SCHLUND V. Bush -- Pt. 2
Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:25
216.19.125.20

22. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief and on those grounds,
that in the files that George Bush, Sr. removed from the government in 1976,
there were thousands of files on political assassinations that had been or would
be done in the future.

23. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that according to these CIA files George Bush Sr.
controlled through the CIA and others the states of Florida, Texas, and Arizona.
These states were more important to control than other states in order to
protect the incoming drug shipments. These states were where the CIA ran their
drugs into the United States. The illegal drugs were the common denominator
that held the gangs together. These gangs furnished the children, girls, and
boys for sex for the different corrupt judges and politicians and the drugs
authorized many of the investigations against political witnesses (Plaintiff)
and dissidents. The gangs and drugs created the crimes needed to authorize all
the new laws as America became more and more conservative and more totalitarian.

The drugs were the catalyst that held everything together, and the proceeds
from the drugs helped finance many of the covert operations, resulting in the
building of large expensive churches and the funding of the religious channels
on T.V. and many other illegal covert CIA operations that were part of the
systematic overthrow of the U.S.A. by the CIA. The drugs would be used in part
to authorize trials, which would be used to establish new case law, which would
result in the limiting of Constitutional Rights. In these CIA files, the
American Constitution would remain intact as a piece of paper to hold up before
the people that would in effect have no legal power to protect the people of the
United States. The protections of the Constitution would be replaced by
judicial made law which would be used by the Defendants to undermine and erode
freedom, liberty, justice, and constitutional power. Legal rights, civil
liberties, and other freedoms would no longer apply to the people, and
politically appointed courts that were more often corrupt than not would decide
who got real legal representation. In other words, if you were a drug dealer
working for the government and you got busted, the sentence would be short or
the arrest would be ruled illegal and the conviction would be overturned. If
you were a political threat that had been set up, the sentence would be long and
the court would rule that the arrest was legal and the conviction would stand.
The drugs would also be used by the DEA and others to convict the blacks and
other non-white minorities of drug-related crimes to remove their right to vote.

24. Further, on information and belief, Plaintiff Schlund alleges that this
joint effort and agreement was calculated, conducted, and controlled to cover up
George Bush, Sr., Defendant George W. Bush, and others’ illegal and systematic
plans and operations to interfere with and fix the presidential elections of the
U.S.A. and to cover up other federal and constitutional crimes which fit within
the statutory categories of high crimes and misdemeanors.

25. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that the framing of Plaintiff Schlund was
for the political purpose of justifying the need for a criminal and perpetual
surveillance, violating personal rights to privacy of Plaintiff Schlund and
others who associate with him under their constitutional right of freedom of
association. Further, Plaintiff alleges that said investigations also serve the
primary purpose to keep Plaintiff Schlund under perpetual surveillance, to
administratively and politically target him and torture Plaintiff Schlund as a
political witness who can and will testify against Defendant’s for high crimes
and misdemeanors. Those under the government’s influence and control included,
but were not limited to the various agencies, person(s) and organizations which
had to place Plaintiff Schlund under constant and continual investigation, which
such investigations, surveillance, harassment, persecution, and torture were
ordered and/or ratified by corrupt, dishonest, paranoid, unethical, and evil
corrupt judges and who issue judicial decisions under the pretext of law.

26. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges on information and belief that the
investigations were then used to plant the needed evidence to frame Plaintiff
Schlund and Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses. This was done and continues to be
done to this day, Plaintiff Schlund was arrested and acquitted on all charges,
including alleged drug conspiracy charges and alleged conspiracy drug
manufacturing charges, which were specifically determined by U.S. District Court
Judge Lacey to be nothing more than an act of fraud and violations of the law by
government officials and their agents. Despite the acquittal, Plaintiff Schlund
alleges that warrants were obtained and have continued to be obtained since the
day of his acquittal, to be used as a pretext for perpetual investigations and
surveillance of him and those he associates with, including his attorneys.

These warrants are used to harass, persecute, and torture Plaintiff Schlund in
an attempt to deter his ongoing disclosure of the illegal acts and conduct of
the government and the Defendants individually, including President Bush. This
is done to intimidate, harass, torture, and persecute Plaintiff Schlund as a
political witness who has advised the F.B.I. of the activities by the
Defendants, including the CIA, DEA and George W. Bush which, in each instance
over the years (about 28 years) has materialized, including the recent
demonstration of the fixing of the presidential election under color of
authority and while using the judicial system and the corrupt judges on the
highest levels to fix the presidential election which put George W. Bush in
office as the President of the United States. The factual reality of the fixing
of the presidential election at any cost to insure George W. Bush was placed in
office as the President now remains historically undisputable as projected by
Plaintiff with the Don Bolles Papers nearly 29 years ago, by those with a clear
understanding of the facts and a clear, objective and rational mind. Further,
the bogus warrants, although appearing to be procedurally valid, were actually
illegal in substance and illegally used to obstruct and otherwise interfere with
justice to harass, persecute, invade his privacy, and torture Plaintiff Schlund
as a political witness. They were also issued and used to assassinate or
threaten, harass, extort, and intimidate Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses,
associates, friends, attorneys, family members, and others with threats to harm,
execute, or jail them and/or their [children].

27. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief, he has been and will
continue to be kept under perpetual surveillance, harassed and tortured 24 hours
a day, seven days a week, year after year as Defendants, and their agents and
others working in a joint effort and a common scheme, plan and design to achieve
the joint effort and benefit of said scheme while utilizing the corrupt judges
and the influences of the Attorney General’s Office against Plaintiff Schlund as
a political witness and those who associate with him. Plaintiff alleges he will
be continuously, selectively, and administratively prosecuted with the procedure
of the warrant and other methods and processes whereby as each warrant becomes
invalid, new illegal, perpetual surveillance, harassment, and torture of him
under color of law based on new investigations will continue. Plaintiff Schlund
further alleges that as the perpetual harassment and torture increases
dramatically, it sometimes puts Plaintiff Schlund close to death, and during
such times he has agreed under torture to say things or make false conversations
or false telephonic calls in exchange for relief from the torture or in exchange
for sleep. Plaintiff alleges the above said Defendants, as part of the common
scheme and joint agreement and effort, utilized, including but not limited to,
invasion of privacy and sound harassment, which causes extreme pain and sleep
deprivation as a form of torture against Plaintiff Schlund and those that
associate with him. Defendants and their agents trespass and intrude into, on,
and upon Plaintiff’s private land, home, computer, telephones, vehicles,
financial information, personal and family activities, and business activities
through the use of wireless technology of an electronic nature and associated
products, including Plaintiff’s body. Further, Plaintiff alleges that sometimes
these statements were made after Plaintiff Schlund was intentionally deprived of
necessary sleep for up to six (6) days at a time and then allowing Plaintiff
Schlund only a few hours of sleep before repeating the harassment and torture
plan and scheme on a weekly basis for years. The sleep deprivation pattern, as
aforesaid, has ultimately resulted at times in Plaintiff Schlund’s body
physiologically collapsing, which remains undisputed. Plaintiff has become a
diabetic, which has been directly linked to the activities of Defendants as set
forth in this Complaint. His diabetes has resulted from thousands of nights of
sleep deprivation and torture by the acts and conduct of Defendant Bush and DOES
1-10, and through government connected person(s) using wireless telemetry and
electronic implants to intentionally interfere with and stop Plaintiff Schlund
from sleeping.

28. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, he set up the corrupt federal and state judges
and DEA and other agents for the FBI. While setting up the corrupt people in
the government, Plaintiff briefed the FBI on the information Plaintiff had,
including the plans for the systematic overthrow of the United States by the
Bush family, CIA, DEA, and others.

29. Plaintiff alleges that in 1992 and thereafter, he briefed the FBI on how
the CIA would use the Electoral College to fix the presidential elections if the
elections could not be fixed by splitting the vote using CIA controlled third
and fourth political party. The Electoral College would only be used if all
other methods failed and was only the way of last resort to put their people in
power. Plaintiff briefed the FBI in great detail on how the Electoral College
would be used as a way of fixing the presidential elections.

30. In 1992, at the request of the FBI, Plaintiff Schlund began to supply the
FBI with the names of the Supreme Court judges that worked for the CIA and the
Bush and Rockefeller families. Plaintiff Schlund supplied the FBI with five
United States Supreme Court Justices’ names from the CIA files (Don Bolles
Papers) Plaintiff Schlund had read and from other information Plaintiff Schlund
had, and these five judges were the five United States Supreme Court Judges that
seven or eight years later stopped the recount of the presidential votes in
Florida and appointed George W. Bush to the presidency of the United States of
America. During these briefings to the FBI, Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI
of what was in three of these judges’ CIA files, including all the details of
their corruption and crimes and why they had picked to be appointed as Supreme
Court Justices on the United States Supreme Court.

31. In May or June of 1992, Plaintiff Schlund went to Washington D.C. to set up
the Washington Post for the FBI. While in Washington, D.C., the CIA, DEA, or
others controlled and electronically intruded on Plaintiff Schlund’s motel phone
lines. Plaintiff Schlund then tried to call the FBI and the CIA, DEA, or others
intercepted the call with a recording that the FBI’s phone lines were not in
service. Plaintiff Schlund then called the phone company operator and told her
that this was an emergency, and that he needed her to dial the FBI for him.
This call went through, and the FBI answered and immediately sent out a phone
truck to switch the phone lines in the telephone company pedestal in front of
the motel to stop the CIA’s control of Plaintiff’s phone lines. The FBI then
called back and said to go ahead. Plaintiff Schlund then called the Washington
Post to prove to the FBI how the Washington Post, working for the CIA, had
covered up Watergate (The attempted overthrow of the United States) and how they
would be used to cover up the information Plaintiff Schlund was trying to supply
to the FBI. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he later also briefed the FBI that the
Miami Herald was also one of their newspapers and was under their control, and
that the Bush Family and others controlled what they printed to a large degree.
The Miami Herald did the recount confirming the results of the presidential
elections in Florida, and the Washington Post confirmed the Miami Herald’s
findings. In other words, the CIA covertly confirmed the CIA’s findings.
Plaintiff’s privacy was violated and he continues to be electronically harassed
and tortured as a political witness thereafter to present.

32. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that he also briefed the FBI on the new
electronic implants that the CIA had designed, which were being mass produced in
1977 by the National Security Administration (“NSA”). These electronic implants
could be used to fix ball games, horse races, and dog races, or to fix
presidential or local elections. They were being injected into large numbers of
people in investigations and used to monitor and control selectively targeted
people to cover up the massive corruption in the government, which involved the
Bush Family. They could not make Republicans vote for Democrats, and they could
not make Democrats vote for Republicans; but they could stop them from voting,
if needed. These electronic devices or implants could also influence who
independent voters would vote for. George Bush, Sr. and the CIA planned on
using these electronic devices whenever possible to corruptly fix future
presidential elections of the United States and other countries around the
world. The fixing of the American presidential elections with these electronic
devices was not only possible, but also easy when used in conjunction with other
covert operations. George Bush and the CIA had planned on trying to fix all
future presidential elections using these electronic devices and implants
controlled by super computers and sometimes controlled directly by people. This
process was simple, and the devices would be used to make the implanted person
feel physiologically/psychologically sick any time they heard the name of the
person they were not to vote for; and they would make the injected person feel
good and have a feeling of great joy and well-being any time the injected person
heard the name of who they were supposed to vote for. Plaintiff Schlund has
been harassed, tortured, and stopped from voting on Election Day with such
technology and devices. In the Don Bolles papers George W. Bush was fully
briefed on all of this CIA and other information.

Main Page - Saturday, 9/17/05

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)