October 16th, 2006 - James A. Baker and 9/11 Co-Chariman Lee
Hamilton are withholding this report from the public til after
the election (when it won't make a difference) the Baker-led
group is keeping valuable information from the voters that could
very well alter the election.
Baker is Senior Counsel for The Carlyle Group.
Gen. Sir Richard Dannatt is included in the video.
YOUTUBE:
Iraq Study Group Playing Politics By Not Playing Politics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q0TyVrsKhM
===========================
The Carlyle Group
&
Halliburton
Former World Leaders and Washington Insiders Making Billions in
the War on Terrorism
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/carlyle_group.htm
Why Did Bush Lie us into Iraq?
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushco/bush_lied.htm
Investing in War
The Carlyle Group profits from government and conflict
http://www.publicintegrity.org/pns/report.aspx?aid=424
Meet The Carlyle Group
EXPOSED: The Carlyle Group
48 minute Real Player video ~ watch now
http://movies01.archive.org/opensource_movies/newsreal/indybay/uploads/carlyle_group.rm
(67.1MB)
Audio version of the above movie
#1
http://www.apfn.net/audio/carlyle_groupA.MP3 (7.19MB)
#2
http://www.apfn.net/audio/carlyle_groupB.MP3 (6.43MB)
#3
http://www.apfn.net/audio/carlyle_groupC.MP3 (8.45MB)
#4
http://www.apfn.net/audio/carlyle_groupD.MP3 (9.60MB)
04/17/06 Randi Rhodes re: 911
http://www.apfn.net/audio/M001I060417203929-rhodes-911.MP3
(5.94MB) 25Min 57Sec
Democracy Now! Broadcast Exclusive: James Baker's Double Life in
Iraq: The Carlyle Group Stands to Make Killing on Iraqi Debt
Listen/Watch:
http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2004/oct/video/dnB20041013a.rm&proto=rtsp&start=13:06.00
In a major expose published last night on The Nation magazine's
website, columnist Naomi Klein reveals that President Bush's
special envoy on Iraq's debt, former Secretary of State James
Baker, has been using his position to benefit his corporate
clients and the Carlyle Group, the powerful merchant bank and
defense contractor where Baker serves as a partner. [includes
rush transcript]
According to confidential documents obtained by The Nation,
Carlyle has sought to secure an extraordinary $1 billion
investment from the Kuwaiti government, with Baker"s influence
as debt envoy being used as a crucial lever. The secret deal
involves a complex transaction to transfer ownership of as much
as $57 billion in unpaid Iraqi debts. The debts, now owed to the
government of Kuwait, would be assigned to a foundation created
and controlled by a consortium in which the key players are the
Carlyle Group and the Albright Group, which is headed by another
former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright. There are also
several other well-connected firms involved.
Under the deal, the government of Kuwait would also give the
consortium $2 billion up front to invest in a private equity
fund devised by the consortium, with half of it going to
Carlyle. In a letter dated August 6, 2004, the consortium
informed Kuwait's foreign ministry that the country"s unpaid
debts from Iraq are "in imminent jeopardy." Another letter warns
the Kuwaitis that world opinion is turning in favor of debt
forgiveness. As evidence the consortium points out to Kuwait
"President Bush's appointment...of former Secretary of State
James Baker as his envoy to negotiate Iraqi debt relief." The
consortium's proposal spells out the threat: Not only is Kuwait
unlikely to see any of its $30 billion from Iraq in sovereign
debt, but the $27 billion in war reparations that Iraq owes to
Kuwait from Saddam Hussein"s 1990 invasion "may well be a
casualty of this U.S. [debt relief] effort."
In the face of this threat, the consortium offers its services.
If Kuwait agrees to transfer the debts to the consortium"s
foundation, the consortium will use these personal connections
to persuade world leaders that Iraq must "maximize" its debt
payments to Kuwait, which would be able to collect the money
after ten to fifteen years. And the more the consortium gets
Iraq to pay during that period, the more Kuwait collects, with
the consortium taking a 5 percent commission or more.
Naomi Klein, award-winning journalist and author of Fences and
Windows: Dispatches From the Front Lines of the Globalization
Debate and No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies.
Naomi Klein's article in The Nation: "James Baker's Double Life"
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/13/144220
The ex-presidents' club
Oliver Burkeman and Julian Borger
Wednesday October 31, 2001
The Guardian
It is hard to imagine an address closer to the heart of American
power. The offices of the Carlyle Group are on Pennsylvania
Avenue in Washington DC, midway between the White House and the
Capitol building, and within a stone's throw of the headquarters
of the FBI and numerous government departments. The address
reflects Carlyle's position at the very centre of the Washington
establishment, but amid the frenetic politicking that has
occupied the higher reaches of that world in recent weeks, few
have paid it much attention. Elsewhere, few have even heard of
it.
This is exactly the way Carlyle likes it. For 14 years now, with
almost no publicity, the company has been signing up an
impressive list of former politicians - including the first
President Bush and his secretary of state, James Baker; John
Major; one-time World Bank treasurer Afsaneh Masheyekhi and
several south-east Asian powerbrokers - and using their contacts
and influence to promote the group. Among the companies Carlyle
owns are those which make equipment, vehicles and munitions for
the US military, and its celebrity employees have long served an
ingenious dual purpose, helping encourage investments from the
very wealthy while also smoothing the path for Carlyle's defence
firms.
But since the start of the "war on terrorism", the firm -
unofficially valued at $3.5bn - has taken on an added
significance. Carlyle has become the thread which indirectly
links American military policy in Afghanistan to the personal
financial fortunes of its celebrity employees, not least the
current president's father. And, until earlier this month,
Carlyle provided another curious link to the Afghan crisis:
among the firm's multi-million-dollar investors were members of
the family of Osama bin Laden.
The closest the Carlyle Group has previously come to public
attention was last May, when a Seoul-based employee called Peter
Chung was forced to resign from his £100,000-a-year job after
sending an email to friends - subsequently forwarded to
thousands of others - boasting of his plans to "... every hot
chick in Korea over the next two years". The more
business-oriented activities of Carlyle's staff have been
conducted much more quietly: since it was founded in 1987 by
David Rubenstein, a policy assistant in Jimmy Carter's
administration, and two lawyer friends, the firm has been
dispatching an array of former world leaders on a series of
strategic networking trips.
Last year, George Bush Sr and John Major travelled to Riyadh to
talk with senior Saudi businessmen. In September 2000, Carlyle
hired speakers including Colin Powell and AOL Time Warner chair
Steve Case to address an extravagant party at Washington's
Monarch Hotel. Months later, Major joined James Baker for a
function at the Lanesborough Hotel in London, to explain the
Florida election controversy to the wealthy attendees.
We can assume that Carlyle pays well. Neither Major's office nor
Carlyle will confirm the details of his salary as European
chairman - an appointment announced shortly before he left the
House of Commons after the election - but we know, for the
purposes of comparison, that he is paid £105,000 for 28 days'
work a year for an unrelated non-executive directorship. Bush
gives speeches for the company and is paid with stakes in the
firm's investments, believed to be worth at least $80,000 per
appearance. The benefits have attracted political stars from
around the world: former Philippines president Fidel Ramos is an
adviser, as is former Thai premier Anand Panyarachun - as well
as former Bundesbank president Karl Otto Pohl, and Arthur Levitt,
former chairman of the SEC, the US stock market regulator.
Carlyle partners, who include Baker and the firm's chairman,
Frank Carlucci - Ronald Reagan's defence secretary and a former
deputy director of the CIA - own stakes that would be worth
$180m each if each partner owned an equal slice. As in many
areas of its work, though, Carlyle is not obliged to reveal the
details, and chooses not to.
Among the defence firms which benefit from Carlyle's success is
United Defense, a Virginia-based contractor which makes vertical
missile launch systems currently on board US Navy ships in the
Arabian sea, as well as a range of other weapons delivery
systems and combat vehicles. Carlyle's other holdings span an
improbable range, taking in the French newspaper Le Figaro and
the company which bottles Dr Pepper.
"They are big, and they are quiet," says David Mulholland,
business editor of Jane's Defence Weekly. "But they're not easy
to get information out of, [but] United Defense are going to do
well [in the current conflict]." United also owns Bofors, a
Swedish munitions manufacturer.
Carlyle has said that it does not lobby the federal government,
thus avoiding a conflict of interest when, for example, Carlucci
met Rumsfeld in February when several important defence
contracts were under consideration. But critics see that as a
matter of definition.
"It should be a deep cause for concern that a closely held
company like Carlyle can simultaneously have directors and
advisers that are doing business and making money and also
advising the president of the United States," says Peter Eisner,
managing director of the Center for Public Integrity, a
non-profit-making Washington think-tank. "The problem comes when
private business and public policy blend together. What hat is
former president Bush wearing when he tells Crown Prince
Abdullah not to worry about US policy in the Middle East? What
hat does he use when he deals with South Korea, and causes
policy changes there? Or when James Baker helps argue the
presidential election in the younger Bush's favour? It's a
kitchen-cabinet situation, and the informality involved is
precisely a mark of Carlyle's success."
The world of private equity is an inherently secretive one.
Firms such as Carlyle make most of their money buying firms
which are not publicly traded, overhauling them and selling them
at a profit, so the process by which likely targets are
evaluated is much more confidential than on the open market.
"These firms certainly don't go out of their way to get into the
headlines," says Steven Bell, chief economist at Deutsche Asset
Management. "They'd rather make a splash in Institutional
Pensions Week. The aim is to realise very high returns for your
investors while exerting a high degree of control over the
company. You don't want to get into the headlines when you force
the management to fire a director."
The process has worked wonders at United, and this month the
firm announced plans to go public, giving Carlyle the chance to
cash in its investment.
But what sets Carlyle apart is the way it has exploited its
political contacts. When Carlucci arrived there in 1989, he
brought with him a phalanx of former subordinates from the CIA
and the Pentagon, and an awareness of the scale of business a
company like Carlyle could do in the corridors and steak-houses
of Washington. In a decade and a half, the firm has been able to
realise a 34% rate of return on its investments, and now claims
to be the largest private equity firm in the world. Success
brought more investors, including the international financier
George Soros and, in 1995, the wealthy Saudi Binladin family,
who insist they long ago severed all links with their notorious
relative. The first president Bush is understood to have visited
the Binladins in Saudi Arabia twice on the firm's behalf.
FULL REPORT:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/carlyle_group.htm