The injuries of Plaintiff Schlund are now so severe that they will in
time result in his death. This is murder. In fact Plaintiff Schlund was
tortured to near death and had to go to the emergency room at Thunderbird
hospital to save his life on September 10, 2005. The Death threats continue as
Plaintiff Schlund continues to work on this motion. This is one of the patterns
by Defendant and those associated with him in the government. The continued
modification and use of this pattern is the step-up of wireless technology
electronic activities using systems instrumentalities utilized for that propose
and other purposes including torture. These operations include injecting
electronic implants which function off a wireless technology into all Plaintiff
Schlund friends, attorneys, children as babies and again later again later as
teenagers and adults, along with Plaintiff Schlund employees and many of those
around Plaintiff as specify those of which are perceived to be in close
relationship to him. This illegal perpetual surveillance has no boundaries and
the core aspects of it are constantly attempted to be concealed except on
unimportant operational levels and classifications. The core levels of these
operations involved the endless and perpetual surveillance of Plaintiff Schlund
with select information passing only to relatively unimportant operational
levels to devise a way of further framing Plaintiff Schlund as being involved in
some kind criminal activity where none exist at all. This pattern and acts of
conduct is easily provable. Its focus is to harass, retaliate, discriminate,
torture, deprive Plaintiff of sleep and attempt to discredit Plaintiff Schlund
as a political witness and then murder Plaintiff for his whistle blowing
activities (In 1997 and forward until recently the disclosure of the corrupt
activities of the select individual within the government where not called
“Whistle Blowing” they were simply referred to as “Exposing” set individual).
The profiling and classification of the individuals targeted for “exposing” has
also been re-categorized but the systematic administrative listing and targeting
of individuals slotted into known illegal profiling is rampant. This is also an
undisputed fact easy to prove. These whistle blowing activities concerning
Plaintiff Schlund and others are usually done internally by individuals who work
for the government or have knowledge of government corruption. The acts of
torture and invasion of privacy by Defendant connected to his individual
capacity continued though his title of President of the United States or
government capacity and have been committed to make an example of Plaintiff
Schlund who has personal knowledge of these activities which clearly fall into
non-garden variety racketeering activities as alleged in the Complaint. The
focus on Plaintiff Schlund by Defendant is to threaten all other witnesses who
might dare try to testify against the corruption in the courts and government
and furthers the purpose to cover up the fixing of the Presidential elections of
The United States and the plundering of the United States Department of Treasury
and the ultimate overthrow of The United States and otherwise pursue the
individual goals of the Defendant as plead in the Complaint.
In addition to the above facts, Plaintiff Schlund has personal
knowledge of the corruption and has been under constant torture and surveillance
and under many different [investigations] since reading the Central Intelligence
Agency (“CIA”) and other files that he has always called the “Don Bolles Papers”
referred to herein as the “Bolles Papers”. Plaintiff has personal knowledge
from the government and private documents and files in 1977. The Bolles Papers
were all the papers that George H. Bush, had removed from the government when
Jimmy Carter was elected to the Presidency and these and the information therein
has been passed down to Defendant George W. Bush, Jr. as set forth in the
Complaint. Plaintiff has personal knowledge of these facts which remain
undisputed. These papers were removed to stop President Jimmy Carter and those
he would appoint from obtaining the contained information on government
corruption, drug manufacturing and running, assignations, fixing of presidential
elections and corruption of the federal and other courts and other related
activities there to. The Director of the CIA, George Bush Sr., intentionally
removed these documents from the government in 1976. Plaintiff has been under
constant endless and boundary less surveillance, by Defendant not for the
propose to collect information for the prosecution of him or for some crime he
purportedly has committed, but to authorized the use of retaliation,
harassment, torture, invasion of his privacy and in violation and deprivation of
other protected civil rights for the propose of attempting to collect
information to be used to discredit him while he is in the status of being a
political witness due to his personal knowledge of Defendants illegal and
corrupt activities.
It is factual substantiated that Defendant’s only purpose is to stop
any trial and to stop the release of factual information to the public of the
above and other regards. The defendant must continue to torture Plaintiff
Schlund though the use of electronic wireless technology and associative
instrumentalities and implant products as Plaintiff would write a book listing
the details of all the corrupt Judges, agents’ politicians and others jointly
connected with them and the corrupt and illegal activities if the torture of
Plaintiff was stopped to allow him to write a book. The corrupt elements in the
government have no intent on ever arresting Plaintiff Schlund. It remains an
undisputed fact that the torture of Plaintiff was and is continuously being done
to force him to make the statements to the Defendant individually and in his
capacity with the government that it desires after he has been tortured close to
death to justify the illegal surveillance such as occurred on September 29,
2003. These conversations were set forth in Exhibit “A” to Plaintiffs original
Notice of Motion for Order for Injunction Relief which the court has hereby
request to take judicial notice of. The conversations set forth in that exhibit
were taken from Plaintiff Schlund under torture and agreed to by him as a
condition in an exchange for some relief from the torture or in exchange for
sleep to stop the torture and sleep deprivation which is of operational activity
used by the Defendant in carrying out the illegal activities. These
conversations are then submitted to the court “including justification and
affidavits to the Surveillance Court or other courts with a twist of fabricated
facts based on perverted distortions of the truth by the select corrupt
individuals in the Chain of Command with Defendant in the government under
penalty of perjury done falsely out of context to reality to assist the intra
and /or inter-governmental departments (i.e. DOJ, DEA and others). Many of
these conversations were recorded while Plaintiff was working with the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) setting up such corrupt agents in the DEA and
other federal and state departments and agencies and the judges of these corrupt
courts.[3]
In short, Plaintiff Schlund is responsible for the busting of about a
billion dollars in drugs that were being ran or protected by the DEA and State
of Arizona including its in-house manufactured drugs or stated another way,
drugs manufactured under its supervision, protection and control along with CIA
and others in and connected to the government. Billions more in drugs were
stopped in addition to the aforesaid. This court has the power to order
information on these different drug busts for its review directly connected to
the factual information given by Plaintiff Schlund. This Court also has the
power to order the FBI to brief the court concerning their own investigations
related to the information they have in fact confirmed concerning the
information given to them from Plaintiff Schlund over the years, including the
well anticipated fixing of the Presidential election concerning defendant. It
also remains an undisputed fact (as well as one admitted and conceded to by the
Defendant) that Defendant’s torture of Plaintiff is in direct retaliation for
the loss of the above-said government drugs and the exposure of the detailed
plans to fix the President Elections of the United States. The proceeds from
these drugs were and continue to be used for the funding of covert operations
that were connected to fixing and/or influencing the presidential elections of
the United States and other public elections of the United States. These select
appointed agents and judges involved in these activities are far above any laws
and are protected from the highest offices of the United States government which
include the Judiciary. Select propaganda campaigns are utilized to adjust other
in the public’s perceptions of these select individuals, as part of the cover-up
operations as an operational activity toward the ends of achieving said goal on
a local and other levels. These agents and select judges can torture, murder
and deprive civil rights from individuals whom may pose a direct threat to their
operations which function under the total protection of the Department of
Justice (“DOJ”) and the courts. They can misappropriate all the funds they need
to commit these, nothing less than, racketeering activities from the Treasury of
the United States under the total protection of corrupt judges and politicians.
They are above all laws and this is now being proved in this court by their
continued freedom as they torture and murder the witnesses against them. The
Defendant, said agents and judges and assassins under them have had people
murdered in Plaintiff Schlund’s home with the police refusing to take police
reports because these people are above any laws. The same is true when the
government committed the murders of family members, friends and neighbors. The
agents and judges have taken Plaintiffs guns and then tried to assassinate
Plaintiff Schlund planning on using the guns as throw down weapons. Some times
when a gun was stolen by the corrupt agents the police department refused to
take a police report because federal agents took the gun and they are above the
jurisdiction of the local police. The FBI told the Phoenix Police that this is
a Federal matter and that they can not take a police report. The guns were then
most likely planted by the corrupt police and agents under the protection of
corrupt Judges to make it look like Plaintiff hid the guns. Then Plaintiff
could be targeted for the reported government crimes in addition to his
outspoken words about the defendants corrupt activities an individual and in
their capacity with the government.
The above said racketeering acts and conduct of the Defendant’s in his
individual and joint capacity with the government to selectively,
administratively target and/or prosecute Plaintiff is to assist in keeping the
corrupt individuals above the law and under the protection of the judicial
system through corrupt judges and to stop Plaintiff from getting his additional
documentation to further prove the truth of his position through Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA”) records which would lead to other documentation
confirming the truth of his position. It is undisputed that the truth of the
above said racketeering activities has resulted in egregious denials of
Plaintiff’s due process equal protection and rights to a jury trail protected
under the United States Constitution have all been disregarded by this court
despite Plaintiff’s reasonable compliance with all the Rules of Civil Procedure
as reflected by the record by this matter.
By this Court ignoring Plaintiff’s assertions of his Constitutional
Rights to fair access to the Federal System which it has done is also undisputed
fact. In turn, it allows Plaintiff to continue to be tortured by Defendants in
their joint operations which will more than likely result in horrible traffic
accident causing the death of innocent people including Plaintiff Schlund or
other kinds of death such as simulated heart attacks as was attempted September
10, 2005. The Defendant and others engaged in joint operations with him has
engaged in daily torture and have tried to force Plaintiff Schlund into an
accident to stop the present legal proceedings. Plaintiff will continue to do
everything in his power to stop from crashing his truck as he is being tortured.
The continued torture has made Plaintiff Schlund more and more disabled. In
the near future there will be no possible way of him being able to stop the
resulting accident from occurring while being subject to the torture pursuant to
the executive orders of the government and under the chain of command of
Defendant. If this court continues to allow the torture of Plaintiff and others
to continue it will have the effect of causing irreparable harm through death or
serious injury to innocent people caused as a direct result of Defendant’s acts
and conduct as alleged in the Complaint which remain undisputed. If this court
continues to allow the illegal activities of torture, trespass of Plaintiff’s
property, invasion of his rights to privacy through the use of electronic
wireless technology and other outrageous conduct of Defendant and those acting
with in his chain of command in the government has caused and will continue to
cause irreparable harm if not restrained by the court. The court will then be
guilty of premeditated murder and ratification of illegal conduct resulting in
the overthrow of the United States and the suspension of the Constitution.
Plaintiff has and will continue to do everything in his power to stop
the torture through use of the court system while depending on the integrity and
fairness of the court to allow him to go forward with his efforts to protect his
Constitutional Rights. If the court is going to allow the torture to continue
by not granting this motion for injunctive relief then the court will be given
the appearance of impropriety of ratifying illegal racketeering activity which
includes the murder of innocent people and torture of Plaintiff which is the
present posture of the case. The Court is respectfully requested to avoid the
appearance of impropriety and uphold the appearance of justice so as not to
undermine Plaintiff and the public’s trust in the honorary judicial system.
time result in his death. This is murder. In fact Plaintiff Schlund was
tortured to near death and had to go to the emergency room at Thunderbird
hospital to save his life on September 10, 2005. The Death threats continue as
Plaintiff Schlund continues to work on this motion. This is one of the patterns
by Defendant and those associated with him in the government. The continued
modification and use of this pattern is the step-up of wireless technology
electronic activities using systems instrumentalities utilized for that propose
and other purposes including torture. These operations include injecting
electronic implants which function off a wireless technology into all Plaintiff
Schlund friends, attorneys, children as babies and again later again later as
teenagers and adults, along with Plaintiff Schlund employees and many of those
around Plaintiff as specify those of which are perceived to be in close
relationship to him. This illegal perpetual surveillance has no boundaries and
the core aspects of it are constantly attempted to be concealed except on
unimportant operational levels and classifications. The core levels of these
operations involved the endless and perpetual surveillance of Plaintiff Schlund
with select information passing only to relatively unimportant operational
levels to devise a way of further framing Plaintiff Schlund as being involved in
some kind criminal activity where none exist at all. This pattern and acts of
conduct is easily provable. Its focus is to harass, retaliate, discriminate,
torture, deprive Plaintiff of sleep and attempt to discredit Plaintiff Schlund
as a political witness and then murder Plaintiff for his whistle blowing
activities (In 1997 and forward until recently the disclosure of the corrupt
activities of the select individual within the government where not called
“Whistle Blowing” they were simply referred to as “Exposing” set individual).
The profiling and classification of the individuals targeted for “exposing” has
also been re-categorized but the systematic administrative listing and targeting
of individuals slotted into known illegal profiling is rampant. This is also an
undisputed fact easy to prove. These whistle blowing activities concerning
Plaintiff Schlund and others are usually done internally by individuals who work
for the government or have knowledge of government corruption. The acts of
torture and invasion of privacy by Defendant connected to his individual
capacity continued though his title of President of the United States or
government capacity and have been committed to make an example of Plaintiff
Schlund who has personal knowledge of these activities which clearly fall into
non-garden variety racketeering activities as alleged in the Complaint. The
focus on Plaintiff Schlund by Defendant is to threaten all other witnesses who
might dare try to testify against the corruption in the courts and government
and furthers the purpose to cover up the fixing of the Presidential elections of
The United States and the plundering of the United States Department of Treasury
and the ultimate overthrow of The United States and otherwise pursue the
individual goals of the Defendant as plead in the Complaint.
In addition to the above facts, Plaintiff Schlund has personal
knowledge of the corruption and has been under constant torture and surveillance
and under many different [investigations] since reading the Central Intelligence
Agency (“CIA”) and other files that he has always called the “Don Bolles Papers”
referred to herein as the “Bolles Papers”. Plaintiff has personal knowledge
from the government and private documents and files in 1977. The Bolles Papers
were all the papers that George H. Bush, had removed from the government when
Jimmy Carter was elected to the Presidency and these and the information therein
has been passed down to Defendant George W. Bush, Jr. as set forth in the
Complaint. Plaintiff has personal knowledge of these facts which remain
undisputed. These papers were removed to stop President Jimmy Carter and those
he would appoint from obtaining the contained information on government
corruption, drug manufacturing and running, assignations, fixing of presidential
elections and corruption of the federal and other courts and other related
activities there to. The Director of the CIA, George Bush Sr., intentionally
removed these documents from the government in 1976. Plaintiff has been under
constant endless and boundary less surveillance, by Defendant not for the
propose to collect information for the prosecution of him or for some crime he
purportedly has committed, but to authorized the use of retaliation,
harassment, torture, invasion of his privacy and in violation and deprivation of
other protected civil rights for the propose of attempting to collect
information to be used to discredit him while he is in the status of being a
political witness due to his personal knowledge of Defendants illegal and
corrupt activities.
It is factual substantiated that Defendant’s only purpose is to stop
any trial and to stop the release of factual information to the public of the
above and other regards. The defendant must continue to torture Plaintiff
Schlund though the use of electronic wireless technology and associative
instrumentalities and implant products as Plaintiff would write a book listing
the details of all the corrupt Judges, agents’ politicians and others jointly
connected with them and the corrupt and illegal activities if the torture of
Plaintiff was stopped to allow him to write a book. The corrupt elements in the
government have no intent on ever arresting Plaintiff Schlund. It remains an
undisputed fact that the torture of Plaintiff was and is continuously being done
to force him to make the statements to the Defendant individually and in his
capacity with the government that it desires after he has been tortured close to
death to justify the illegal surveillance such as occurred on September 29,
2003. These conversations were set forth in Exhibit “A” to Plaintiffs original
Notice of Motion for Order for Injunction Relief which the court has hereby
request to take judicial notice of. The conversations set forth in that exhibit
were taken from Plaintiff Schlund under torture and agreed to by him as a
condition in an exchange for some relief from the torture or in exchange for
sleep to stop the torture and sleep deprivation which is of operational activity
used by the Defendant in carrying out the illegal activities. These
conversations are then submitted to the court “including justification and
affidavits to the Surveillance Court or other courts with a twist of fabricated
facts based on perverted distortions of the truth by the select corrupt
individuals in the Chain of Command with Defendant in the government under
penalty of perjury done falsely out of context to reality to assist the intra
and /or inter-governmental departments (i.e. DOJ, DEA and others). Many of
these conversations were recorded while Plaintiff was working with the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) setting up such corrupt agents in the DEA and
other federal and state departments and agencies and the judges of these corrupt
courts.[3]
In short, Plaintiff Schlund is responsible for the busting of about a
billion dollars in drugs that were being ran or protected by the DEA and State
of Arizona including its in-house manufactured drugs or stated another way,
drugs manufactured under its supervision, protection and control along with CIA
and others in and connected to the government. Billions more in drugs were
stopped in addition to the aforesaid. This court has the power to order
information on these different drug busts for its review directly connected to
the factual information given by Plaintiff Schlund. This Court also has the
power to order the FBI to brief the court concerning their own investigations
related to the information they have in fact confirmed concerning the
information given to them from Plaintiff Schlund over the years, including the
well anticipated fixing of the Presidential election concerning defendant. It
also remains an undisputed fact (as well as one admitted and conceded to by the
Defendant) that Defendant’s torture of Plaintiff is in direct retaliation for
the loss of the above-said government drugs and the exposure of the detailed
plans to fix the President Elections of the United States. The proceeds from
these drugs were and continue to be used for the funding of covert operations
that were connected to fixing and/or influencing the presidential elections of
the United States and other public elections of the United States. These select
appointed agents and judges involved in these activities are far above any laws
and are protected from the highest offices of the United States government which
include the Judiciary. Select propaganda campaigns are utilized to adjust other
in the public’s perceptions of these select individuals, as part of the cover-up
operations as an operational activity toward the ends of achieving said goal on
a local and other levels. These agents and select judges can torture, murder
and deprive civil rights from individuals whom may pose a direct threat to their
operations which function under the total protection of the Department of
Justice (“DOJ”) and the courts. They can misappropriate all the funds they need
to commit these, nothing less than, racketeering activities from the Treasury of
the United States under the total protection of corrupt judges and politicians.
They are above all laws and this is now being proved in this court by their
continued freedom as they torture and murder the witnesses against them. The
Defendant, said agents and judges and assassins under them have had people
murdered in Plaintiff Schlund’s home with the police refusing to take police
reports because these people are above any laws. The same is true when the
government committed the murders of family members, friends and neighbors. The
agents and judges have taken Plaintiffs guns and then tried to assassinate
Plaintiff Schlund planning on using the guns as throw down weapons. Some times
when a gun was stolen by the corrupt agents the police department refused to
take a police report because federal agents took the gun and they are above the
jurisdiction of the local police. The FBI told the Phoenix Police that this is
a Federal matter and that they can not take a police report. The guns were then
most likely planted by the corrupt police and agents under the protection of
corrupt Judges to make it look like Plaintiff hid the guns. Then Plaintiff
could be targeted for the reported government crimes in addition to his
outspoken words about the defendants corrupt activities an individual and in
their capacity with the government.
The above said racketeering acts and conduct of the Defendant’s in his
individual and joint capacity with the government to selectively,
administratively target and/or prosecute Plaintiff is to assist in keeping the
corrupt individuals above the law and under the protection of the judicial
system through corrupt judges and to stop Plaintiff from getting his additional
documentation to further prove the truth of his position through Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA”) records which would lead to other documentation
confirming the truth of his position. It is undisputed that the truth of the
above said racketeering activities has resulted in egregious denials of
Plaintiff’s due process equal protection and rights to a jury trail protected
under the United States Constitution have all been disregarded by this court
despite Plaintiff’s reasonable compliance with all the Rules of Civil Procedure
as reflected by the record by this matter.
By this Court ignoring Plaintiff’s assertions of his Constitutional
Rights to fair access to the Federal System which it has done is also undisputed
fact. In turn, it allows Plaintiff to continue to be tortured by Defendants in
their joint operations which will more than likely result in horrible traffic
accident causing the death of innocent people including Plaintiff Schlund or
other kinds of death such as simulated heart attacks as was attempted September
10, 2005. The Defendant and others engaged in joint operations with him has
engaged in daily torture and have tried to force Plaintiff Schlund into an
accident to stop the present legal proceedings. Plaintiff will continue to do
everything in his power to stop from crashing his truck as he is being tortured.
The continued torture has made Plaintiff Schlund more and more disabled. In
the near future there will be no possible way of him being able to stop the
resulting accident from occurring while being subject to the torture pursuant to
the executive orders of the government and under the chain of command of
Defendant. If this court continues to allow the torture of Plaintiff and others
to continue it will have the effect of causing irreparable harm through death or
serious injury to innocent people caused as a direct result of Defendant’s acts
and conduct as alleged in the Complaint which remain undisputed. If this court
continues to allow the illegal activities of torture, trespass of Plaintiff’s
property, invasion of his rights to privacy through the use of electronic
wireless technology and other outrageous conduct of Defendant and those acting
with in his chain of command in the government has caused and will continue to
cause irreparable harm if not restrained by the court. The court will then be
guilty of premeditated murder and ratification of illegal conduct resulting in
the overthrow of the United States and the suspension of the Constitution.
Plaintiff has and will continue to do everything in his power to stop
the torture through use of the court system while depending on the integrity and
fairness of the court to allow him to go forward with his efforts to protect his
Constitutional Rights. If the court is going to allow the torture to continue
by not granting this motion for injunctive relief then the court will be given
the appearance of impropriety of ratifying illegal racketeering activity which
includes the murder of innocent people and torture of Plaintiff which is the
present posture of the case. The Court is respectfully requested to avoid the
appearance of impropriety and uphold the appearance of justice so as not to
undermine Plaintiff and the public’s trust in the honorary judicial system.
- Part 3- Note: There Are FOUR Parts —M. F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 15:15
- High-Tech Torture: Part 4 of 4 —M. F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 15:18
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
