Fw: Tom Flocco article about Barbara Olson is a fake
Sat Sep 24, 2005 01:21
64.140.158.12

 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: Tom Flocco article about Barbara Olson is a fake
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:10:05 -0600
From: spiker spiker@spiker.biz
To: (Recipient list suppressed)


From: Mark Robinowitz mark@oilempire.us

Tom Flocco is not a "reliable source." He had one or two good articles shortly after 9/11, is now pushing a large amount of disinformation that distracts from real, provable, documented evidence of complicity.

It is highly unlikely that this new story has any truth to it.

Tom Flocco is a website, www.tomflocco.com  with a history of promoting hoaxes (several of them), and a single story that lacks any means of verifying anything is not exactly journalism.

A clue is the fake claim that the hole in the Pentagon was too small for a plane -- this is blatantly untrue, and strong evidence that this article is disinformation. While there are still some people pushing that lie, it is not real, and even many in the 9/11 truth movement have shown how this is nonsense.

Also -- haven't the Italians shifted from "lyra" currencies (it was spelled LIRA) to the EURO? Is this just another clue that this is bullshit?

It's probably just more "bait" for the 9/11 skeptics to discredit themselves. The dictator's polls are headed down more, so Karl Rove and his pals have cranked up their propaganda ministry to float more nonsense.

Forwarding this wild speculation that contains obvious embedded hoaxes is not truth seeking.

There is zero evidence that anything other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. The eyewitnesses who had a good view were in agreement that a large twin engine jet hit. The impact zone was the width of the plane. Plane parts were scattered widely by the impact. No one saw a missile, or global hawk, or f-15 or flying saucer with giant lizards at the controls. It was just a hoax to create a fake debate between "no plane" and "no complicity," which distracts from how the plane was steered into the nearly empty part of the Pentagon (the real issue). It's a critical part of the cover-up, since most of the military was not part of Cheney's cabal, and the no plane hoax was needed to alienate them from thinking about the real issues.

In the unlikely event that Barbara Olson is really still alive, then that would mean she was not actually on the plane. But her story reminds me of a German (non-Jewish) woman who accidentally got on a train during the Nazi times with her kids, and wound up at the Treblinka extermination camp. She complained that she was not a Jew, and an officer's wife, and it was a mistake that she was on a train that wound up at the death camp. She and her kids were killed anyway.

If you still have the illusion that "no plane hit the Pentagon" I recommend (among other sources) http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html

Virtually all of the best citizen investigators who've written on these topics either never fell for this hoax or have since come to understand it is not real.
 

Main Page - Monday, 9/26/05

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)