CHAOSMAN
DISCLAIMER! MUCH INFO INCOMING TO ME:
Sat Sep 22, 2007 14:06
72.201.70.108
DISCLAIMER! MUCH INFO INCOMING TO ME:
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/towrcmmnt.htm
DISCLAIMER! MUCH INFO INCOMING TO ME: PLEASE DOUBLE-CHECK REPORTS. IN
USUAL ORBIT FORMAT WILL REPORT ALL, CONFIRMED OR NOT, SO WADE THROUGH TO
THE CORE FACTS PLEASE! TIMED OUT NEWS LINKS? TRY THE: WAYBACK MACHINE
http://www.archive.org/internet/index.html
EDITOR: debate boils down to which came first the chicken or the egg?
Did the collapse of the South tower cause a mushroom-shaped plume to
appear remotely near building 6 or 7, or did a detonation at 6-7
[possibly a pulsed blast at a precise harmonic frequency] do a
death-knell to the weakened towers? In recap to the diverse comments
below the questions here remain:
A. The immense plume happened we think prior, maybe only seconds, to the
collapse of the first or south tower. Seismic:
B. Even if the South tower was beginning to collapse [at 9:59] I still
wonder why such a compression plume would burst up so remotely rather
than ring-around the actual base in a tighter circumference to the South
tower?
C. The plume came up near building six or seven.
D. Even if the South tower were indeed beginning to implode and
telescope downward It would like the North tower would act as a
barricade to block the flow of any smoke and debris.
E. Also the plume burst up so suddenly and vertically from a most
specific territory.
F. Amazingly the location of the plume corresponds on the recon sat map
with the most pronounced crater of the entire area of destruction.
F. In my timeline reckoning the WTC residents were still successfully
leaving the main towers, at least the North tower, at the time of this
most specific and seemingly isolated and well-defined event. Would not a
compression event as expressed so profoundly in the designated plume
have had more effect on the overall evacuation ordeal? MOST IMPORTANT
See this Kronos sat aerial and red location circle indicating the
location of the plume:
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/wtclayout.html More comments
--------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE:
9/11/2006 5:43:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time
Greetings. In regards to the pic:
...The pic shows one tower standing, and the dust ploom is from *the
collapse of the other tower*. This was proven beyond any doubt. The full
unedited CNN video clip is available on the "9/11 in Plane Sight"The pic
shows one tower standing, and the dust ploom is from *the collapse of
the other tower*. This was proven beyond any doubt. The full unedited
CNN video clip is available on the "9/11 in Plane Sight"
I somewhat accept this, barring additional evidence. When we were doing
ongoing realtime chronicling we simply presented all incoming theory,
many ideas and viewpoints--to be sorted with out historically. At the
time we were wondering if the compression cloud event showed that WTC7
was destroyed by explosives involving a separate agenda. WTC7 came down
at 5:20 Turns out it was probably PULLED-- even more bizarre. “Lucky
Larry” Silverstein 2 It must also be indicated that some researchers are
again daring to mention, NUKE, which stews up a whole new kettle o'
fish. View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade
Center collapsed Nuclear Winter at the WTC? Expanded Comment
FINNISH REPORT: The Bombs in the WTC Index [compression cloud or blast
below?]
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/towrcmmnt.htm
http://www.bannedmagazine.com/UnitedStatesofAmerica.htm
EDITOR: Huh? Think this is an explosive device shooting toward the
ground?
ACTIVE FBI SPECIAL AGENT FILES COMPLAINT CONCERNING
OBSTRUCTED FBI ANTI-TERRORIST INVESTIGATIONS FBI
Whistleblower Says Bureau Bungled Terror Probes
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/towrcmmnt.htm
Collapsing towers caused seismic shock
Note: BBC pulled this file. Saved here if needed for research.
The south tower goes just before 1430 GMT