Charles Schlund: High-Tech Torture In The U.S.A.
Fri Sep 16, 2005 15:02
216.19.125.20
Charles August Schlund, III
8520 North 54th Drive
Glendale, Arizona 85302
Phone 602-670-2017
Plaintiff In Pro Per
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles August Schlund, III, an individual
Plaintiff,
v.
George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a Sovereign Nation;
George W. Bush, an individual; Does 1-10, individuals; Does 11-20, entities,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM
NOTICE AND MOTION FOR ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO STOP TORTURE, INVASION OF
PRIVACY AND DEPRIVATION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE COVER-UP OF THE FIXING OF
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
(Request for Hearing)
Charles August Schlund, III (“Plaintiff”) hereby files his Notice of
Motion for Injunction Relief for Order to Stop Torture, Invasion of Privacy and
Deprivation of Freedom of Speech and the cover-up of the Fixing of the
Presidential Elections of the United States of America causing him irreparable
harm under F.R.C.P. Rule 65. The grounds for the motion include but are not
limited to, (1) Torture is illegal and constitutes a criminal act in the United
States (2) Electronic invasion of privacy is a violation of the United States
Constitution and constitutes an electronic trespass and (3) Deprivation of
Freedom of Speech violates the United States Constitution. Anyone and all of the
aforesaid justify an Order for Injunction Relief under F.R.C.P. 65 and such
actionable violations of Plaintiff Schlund rights by the Defendant and others
under his protection, direction or control are subject to restraint by court
order.
Plaintiff specifically requests which shall constitute a continuing
request for the court to make findings of fact including of law on each and all
of the issues raised herein and at the hearing of the matter pursuant to
F.R.C.P. 52.
Notice Of Request For Hearing On Injunctive Relief.
Plaintiff Schlund request the court to set a hearing on this motion
for injunctive relief.
Dated: September 12, 2005
By: _____________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
In Pro Per
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
I. Summary Of The Facts
Plaintiff Schlund filed his Verified Complaint (“Complaint”) in
compliance with F.R.C.P. Rule(s) 11 and 65 and has requested injunctive relief
in the Complaint to stop torture, deprivation of civil rights, deprivation of
freedom of speech, and deprivation of rights of privacy, including but not
limited to electronic wireless technology (Complaint pages 61 through 64). He
is also properly alleged in his Complaint injunction relief is necessary in
order to stop defendant’s use of torture on him which has deprived his
Constitutional Right to vote as well (Complaint page 35 and 36). He has alleged
specific facts of the emergency medical services, including but not limited to,
emergency ambulance services, electrodes, emergency room, pharmacy, medical
supplies, laboratories services, chest x-rays, EKG/ECG, Electrode Cardiogram,
and other professional medical fees and services of radiologist, ER Physicians
and their staff to stabilized his body after Defendant’s torture resulting in
Post-Torture Traumatic Shock (“P.T.T.S.”) based on the risk assessments by the
Glendale Fire Department Emergency Rescue Unit as a result of Defendant’s
torture of him and harassment by electronic invasion of privacy causing him
emotional harm though such electric harassment and invasion of his privacy by
Defendant’s causing irreparable injury and damages which have been continuous
and ongoing (complaint pages pgs 2 - 65, incorporated by this reference F.R.C.P.
10).
Defendant’s physiological and psychological torture of Plaintiff
through electronic wireless technology and other electric harassment has caused
Plaintiff medical fees resulting from the torture which is continuous and
on-going in the amount of hundreds of thousands of dollars which can be easily
proved. Further, Plaintiff has never had high blood pressure until he was
injected with and tortured by these electronic devices and subjected to the
electric wireless technology utilized by Defendant’s for proposes of torture and
electric harassment and the Invasion of Privacy of Plaintiff which were forcibly
installed in Plaintiff’s body in 1993 and possibly other times. Defendant’s
have jointly been participants in the use of electronic wireless technology of a
nature which can be easily proved by Plaintiff with non-expert testimony and/or
expert testimony upon evidentiary proof at the hearing of the matter. This
electronic wireless technology and associated products have been and continued
to be used by Defendant’s against selected administrative, targeted individuals
(here, Plaintiff Schlund) for proposes of telecommunication extraction of
information / data, caused intentional electronic harassment and/or caused years
of sleep deprivation, extreme pain and suffering and other commonly known
episodes of trauma associated to and under the definition of “torture” has
acknowledged in the Domestic and International laws. Plaintiff has suffered
what appears to be the intentionally created diagnoses of diabetes, arthritis,
pain, blindness, heart attacks and other intentionally stimulated increases of
blood pressure levels with highs between 200 and 300 by Defendant’s use of
electronic wireless technology and associated devices for this propose.
Defendant’s acts are to induce threats, intimidation, obstruction of justice,
witness tampering and the murder of Plaintiff by making it appear as other
medically related ailments and during the interim prior to death electronically
inducing the appearance that Plaintiff is emotionally unstable utilizing the
electronic wireless harassment and torture of Plaintiff. In fact, this Court
has nudged the Honorable United States Marshall’s Office to send two of its
Officers to Plaintiff home to leave a paper trail of this appearance also having
the effect of harassing his children with ridiculous inquiries about Plaintiff’s
potential for violence as the courts and government use torture and sleep
deprivation to try to force Plaintiff to defend himself from the governments
evil and criminal acts. [1]
This court will recall that prior to, and on or before June 17, 1978
and continued thereafter, Plaintiff Schlund was an ex-Vietnam veteran who, upon
discharge from the United States Marine Corps was solicited by the Drug Cartel
members for the Central Intelligence Agency (1968) (Later, named the Drug
Enforcement Administration [“DEA”] and modernly, activities fell under the
Homeland Security umbrella). Other Agencies are also involved for the propose
of sheltering the internal corruption of Plaintiff Schlund’s personal
knowledge acquired due to his personal involvement with the aforesaid as set
forth with his Verified Complaint which touches the tip of the iceberg of
corrupt activities violating individual civil rights by Defendant’s. After
acquiring this personal knowledge of Defendant’s and their associates Plaintiff
Schlund began to fully understand the reality of Defendant’s agenda. He
rejected it and refused to work for them and pulled out. When he did he was set
up by the government as a purported drug manufacturer. Plaintiff forced the DEA
and Arizona State agencies to trial and after the Court found the government and
its individual agents engaged in outrageous conduct which included but not
limited to, perjured testimony, fabricated evidence, withholding truthful
evidence which exonerated Plaintiff, The government engaged in witness
tampering, death threats and other obstruction of justice and illegal activity,
Plaintiff Schlund was acquitted of all charges. Plaintiff was offered money and
power including the ability to gas and torture and/or rape any girl that turned
Plaintiff down for sex and other illegal activities normal to the gang-style
activates of the Defendant’s working under the color of authority. Although
this was offered under the pretext of color of law using warrants by the corrupt
individuals inside the said agencies which included the activities alleged in
Plaintiffs complaint involved the issuing of warrants which were used in
reported drug investigations issued by corrupt judges in the Surveillance Court
and other courts. Although these warrants had limitations under the law such
limitations were completely disregarded and surveillance activities continued in
perpetuity in a boundary list fashion violating the United States Constitution
and the individual’s civil rights. Nothing has changed despite the illegal
nature of the conduct and continued on modernly today. At the Injunction
Hearing Plaintiff can substantiate with actual facts what he alleges is true and
not surreal and fantastic.
After Plaintiff Schlund’s refusal to comply with Defendant’s demand he
was systematically, selectively and selectively administratively targeted and
placed under perpetual surveillance and repeatedly framed and/or set-up by the
corrupt individuals including Defendant’s within the government to torture him.
Defendant’s activities hope to locate critical information concerning their
illegal and corrupt activities, control the information or otherwise engage in a
campaign to dilute, deter and prevent the use of the truth against the
Defendant’s or substantiate the egregious and serious past and present,
individual and joint government corruption under color of authority of
Plaintiff’s personal knowledge and to punish him as a political witness against
Defendant in hopes in discrediting him and protect the veil of protection
through use of electronic means.
After the government intentionally fabricated evidence and engaged in
what the Honorable Judge Lacey who was a visiting judge to the United States
District Court of Arizona and assigned to the trial of the matter placed on the
record was nothing less than “outrageous conduct” by the government constituting
Obstruction of Justice and threatened the individual agents and others involved
with Contempt of Court and demanded that all the agents be arrested for perjury.
Judge Lacey determined that the government had intentionally fabricated
evidence, committed perjury and then set-up an arrested and charged Plaintiff
Schlund for alleged Conspiracy to Manufacture Illegal Drugs, claimed that he was
a drug dealer, murder, gun runner, smuggler and thief and that there was no
factual basis’s for these allegations or the intense perpetual surveillance and
investigation conducted by these corrupt government officials. The Federal
prosecution of Plaintiff Schlund was extraordinarily aggressive and Defendant
engaging in witness tampering through extortion, blackmail and threats of
murdering first witnesses’ children if they testified. One of the key threats
of said witnesses was jail if they testified truthfully. The key witness and
this fabricated and false malicious prosecution of Plaintiff Schlund was the
governments own agent who was an informant and a specialized drug chemist and
manufacturer of drugs for the government, Carl Altz AKA John Green. In fact,
the corrupt DEA agents short of being held in contempt by Judge Lacey who is
demanding their arrest for committing what he classified as clear perjury,
witness tampering and fabrication of evidence in an attempt to falsify the
justification of the surveillance operations against Plaintiff Schlund and those
associated with him. Federal Judge Lacey expressed extreme outrage at Maricopa
County Sheriff’s Department and DEA’s conduct in the malicious prosecution of
Plaintiff Schlund. In fact, the Sheriff’s Department and the DEA agents have
threatened to murder the children and wife of Plaintiff Schlund’s first witness
by slitting their throats while the witness was on the witness stand if he dared
to say anything other than taking the “5th Amendment”. This threat was made out
by the DEA and Sheriff’s Department as they interviewed Robert Snow who was
Plaintiff Schlund’s first witness.[2]
The DEA and various members of the Maricopa Sheriff’s Department then
went to Plaintiff Schlund’s second witness and threaten to prosecute him if he
admitted to having any knowledge of the facts of the case. These threats and
other exact same pattern of corrupt law enforcement tactics continue today.
Plaintiff Schlund is not asserting all law enforcement is corrupt.
But it is common knowledge that there are corrupt law enforcement personnel in
all areas of law enforcement and it is these specific corrupt individuals of
which he makes reference. There is an ongoing list of these individuals which
are included in the Bolles papers.
Plaintiff Schlund second witness was Plaintiff‘s brother, William L.
Schlund who did not have wife or children to threaten. Judge Lacey repeatedly
called the government’s conduct outrageous conduct of the United States which is
the exact same conduct engaged in by Defendant as set forth in Plaintiff’s
Complaint prior to and after becoming President of The United States. Despite
the truth of what Plaintiff consistently has stated in writing and verbally over
the last 29 years, some of these facts were actually brought out in Court which
led to Judge Lacey’s findings and Plaintiff was acquitted on all counts which
the government appealed. The acquittal judgment was upheld on appeal. The
government surveillance, torture, and invasion of his privacy, and other
violations of his civil rights and his family and others Constitutional Rights
is motivated by corrupt government officials’ retaliation against him for the
purpose of continuing to harass and torture Plaintiff, his witnesses and
others associated with him. This has continued every day for over 29 years,
including the electronic wireless technology, monitoring, invasion of privacy
and torture of Plaintiff Schlund who has been and continues to be seriously
injured and damaged in his health, body, mind and financially by the illegal
harassment and torture as set forth in his Complaint. These facts remain
undisputed and in every case the government has admitted to these facts either
as a legal consequence of procedure maneuvering to avoid evidentiary hearings
and trial of the matter without exception. It is also to prevent Plaintiff
Schlund from having brought forth knowledgeable experts recognized under the law
and by Defendant in his individual capacity and the government itself from
having the truth exposed.
8520 North 54th Drive
Glendale, Arizona 85302
Phone 602-670-2017
Plaintiff In Pro Per
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles August Schlund, III, an individual
Plaintiff,
v.
George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a Sovereign Nation;
George W. Bush, an individual; Does 1-10, individuals; Does 11-20, entities,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM
NOTICE AND MOTION FOR ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO STOP TORTURE, INVASION OF
PRIVACY AND DEPRIVATION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE COVER-UP OF THE FIXING OF
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
(Request for Hearing)
Charles August Schlund, III (“Plaintiff”) hereby files his Notice of
Motion for Injunction Relief for Order to Stop Torture, Invasion of Privacy and
Deprivation of Freedom of Speech and the cover-up of the Fixing of the
Presidential Elections of the United States of America causing him irreparable
harm under F.R.C.P. Rule 65. The grounds for the motion include but are not
limited to, (1) Torture is illegal and constitutes a criminal act in the United
States (2) Electronic invasion of privacy is a violation of the United States
Constitution and constitutes an electronic trespass and (3) Deprivation of
Freedom of Speech violates the United States Constitution. Anyone and all of the
aforesaid justify an Order for Injunction Relief under F.R.C.P. 65 and such
actionable violations of Plaintiff Schlund rights by the Defendant and others
under his protection, direction or control are subject to restraint by court
order.
Plaintiff specifically requests which shall constitute a continuing
request for the court to make findings of fact including of law on each and all
of the issues raised herein and at the hearing of the matter pursuant to
F.R.C.P. 52.
Notice Of Request For Hearing On Injunctive Relief.
Plaintiff Schlund request the court to set a hearing on this motion
for injunctive relief.
Dated: September 12, 2005
By: _____________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
In Pro Per
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
I. Summary Of The Facts
Plaintiff Schlund filed his Verified Complaint (“Complaint”) in
compliance with F.R.C.P. Rule(s) 11 and 65 and has requested injunctive relief
in the Complaint to stop torture, deprivation of civil rights, deprivation of
freedom of speech, and deprivation of rights of privacy, including but not
limited to electronic wireless technology (Complaint pages 61 through 64). He
is also properly alleged in his Complaint injunction relief is necessary in
order to stop defendant’s use of torture on him which has deprived his
Constitutional Right to vote as well (Complaint page 35 and 36). He has alleged
specific facts of the emergency medical services, including but not limited to,
emergency ambulance services, electrodes, emergency room, pharmacy, medical
supplies, laboratories services, chest x-rays, EKG/ECG, Electrode Cardiogram,
and other professional medical fees and services of radiologist, ER Physicians
and their staff to stabilized his body after Defendant’s torture resulting in
Post-Torture Traumatic Shock (“P.T.T.S.”) based on the risk assessments by the
Glendale Fire Department Emergency Rescue Unit as a result of Defendant’s
torture of him and harassment by electronic invasion of privacy causing him
emotional harm though such electric harassment and invasion of his privacy by
Defendant’s causing irreparable injury and damages which have been continuous
and ongoing (complaint pages pgs 2 - 65, incorporated by this reference F.R.C.P.
10).
Defendant’s physiological and psychological torture of Plaintiff
through electronic wireless technology and other electric harassment has caused
Plaintiff medical fees resulting from the torture which is continuous and
on-going in the amount of hundreds of thousands of dollars which can be easily
proved. Further, Plaintiff has never had high blood pressure until he was
injected with and tortured by these electronic devices and subjected to the
electric wireless technology utilized by Defendant’s for proposes of torture and
electric harassment and the Invasion of Privacy of Plaintiff which were forcibly
installed in Plaintiff’s body in 1993 and possibly other times. Defendant’s
have jointly been participants in the use of electronic wireless technology of a
nature which can be easily proved by Plaintiff with non-expert testimony and/or
expert testimony upon evidentiary proof at the hearing of the matter. This
electronic wireless technology and associated products have been and continued
to be used by Defendant’s against selected administrative, targeted individuals
(here, Plaintiff Schlund) for proposes of telecommunication extraction of
information / data, caused intentional electronic harassment and/or caused years
of sleep deprivation, extreme pain and suffering and other commonly known
episodes of trauma associated to and under the definition of “torture” has
acknowledged in the Domestic and International laws. Plaintiff has suffered
what appears to be the intentionally created diagnoses of diabetes, arthritis,
pain, blindness, heart attacks and other intentionally stimulated increases of
blood pressure levels with highs between 200 and 300 by Defendant’s use of
electronic wireless technology and associated devices for this propose.
Defendant’s acts are to induce threats, intimidation, obstruction of justice,
witness tampering and the murder of Plaintiff by making it appear as other
medically related ailments and during the interim prior to death electronically
inducing the appearance that Plaintiff is emotionally unstable utilizing the
electronic wireless harassment and torture of Plaintiff. In fact, this Court
has nudged the Honorable United States Marshall’s Office to send two of its
Officers to Plaintiff home to leave a paper trail of this appearance also having
the effect of harassing his children with ridiculous inquiries about Plaintiff’s
potential for violence as the courts and government use torture and sleep
deprivation to try to force Plaintiff to defend himself from the governments
evil and criminal acts. [1]
This court will recall that prior to, and on or before June 17, 1978
and continued thereafter, Plaintiff Schlund was an ex-Vietnam veteran who, upon
discharge from the United States Marine Corps was solicited by the Drug Cartel
members for the Central Intelligence Agency (1968) (Later, named the Drug
Enforcement Administration [“DEA”] and modernly, activities fell under the
Homeland Security umbrella). Other Agencies are also involved for the propose
of sheltering the internal corruption of Plaintiff Schlund’s personal
knowledge acquired due to his personal involvement with the aforesaid as set
forth with his Verified Complaint which touches the tip of the iceberg of
corrupt activities violating individual civil rights by Defendant’s. After
acquiring this personal knowledge of Defendant’s and their associates Plaintiff
Schlund began to fully understand the reality of Defendant’s agenda. He
rejected it and refused to work for them and pulled out. When he did he was set
up by the government as a purported drug manufacturer. Plaintiff forced the DEA
and Arizona State agencies to trial and after the Court found the government and
its individual agents engaged in outrageous conduct which included but not
limited to, perjured testimony, fabricated evidence, withholding truthful
evidence which exonerated Plaintiff, The government engaged in witness
tampering, death threats and other obstruction of justice and illegal activity,
Plaintiff Schlund was acquitted of all charges. Plaintiff was offered money and
power including the ability to gas and torture and/or rape any girl that turned
Plaintiff down for sex and other illegal activities normal to the gang-style
activates of the Defendant’s working under the color of authority. Although
this was offered under the pretext of color of law using warrants by the corrupt
individuals inside the said agencies which included the activities alleged in
Plaintiffs complaint involved the issuing of warrants which were used in
reported drug investigations issued by corrupt judges in the Surveillance Court
and other courts. Although these warrants had limitations under the law such
limitations were completely disregarded and surveillance activities continued in
perpetuity in a boundary list fashion violating the United States Constitution
and the individual’s civil rights. Nothing has changed despite the illegal
nature of the conduct and continued on modernly today. At the Injunction
Hearing Plaintiff can substantiate with actual facts what he alleges is true and
not surreal and fantastic.
After Plaintiff Schlund’s refusal to comply with Defendant’s demand he
was systematically, selectively and selectively administratively targeted and
placed under perpetual surveillance and repeatedly framed and/or set-up by the
corrupt individuals including Defendant’s within the government to torture him.
Defendant’s activities hope to locate critical information concerning their
illegal and corrupt activities, control the information or otherwise engage in a
campaign to dilute, deter and prevent the use of the truth against the
Defendant’s or substantiate the egregious and serious past and present,
individual and joint government corruption under color of authority of
Plaintiff’s personal knowledge and to punish him as a political witness against
Defendant in hopes in discrediting him and protect the veil of protection
through use of electronic means.
After the government intentionally fabricated evidence and engaged in
what the Honorable Judge Lacey who was a visiting judge to the United States
District Court of Arizona and assigned to the trial of the matter placed on the
record was nothing less than “outrageous conduct” by the government constituting
Obstruction of Justice and threatened the individual agents and others involved
with Contempt of Court and demanded that all the agents be arrested for perjury.
Judge Lacey determined that the government had intentionally fabricated
evidence, committed perjury and then set-up an arrested and charged Plaintiff
Schlund for alleged Conspiracy to Manufacture Illegal Drugs, claimed that he was
a drug dealer, murder, gun runner, smuggler and thief and that there was no
factual basis’s for these allegations or the intense perpetual surveillance and
investigation conducted by these corrupt government officials. The Federal
prosecution of Plaintiff Schlund was extraordinarily aggressive and Defendant
engaging in witness tampering through extortion, blackmail and threats of
murdering first witnesses’ children if they testified. One of the key threats
of said witnesses was jail if they testified truthfully. The key witness and
this fabricated and false malicious prosecution of Plaintiff Schlund was the
governments own agent who was an informant and a specialized drug chemist and
manufacturer of drugs for the government, Carl Altz AKA John Green. In fact,
the corrupt DEA agents short of being held in contempt by Judge Lacey who is
demanding their arrest for committing what he classified as clear perjury,
witness tampering and fabrication of evidence in an attempt to falsify the
justification of the surveillance operations against Plaintiff Schlund and those
associated with him. Federal Judge Lacey expressed extreme outrage at Maricopa
County Sheriff’s Department and DEA’s conduct in the malicious prosecution of
Plaintiff Schlund. In fact, the Sheriff’s Department and the DEA agents have
threatened to murder the children and wife of Plaintiff Schlund’s first witness
by slitting their throats while the witness was on the witness stand if he dared
to say anything other than taking the “5th Amendment”. This threat was made out
by the DEA and Sheriff’s Department as they interviewed Robert Snow who was
Plaintiff Schlund’s first witness.[2]
The DEA and various members of the Maricopa Sheriff’s Department then
went to Plaintiff Schlund’s second witness and threaten to prosecute him if he
admitted to having any knowledge of the facts of the case. These threats and
other exact same pattern of corrupt law enforcement tactics continue today.
Plaintiff Schlund is not asserting all law enforcement is corrupt.
But it is common knowledge that there are corrupt law enforcement personnel in
all areas of law enforcement and it is these specific corrupt individuals of
which he makes reference. There is an ongoing list of these individuals which
are included in the Bolles papers.
Plaintiff Schlund second witness was Plaintiff‘s brother, William L.
Schlund who did not have wife or children to threaten. Judge Lacey repeatedly
called the government’s conduct outrageous conduct of the United States which is
the exact same conduct engaged in by Defendant as set forth in Plaintiff’s
Complaint prior to and after becoming President of The United States. Despite
the truth of what Plaintiff consistently has stated in writing and verbally over
the last 29 years, some of these facts were actually brought out in Court which
led to Judge Lacey’s findings and Plaintiff was acquitted on all counts which
the government appealed. The acquittal judgment was upheld on appeal. The
government surveillance, torture, and invasion of his privacy, and other
violations of his civil rights and his family and others Constitutional Rights
is motivated by corrupt government officials’ retaliation against him for the
purpose of continuing to harass and torture Plaintiff, his witnesses and
others associated with him. This has continued every day for over 29 years,
including the electronic wireless technology, monitoring, invasion of privacy
and torture of Plaintiff Schlund who has been and continues to be seriously
injured and damaged in his health, body, mind and financially by the illegal
harassment and torture as set forth in his Complaint. These facts remain
undisputed and in every case the government has admitted to these facts either
as a legal consequence of procedure maneuvering to avoid evidentiary hearings
and trial of the matter without exception. It is also to prevent Plaintiff
Schlund from having brought forth knowledgeable experts recognized under the law
and by Defendant in his individual capacity and the government itself from
having the truth exposed.
- High-Tech Torture -- Pt. 2 of 3 —Martin F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 15:09
- Part 3- Note: There Are FOUR Parts —M. F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 15:15
- High-Tech Torture: Part 4 of 4 —M. F. Abernathy, Fri Sep 16 15:18
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
