The Automated Metropolis
The always insightful Joel Garreau argues that, however much he
or you or I might prefer otherwise, the City of New Orleans will
not be rebuilt. The economy may demand a port there, he writes,
but the port no longer demands a city:
Also distinct from the city are the region's ports, lining 172
miles of both banks of the Mississippi, as well as points on the
Gulf. For example, the largest in the Western Hemisphere is the
54-mile stretch of the Port of South Louisiana. It is centered
on La Place, 20 miles upriver from New Orleans. It moved 199
million tons of cargo in 2003, including the vast bulk of the
river's grain. That is more than twice as much as the Port of
New Orleans, according to the American Association of Port
Authorities. The Port of Baton Rouge, almost as big as the Port
of New Orleans, was not damaged. Also, downstream, there is the
LOOP -- the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port out in the Gulf that
handles supertankers requiring water depths of 85 feet. These
ports are just a few of the biggest.
Illustrating how different the Port of New Orleans is from the
city, its landline phones were back in business a week ago, says
Gary LaGrange, the port's president and CEO. "The river is
working beautifully," he reports, and "the terminal's not that
bad."
Throughout the world, you see an increasing distinction between
"port" and "city." As long as a port needed stevedores and
recreational areas for sailors, cities like New Orleans -- or
Baltimore or Rotterdam -- thrived. Today, however, the measure
of a port is how quickly it can load or unload a ship and return
it to sea. That process is measured in hours. It is the product
of extremely sophisticated automation, which requires some very
skilled people but does not create remotely enough jobs to
support a city of half a million or so.
The dazzling Offshore Oil Port, for example, employs only about
100 people. Even the specialized Port of New Orleans, which
handles things like coffee, steel and cruise boats, only needs
2,500 people on an average day, LaGrange says.
Posted by Jesse Walker at 06:12 PM | Comments (26)
Blankley Going Where Wrong Men Had Gone Before
Washington Times Opinion Editor Tony Blankley gives a helpfully
clear demonstration of how some conservatives are convinced that
the War on Terror is only winnable if we enthusiastically scale
back American liberties. Starting off, persistently enough, with
a 21st century update to that world-beating war strategy,
Japanese internment:
During World War II, the country was faced with the prospect of
large numbers of people -- again identifiable by ethnicity, not
conduct -- who were real or potential enemies.
The logic of the Supreme Court's opinion is applicable to the
situation we face today. The court held that people ethnically
connected to the war-makers are more likely to support them than
are others -- and our country at war has a right to protect
itself from this presumed higher risk of danger.
This is true regardless of the personal innocence of particular
individuals.
Next, Blankley pines for a Supreme Court that helps persecute
the insufficiently patriotic:
Members of the Jehovah's Witnesses were prosecuted during World
War II for refusing to let their children recite the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, a liberal, wrote the
majority opinion in the case. He upheld the school expulsions
and parental prosecutions for violating compulsory attendance
laws.
Justice Frankfurter observed that "the mere possession of
religious convictions which contradict the relevant concerns of
a political society does not relieve the citizen from the
discharge of political responsibilities."
This is particularly applicable to the situation we face today.
And why is a terrible 60-year-old spasm of paranoid injustice
"applicable," suddenly? Brace yourself for the illiteral
historical analogy:
But back then, as now, we were a nation of newly arrived
immigrants, threatened from abroad and bombarded with
destructive ideologies.
Then, it was communism and fascism. Today, it is
multiculturalism, political correctness and, among the Muslim
population, radical Islam.
Italics mine. That's right, Tony Blankley (an immigrant himself,
by the way) just committed the Mother of all Godwins by
comparing the two most murderous political ideologies in modern
history to ...ing "political correctness."
I'm beginning to suspect that the phrase "let loose the dogs of
war" was meant to refer just as much to the yapping loons on the
homefront.
Posted by Matt Welch at 04:17 PM | Comments (34)
Woah
George Bush today:
Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at
all levels of government. And to the extent that the federal
government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility.
On a second pass, that "to the extent" has a bit of the ring of
"I'm sorry if I offended anyone." Still, let's hope that's the
start of a trend. (Hat tip: TPM)
Posted by Julian Sanchez at 03:35 PM | Comments (33)
Common Ground
This makes me happy:
The ethnically divided Bosnian city of Mostar has agreed to
erect a new symbol of unity -- a statue of kung fu legend Bruce
Lee, worshipped by Muslims, Serbs and Croats.
Posted by Jesse Walker at 03:20 PM | Comments (26)
Fat Is Phat, or, In Defense of Lard-Ass Americans
From the always-interestin' Spiked, a piece by Daniel Ben-Ami
that chews over why so many people hate fat Americans:
Overweight Americans represent, in caricatured form, the
affluence of US society. They are the personification of a
society in which scarcity, if not eliminated, has become
marginalised. Yet we live in a world in which consumption is
seen as a problem and the possibility of creating a better
society is seen as unrealistic. By focusing on fat Americans the
critics of consumption are saying, implicitly at least, that
people should consume less. They are arguing for a world in
which Americans become more like those who live in the poorer
countries of the world. From such a perspective equality means
levelling everyone down rather than raising the living standards
of the poor. It means giving up on the battle to resist
hurricanes or to reclaim land from the sea. Yet implementing
such a viewpoint is a super-size mistake. Our aspiration for the
world should be to give the poor the advantages of affluence
enjoyed by those in the West. Living standards in countries such
as Ethiopia and Niger should be, at the very least, as high as
those in America today. In that sense we should all aim to be
fat Americans.
Whole thing here.
Reason grokked chubsy-ubsyism here, here, and here.
Posted by Nick Gillespie at 03:12 PM | Comments (27)
New at Reason
Officials keep insisting that Katrina survivors are not
"refugees." Kerry Howley agrees: We have competently executed
plans for dealing with international refugees.
Posted by Julian Sanchez at 02:14 PM | Comments (13)
Litigation Ho
Plaid-throated Minnesota bore, Homegrown Democrat and censorship
casualty Garrison Keillor is threatening to sue a blogger for
selling a T-shirt that says "A Prairie Ho Companion." (Link via
Sploid.)
Posted by Matt Welch at 12:56 PM | Comments (36)
Radio Comes to the Astrodome
Remember that radio station for the Astrodome's evacuees that
the dome authorities decided to block? The organizers went back
to the drawing board, and at noon central time today they'll
start broadcasting from the parking lot instead.
Posted by Jesse Walker at 12:20 PM | Comments (13)
=========
Charles Goyette
6:00 - 9:00am
Charles Goyette is a familiar voice to radio listeners all
across Arizona. His broadcasting career has taken him from
Flagstaff to Sedona and Tucson, with stops in southern
California as well, before settling in Phoenix. In 2003 Charles
Goyette was voted the best local air personality.
Charles positively delights in questioning the conventional
wisdom. There is no political correctness, no sacred cow or
authority that he won't challenge - with plenty of fun along the
way!
Charles was the winner of the New Times Best Talk Show
Personality in 2003
Charles Goyette can be reached from his home page at:
HTTP://www.charlesgoyette.com
Charles Goyette Archive & Schedule can be accessed at:
http://www.charlesgoyette.com/archive