America Has Fallen to a Jacobin Coup
by Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=7282
The most important casualties of Sept. 11 are respect
for truth and American liberty. Propaganda has replaced
deliberation based on objective assessment of fact. The
resurrection of the Star Chamber has made moot the legal
protections of liberty.
The U.S. invasion of Iraq was based on the deliberate
suppression of fact. The invasion was not the result of
mistaken intelligence. It was based on deliberately
concocted "intelligence" designed to deceive the U.S.
Congress, the American public, and the United Nations.
In an interview with Barbara Walters on ABC News,
General Colin Powell, who was secretary of state at the
time of the invasion, expressed dismay that he was the
one who took the false information to the UN and
presented it to the world. The weapons of mass
destruction speech, he said, is a "blot" on his record.
The full extent of the deception was made clear by the
leaked top secret "Downing Street memos."
Two and one-half years after the March 2003 invasion,
the U.S. Congress and the American people still do not
know the reason Iraq was invaded. The U.S. is bogged
down in an expensive and deadly combat, and no one
outside the small circle of neoconservatives who
orchestrated the war knows the reason why. Many guesses
are rendered – oil, removal of Israel's enemy – but the
Bush administration has never disclosed its real agenda,
which it cloaked with the WMD deception.
This itself is a powerful indication that American
democracy is dead. With the exception of right-wing talk
radio, everyone in America now knows that the invasion
of Iraq was based on false information. Yet, 40 percent
of the public and both political parties in Congress
still support the ongoing war.
The CIA has issued a report that the war is working only
for Osama bin Laden. The unprovoked American aggression
against Iraq, the horrors perpetrated against Muslims in
Abu Ghraib prison, and the slaughter and mistreatment of
Iraqi noncombatants, have radicalized the Muslim world
and elevated bin Laden from a fringe figure to a leader
opposed to American hegemony in the Middle East. The
chaos created in Iraq by the U.S. military has provided
al-Qaeda with superb training grounds for insurgency and
terrorism. Despite overwhelming evidence that the "war
on terror" is in fact a war for terror, Republicans
still cheer when Bush says we have to "fight them over
there" so they don't come "over here."
If fact played any role in the decision to continue with
this war, the U.S. would not be spending hundreds of
billions of borrowed dollars to provide recruits and
training for al-Qaeda, to radicalize Muslims, and to
destroy trust in the United States both abroad and among
its own citizens.
American casualties (dead and wounded) of this
gratuitous war are now approximately 20,000. In July,
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld said the war might continue
for 12 years. U.S. casualties from such protracted
combat would eat away U.S. troop strength. Considering
the well-publicized recruitment problems, America would
require a draft or foreign mercenaries in order to
continue a ground war. Like the overextended Roman
Empire, the U.S. would have to deplete its remaining
wealth to pay mercenaries.
Dead and wounded Americans are too high a price to pay
for a war based on deception. This alone is reason to
end the war, if necessary by impeaching Bush and Cheney
and arresting the neoconservatives for treason. Naked
aggression is a war crime under the Nuremberg standard,
and neoconservatives have brought this shame to America.
There is an even greater cost of the war – the legal
system that protects liberty, a human achievement for
which countless numbers of people gave their lives over
the centuries. The Bush administration used Sept. 11 to
whip up fear and hysteria and to employ these weapons
against American liberty. The Orwellian-named PATRIOT
Act has destroyed habeas corpus. The executive branch
has gained the unaccountable power to detain American
citizens on mere suspicion or accusation, without
evidence, and to hold Americans indefinitely without a
trial.
Foolishly, many Americans believe this power can only be
used against terrorists. Americans don't realize that
the government can declare anyone to be a terrorist
suspect. As no evidence is required, it is entirely up
to the government to decide who is a terrorist. Thus,
the power is unaccountable. Unaccountable power is the
source of tyranny.
The English-speaking world has not seen such power since
the 16th and 17th centuries when the Court of Star
Chamber became a political weapon used against the
king's opponents and to circumvent Parliament. The Star
Chamber dispensed with juries, permitted hearsay
evidence, and became so reviled that "Star Chamber"
became a byword for injustice. The Long Parliament
abolished the Star Chamber in 1641. In obedience to the
Bush regime, the U.S. Congress resurrected it with the
PATRIOT Act. Can anything be more Orwellian than
identifying patriotism with the abolition of habeas
corpus?
Historians are quick to note that the Star Chamber was
mild compared to Gitmo, to the U.S. practice of sending
detainees abroad to be tortured, and to the justice
(sic) regime being run by Attorney General "Torture"
Gonzales and his predecessor, "Draped Justice" Ashcroft,
who went so far as to say that opposition to the PATRIOT
Act was itself the mark of a terrorist.
The time-honored attorney-client privilege is another
casualty of the "war on terror." Taking their cue from
the restrictions placed on lawyers representing Stalin's
victims in the 1930s show trials, Justice (sic)
Department officials seek to limit attorneys
representing terrorist suspects to procedural niceties.
Lynne Stewart, attorney for Omar Abdel Rahman, was
handed a letter by a Justice (sic) Department prosecutor
instructing her how to represent her client. When she
did what every good lawyer would do and represented her
client aggressively, she was arrested, indicted, and
convicted.
Many conservative lawyers have turned a blind eye
because Stewart is regarded as a left-wing lawyer whom
they dislike. Only a few civil libertarians, such as
Harvey Silverglate, have pointed out that prosecutors
cannot create felonies by writing letters to attorneys.
Stewart was convicted for violating a prosecutor's
letter (technically, a Special Administrative Measure).
This should make it obvious even to the blind that
American democracy has lost all control over law.
Federal officials have sensed the sea change in American
law: arbitrary actions and assertions by federal
officials are taking the place of statutory legislation.
We saw an example recently when the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) announced that news media
covering the New Orleans hurricane story were prohibited
from taking pictures of the bodies of inhabitants
drowned when the levees failed. Nowhere is FEMA given
authority to override the First Amendment. Yet, FEMA
officials saw no reason not to issue its decree. Rome
had one Caesar. America has them throughout the
executive branch.
We see the same exercise of arbitrary authority in
break-ins by police into New Orleans homes in order to
confiscate legally owned firearms. No authority exists
for these violations of the Second Amendment. No
authority exists for the forceful removal of residents
from non-damaged homes. Tyrannical precedents are being
established by these fantastic abuses of government
authority.
In the U.S. today nothing stands in the way of the
arbitrary exercise of power by government. Federal
courts have acquiesced in unconstitutional detention
policies. There is no opposition party, and there is no
media, merely huge conglomerates or collections of
federal broadcasting licenses, the owners of which are
afraid to displease the government.
The collapse of the institutions that confine government
to law and bind it with the Constitution was sudden. The
president previous to Bush was impeached by the House
for lying about a sexual affair. If we go back to the
1970s, President Richard Nixon had the decency to resign
when it came to light that he had lied about when he
first learned of a minor burglary. Bush's failures are
far more serious and numerous, yet Bush has escaped
accountability.
Polls show that a majority of Americans have lost
confidence in the Iraq war and believe Bush did a poor
job responding to flooded New Orleans. Many Americans
hope that these two massive failures have put Bush back
into the box of responsible behavior from which Sept. 11
allowed him to escape. However, there is no indication
that the Bush administration sees any constraints placed
on its behavior by these failures.
The identical cronyism and corrupt government contract
practices, by which taxpayers' money is used to reward
political contributors, so evident in Iraq is now
evident in New Orleans.
Despite having been fought to a stalemate by a few
thousand insurgents in Iraq, the Bush administration
continues to issue thunderous threats to Syria and Iran.
To press its fabricated case against Iran's alleged
weapons of mass destruction program, the Bush
administration is showing every foreign diplomat it can
corral an hour-long slide show titled, "A History of
Concealment and Deception." Wary foreigners are reminded
of the presentations about Iraq's WMD and wonder who is
guilty of deception, Iran or the Bush administration.
Now that the war in Iraq has established that U.S.
ground forces cannot easily prevail against insurgency,
the Bush administration is bringing new military threats
to the fore. The neocon orchestrated "Doctrine for Joint
Nuclear Operations" abandons the established doctrine
that nuclear weapons are last resort options. The Bush
administration is so enamored of coercion that it is
birthing the doctrine of preemptive nuclear attack. U.S.
war doctrine is being altered to eliminate the need for
a large invasion force and to use "preventive nuclear
strikes" in its place.
Is this the face that the American people want to
present to the world? It is hard to imagine a greater
risk to America than to put the entire world on notice
that every country risks being nuked based on mere
suspicion. By making nuclear war permissible, the Bush
administration is crossing the line that divides
civilized people from barbarians. The United States is
starting to acquire the image of Nazi Germany.
Knowledgeable people should have no trouble drawing up
their own list of elements common to both the Bush and
Hitler regimes: the use of extraordinary lies to justify
military aggression; reliance on coercion and threats in
place of diplomacy; total belief in the virtue and
righteousness of one's cause; the equating of factual
objections or "reality-based" analysis to treason; the
redirection of patriotism from country to leader; the
belief that defeat resides in debate and a weakening of
will; refuge in delusion and denial when promised
results don't materialize.
As Professor Claes Ryn made clear in his book, America
the Virtuous, the neoconservatives are neo-Jacobins.
There is nothing conservative about them. They are
committed to the use of coercion to impose their agenda.
Their attitude is merciless toward anyone in their way,
whether fellow citizen or foreigner. "You are with us or
against us." For those on the receiving end, the Nazi
and Jacobin mentalities come to the same thing.
The Bush administration has abandoned American
principles. It is a Jacobin regime. Woe to its citizens
and the rest of the world.

Dr. Roberts is John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for
Political Economy and Research Fellow at the Independent
Institute. He is a former associate editor of the Wall
Street Journal and a former assistant secretary of the
U.S. Treasury. He is the co-author of The Tyranny of
Good Intentions.
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=7282
September 16, 2005