Charles August Schlund, III
8520 North 54th Drive
Glendale, Arizona 85302
Phone 602-670-2017
Plaintiff In Pro Per
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a sovereign nation;
GEORGE W. BUSH, an individual; DOES 1-10, individuals, and DOES 11-20, entities,
Defendants. )
Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM
FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES.
AND,
NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (F.R.C.P. 38 and 39)
Charles August Schlund, III ("Plaintiff Schlund"), an individual, alleges as follows:
DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES
JURISDICTION
1. This action is brought pursuant to, including but not limited to, the Federal
Torts Claim Act, 2 (a) U.S.C. Sections 2671 through 2680; 28 U.S.C. Section 1346
(b); 18 U.S.C. Section 1964; 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1988, Protection of
Human Rights Act, the Convention Against Torture and Cruel, Inhumane, Degrading
Treatment or Punished Act of June 26, 1987 and as amended thereafter, the Hague
Convention; 42 U.S.C. Section 1981; 42 U.S.C. Section 1982, 1983, 1985 and 1986
of 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 [Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights] of said
Title IX of Public Law 92-318 [2 U.S.C. (a) Section 1681 et seq.]; the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. Section 2000 (b) (b) et seq.]; Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000(d) et seq.], including 13981
of said Title. Plaintiff’s leaves here to amend with additional law.
2. Jurisdiction is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1331,
1337. This matter includes allegations of illegal behavior arising under the
laws of the United States, including, but not limited to, violations of
Deprivation of Civil Rights through racketeering activities and Racketeer
Influence and Corruption Organization (“RICO”). 18 U.S.C. Section 1964(a), (c)
and 28 U.S.C. Section 1651 (a). Plaintiff and Defendants are “persons” within
the meaning of 18 U.S.C. Section 1961(3). The jurisdiction is proper in this
court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332; the matter and controversy exceeds the
sum or value of $75,000 and involves part of diverse citizenship or status under
the Constitution. This court may exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s
non-federal claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, as this court possesses
both federal subject matter and/or diversity jurisdiction.
VENUE
3. Plaintiff alleges that Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1965(a),Defendants reside, are found, operate under color of authority
or office, have an agent or are connected with or related to the aforesaid, or
transact affairs in this district. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18
U.S.C.1965 (b), to the extent any Defendant may reside outside this district,
the ends of justice require such Defendant(s) to be brought before the Court.
Venue properly lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (b) (2) or,
alternatively, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (a) (2).
PARTIES
4. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that the United States of
America (“U.S.A.”), an international sovereign nation empowered, limited, and is
controlled and its territorial boundaries established subject to its United
States Constitution (hereinafter “Constitution”). It is a member in good
standing with the Geneva Convention and avows against any use of deprivation of
civil rights and torture.
5. Pursuant to the United States Constitution Articles I, II, and III,
establishes the legislative powers, executive power, and the judicial power of
the United States, respectively. On information and belief, George W. Bush, is
an individual (“Defendant Bush” and sometimes referred to as the “George W.
Bush” or “Bush Family”), under color of authority and office under the powers of
Article II of the Constitution, utilized the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), U.S.
Attorney General’s Office (“A.G.”), Homeland Security Department (“H.S.”) and
department, agency, and entity for his own personal gain and to harass,
persecute, and torture Plaintiff in concert with DOES 1-10 individuals, within
the government and the private sector, and DOES 11-20 in the government and
private entity as set forth herein.
6. Defendant Bush receives for his compensation for services payments from the
United States Treasury to conduct the acts and conduct in a faithful manner and
uptake and solemnly swears that he will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States and will do the best of his ability to preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Under color of
authority and office, he is also responsible for the aforesaid entities and
those activities of DOES 1-10 individuals and DOES 11-20 entities, acting
individually and in concert with one another as support therein pursuant to
Article II of the Constitution. Also, under color of authority and office,
Defendant Bush shall appoint judges of the Supreme Court and other officers of
the United States whose appointment is not otherwise provided for and
established by law under Article I of the Constitution. These appointments are
not to be done for the purpose of supporting Defendants’ corrupt activities or
corrupt individuals or/and activities in the government as alleged herein.
7. Plaintiff alleges, as a citizen of the U.S.A. that he has a legal right and
duty to disclose and defend against the corrupt activities of Defendant Bush and
his agents as set forth herein and any other illegal activities effecting his
personal, financial interest, welfare, safety, or security as a citizen of
U.S.A. This includes whistle blowing activity, and disclosure of same through
the exercise of his Constitutional rights through use of the federal judicial
system(s), direct communication to any branch of the federal government, and
otherwise petition for redress as provided for under Article(s) 4, Sections 2
and 3, and as thereafter amended Article 1, IV, V, IX, X, or XIV of the United
States Constitution.
8. Plaintiff alleges that pursuant to the four subdivisions of the United
States Constitution, federal and/or state law of Arizona, including treaties
entered into by the United States, there is a duty imposed on said Defendant and
the judicial system to counter corrupt and any other illegal activities
disclosed by Plaintiff Schlund as “political witness,” affecting his and other
U.S. citizens personal rights, privileges, and amenities as a citizen of the
United States and in the capacity of, as commonly referred to, as a “whistle
blower” and/or a” political witness” as set forth herein. Plaintiff alleges the
law protects his status and rights as aforesaid and shall not be subject to
electronic invasion of his privacy or electronic torture, harassment, punishment
or persecution of him or threats of same or other violations of his
Constitutional rights by Defendant Bush and his agents through any method or/and
medium of any nature or kind whatsoever, especially as a political witness
against the aforesaid.
9. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that it is the legal duty imposed upon said
Defendant to protect Plaintiff Schlund against harassment, torture, persecution,
invasion of his privacy and other harm personally and to his financial interest
related to Defendants’ use of the various financial institutions (i.e.
Department of Treasury) and infrastructure within the government, including but
not limited to, the federal judicial system.
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Plaintiff’s investigation of the facts and research of the law is continuous and
ongoing and not yet complete. He leaves here to amend his complaint according to
proof.
ALLEGATIONS
10. Plaintiff alleges, on his information and belief and on those grounds,
Defendants Bush and DOES herein carried out and continue to systematically carry
out their plan, scheme, and design of deprivation of civil rights through
racketeering activities, including but not limited to the following:
11. Plaintiff Schlund makes the following allegations on his information and
belief and on those grounds, George Bush, Sr. (“Bush Sr.”) who in 1976 was the
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”). Bush Sr. as the Director
of the CIA in 1976, under the orders of Nelson Rockefeller, removed from the
government all of the evidence of corruption, wrongdoing, crimes, and criminal
acts including the detailed plans to fix the presidential elections of the
United States. All of these files and documents, sometimes referred to as
“evidence,” were removed from the government to conceal the information to
prevent Jimmy Carter and those he would appoint to public office from accessing
the information. This act by Bush Sr. constitutes an act of treason. The
evidence contained various files, papers, documents, data, films, tape
recordings, maps, log books, and other tangible items and things which were
moved to be under Bush Sr.’s possession and control as he was ordered by Nelson
Rockefeller. The said evidence and its contents are generally referred to as
the “Don Bolles Papers,” unless denoted otherwise.
12. Plaintiff alleges the CIA and other files Plaintiff Schlund has always
called the Don Bolles Papers contained massive amounts of information, much of
which were authenticated U.S.A. documents related to illegal, immoral, criminal,
private, corporate, and government covert operations, conducted under the
highest level of control of the CIA, DEA, NSA, Justice Department, federal
courts, and many others. These are the documents Plaintiff Schlund calls the
Don Bolles Papers, and it is obvious to Plaintiff Schlund that these papers
contained the highest levels of private/governmental planning regarding the
systematic overthrow (private control) of the United States of America.
13. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers were then moved to Phoenix, Arizona
by the CIA to one of the drug cartels that the CIA influenced, operated, and
controlled known as the Dirty Dozen Motorcycle Gang (“DD”) which was a gang
comprised of different organizational levels who had individuals involved at
many levels within the government in the State of Arizona. The DD was operated
and controlled by the CIA and was a drug cartel under the CIA’s and DEA’s
influence and control.
14. Plaintiff alleges the DD was comprised of prospects, murderers,
prostitutes, thieves, bikers, informants, private investigators, business
owners, police officers, judges, federal agents, governors, senators,
congressmen, and others.
15. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers and files were then taken from the
DD, actually the CIA, in a burglary resulting in the CIA losing control of these
highly sensitive documents, plans, and other criminal evidence.
16. Plaintiff alleges on or about 1977, Plaintiff Schlund was one of the
individuals of a group of people who received the Don Bolles Papers and files
who, along with these other individuals, began to read and analyze them.
17. Further, Plaintiff alleges that the content of the Don Bolles Papers
included documentation, which revealed a plan for the systematic overthrow of
the U.S.A. using the CIA, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and the
judicial system and its courts and others under the color of law, which included
Bush Sr. and Defendant Bush, the DOJ, certain members of Congress and the
Senate, and other positions inside and outside the government. It was clearly
indicated in the Don Bolles Papers that key positions were being obtained
through the method of assassinations and the fixing of presidential and other
elections and by political appointment to achieve the CIA’s goal of taking over
and controlling key positions in the government and private sector.
18. Plaintiff asserts these files detailed George Bush Sr. and the CIA’s
bugging of the White House, Camp David, Jimmy Carter’s home, and anyone else
that could stand in their way or could become a threat to their empire at some
time in the future, which currently includes Plaintiff and anyone closely
associated with him.
19. The CIA monitored [everyone of interest] in the government from Congress to
the President, and even the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
of America. Further, In the Don Bolles Papers were the files on the bugging of
everyone that the CIA, Rockefeller family, Bush Family, or others considered a
threat to their plans and joint operation.
20. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in the files he had were thousands of
innocent people that were being kept under illegal, perpetual constant
investigation and torture so they could be directed, controlled, manipulated,
discredited, or assassinated if it became necessary. These created and
fabricated investigations were initially authorized by the courts and conducted
under the cover of authority and warrant. Some of the warrants were issued on
the claims they were protecting these people from terrorists or kidnappers, and
other warrants were issued after framing them as being involved in drugs or for
other alleged criminal activity. In truth, none of these people were guilty of
anything other than being good honest Americans with political beliefs different
than the secret government that runs part of the United States government.
21. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that in these same files, Plaintiff
Schlund read all the files of all the CIA operatives that were or would be
involved in the systematic overthrow of America by the CIA. It included
Defendant Bush and DOES 1- 10.
8520 North 54th Drive
Glendale, Arizona 85302
Phone 602-670-2017
Plaintiff In Pro Per
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a sovereign nation;
GEORGE W. BUSH, an individual; DOES 1-10, individuals, and DOES 11-20, entities,
Defendants. )
Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM
FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES.
AND,
NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (F.R.C.P. 38 and 39)
Charles August Schlund, III ("Plaintiff Schlund"), an individual, alleges as follows:
DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES
JURISDICTION
1. This action is brought pursuant to, including but not limited to, the Federal
Torts Claim Act, 2 (a) U.S.C. Sections 2671 through 2680; 28 U.S.C. Section 1346
(b); 18 U.S.C. Section 1964; 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1988, Protection of
Human Rights Act, the Convention Against Torture and Cruel, Inhumane, Degrading
Treatment or Punished Act of June 26, 1987 and as amended thereafter, the Hague
Convention; 42 U.S.C. Section 1981; 42 U.S.C. Section 1982, 1983, 1985 and 1986
of 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 [Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights] of said
Title IX of Public Law 92-318 [2 U.S.C. (a) Section 1681 et seq.]; the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. Section 2000 (b) (b) et seq.]; Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000(d) et seq.], including 13981
of said Title. Plaintiff’s leaves here to amend with additional law.
2. Jurisdiction is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1331,
1337. This matter includes allegations of illegal behavior arising under the
laws of the United States, including, but not limited to, violations of
Deprivation of Civil Rights through racketeering activities and Racketeer
Influence and Corruption Organization (“RICO”). 18 U.S.C. Section 1964(a), (c)
and 28 U.S.C. Section 1651 (a). Plaintiff and Defendants are “persons” within
the meaning of 18 U.S.C. Section 1961(3). The jurisdiction is proper in this
court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332; the matter and controversy exceeds the
sum or value of $75,000 and involves part of diverse citizenship or status under
the Constitution. This court may exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s
non-federal claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, as this court possesses
both federal subject matter and/or diversity jurisdiction.
VENUE
3. Plaintiff alleges that Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1965(a),Defendants reside, are found, operate under color of authority
or office, have an agent or are connected with or related to the aforesaid, or
transact affairs in this district. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18
U.S.C.1965 (b), to the extent any Defendant may reside outside this district,
the ends of justice require such Defendant(s) to be brought before the Court.
Venue properly lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (b) (2) or,
alternatively, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (a) (2).
PARTIES
4. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that the United States of
America (“U.S.A.”), an international sovereign nation empowered, limited, and is
controlled and its territorial boundaries established subject to its United
States Constitution (hereinafter “Constitution”). It is a member in good
standing with the Geneva Convention and avows against any use of deprivation of
civil rights and torture.
5. Pursuant to the United States Constitution Articles I, II, and III,
establishes the legislative powers, executive power, and the judicial power of
the United States, respectively. On information and belief, George W. Bush, is
an individual (“Defendant Bush” and sometimes referred to as the “George W.
Bush” or “Bush Family”), under color of authority and office under the powers of
Article II of the Constitution, utilized the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), U.S.
Attorney General’s Office (“A.G.”), Homeland Security Department (“H.S.”) and
department, agency, and entity for his own personal gain and to harass,
persecute, and torture Plaintiff in concert with DOES 1-10 individuals, within
the government and the private sector, and DOES 11-20 in the government and
private entity as set forth herein.
6. Defendant Bush receives for his compensation for services payments from the
United States Treasury to conduct the acts and conduct in a faithful manner and
uptake and solemnly swears that he will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States and will do the best of his ability to preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Under color of
authority and office, he is also responsible for the aforesaid entities and
those activities of DOES 1-10 individuals and DOES 11-20 entities, acting
individually and in concert with one another as support therein pursuant to
Article II of the Constitution. Also, under color of authority and office,
Defendant Bush shall appoint judges of the Supreme Court and other officers of
the United States whose appointment is not otherwise provided for and
established by law under Article I of the Constitution. These appointments are
not to be done for the purpose of supporting Defendants’ corrupt activities or
corrupt individuals or/and activities in the government as alleged herein.
7. Plaintiff alleges, as a citizen of the U.S.A. that he has a legal right and
duty to disclose and defend against the corrupt activities of Defendant Bush and
his agents as set forth herein and any other illegal activities effecting his
personal, financial interest, welfare, safety, or security as a citizen of
U.S.A. This includes whistle blowing activity, and disclosure of same through
the exercise of his Constitutional rights through use of the federal judicial
system(s), direct communication to any branch of the federal government, and
otherwise petition for redress as provided for under Article(s) 4, Sections 2
and 3, and as thereafter amended Article 1, IV, V, IX, X, or XIV of the United
States Constitution.
8. Plaintiff alleges that pursuant to the four subdivisions of the United
States Constitution, federal and/or state law of Arizona, including treaties
entered into by the United States, there is a duty imposed on said Defendant and
the judicial system to counter corrupt and any other illegal activities
disclosed by Plaintiff Schlund as “political witness,” affecting his and other
U.S. citizens personal rights, privileges, and amenities as a citizen of the
United States and in the capacity of, as commonly referred to, as a “whistle
blower” and/or a” political witness” as set forth herein. Plaintiff alleges the
law protects his status and rights as aforesaid and shall not be subject to
electronic invasion of his privacy or electronic torture, harassment, punishment
or persecution of him or threats of same or other violations of his
Constitutional rights by Defendant Bush and his agents through any method or/and
medium of any nature or kind whatsoever, especially as a political witness
against the aforesaid.
9. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that it is the legal duty imposed upon said
Defendant to protect Plaintiff Schlund against harassment, torture, persecution,
invasion of his privacy and other harm personally and to his financial interest
related to Defendants’ use of the various financial institutions (i.e.
Department of Treasury) and infrastructure within the government, including but
not limited to, the federal judicial system.
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Plaintiff’s investigation of the facts and research of the law is continuous and
ongoing and not yet complete. He leaves here to amend his complaint according to
proof.
ALLEGATIONS
10. Plaintiff alleges, on his information and belief and on those grounds,
Defendants Bush and DOES herein carried out and continue to systematically carry
out their plan, scheme, and design of deprivation of civil rights through
racketeering activities, including but not limited to the following:
11. Plaintiff Schlund makes the following allegations on his information and
belief and on those grounds, George Bush, Sr. (“Bush Sr.”) who in 1976 was the
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”). Bush Sr. as the Director
of the CIA in 1976, under the orders of Nelson Rockefeller, removed from the
government all of the evidence of corruption, wrongdoing, crimes, and criminal
acts including the detailed plans to fix the presidential elections of the
United States. All of these files and documents, sometimes referred to as
“evidence,” were removed from the government to conceal the information to
prevent Jimmy Carter and those he would appoint to public office from accessing
the information. This act by Bush Sr. constitutes an act of treason. The
evidence contained various files, papers, documents, data, films, tape
recordings, maps, log books, and other tangible items and things which were
moved to be under Bush Sr.’s possession and control as he was ordered by Nelson
Rockefeller. The said evidence and its contents are generally referred to as
the “Don Bolles Papers,” unless denoted otherwise.
12. Plaintiff alleges the CIA and other files Plaintiff Schlund has always
called the Don Bolles Papers contained massive amounts of information, much of
which were authenticated U.S.A. documents related to illegal, immoral, criminal,
private, corporate, and government covert operations, conducted under the
highest level of control of the CIA, DEA, NSA, Justice Department, federal
courts, and many others. These are the documents Plaintiff Schlund calls the
Don Bolles Papers, and it is obvious to Plaintiff Schlund that these papers
contained the highest levels of private/governmental planning regarding the
systematic overthrow (private control) of the United States of America.
13. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers were then moved to Phoenix, Arizona
by the CIA to one of the drug cartels that the CIA influenced, operated, and
controlled known as the Dirty Dozen Motorcycle Gang (“DD”) which was a gang
comprised of different organizational levels who had individuals involved at
many levels within the government in the State of Arizona. The DD was operated
and controlled by the CIA and was a drug cartel under the CIA’s and DEA’s
influence and control.
14. Plaintiff alleges the DD was comprised of prospects, murderers,
prostitutes, thieves, bikers, informants, private investigators, business
owners, police officers, judges, federal agents, governors, senators,
congressmen, and others.
15. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers and files were then taken from the
DD, actually the CIA, in a burglary resulting in the CIA losing control of these
highly sensitive documents, plans, and other criminal evidence.
16. Plaintiff alleges on or about 1977, Plaintiff Schlund was one of the
individuals of a group of people who received the Don Bolles Papers and files
who, along with these other individuals, began to read and analyze them.
17. Further, Plaintiff alleges that the content of the Don Bolles Papers
included documentation, which revealed a plan for the systematic overthrow of
the U.S.A. using the CIA, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and the
judicial system and its courts and others under the color of law, which included
Bush Sr. and Defendant Bush, the DOJ, certain members of Congress and the
Senate, and other positions inside and outside the government. It was clearly
indicated in the Don Bolles Papers that key positions were being obtained
through the method of assassinations and the fixing of presidential and other
elections and by political appointment to achieve the CIA’s goal of taking over
and controlling key positions in the government and private sector.
18. Plaintiff asserts these files detailed George Bush Sr. and the CIA’s
bugging of the White House, Camp David, Jimmy Carter’s home, and anyone else
that could stand in their way or could become a threat to their empire at some
time in the future, which currently includes Plaintiff and anyone closely
associated with him.
19. The CIA monitored [everyone of interest] in the government from Congress to
the President, and even the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
of America. Further, In the Don Bolles Papers were the files on the bugging of
everyone that the CIA, Rockefeller family, Bush Family, or others considered a
threat to their plans and joint operation.
20. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in the files he had were thousands of
innocent people that were being kept under illegal, perpetual constant
investigation and torture so they could be directed, controlled, manipulated,
discredited, or assassinated if it became necessary. These created and
fabricated investigations were initially authorized by the courts and conducted
under the cover of authority and warrant. Some of the warrants were issued on
the claims they were protecting these people from terrorists or kidnappers, and
other warrants were issued after framing them as being involved in drugs or for
other alleged criminal activity. In truth, none of these people were guilty of
anything other than being good honest Americans with political beliefs different
than the secret government that runs part of the United States government.
21. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that in these same files, Plaintiff
Schlund read all the files of all the CIA operatives that were or would be
involved in the systematic overthrow of America by the CIA. It included
Defendant Bush and DOES 1- 10.
- SCHLUND V. Bush -- Pt. 2 —Martin F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 10:25
- SCHLUND V. BUSH --- Pt. 3 of 3 —Martin F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 10:28
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
