New Orleans; Urban Renewal NWO-Style

Philip Toler

New Orleans; Urban Renewal NWO-Style - 911 & Katrina

Tue Sep 13, 2005 22:19

64.140.158.94

From: "Philip Toler" pktoler@asapchoice.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: 911 & Katrina

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine
and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have
been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is
now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The
supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries."
David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

New Orleans; Urban Renewal NWO-Style

By Weben Hadd

The "international bankers and intellectual elite", as David Rockefeller
describes himself and his pals, are opening up the playbook, and the gloves
are coming off. Their stooges have been given the green light to begin to
show us what the various, and nefarious "War on ______" are all about. We
see now the War on Poverty is really a war on the poor, and not the
institution itself. In like fashion the War on Drugs has been long shown to
be a war on the governments competitors in the drug business. Heck, if we
can get the government to declare a War on Usury, it would solve all our
problems!

But the situation in New Orleans demonstrates just how bold these cads have
gotten. Let us take the worst-case scenario, and you can just ignore the
weird science and even hide behind the "they wouldn't do that to their own
people" when the going gets rough, but there's still enough on the table to
convince anyone not panting in anticipation of the rapture to realize
something is oh so rotten inside the beltway and on Wall Street. And this is
certainly no time to be bamboozled by the artifice of the political parties
or even the talking heads that might as well be wearing big signs that say
"LIBERAL" or "CONSERVATIVE". It's all a cheap side show that recalls P. T.
Barnum's observation regarding the intelligence of the average American.

Now then - we begin with a problem, and follow the way a denizen of the
"intellectual elite or international bankers" would go about solving it in
the most efficient - well, make that profitable - way. The problem is all
those poor people and drug users in New Orleans that make the place too
seedy to bring in the Disneyland and Vegas ships of fools. So if you figure
a way to off a few thousand of them and body search the rest as they
politely file out, then an unfortunate series of fires at places that keep
deeds would let you could condemn whole sections of the city and sell them
off to your rich buddies for pennies on the dollar. Then they get the US
taxpayer to finance some snappy new levees, and, presto! Problem solved!

Time for a call to the black operations team and get them on it. Way up in
Alaska the government has built, for research purposes only, of course, two
massive arrays of antennae that are just what the amazing Nicola Tesla
calculated would be needed to modify weather, among other dandy things. One
can understand the basics of how it works without an advanced degree in
something or another, and goes like this: of the many spheres floating
around out there somewhere is one called the ionosphere. Since ions are
charged electrons, they have electromagnetic properties. Now, we don't often
fall to our knees and genuflect to our very good friend the ionosphere, but
we should - at least every once in a while - because without its shield
against solar radiation, there could be no life on Earth. Not even
"intellectual elite or international bankers"!

Anyway, Nikky figured that if you could bombard a particular spot on the
ionosphere with electromagnetic energy, it would cause it to form a bubble
that would create a low pressure zone directly below it on the surface of
the earth. The stronger the beam, the lower the pressure and the larger the
coverage. When you then recall that virtually all weather systems are an
interaction between zones of higher and lower pressures, well, you've put
the whole thing together. So they wait till hurricane season, of course, for
the alibi, then you pick a spot, say Bermuda just for fun, then call Alaska
and tell them to focus their research, heh heh, at the point of the
ionosphere right above that heinous zone. I mean, as a final limited hang
out, as the spooks call it, they can blame the whole thing on the nasty
Bermuda Triangle. Once the pressure drops low enough, the thing starts to
suck up massive amounts of moisture, and the incoming winds that accompany
it begin to spin the seeded c
louds
like a pinwheel in the breeze. All that's left is to move the beam along a
track and you can steer that sucker like a remote controlled airplane into a
tall building!

Since these guys plan way ahead, they make sure the levees don't get updated
as they inexorably sink into a basin that is supported by a rapidly eroding
wetland area which surrounds it. Then they head to the bunkers and rub their
little elite hands in anticipation of all that misery. But just in case the
levees don't break, you've got a team of divers armed with sophisticated
underwater explosives to make sure it happens where it will do the most
damage to the - sniff, sniff - underprivileged 'hoods. Now all that's left
is to throw Feeble Fema up as a roadblock in and out of the city, and the
recipe is complete.

Of course you have a patsy set up for the first line of excuses, ("Brownie"
was a loser who lied on his resume), you spread the blame to the victims,
and then fall back on a plea of incompetence and declare that disaster
relief be privatized so that Halliburton can incorporate HEMA. All that's
left is to "manage" the crisis, let a few reporters wake up from their long
nap, and even if it gets out of hand, little Georgie has about used up his
usefulness, anyway. That will just make Dick head of USA INC and off we go
to Syria to protect our helpless little pals in Zionistan. Then as soon as
that gets out of hand, let's cook up a cracking excellent quake with ground
zero at Haight and Ashbury! Think of all the dead fags!

-----Original message-----
From: alan random alanrandom@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:17:55 -0500
To: 911truthaction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Spam] [911TruthAction] 911 & Katrina

Kevin Barrett wrote:> The federal authorities responded
to the New Orleans disaster like
> sloths on sleeping pills.
>
> This obscenely lethargic response is not just a moral outrage. It is
> also a conundrum. Since 9/11 they've more than doubled the annual
> military and FEMA budgets, and supposedly spent massive funds and
> energy preparing for disasters hitting US cities. Over and over we
> hear the mantra: "It's not if, but when" a city gets nuked by
> terrorists. Since they admit they can't stop it, where are our
> hundreds of billions of dollars going, if not to prepare for
> ultra-rapid, hyper-effective emergency response efforts to rescue
> devastated cities?
>
> A related enigma: How to explain the disparity between the perfectly
> coordinated emergency response in New York on 9/11/01, and the New
> Orleans situation? One of the odd things about 9/11 was the apparent
> massive incompetence of everybody who should have stopped the attacks,
> in contrast with the amazing competence of the relief efforts and
> disaster management. (It turned out that FEMA was in NY already on
> 9/11/01 setting up for the Tripod 2 biowar exercises scheduled for
> 9/12/01, which explains why they were so well prepared.*)
>
> If there really is a "war on terror" and they really do expect US
> cities to be the victims of gigantic terrorist-induced disasters, how
> could they possibly be so slow getting to New Orleans, America's most
> strategic city?
>
> A possible answer: 9/11 and the "war on terror" are Orwellian hoaxes,
> as suggested by the BBC documentary series The Power of Nightmares.**
> This would explain the incompetence by suggesting that no real effort
> has been put into preparing for big unexpected terrorist events,
> because such events are not going to happen--if the wing of the CIA
> known as "al-Qaida" strikes they'll already have FEMA in place, as
> they did on 9/11/01.
>
> Is there another answer that makes more sense?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Kevin Barrett
>
> Instructor, University of Wisconsin-Madison
> Instructor, Edgewood College
>
> *For documentation on the Tripod 2 exercises and 9/11, use search
> terms FEMA and Tripod at: http://www.complete911timeline.org/
> ** http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html
>
Kevin Barrett
Coordinator, MUJCA-NET: http://mujca.com
============================================

THE REAL REASON WE ARE AT WAR!

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_reason.htm

Spoils of War-Follow the money
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_spoils.htm

DynCorp Awarded Up to $500MM on Sole Source to "Police" Iraq
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_DynCorp.htm

While Halliburton & DynCorp are Raking in the Dough ...
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_dough.htm