Ms. Terri Schiavo

Joseph Sadowski
Ms. Terri Schiavo
Wed Oct 22 15:02:19 2003

This was sent to All members of the House and Senate on

October 20, 2003
Joseph AF. Sadowski
30 Murray Rd.
Hicksville, New York.

To Members of the Senate & House:

My Name is Joseph AF. Sadowski. I do petition each member of this House to intervene on the behalf and the request of Terri Schiavo, who at this time, cannot make this request! I have a grievance, which I have been made aware of! It has come to light that Probate Judge George W. Greer, has made a decision regarding Ms. Terri Schiavo! In a trial initiated by Michael Schiavo, Circuit Court Judge, George W. Greer, issued a verdict delivered on February 11, 2000. Judge Greer granted authorization to discontinue Terri’s feeding tube. Judge Greer’s verdict will cause Terri to die, in 10 to 14 days. Terri’s death will be by starvation. Starvation is one of the most painful ways, any one person can fall to death!

I would like to point out that; it is this Petitioner’s belief that Judge George W. Greer, is a Probate Judge. This type of Judge involves decisions of estates and last wills and testament! Ms. Terri Schiavo did not have any will or living will! The last I looked, a human life is not baggage, nor is it an item or real property! Wherefore, Judge George W. Greer, does not have the Jurisdiction nor does he have subject matter Jurisdiction. Wherefore, he does not have foundation to sit over and here this type of case! That would make him an accomplice to Manslaughter and he has also violated 18 USC. Section 2. With violations in 42 USC 1983 Section 7.12 of the Civil Rights, as in state of mind and simple jurisdiction! All Judges know of their Cannon Rules, which is their guidelines within Jurisdiction, in which they are allowed to preside over certain issues! I may be wrong, but this Judge has stepped outside that jurisdiction!

There will be a liability placed upon the State of Florida, for allowing this execution to continue! I foresee a civil rights lawsuit filed within that State, for no other reason than jurisdiction and the lack therein! This Order will open a magnitude of issues, involving jurisdictional cases! This is the reason we have different levels of Courts, which is clearly stated, Subject matter Jurisdiction.

Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion for discretion is incident to jurisdiction “Piper Vs. Person 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley Vs. Fisher, 13 wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872).

A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his act. Davit Vs. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d big 689 (1938)

“No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority out side of the limits of the jurisdiction of the Court Judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence. Ableman Vs. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859);

In Elliot Vs. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 US. (1828), under federal law which is applicable to all states, the United States Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority”, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences are considered, in law, as trespassers.

When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction. State of Little Vs. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697.

Generally, judges are immune from Suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in clear absence of all jurisdiction, Gregory Vs. Thompson, 500 F.2d 59 (C.A. Ariz.1974).

McClendon Vs. city of Columbia, No 00-60256 (5th. Cir. July 26, 2001) the fifth circuit adopted the “state created danger” theory of liability, requiring that a Plaintiff need only show that state actor created a dangerous environment that they knew to be dangerous were deliberately indifferent to the plight of the Plaintiff.

It takes a Supreme Court Judge to have Jurisdiction, to preside over any case with a possible verdict, being set down for death! It is morally wrong for anyone to believe, that they (a Judge) have the right to end a life, for no other reason other than a nuisance! There are many people in state institutions, that cannot care for themselves; some bed ridden and most all in a state mental institution have brain damage!

By adhering to this type of Order, it is then possible to put each of them to death, by means of painful starvation! What kind of people are we to take life of this magnitude and end it because of a whim?

The husband has shown only support of death to his wife during the past years, which has been stated on the record, by people working in that hospital!

There were questions! Terri was a Battered Wife? One year after Terri's collapse, a bone scan revealed that she had compression fractures and apparent traumatic injuries. Michael wants Terri's body cremated, following her death. Is this a normal event? Should we worried that doing so, would destroy any evidence investigators could use, to ascertain whether Terri was a victim of domestic abuse? This, which could have been the reason that Terri lay in that hospital today and for the past 14 years! Only recently has information been made available, by an unnamed physician who reviewed the nuclear imaging bone scan, found evidence of ‘multiple fractures. “Somebody worked her over real good“, the doctor claimed!

There was one particular allegation that was "very disturbing". A criminal investigation was requested by Carla Sauer Iyer, who was a registered nurse who cared for Terri from about April of 1995, until August of 1996, claming Terri's blood sugar levels were normally "very stable due to the uniformity of her diet." Carla Sauer Iyer suspects Schiavo of injecting Terri with regular insulin, to drive her into hypoglycemic shock. Carla Sauer Iyer noted “at least five times when Michael Schiavo would come to visit Terri, close the door to her room and then emerge sometime later and leave," Hennessy related. "On those occasions, Iyer had tested Terri's blood sugar, and the level was so low it wasn't even registering. She would administer dextrose to get Terri...out of danger."

At that time, an investigation should have been launched, for the sole reason of the Blood sugar levels and the timely events that Michael was visiting his wife! At very least, a Protection Order should have been issued!

Why would the husband and the police officers stop the Roman Catholic priest, from giving the host to Terri at her last rights?

In early October 1990, the hearing began to determine the fate of this 38-year-old woman. Her parents and their doctors say Terri is responsive and deserves to live. Now you have the husband, who has just had a daughter by the woman to whom he is now engaged. Michael wants Terri to die! The Law is very clear in Florida 798.01. Living in open adultery. Whoever lives in an open state of adultery, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Where either of the parties living in an open state of adultery is married, both parties so living shall be deemed to be guilty, of the offense provided for in this section.

It is within this Petitioner’s belief, that the husband of Terri, should be held accountable for his actions and an investigation be immediately launched, to find if the husband Michael, did in fact, cause the damage to the brain of Terri Schiavo!

Thank You
Joseph AF. Sadowski
30 Murray Rd.
Hicksville, New York.

Main Page - Monday, 10/22/03

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)