33. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he also briefed the FBI in 1992, 1993 and
thereafter on George Bush, Sr.’s, Nelson Rockefeller’s, and the CIA’s plans to
put their corrupt people in key positions in the Federal and State courts. This
process had already been going on for many years with many of these corrupt
judges already being on the bench. These corrupt and evil judges were making
their legal rulings based on corruption, corrupt influences, and evil, not on
law or the Constitution. Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI of how some of these
judges would assume their positions which were predesignated in some cases 20
years in advance, after being selected for these positions. Plaintiff Schlund
alleges he briefed the FBI that he had read through hundreds of files of corrupt
judges or future corrupt judges. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he briefed the FBI
that some of these judges were pedophiles and others were murderers or drug
dealers and others were just evil or corrupt. Each of these files had a list of
people who were political witnesses, like Plaintiff, that could be possible
witnesses against these corrupt and evil judges. In each file was who the CIA,
DEA, or others were to assassinate and who was to be harassed, committed as
insane, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, or given different illnesses or
conditions to remove them as potential witnesses. The Bush Family could appoint
these corrupt and evil people to the federal or state bench pretending they were
Christians and moral people with all the witnesses against them being dead or
discredited or/and in prison.
34. Plaintiff Schlund, on information and belief, alleges that Defendant
intentionally entered into illegal agreements before becoming President and
thereafter to violate U.S. Constitutionally protected right to privacy
authorizing implants and to do everything to overturn the case: Roe vs. Wade,
410 U.S. 113 (1973) as part of the corrupt plan, scheme, and design to deprive
Plaintiff and others of the right to privacy. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in
1992 and 1993 he briefed the FBI on George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller’s
and others plans to overturn in part Roe v. Wade. The Roe v. Wade case was a
threat to the empire. The United States Justice Department had briefed George
Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller that Roe v. Wade could be interpreted as a
human rights ruling giving the people the right to their own bodies. If
American citizens had a right to their own bodies, electronic implants, forcibly
or covertly installed, would be illegal. George Bush, Sr. and the United States
Department of Justice believed that the ruling of Roe v. Wade could be
successfully used in court to create case law that could make the government’s
use of electronic implants illegal. George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller
planned on conducting the CIA covert operation of overturning Roe v. Wade in
part to make a legal exception so the use of covertly installed electronic
implants could still be done under the cover and color of law. George Bush, Sr.
did not want to stop abortion. All he wanted was to make an exception to the
ruling so that implants could be legally used against political witnesses and
dissidents such as Plaintiff so corrupt public officials and judges could be
protected using the cover of investigations which would use implants to monitor,
harass, persecute, torture, and murder political witnesses, including Plaintiff
Schlund.
35. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that he has a right to be free from intrusion and
implants used for torture and/or surveillance, violating his body privacy and
other privacy rights within expected orbits and zones of privacy. The
government’s placing of implants into Plaintiff Schlund’s body, as alleged
herein, violates and deprives him of his civil rights to privacy under the
First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution and the holding of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) because he is a
political witness against Defendant Bush and DOES 1-20.
36. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief, that in order to
succeed in Defendant Bush’s schemes, plans, and efforts to overthrow the United
States government, part of the systematic plan would require the modification or
elimination of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. To
eliminate this decision achieves the result of eliminating the inalienable
[right] or a person’s [right] to personal privacy and all other connected
privacies as well. Such is being accomplished on Plaintiff Schlund by
electronic intrusions and torture at present.
37. Plaintiff alleges that in these files, The Bush family had assured their
people that they controlled the federal courts and that the courts would not
allow anyone to go to trial over the use of the implantable devices and the
government would deny their use of the implants under the protection of their
corrupt Attorney Generals and federal judges.
38. In 1991, Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI on how the DEA had people
murdered in front of Plaintiff’s wife in order to threaten her and to force her
to work for the DEA against her husband, Plaintiff Schlund. These murders were
committed under the orders, protection, and direction of the DEA, police, the
Justice Department, and the courts. These murders could then be blamed on
Plaintiff Schlund, and if Plaintiff’s wife refused to aid the DEA in their
crimes, her children would be murdered. The DEA also threatened to murder
Plaintiff Schlund and his witnesses. The police refused and continue to refuse
to take or allow murder reports from Plaintiff Schlund and refused to allow any
of the witnesses to testify to them or before any juries. The police and the
DEA and others then injected all the known witnesses with electronic implants
and proceeded to monitor, harass, torture, invade their privacy, and control
them with these implants, to threaten them any time they said anything about
those involved in these government murders or anything else that the government
was covering up. This obstruction of justice and witness tampering continues to
this day with the Justice Department and others continuing to threaten the lives
of the Plaintiff’s witnesses and refusing to stop the use of torture to threaten
the witnesses.
39. These acts of evil by Defendants against Plaintiff as a political witness
have continued since 1977 on a daily basis, to the present time and have caused
and will continue to cause irreparable harm and injury to Plaintiff.
39. Plaintiff alleges that everything asserted in advance to the FBI by
Plaintiff Schlund was confirmed true by the test of time, as Plaintiff Schlund
briefed the FBI that it would. Because of these briefings by Plaintiff to the
FBI, he continues to be harassed, persecuted and tortured as a political
witness.
40. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief and evidence, that
Defendants use and will continue to use as part of their plan and scheme of
persecution, harassment, and torture of him, this method of electronic torture
to violate fundamental constitutional rights of Plaintiff Schlund and other
similarly situated plaintiffs. Doran v. McGinnes, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994). This
case is systematically used to invalidate valid civil rights cases filed against
the government’s use of wireless technology and associated product technology
which includes electronic implants used by Defendant and his agents for
different purposes. This defense is used against cases filed in the federal
court which assert legitimate claims such as those Plaintiff Schlund has filed
against the government in their use of an integrated system of wireless
electronic-force technology to hurt a person. It then systematically uses the
United States Attorney General’s Office, and attorneys, to assert the
unmeritorious argument in motions for summary judgment that (all) implant
technology civil rights cases are connected to “implant mental telepathy”
similar to Doran. Then, allegedly, a less technologically informed judge or a
purely corrupt judge disregards the disputed, relevant material facts, normally
within the province of a jury, grants the motion, and prematurely procedurally,
terminates Plaintiff’s actions and other less informed lawsuits after routinely
“staying” all of [a] plaintiff’s discovery. Then routinely dismisses the case,
cutting off the constitutional right to a jury trial. Plaintiff Schlund’s
torture as a political witness continues, under the pretext of color of
authority, in reality, and is illegal and corrupt as aforesaid, causing
irreparable injury and harm requiring injunctive relief to maintain the status
quo.
41. The torture being inflicted against Plaintiff Schlund is at times worse
than being crucified and then skinned alive, over and over again. The only
difference is that this torture is being done on the inside of Plaintiff
Schlund, not leaving marks on the outside for people to see. On September 10,
2005 the Defendant’s attempted to assassinate Plaintiff Schlund and then
deprived Plaintiff Schlund of sleep and dramatically increased Plaintiff
Schlund’s torture in an attempt to stop this lawsuit from being filed. The
torture of Plaintiff Schlund is done [in hopes of] forcing Plaintiff Schlund to
commit some crime in his self-defense, which would allow the government to
remove him as a political witness under the cover of law. These acts are acts
of violations of federal law prohibiting persecution, harassment, torture,
terrorism, electronic stalking, assault, battery, trespass, invasion of privacy,
etc. and will continue to deprive Plaintiff of his civil rights, causing him
irreparable injury and damages in excess of $75,000, which is continuous and
ongoing in an amount according to proof.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and each of them,
individually, jointly, and severally, as follows:
1. For all compensatory damages for pain and suffering, etc. in the amount of
$20 million or according to proof;
2. For all costs of suit, including attorney fees, investigators, and
other related fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1877 or/and the Private
Attorney General Act or according to proof;
3. For all special damages in the amount of $40 million according to proof;
4. For all treble damages based on compensatory damages per RICO statue
according to proof;
5. For all costs incurred in this action according to proof;
6. The court is hereby demanded to make specific findings of fact and
conclusions of law, pursuant to Federal Code of Civil Procedures, Rule 52, on
each and all issues of specific and ultimate facts raised in this Complaint;
[This demand shall constitute a continuing demand and shall not be deemed waived
unless specifically done so by Plaintiff, in writing, in a separately filed,
notarized pleading with the court entitled, “Notice of Waiver of Finding of Fact
and Conclusion.”];
7. For all pre-judgment interest in an amount according to proof; and
8. For all such other further relief as the Court deems just, fair and proper
under the circumstances.
Dated: September 15, 2005 By: ______________________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
In Pro Per
VERIFICATION AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
I, Charles August Schlund, III, have read my Verified Complaint. The facts
therein are of my own personal knowledge and are true and correct, except as to
those facts I believe to be true and correct on information and my belief.
I declare the aforegoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge under
penalty of perjury.
By ______________________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY of Maricopa )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 15th day of September, 2005.
________________________________________
Notary Public
My commission expires:
_______________________
15th day of September, 2005 to:
Clerk of the Court
U.S. District Court of Arizona
401 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ. 85009
and
COPIES of the foregoing mailed to:
Mr. Richard G. Patrick
Assistant U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney's Office District of Arizona
Two Renaissance Square
40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix Arizona 85004-4408
Fax: (602) 514-7760
Office: (602) 514-7500
George W. Bush, President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Mr. George W. Bush, an individual
C/O The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
By ____________________________
thereafter on George Bush, Sr.’s, Nelson Rockefeller’s, and the CIA’s plans to
put their corrupt people in key positions in the Federal and State courts. This
process had already been going on for many years with many of these corrupt
judges already being on the bench. These corrupt and evil judges were making
their legal rulings based on corruption, corrupt influences, and evil, not on
law or the Constitution. Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI of how some of these
judges would assume their positions which were predesignated in some cases 20
years in advance, after being selected for these positions. Plaintiff Schlund
alleges he briefed the FBI that he had read through hundreds of files of corrupt
judges or future corrupt judges. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he briefed the FBI
that some of these judges were pedophiles and others were murderers or drug
dealers and others were just evil or corrupt. Each of these files had a list of
people who were political witnesses, like Plaintiff, that could be possible
witnesses against these corrupt and evil judges. In each file was who the CIA,
DEA, or others were to assassinate and who was to be harassed, committed as
insane, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, or given different illnesses or
conditions to remove them as potential witnesses. The Bush Family could appoint
these corrupt and evil people to the federal or state bench pretending they were
Christians and moral people with all the witnesses against them being dead or
discredited or/and in prison.
34. Plaintiff Schlund, on information and belief, alleges that Defendant
intentionally entered into illegal agreements before becoming President and
thereafter to violate U.S. Constitutionally protected right to privacy
authorizing implants and to do everything to overturn the case: Roe vs. Wade,
410 U.S. 113 (1973) as part of the corrupt plan, scheme, and design to deprive
Plaintiff and others of the right to privacy. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in
1992 and 1993 he briefed the FBI on George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller’s
and others plans to overturn in part Roe v. Wade. The Roe v. Wade case was a
threat to the empire. The United States Justice Department had briefed George
Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller that Roe v. Wade could be interpreted as a
human rights ruling giving the people the right to their own bodies. If
American citizens had a right to their own bodies, electronic implants, forcibly
or covertly installed, would be illegal. George Bush, Sr. and the United States
Department of Justice believed that the ruling of Roe v. Wade could be
successfully used in court to create case law that could make the government’s
use of electronic implants illegal. George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller
planned on conducting the CIA covert operation of overturning Roe v. Wade in
part to make a legal exception so the use of covertly installed electronic
implants could still be done under the cover and color of law. George Bush, Sr.
did not want to stop abortion. All he wanted was to make an exception to the
ruling so that implants could be legally used against political witnesses and
dissidents such as Plaintiff so corrupt public officials and judges could be
protected using the cover of investigations which would use implants to monitor,
harass, persecute, torture, and murder political witnesses, including Plaintiff
Schlund.
35. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that he has a right to be free from intrusion and
implants used for torture and/or surveillance, violating his body privacy and
other privacy rights within expected orbits and zones of privacy. The
government’s placing of implants into Plaintiff Schlund’s body, as alleged
herein, violates and deprives him of his civil rights to privacy under the
First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution and the holding of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) because he is a
political witness against Defendant Bush and DOES 1-20.
36. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief, that in order to
succeed in Defendant Bush’s schemes, plans, and efforts to overthrow the United
States government, part of the systematic plan would require the modification or
elimination of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. To
eliminate this decision achieves the result of eliminating the inalienable
[right] or a person’s [right] to personal privacy and all other connected
privacies as well. Such is being accomplished on Plaintiff Schlund by
electronic intrusions and torture at present.
37. Plaintiff alleges that in these files, The Bush family had assured their
people that they controlled the federal courts and that the courts would not
allow anyone to go to trial over the use of the implantable devices and the
government would deny their use of the implants under the protection of their
corrupt Attorney Generals and federal judges.
38. In 1991, Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI on how the DEA had people
murdered in front of Plaintiff’s wife in order to threaten her and to force her
to work for the DEA against her husband, Plaintiff Schlund. These murders were
committed under the orders, protection, and direction of the DEA, police, the
Justice Department, and the courts. These murders could then be blamed on
Plaintiff Schlund, and if Plaintiff’s wife refused to aid the DEA in their
crimes, her children would be murdered. The DEA also threatened to murder
Plaintiff Schlund and his witnesses. The police refused and continue to refuse
to take or allow murder reports from Plaintiff Schlund and refused to allow any
of the witnesses to testify to them or before any juries. The police and the
DEA and others then injected all the known witnesses with electronic implants
and proceeded to monitor, harass, torture, invade their privacy, and control
them with these implants, to threaten them any time they said anything about
those involved in these government murders or anything else that the government
was covering up. This obstruction of justice and witness tampering continues to
this day with the Justice Department and others continuing to threaten the lives
of the Plaintiff’s witnesses and refusing to stop the use of torture to threaten
the witnesses.
39. These acts of evil by Defendants against Plaintiff as a political witness
have continued since 1977 on a daily basis, to the present time and have caused
and will continue to cause irreparable harm and injury to Plaintiff.
39. Plaintiff alleges that everything asserted in advance to the FBI by
Plaintiff Schlund was confirmed true by the test of time, as Plaintiff Schlund
briefed the FBI that it would. Because of these briefings by Plaintiff to the
FBI, he continues to be harassed, persecuted and tortured as a political
witness.
40. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief and evidence, that
Defendants use and will continue to use as part of their plan and scheme of
persecution, harassment, and torture of him, this method of electronic torture
to violate fundamental constitutional rights of Plaintiff Schlund and other
similarly situated plaintiffs. Doran v. McGinnes, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994). This
case is systematically used to invalidate valid civil rights cases filed against
the government’s use of wireless technology and associated product technology
which includes electronic implants used by Defendant and his agents for
different purposes. This defense is used against cases filed in the federal
court which assert legitimate claims such as those Plaintiff Schlund has filed
against the government in their use of an integrated system of wireless
electronic-force technology to hurt a person. It then systematically uses the
United States Attorney General’s Office, and attorneys, to assert the
unmeritorious argument in motions for summary judgment that (all) implant
technology civil rights cases are connected to “implant mental telepathy”
similar to Doran. Then, allegedly, a less technologically informed judge or a
purely corrupt judge disregards the disputed, relevant material facts, normally
within the province of a jury, grants the motion, and prematurely procedurally,
terminates Plaintiff’s actions and other less informed lawsuits after routinely
“staying” all of [a] plaintiff’s discovery. Then routinely dismisses the case,
cutting off the constitutional right to a jury trial. Plaintiff Schlund’s
torture as a political witness continues, under the pretext of color of
authority, in reality, and is illegal and corrupt as aforesaid, causing
irreparable injury and harm requiring injunctive relief to maintain the status
quo.
41. The torture being inflicted against Plaintiff Schlund is at times worse
than being crucified and then skinned alive, over and over again. The only
difference is that this torture is being done on the inside of Plaintiff
Schlund, not leaving marks on the outside for people to see. On September 10,
2005 the Defendant’s attempted to assassinate Plaintiff Schlund and then
deprived Plaintiff Schlund of sleep and dramatically increased Plaintiff
Schlund’s torture in an attempt to stop this lawsuit from being filed. The
torture of Plaintiff Schlund is done [in hopes of] forcing Plaintiff Schlund to
commit some crime in his self-defense, which would allow the government to
remove him as a political witness under the cover of law. These acts are acts
of violations of federal law prohibiting persecution, harassment, torture,
terrorism, electronic stalking, assault, battery, trespass, invasion of privacy,
etc. and will continue to deprive Plaintiff of his civil rights, causing him
irreparable injury and damages in excess of $75,000, which is continuous and
ongoing in an amount according to proof.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and each of them,
individually, jointly, and severally, as follows:
1. For all compensatory damages for pain and suffering, etc. in the amount of
$20 million or according to proof;
2. For all costs of suit, including attorney fees, investigators, and
other related fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1877 or/and the Private
Attorney General Act or according to proof;
3. For all special damages in the amount of $40 million according to proof;
4. For all treble damages based on compensatory damages per RICO statue
according to proof;
5. For all costs incurred in this action according to proof;
6. The court is hereby demanded to make specific findings of fact and
conclusions of law, pursuant to Federal Code of Civil Procedures, Rule 52, on
each and all issues of specific and ultimate facts raised in this Complaint;
[This demand shall constitute a continuing demand and shall not be deemed waived
unless specifically done so by Plaintiff, in writing, in a separately filed,
notarized pleading with the court entitled, “Notice of Waiver of Finding of Fact
and Conclusion.”];
7. For all pre-judgment interest in an amount according to proof; and
8. For all such other further relief as the Court deems just, fair and proper
under the circumstances.
Dated: September 15, 2005 By: ______________________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
In Pro Per
VERIFICATION AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
I, Charles August Schlund, III, have read my Verified Complaint. The facts
therein are of my own personal knowledge and are true and correct, except as to
those facts I believe to be true and correct on information and my belief.
I declare the aforegoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge under
penalty of perjury.
By ______________________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY of Maricopa )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 15th day of September, 2005.
________________________________________
Notary Public
My commission expires:
_______________________
15th day of September, 2005 to:
Clerk of the Court
U.S. District Court of Arizona
401 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ. 85009
and
COPIES of the foregoing mailed to:
Mr. Richard G. Patrick
Assistant U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney's Office District of Arizona
Two Renaissance Square
40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix Arizona 85004-4408
Fax: (602) 514-7760
Office: (602) 514-7500
George W. Bush, President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Mr. George W. Bush, an individual
C/O The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
By ____________________________
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
