Dimitrius Papas was allowed access to the information on
the case (153).
(150) Minor Calvo before the O.I.J.
(151) Minor Calvo, Allan Solano, ALbert Llorente, Luis Fernando
Centeno before the O.I.J.
(152) Gustavo Castillo, Allan Solano. Aloert Llorente. Luis
Fernando Centeno before the O.I.J.
(153) Edgar Monge Leiton. Jose Mo. Machaco
40
d) When Allan Solano had established that the perpetrator
of the crime was Peer Anker Hansen, Dimitrius Papas went before
him and told him that according with what the U.S. Embassy
functionaries had investigated, the person identified as Anker
Hansen was HECTOR ARMODIO PEREZ, of Uruguayan nationality,
connected with a tupamaro group (154)
At that very moment Allan Solano prevented that the efforts
of the investigation be directed in the manner suggested by
Papas, indicating to him that was impossible, as the height of
the man who placed the bomb was from 1.85 mt. to 1.90 mt. while
that of Armodio Perez was of approximately 1.74 mt.
Dimitrius Papas not only gave that information to Allan
Solano. but also to Lic. Minor Calvo, Director of O.I.J., reason
for which the latter called Solano to his office and told him of
the information, it being necessary, to convince Don Minor as to
the incorrectness of the report, to bring to his office an U.H.F.
equipment so that he could appreciate the stature and other
physical characteristics of Anker Hansen (155).
e) The intervention of Dimitrius Papa is also indicated in
two triPs that Allan Solano took. In the first one he was
informed that Peer Anker Hansen was in Miami, the U.S. Embassy
supplying him with the tickets and the per diem, resulting that
the person mentioned resided in Nicaragua, he was married to a
Nicaraguan woman and was not the perpetrator of the criminal
assault. In the second trio Solano was told that in
Honduras
(154) Allan Solano, Luis Fdo. Centeno.
(155) ----mising---
41
there were several persons suspected of having participated in
"La Penca" and Papas told some of the members of "The Babies"
that Peer Anker Hansen was in that country and that he wanted
that Allan Solano would go there to verify it. Indeed, Solano
went to Honduras with the tickets and expenses paid by the U.S.
Embassy, the suspicious ones turning out to be Peter Tourbinson,
his daughter and the Danish newspaper team (156).
In both cases the trips were unnecessary and the
verification of the identities was easily clear, to the F.B.I.,
as well as to the Honduran police, with the basis of data which
the O.I.J. as well as Dimitrius Papas had.
In the trip to Honduras. nevertheless. Allan Solano,
deviating from the purpose for which he was sent, corroborated
the stay of Peer Anker Hansen in that country in the month of
March of 1984 (157).
f) In connection with the private investigations of
journalists Tony Avirghan and Marta Honey, published in a book on
the crime at "La Penca", in spite of the fact that these oersons
delivered typed copies of it to the Office of Special Affairs,
none of the events related there were investigated, because
accordino to what the officials allege, the authors refused to
reveal the identity of the witnesses, adducing that their lives
were in danger. That is why they were told to make them go to
(156) Allan Solano, Albert Llorente,Luis Centeno, Guillermo Marin
before the O.I.J.
(157) Allan Solano.
42
the office later so as to interview them.
It should be stated here that in the referred to private
investigation, mention is made of John Hull's activity, which was
of full knowledge as much on the part of the D.I.S. as of the
Regional Delegation of the O.I.J. in San Carlos, in such a way
that the investigation of Special Affairs was able to orient
itself through these aspects and not to depend on what the
authors of the book saw fit to offer (158).
g) On 23 May 1986 the journalists Honey and Avirgon brought
Jack Terrel before the Sub-Chief of the Public Prosecutors, a
witness that as it was seen. gave concrete information on the
identity of the perpetrator of the event and the possible
participation of other persons. The content of this deposition,
as Allan Solano states, was not investigated because that witness
had appeared in a trial among Avirgam. Honey and John Hull. He
also adds that as the witness statements tied the conclusions of
the investigation with the conclusions of the book, as these
journalists had not wanted to reveal the sources that let them to
those conclusions, and, because immediately after an accusation
brought up by them, efforts were made so that Special Affairs
would investigate other police forces, it looked as though they
wanted to control things. For these reasons. in addition to the
fact that Jack Terrel told them that he was a policeman and that
(158) Luis Centeno, Allan Solano, Albert Liorente before the
O.I.J.
43
he had military training, something that he did not believe, he
consulted the U.S. Embassy, being told some time later that this
individual had a police record, so he took the determination to
act with prudence and leave the matter dormant until he would
have new facts to formulate an opinion (159).
As Edgar Monge Leiton and Jose Mo. Machado, officials that
belonged to that office, relate it, what happened was that a
person known as Alberto, who was the one that had substituted
Papas, who by that time was no longer in the country, told Albert
Llorente that what that witness was saying was false and that man
was known as a delinquent by the C.I.A. (160).
None of the reasons given was sufficient to take the
decision of not investigating the contents of that clarification,
above all because by Mandate at 9 hours and 40 minutes of 30 May
1986, the Judge of the Fourth Trial Court had ordered that an "in
depth investigation" of the events be made (161)
AS TO THE CONTENTS OF JACK TERREL'S DECLARATION
a- According to what Robert Owen and Adolfo Calero stated
before different U.S. authorities, the meetings that Terrel
accounts, were really carried out (162).
b- According to the report No. 84-2568-QUI from the Forensic
science Department of the O.I.J., in what was left of the
small
159) Allan Solano before the O.I.J.
160) ----missing---
161) File 2297-1-88 c Ignored in detriment of Linda Frazier.
162) Robert Owen before the Iran-Contra Commission: Adolfo
Calero before the District Court of South Florida, Civil
Action No. 86-1146-CIV-King; Tony Avirgan vs John Hull and
Others.
44
suitcase which carried the bomb, it was found haxahidro 1, 3, 5,
trinitro 1, 3, 5, trianzina, a compound xnown as "ciclonite"
(R.D.X.), components of the military explosive C-4. No T.N.T.,
D.N.T., nor nitrates or nitritos were found. Neither
nitroglycerine nor dynamite of the hydrosoluble gelatine type
(M.N.AN.) were found, which reaffirms the accounts that Terrel
gives (163).
c- Through photographic inspection before the Fourth
Trial Judge, Jack Terrel identified the person known as Peer
Ankar Hansen as the person that in the last meeting mentioned by
him, was introduced to him under the name of Amac Galil (164).
ch- In accordance with what has been investigated, it has
been established that there is a person that came into the
country in 1983 under the name of AHMED FAIG KHALIL, whose
pronunciation corresponds to a hispanicized version of the name
referred to by the witness (165).
Having consulted INTERPOL as to the name, it is informed
that in their records appears reported the name KHALIL TAWFICK
AHMED, who uses a great number of aliases and who is wanted by
the German police for the highjacking of a plane and the murder
of three persons. We are awaiting an answer from that police
unit with the identification data on that individual (166).
d- Even though Robert Owen and Adolfo Calero deny that
inthe meeting it was talked about what Terrels recounts,
the
(163) Judgement made in proceedings instituted by Special
Affairs.
(164) Case 2297-1-88 IV Trial Court Charge - Unknown.
(165) Shipping card.
(166) CableC.I.C.A.D. and from INTERPOL.
45
evidence indicates that his depositions should be considered with
caution on account of the possible interest that it could have in
the matter. In addition Terrel mentions with clarity that part
of the declarations that Felipe Vidal made to him in connection
with the crime at "La Penca", were given in an exclusive
conversation between the two of them during lunch (167).
e- The content of Terrel's statement, due to its
seriousness, cannot continue to be in the proceedings as an
additional data, as it has been up to this day, but it should be
investigated until its veracity or falsity is determined,
independently of the qualitative qualifications that have been
given to the witness.
ON WITNESS JACK TERREL
Jack Terrel, known as "el Flaco" < The Skinny one> or
"Coronel Flaco" <Colonel Skinny>, belonged to a group of American
mercenaries called "Civilian Military Assistance" (C.M.A.)
commanded by Thomas Posey and linked to "Legion Cubana" group in
Miami headed by Jose Coutin (168). Tom Posey was invited in
January 1984 by Enrique Bermudez, Military Director of the F.D.N.
to give his help to the anti-communist struggle (169). Posey as
well as Terrel maintained relations with John Hull and Robert
Owen and they had developed a plan called "Pegasus", designed to
attack military objectives in Nicaragua. that plan was known to
(167) Jack Terrel before the IV Trial Court.
(168) Rene Corvo before the F.B.I., RePort of the F.B.l. (Kerry
commission).
(169) Letter from Enrioue Bermudez (in Kerry Report).
46
Owen, Calero and the leaders of the F.D.N. (170).
In the month of September of 1984, immediately after
an investigation carried out by the F.B.I. in connection with a
bomb that exploded in the Continental Bank in Miami on 27 May
1983, the special agents of that police force became
knowledgeable of the activities of the C.M.A., the Cuban groups,
John Hull and Rodrigo Paniagua (171). An investigation was then
started in relation with the traffic of arms between the United
States and the Southern Front, for infringement of the neutrality
laws of that country. Jack Terrel, Tom Posey and others were
subjected to surveillance some time later. As a consequence of
this investigation a trip was made to Costa Rica by Officers
George Kiszinsky and Kevin Curriers, accompanied by a prosecutor
from Florida, who apparently were hindered in their
investigations by Joe Fernandez, Chief of the C.I.A. in our
country. In his report Prosecutor Feldman concludes that there
is evidence that between the end of 1984 and the beginning of
1985 the C.M.A. and Rene Corvo actively recruited mercenaries in
the United States that were later sent to Honduras and Costa Rica
to train or fight together with the anti-sandinist groups.
Adding that the F.B.I. has requested that an investigation be
started by the Grand Jury in connection with these activities,
among other reasons because the Bureau considers that this would
dissipate complaints in the
sense that the Justice Department has not pursued this
matter
(170) Document on the "Pegasus plan" in Kerry report: Robert
Owen and Adolfo Calero. Oo.cit.162.
(171) F.B.I. Report.
47
aggresively. Nevertheless, Feldman considers oremature to take
this matter to the Grand Jury and considers that the
investigation should continue (172).
While the F.B.I. was carrying out these investigations, from
what it can be deduced from the meetings that Terrel, Posey,
Owen, Calero and Hull had, they kept a pretty active
relationship. Nevertheless, after Terrel testified first before
the national authorities and later before the U.S. Senate
Commission, Oliver North discribed him in a memorandum, as a
misinformer harmful to the interests of the United States and
suggests that he be formally accused (173). Terrel, after his
statements, was accused in Florida and faces charges of violation
of the U.S. neutrality laws for his help to the "Contras" (174).
Robert Owen and Adolfo Calero in their depositions admit
their relationship with Terrel, but tney refer to him as an
unstable and imaginative oerson (175).
7- The Affiliation of the Perpetrator of the Crime: a- It
has been mentioned during the investioation that the
perpetrator of the crime was someone sent by Omar Khadafi. The
sources of this information are John Hull, who commented it with
Alvaro Arroyo some two months after the crime, and Victor Wolf,
Hull s partner in the help to the Southern Front, who affirms to
have received this information from a Central American official,
(172) Report in documents of the U.S. Senate Sub-committe on
Terrorism, etc. (Kerry Report).
(173) Document in Kerry report.
(174) ---missing---
(175) #o.cit.162.
48
indicating as the motive the fact that Pastora took some money.
when he was Vice Minister in Nicaragua, that the former had sent
to the government of that country (176).
b- As to the possibility that the perpetrator of the crime
would have been one sent by the Ejercito Popular Sandinista, up
to this date there is no evidence leading in that sense. While
we were in San Carlos we were invited by a representative
Costarricence to a meeting in which of the Asociacion Democratica
we were told that they had proof that the criminal attack was
induced by the sandinista regime. When requested for the
sources, we were shown a series of newspaper clippings and some
publications of a group of friends of General Singlaub. As for us
we interviewed Sr. David Moises Orozco Garcia, a spy who worked
as a diplomat in the Nicaraguan Embassy in Costa Rica between
1984 and 1988. and who deserted in this last year. placing
himself under the protection of the D.l.S. and the C.I.A. As per
Crozco Garcia's information, the Nicaraguan government had
several agents infiltrated in the A.R.D.E. since its foundation.
Among them were Marielos Serrano Guillen, who was personal
assistant to Eden Pastora, Roberto Rascosky Ramirez, Chief of La
Penca base, Oscar El Najo and Fernanoo Morales, Chief of Security
of the area known as "'Los Zorros". The witness recounts that.
notwithstanding, that the crime at La Penca served the Nicaraguan
interests since the use of Costa Rican soil on the part of the
Contra became evidentd the government of Nicaragua did not rotate
the personnel accredited before the Costa Rican government and
(176) Alvaro Arrovo and Victor Wolf before the O.l.J.
49
the structure of the agents infiltrated in was maintained after
the event. The government of Nicaragua. as a normal measure.
could have proceeded to take out the country, legally or
illegally the agents for their protection, something that, as it
was said, did not happen (177).
c- Another version that was told to us by Sr. Ecgardo
Alpizar Montero, in the investigation was recounted to him by
Oscar El Najo, who, as it was seen. was a sandinista spy
infiltrated in A.R.D.E.. According to Alpizar. "El Najo"
suggested to him that after exploding the bomb. the man that
placed it had been arrested at the site of the event, guarded by
two Nicaraguans, but Pastora ordered that he be released (178).
ch- From the evidence shown up to here, it results Probable
that Peer Anker Hansen or Amac Galil or Ahmed Khalil would have
been contacted and contracted by the narcotrafficker group that
backed John Hull, Felipe Vidal and his Cuban movement. Equally,
the evidence indicates as probable that the initiative to kill
Pastora and its implementation were made by John Hull and Felipe
Vidal. Given the prohibitions in the laws of the United States
for its agents to participate or Promote the murdering of
persons, it does not seem viable that the crime had been planned
and implemented by the C.I.A., as Eden Pastora affirms, and there
is no evidence in that respect.
(177) David Orozco before the O.I.J.
(178) Edgardo Alpizar before the O.I.J.
50
It does seem probable that Robert Owen. who was salaried by
Adolfo Calero and was Oliver North's link or courier, would have
known of the plan that was forged.
It is equally probable that Dimitrius Papas's action in
trying to disorient the investigation had. as its purpose, to
protect Oliver North's net and the operation that the United
States was carrying out in the Southern Front. in the Northern
Front and in Costa Rica for reasons of security of that country;
although, of course, with his action he also covered the event.
8-The investigations of the U.S. Senate Commissions: In the
documents examined, both in the Sub-Committed on
Terrorism, Narcotics and International Relations as well as the
Iran-Contra Commission, all the parts referring to the crime of
"La Penca" and a great deal of what refers to the activities of
John Hull, Robert Owen, Oliver North, Joe Fernandez and others.
in the testimonial depositions, are censured and appear covered
with black ink.
IV- OTHER EVENTS KNOWN IN THE INVESTIGATION: A- The Dr.
Hugo Spadafora's Homicide:
On 13 September 1985, Dr. Hugo Spadafora left his house in
Costa Rica, at eight in the morning, bound for Panama (179).
Approximately at 13:10 hours (180), he crossed the frontier with
(179) Arihane Bejarano Acuna before the O.I.J.
(180) Mario Barrantes Escorcia before the O.I.J.
51
Panama and took a microbus that stopped at the first military
cost of the Panama Defence Forces. where a corporal asked him for
his ID and talked through a walkie-talkie (181).
Later he again boarded the microbus and definitely left it
in Concepcion, Chiriqui, accompanied by Francisco Gonzalez, who
is known as a member of the G-2 of the Panamanian Defence Forces
(182). In that place he got off without paying his fare,
together with Gonzalez, the reason for which the driver got down
and followed him to collect it. When he was able to reach him,
Dr. Spadafora tells him his name and tries to that this person
see his I.D., showing it to him, but the collector did not get to
see it (183).
At 18 hours. Alvaro Sequeira Ramirez, observed a white
Toyota jeep, on the Costa Rican side, and near the frontier with
Panama, close to the "la Vaca" river. Believing that it was a
question of smugglers, he got near avoiding being seen and
observed three military men that were laughing and introducing a
bag, like a sleeping bag, with difficulty into the jeep, which
took off bound for the Consejo Nacional de Produccion in Saragoza
(184), a road that communicates with the place where the body was
found.
(181) Edwin Noel Nunez, Orlando Ortega, Ricanti Esquivel before
Office of Supplies of the Republic of Panama.
(182) Report from the Office of Special Affairs.
(183) Edwin Noel Nunez before the Paymaster's Office of the
Republic of Panama.
(184) Alvaro Sequeira Ramirez before the O.I.J.
52
At 24 hours, Jose Angel Chinchilla, heard. while at home.the
noise of two vehicles on the Costa Rican side. he looked out the
window and observed two green colored vehicles, Susuki type, such
as the ones used by the Panamanian guard, that were coming from
the Roble, Costa Rica towards Panama at a high rate of speed
(185).
On 14 September at 13:30 hours the body of Dr. Soadafora
was found under the bridge of the Roblito river in the locality
of Roble de Laurel, Costa Rica (186). The body showed multiple
lineal excoriations around the neck in different directions,
forming a band of 7 cm in width, some of which went down to the
chest, back and left shoulder. It was decaPitated and it had
ecchymosis on the left side of the chest, fracture of three ribs,
lineal excoriations in both arms and excoriations forming the
initials "F-8" in the back (187).
The body was found covered by a green canvas from the waist
up, tied from back to front, with the printed legend "Domestic
U.S. Mail, J-469" with number 1 inside a circle (188).
Before travelling to Panama, Dr. Hugo Spadafora was
gathering information as to the involvement of General Manuel
Antonio Noriega and other elements in the Southern Front (189).
Among the persons with whom Dr. Hugo Spadafora talked about this
(185) Jose Angel Chinchilla Rios before the O.I.J.
(186) Report of the O.I.J. Record of Visual Inspection.
(187) Medico-Legal Report of the O.I.J.
(188) Report from the Delegation of the O.I.J. from Corredores.
(189) Jose Rodrigo Ortiz Leiva before the O.I.J. and the Trial
Court of Santa Cruz Case 282-88, Superior Court of Liberia
for drug trafficking, case Edwin Viales and others.
53
subject were Floyd Carlton Caceres and Cesar Rodriouez. to whom
he stated that he was going "to make a bomb explode" in Panama
with that information, out that it would involve them (190).
The day before his trip to Panama, 12 September 1983. he
commented to his wife, in Costa Rica. that something important
was going to take place in Panama. for which reason he had
deiced to travel there (191).
That night he visited Julio Valverde Arguello in Santo
Domingc de Heredia to talk to him about the reediting of a book
of his that he had in mind (192).
On 26 September 1985, in New York. General Manuel A. Noriega
commented with Sr. Jose Blandon, at that time a man of his trust
in the Panamanian government, that Major Cordoba, who was
stationed a the Military Unit of Chiriqui, had been the one who
assassinated Dr. Spadafora and he was very anxious to know about
the declarations that Amantillo Cordoba, officer of the D.E.N.I.,
had prepared so that a German residing in Costa Rica, would give
it to the press in Panama. This German was Manfred Hoffman
Winttemberg, who appeared in the Panamanian press, saying that
Dr. Spadafora's homicide had been carried out by the F.L.M.N. of
El Salvador. As it is indicated, Hoffman was working for Joe
Fernandez, agent of the C.I.A. in Costa Rica, known as Thomas
Castillo (193).
(190) Floyd Carlton, Jose Blandon and Francis McNeil
before the Sub-Committee. Op.cit.l.
(191) Ariahana Bejarano Acuna before the O.I.J.
(192) Julio Valverde Arguello before the O.I.J.
(193) Jose Blandon
54
B- THE KELSO CASE:
In July of 1986, an informant of the U.S. Treasury
Department named Richard James William. who called himself Joseph
Robert Kelso, was inquiring in Costa Rica about the counterfeit
dollar market. the laundering of dollars and the drug trafficking
in the country (194).
William made contact in our country with Warren Wyant Treece
Osdway, who apparently, was also an informant for the U.S.
authorities and was known by various authorities of the Ministry
of Public Security and the Presidency of the Republic (195).
Warren Treece had requested information in connection with
the possible purchase of the Hotel Holiday Inn in San Jose by
Pablo Escobar; on the possible participation of Daniel Oduber,
Luis Barrantes, Alberto Gonzalez, Lee Abel Sinclair, a German
with the surname of Wagerman and other persons in the cocaine
traffic (195).
Kelso or William was investigating in Costa Rica about these
matters with Brian Cadwell, both being directed by an agent of
the U.S. Treasury Department named Krochemberg (196).
Within the information that these persons had, there was
one, according to which an individual with the surname Hope, was
the one that had made contact with Augusto Rodriguez, son, to use
the Hotel Holiday Inn to launder dollars (197) with the purpose
(194) Warren Treeoe and Alexander Suniga Mc Nulty before the
D.I.S., Gilberto Huete before the O.I.J. Case File on the
death of Augusto Rodriguez, Homicide SEction.
(195) Wasrren Treece, Alexander Zuniga before the D.I.S.
(196) Gilberto Hutt, Manuel Carrilllo, before the O.I.J.
Alexander Zuniga before the D.I.S.
(197) John Hull'.s letter in the Senate document Oo.cit.l
55
of investigating the accounting system of the hotel. Brian asked
Lic. Manuel A. Carrillo Pacheco in 1985, to draw a purchase
option that would include a clause in that since, to be signed by
him and by Augusto Rodriguez, son, who was going to sign in the
name of Landmark S.A., entity owner of the hotel: which was done
(198), the agreement not being finalized due to Sr. Rodriguez
death during those days (199).
Information on the existence of a cocaine laboratory in the
Nicoya peninsula and another one in Talamanca were transmitted by
Treece to an official of the D.E.A. with the surname of Gonzalez,
in Costa Rica, but they were not investigated on account of the
leak of information from this agent. As Treece and Kelso
affirmed, that person was protecting those laboratories (200).
On 8 August 1986, Richard James, William and Bryan Cadwell
were arrested by drug officials of the Organization of Judicial
Investigation and by members of the D.E.A., they were taken to a
building of the I.C.E., where, as they affirm, they were beaten
and threatened.
Later they were transferred to the Offices of Narcotics of
the O.I.J., where Sr. Nieves of the D.E.A. threatened them with
death (201).
(198) Manuel Carrillo Pacheco before the O.I.J.
(199) Ibid. See proceeding on the death of Augusto Rodriguez
in the Homicide Section of the O.I.J.
(200) Warren Treece before the D.I.S. Letter from John Hull to
Robert Owen, in documents in the Sub-Commission on
Terrorism, etc. of the U.S. Senate.
(201) Attachment to the memorandum No. 601-86 of D.I.S., inter-
rogation of Warren Treece, Alexander Zuniga Mc.Nulty before
the D.I.S., Gilberto Huete before the O.I.J.
56
After being set free. Richard James williams appealed to
Alexander Zunica Mc.Nultv. First Commander of the Presidency of
the Republic, and told him what had happened, telling him that he
had called to the United States and they had indicated to him to
place himself in safety as soon as possible (202).
Williams aka Kelso asked Zuniga to transport him to John
Hull's farm to protect himself (203), which the latter indeed
did, transporting him to San Carlos in a vehicle of the
Presidency (204).
Zuniga Mc.Nulty arrived at night at San Carlos and asked
Edgardo AlPizar Montero to give lodging to Kelso because it was
very late and to take him the next day to where John Hull was.
where he received him (205).
Hull, after talking with Kelso and after this told him all
that had taken place, lodged him in a boarding house that is
located in the farm and called by phone to find out who he was
(206).
In the afternoon hours of that day, 9 August 1986, Sr.
Alvaro Ramos Rechnitz, Vice Minister of the Interior, was told
that Rural Guards of Ciudad Quesada and a member of the U.S.
Embassy were looking for him. During the night hours Sr. Ramos
called said embassy and Sr. Robert Nieves indicated to him that
(202) Alexander Zuniga Mc Nulty before the D.I.S., and a letter
his sent to his wife.
(203) Ibid.
(204) Alexander Zuniga before the D.I.S., Edgardo Alpizar before
the O.I.J.; letter from john Hull already mentioned. Robert
Owen before the Senate.
(205) Edgardo Alpizar before the O.I.J.
(206) Margarita Acosta B. before the O.I.J.
57
John Hull' s farm there was a person who had falsified his
identity. he was a foreigner, and that he was highly suspicious
(207).
Lic. Ramos then called the Departmental Delegate of the
Rural Guard of Ciudao Quesada and the Suo-Director of that body,
Antonio Espinoza, asking them to investigate the matter (208).
The Departmental Delegate of the G.A.R.. Luis Humberto
Alfaro, accompanied by various members of his office and by
Alfonso Cruz. Roberto EsPinoza and Minor Ramirez of the Office of
Intelligence and Security, went to Hull's farm, where he told
them that the individual was extremely dangerous. giving them
authorization to enter, nevertheless, as it was during the night.
they decided to circle the place and wait for daybreak (209).
Around four in the morning Antonio Espinoza Calderon.
Director of G.A.R. and Marco Daniel Calderon Loaiza, Director of
the Central Region of the G.A.R., arrived at the place and
ordered that the house be entered and the individual captured
(210).
Before entering the house, Calderon fired a burst from an
AK-47 with the idea of scaring him (211), the door was kicked
open, taking out William, aka Kelso in his underwear and
transporting him to Hull's house (212).
When William was being transported to Hull's house, Roberto
(207) Alvaro Ramos before the O.I.J.
(208) Ibid.
(209) Roberto Espinoza, Alfonso Cruz, Minor Ramirez, Luis Alfaro,
Margarita Acosta before the O.I.J.
(210) Ibid.
(211) Marco Daniel Calderon, Roberto Espinoza and the before
mentiond proof. Op.cit.208.
(212) Margarita Acosta Baldomero before the O.I.J.
58
Esoincza Duran kicked him and hit him several times, hitting him
on the head with the butt of the rifle. at least on one occasion
(213).
From John Hull's farm, Richard James Williams was taken to
the central offices of the Direccion de Inteligencia y Segurioad
where he was interrogated, and. as he had entered the country
under another name, his deportation was ordered on 10 August.
That day Alfonso Cruz was ordered to accompany John Hull in
his vehicle to the D.I.S. offices in San Jose, as he had asked to
speak about the detention with the Directors. Cruz accompanied
Hull, who had an interview with Rodrigo Chavez and later, on the
return to San Carlos. they passed by the airport, place where,
due to Cruz's intervention, the officers of Migration allowed him
to talk with Williams.
Later, on the road, Hull commented to Cruz that Williams was
a U.S. custom agent (214).
FATHER DAVIS'S CASE:
On 17 January 1986, the Catholic priest of U.S.
nationality, David William John arrived at this country
commissioned by the U.S. Federal Court to serve notice in a civil
suit brought by Tony Avirgan against Felipe Vidal for the crime
of La Penca.
Father Davis found an individual by the name of Augusto
Navarro, through whom he tried to find Vidal, giving him his
telephone number. Narcotic officials called that number leaving
(213) Margarita Acosta B., Minor Ramirez Gonzalez, Alfonso Cruz
Corrales before the O.I.J. John Hull's letter and the
statement of Robert Owen in the Sub-Committe on Terrorism,
etc. of the U.S. Senate.
(214) Alfonso Cruz before the O.I.J.
59
him the number 37-28-28 so that he would call. which he did.
being told to present himself at the office. near the Patines
salon. Father Davis showed up at that place accompanied by
attorney Otto Castro, who was set aside and was not allowed to
talk to him.
The officer who ordered his arrest told him that he was
Fernando Leiva, but in reality he was Gilbert Jimenez. aka "Flaco
Jimenez", who interrogated him on the documentation or proofs
that the Avirgans had in connection with "La Penca" case.
Jimenez opened the small case that he was carrying and reviewed
and read all the documents that he was bringing.
At midday he was transported to the D.I.S. where he was
interrogated about the Avirgans, La Penca and on drugs.
Around five in the afternoon he was transported to Migration
and later he was taken to the airport to be deported. As there
was no flight to the United States they tried to place him on a
flight to Puerto Rico, something that could not be achieved, as
the ticket did not cover it, reason for which he was allowed to
board a flight to Managua.
As they were not able to deport him, they confiscated his
passport and told him to present himself the following day, it
being through President Arias's intervention that the passport
and the ticket were returned (215).
It must be remembered here that, Gilbert Jimenez, as it is
indicated above, was a personal friend of Moises Nunez and he
(215) Davis Williams John before the O.I.J.
60
was the one who introduced him to Luis Barrantes. In the same way
Moises Nunez belonged to the Cubans affiliated to John Hull and
was also linked to the Medellin Cartel.
Asked about it Gilberth Jimenez stated that Luis Barrantes
ordered him to investigate Father Davis because there was an
information to the eftec that this person would meet with
narcotraffickers in Soda Palace. He went to investigate and there
no one knew him. so, without giving an explanation to that
resPect, he connected him with a telephone belonging to the
Avirgans. They called him and he was asked to come by the
office. The following day Father Davis arrived at Narcotics
where ne was interrogated about the meetings with persons at the
Soda Palace, something he denied. They searched through the
documents that he was carrying in the suitcase and found some
travel checks signed by Thomas Borge. As he did not have
anything to do with drugs, they took him to the D.I.S., telling
the officials of that body that he was suspicious of being an
"Arab" or a "Jesuit" (216).
D- MARIO CASTRO SANCHEZ'S CASE:
Mario Castro Sanchez was commissioned by the Federal Court
of the United States to notify Moises Nunez Ruiz as to
proceedings, so he appeared at the offices of Frigorificos de
Puntarenas, where he was asked to come into his office. Once
there, Moises Nunez closed the door and after reading the
documents he took out a weapon, a pistol, and an I.D. from Public
(216) Gilbert Jimenez before the O.I.J.
61
Safety - Narcotics with its corresponding badge and he started to
insult him. Later three individuals arrived and stood by him.
Nunez proceeding to make several telephone calls. After an hour,
some officials who said they were from D.I.S. and others from
O.I.J., arrived. taking him to the central offices of the
Organization of Judicial Investigation, telling him that although
there was no crime <committed> to hold him, they were going to
consult their superiors (217).
When Gilberth Jimenez was interrogated about the matter, ne
stated that on one occasion he became aware that a brother of
Lic. Otto Castro had gone to summon Moises Nunez for something
that came from a county in Miami. and that he detected that it
was from Martha Honey and Tony Avirgan. He said that Moises Nunez
told him that was not the way to summon him and that it would
constitute a legal infraction. As there was an argument between
Moises and Castro, a Narcotics Unit was sent but they went to
Moises's house, resulting that the problem was not there.
He adds that it seems that patrols arrived at the place and
detained Castro, seizing a weapon, but that he is not certain
because he was not there (218).
V- RECOMMENDATIONS:
I consider that from the evidence accumulated to this date,
sufficient elements of judgement are derived to start, in
conformity with Article 5 of the Code of Penal Procedures, the
public penal action against:
(217) Mario Castro before the D.I.J.
(218) Gilberth Jimenez Retana before the O.I.J.
62
a- JOHN HULL and FELIPE VIDAL for the crime of qualified
homicide as mediate perPetrators. Article 112 clauses 7 and 45 of
the Penal Code. in detriment of LINDA FRAZIER and others. in
addition the existing Proceeding requirement should be lengthened
against John Hull in the Trial Court of Ciudad Quesada because of
the new events that are narrated in this pleading and which
comprise the crime of Hostile Acts. as per description of Article
280 of the Penal Code.
b- FELIPE VIDAL, ROBERT OWEN, PHILLIPS HOLTZ, RENE CORVO,
MOISES NUNEZ RUIZ, FRANK CASTRO, THOMAS POSEY, GEORGE MORALES,
RICHARD HEALY, BRUCE JONES, JESUS GARCIA, FERNANDO CHAMORRO,
MARCOS AGUADO, CAROL PRADO, EDEN PASTORA. for the crime of
hostile acts, Article 280 of the Penal Code.
c- MAJOR CORDOBA, capacities unknown, officer of the defence
forces of Panama for the crime of qualified homicide. in
detriment of Dr. Hugo Spadafora (Article 212 of the Penal Code).
d- GILBERT JIMENEZ RETANA, for the crime of illegal
privation of freedom (Article 192, Clause 4th of the Penal Code).
e- ANTONIO ESPINOZA CALDERON, for the crime of illegal
privation of freedom (Article 192 Clause 4th of the Penal Code).
f- FERNANDO DURAN AYANEGUI, for the crime of hostile acts
(Article 280 of the Penal Code).
g- LEONEL POVEDA SILES, CARLOS CORONEL, GUILLERMO MENDIETA,
LUIS RIVAS, ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ SAENZ, HAROLD MARTINEZ SAENZ AND
JUAN ZABALA, for the crimes of hostile acts (Article 280 of the
Penal Code).
h- In connection with the behavior of the members of the
63
group called "THE BABIES", I consider that they incurred in the
crime of ILLICIT ENRICHMENT in conformity with Article 344 of the
Penal Code in its 3rd. Clause, however the legal acttion has
prescribed (Article 82 of the Penal Code). Given the seriousness
of the actions by the members of this group against the interest
of the nation and the sources of financing of the D.I.S.. I
consider that it is unavoidable to designate one of the Deputy
Prosecutors from the main office to delve deeply into the
investigations to determine whether in the last two years the
delivery of the "gifts" to personnel of D.I.S., has continued ,
taking the corresponding legal actions if such a thing has
occurred.
i- Colonel RODRIGO PANIAGUA SALAZAR, according to what the
evidence reveals, incurred in the crime of hostile acts, but as
he has passed away, its dismissal should be requested.
j- Sres. ALLAN SOLANO and ALBERT LLORENTE could have
uncured, with their behavior in the crime of unfulfillment of
their duties that Article 230 of the Penal Code provides, but at
this date the public penal action has prescribed. However, on
account of its seriousness, the Full Court should be informed so
that the disciplinary regime be applied as it concerns.
In the investigation it has not been possible to establish
the identity of O.I.J. officials that participated in the arrest
of Richard James Williams and Mario Castro Sanchez. As such
actions could constitute a crime against aggravated privation of
freedom, I consider that the Office of Internal Affairs of this
Organization should be commissioned so that in conjunction with a
64
identification and the fixing of responsibilities, so that penal
action can be taken if it is warranted.
To finalize. this report does not out an end to the
investigation of the crime of LA PENCA, which should continue in
the clarification of the events. A great deal of useful
information is in the United States, and it will depend on the
good faith of the authorities of that country to give access to
what has been censored in the Senate reports. In the same way,
without the help of those authorities it will be impossible to
interviews witnesses in that countrY, for which reason I consider
it important that the respective steps be carried out by the
Government Attorney and the Plenary Court.
Sincerely,
Illegible signature
Lic. Jorge Chavarria Guzman TRIAL
PROSECUTOR OF SAN JOSE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOS
(There is an illegible imprint
of a rubber stamp.)
cc:arch.
jf.
Translated from the original Spanish
into English by John B. Anderson, Cer-
tified Court Interpreter.
Coral Gables, 18 January 1990.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE
SUSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
18Th JANUARY,1990. (
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLA.
My commission expires