Bill Clinton's house of promises has become a house of cards in just the first two weeks of his presidency. Bill's reversals were Olympic quality. Practically speaking, the only card remaining is Bill's promise to the gay communities to integrate the military. Is this great accomplishment to take the place of the "middle class tax break" or "balancing the budget" or "cutting the deficit"?
Hillary has already acquired more raw power than any First Lady in U.S. history. The senate confirmed her selection for the Director of Health and Human Services, an agency of the government that typically spends 40% of the federal budget! As the titular head of Clinton's Health Care Survey, Hillary is essentially relegated approximately half of the U.S. government. Presumably Bill will take on the other half which will be more centered on foreign affairs. So now that we know what Bill and Hillary will be running, we should ask the next logical question --- Who will be running Bill and Hillary?
None of the political pundits will ever say that it is Pamela Harriman who runs Mr. Bill. But confronted with the overwhelming facts, these pundits will be hard pressed to deny this brutal truth. After all, Pamela is the widow of Averell Harriman, the former CEO of BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN, the money ship where Prescott Bush was a partner and where the major portions of the Bush family fortune were derived. Incest at the top is so great that the treasury for the YALE secret society, SKULL AND BONES, for about the last 30 years has been kept by BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN. It is impossible for a thinking person to maintain that this Harriman affiliation with the Bush family is not significant. Even more difficult deny is the obvious fact that Pamela Harriman is Bill Clinton's most powerful backer.
There is a saying "Don't change horses in the middle of a stream." What is it that made investment banker, Jackson Stevens change candidates in the middle of an election? Consider this; In January of 1992 Stevens was a member of George Bush's TEAM 100, having donated $100,000 to the Bush campaign. His wife was co-chairman of the GEORGE BUSH FOR PRESIDENT COMMITTEE in 1988. Pretty solidly in the George Bush camp. So, if he does not give Bill Clinton the requested $3.5 million dollar line of credit, the horse he is riding is certain to win the race. What on earth could make such a man shift his backing in such a situation? Pamela Harriman? Of course.
Now if Pamela Harriman and Jackson Stevens were already backing a sure winner ---- why would they decide to create another new sure winner? Answer: Certainly not to lose power. As I published in the November 92 issue of MONETARY AND ECONOMIC REVIEW George Bush is being programmed to assume authority within the UNITED NATIONS --- in fact the indications that George Bush will become the next Secretary General of the UNITED NATIONS are now overwhelming. I am much more at ease announcing this than I was in April announcing that the world's financial elite had anointed Bill Clinton to be the next president.
Think of what George Bush could do as UNITED NATIONS Secretary General. He would be King/Dictator of the world. Who ever heard of Butrus Butrus? What country is he from? What was he doing before he became Secretary General? How did he get selected? No one knows the answers to these questions. But even with a weakling at its helm, the UN is still formidable. Just think of how the U.N. would gain in stature if an ex-leader of a super-power like Helmet Kohl, Margaret Thatcher ---- or more logically George Bush --- became Secretary General?
Has anyone ever seen a lame duck president behave in office as George Bush has? He sent a message loud and clear, throughout the world centers of power, that he is still running the show. He stated that his START II Agreement was the finest moment of his presidency. Simply moving the signing of this agreement up 5 weeks would have allowed him to present this to the American voters as an accomplishment of his presidency. Instead he chose to harvest world publicity for this ---- after the election ---when he stopped first in Somalia on his way to consummate this agreement with Boris Yeltsin in Moscow. Why spend these choice photo opportunities to create a flourish --- after the election?
George Bush also threw a mega bash in Washington, D.C. (everybody who was anybody was there) on the occasion of the presentation of an award to x-president Reagan. Photo ops don't get any better than this --- but Bush waited until after the election! On this occasion Bush stated that Ronald Reagan "carried forth the HOLY GRAIL of freedom" in Europe.
Was there a dark meaning hidden in this last statement? Remember from MER October 92 that HOLY GRAIL is derived from the English translation of the French words San Grael or Sang Rael. There is something very profound about the way these words are represented. It is very akin to the reader's interpretation of the word puzzle:
G O D I S N O W H E R E
Before reading farther go back to this string of letters until a meaningful sentence is perceived.
There are two directly opposite ways of understanding this configuration of letters --- GOD IS NOW HERE or GOD IS NOWHERE --- each reflecting the disposition of the reader. In the same way the point where one divides the letters Sangreal determines if the HOLY GRAIL is some kind of a cup or indeed "holy blood" or specifically --- a holy blood line. Were the KNIGHTS TEMPLARS organized to protect a cup or to protect a holy blood line? Which sounds more plausible? Is what Ronald Reagan "carried forth" the blood line of George Bush and Otto von Hapsburg and others less known to the public?
Please recall that both George and Barbara Bush are linear decedents of Godfroi de Bouillon, founder in 1118 of the KNIGHTS TEMPLARS as the elite guard for the City of Jerusalem. Again, this material is set forth in the book HOLY BLOOD HOLY GRAIL, a work highly indebted to the Priory of Sion itself for most of its information. Legends abound that enormous amounts of wealth were transferred out of the heart of the Middle East to the kingdoms of Europe during this period. To this day gold bars in their largest denomination are refereed to as bullion --- spoken in English this is phonetically close to the French pronouncement of Bouillon.
To sum up an enormous amount of information in a simple sentence --- IT SO TURNS OUT THAT THE NOBILITY OF EUROPE ARE ALL RELATED AND ALSO TRY TO TRACE THEIR LINEAGE BACK TO KING DAVID OF JERUSALEM! This is true of the English royal family. Otto von Hapsburg's official title this day is HOLY ROMAN EMPEROR AND KING OF JERUSALEM!
In order to better understand the family relationships of European nobility I recommend a complete reading of the historical plays of William Shakespeare. One sees that in the play HENRY V, that Henry V, King of England, and Charles II, King of France, are at war over the throne of France because if royal lineage was traced by the French Salic Law, Charles was the legitimate king of France, but if the lineage is traced by the British method, Henry V would actually the legitimate king of France! They were at war and they were both cousins --- the rule rather than the exception throughout human history. At a certain level there exists an elite where brothers, sisters, cousins, mothers and fathers uncles and aunts are all related through marriage to the governing elite of all other major countries. This obvious and undeniable fact is kept a dark secret from the world peasantry.
I have been converted to the belief that William Shakespeare was the pen name used by Sir Francis Bacon. It makes sense. Shakespeare's plays all glamorize Bacon's ancestors. In previous articles I related that according to the records of the Priory of Sion itself, Sir Francis Bacon served a long term as Grand Master of Priory of Sion. Like the claim that Bacon wrote the Shakespearean plays, this claim is subject to serious question. But one other claim about Sir Francis Bacon is so well accredited that it can not be denied. Sir Francis Bacon headed the team of translators who translated the King James version of the Bible into English!
King James did not have the character any of us would like to associate with any task as awesome as the translation of Scripture. All of his biographers relate his life long exclusive homosexuality. Several mention his hunting habit of dismounting his horse to revel in the blood of his fallen prey. One account has him performing some unspeakable sex act with such an animal in its death throes! At any rate there is plenty of disquieting material of this nature concerning James I to give Christians pause when they consider that James I mandated 880 translation changes to our Bible!
Surveying the entire span of Shakespeare's historical plays is a most formidable task made possible for most of us only by the use of ASIMOV'S GUIDE TO SHAKESPEARE. After surveying this material I was driven to the same conclusion as Isaac Asimov. Shakespeare was almost exclusively obsessed with the question of succession of power. In this regard Shakespeare and the Priory of Sion were concerned with the same question --- WHO SHOULD BE MADE KINGS? The lessons of the strife and civil wars that followed usurpers are clearly represented in JULIUS CAESAR, MACBETH and HENRY IV. Could it be that the same arcane methods for selecting kings, worked out by the Priory of Sion, are being used today to select George Bush as King\Dictator of the UNITED NATIONS? Certainly this is a chilling thought for those who are able to see beyond the "kindly Uncle Fred" PR image Bush's handlers are able to project --- to the CIA black ops, the narcotics trafficking and the phony wars closely associated with the George Bush career.
March 24, 1603 Queen Elizabeth died leaving no children. As first cousin to Elizabeth, James VI, the reigning King of Scotland, being the closest relative to the Queen, became King James I, King of Great Britain and Ireland.
To place matters into a time perspective, imagine it is the year 1606. MACBETH is being performed for the first time at Stratford On Avon and in the audience is James I seated next to his brother-in-law, Christian IV, King of Denmark. (At this time Denmark was a far more powerful kingdom than England). The general in this play who restores order (by restoring the rightful line of Duncan to the throne, which so happened to be the blood line of James I) is MacDuff, the Thane of Fife. It is from this stock that the current governor of Arizona, J. Fife Symington hails. And in HENRY V and HENRY VI the Percy families are the ancestors of both George and Barbara Bush! Clearly this knowledge adds new dimensions of meaning to these plays.
Readers are probably asking if I believe that these elite secret rulers of the world actually maintain the blood line of King David, Joseph of Arimathea or even Jesus Christ (as one claim has it). Could blood decendents of Christ perpetrate the unspeakable atrocities associated with these ruling families?
No, I believe this is a fiction of their own creation to justify the enormous power that they wield that can not be justified by any other claim. Certainly none of them can claim that they came by their power through fair elections or public acclamation of any kind. No where do they govern by the consent of the governed.
Those tracing blood lines are in fair agreement that records after 500 AD are reliable. Before this, there is great room for uncertainty. And of course, one bastard can nullify this entire thesis. (No pun intended.) It is much more probable that this is a conspiracy to subvert Christianity that began during this period, if not at the very moment of the death of Christ.
When I contemplate the mission of the Priory of Sion I often doubt that the anti-Christ is meant in fact to be a single personage. Could the features of the Anti-Christ so clearly visualized by John more precisely define what is explained else where in Scripture to be a "principality of evil"? I can not help but be struck by the fact that the Priory of Sion has already accomplished most of the missions ascribed to the anti-Christ! While pretending a false affiliation with Jesus Christ they have virtually succeeded in making all the peoples of the world bow down before them.
Back to INTELLIGENCE CONNECTION Index
Back to DE-CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Index
DE-CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
P.O. Box 58,
Tempe, Arizona 85280
(602) 977-0296
(C) 1996 Intelligence Connection