Bible Reader
Missing the obvious
Wed Aug 24, 2005 08:07
81.242.121.72
All this hoo hah about the supposed UK police murdering a so-called suspected suicide bomber.
No-one seems to ask the obvious question. Under normal circumstances, every newspaper journalist, TV producer and magazine would want to know the name(s) of the so-called policemen involved in this cold-blooded murder of a restrained man - yet, not a single mention of "who dun it", no-one has bothered to ask the question. I wonder why. A D-notice perhaps. Maybe the killers are no longer in the country. This was a "hit" folks and the trouble is, they "hit" the wrong man. Was it UK police? I have serious doubts. Mossad operatives are trained to go for the head and empty the magazine into their victims, but they use .22s. What calibre bullets were fired? Why isn't the policeman/men who did it suspended and his/their names released? Why has no-one associated with the press tried to find out who he/they is/are? Why the lies? Don't tell me a Brazilian even remotely resembles an Arab. Why did they lie that he ran away? Why did they lie that he wore a "bulky jacket"
You think the UK public give a shit? Of course they don't. The UK public have a LONG history of demanding vengeance, not justice, - pure vengeance. They don't give a shit if Mossad/CIA/M16 or whoever murder 100 innocent men as "suspected bombers" just as long as they get a blood sacrifice for vengeance. They are PISSED because the relatives of the murdered man want an enquiry. THEY demand more blood, ... the rights of the Brazilians - "wot abart us werkers then?"
Is this "democracy" (excuse me whilst I scream with laughter) where no-one is allowed to criticise the war, the government, the jews, the blacks, the muslims or any so-called "minority group", and sovereign countries are bombed and innocent people murdered so that THEY TOO can be forced to enlist in this joke of a so-called democracy. Where an elected government, (Austria, Rhodesia, Venezuela, Haiti to mention but a few) is denounced and new "free and fair" elections demanded until a government pro-USA and pro-Israel is elected.
Is it democratic to FORCE a country to produce a 'democratic" constitution?
Is it democratic that this so-called constitution has to be approved by the USA?
Is it democratic to start a war against a sovereign country because someone in the USA doesn't like the ruler?
Is it democratic to deport Muslims who dare to speak out against the war?
Is it democratic for the Marines to force a President out of his country and into exile?
Is it democratic to declare Austria a pariah country because they elected someone who doesn't like the USA or Israel?
Is it democratic to denounce Bishop Muzarewa, democratically elected and force a new election where UN observers watched voters being herded into voting booths at the point of an AK47 and never said a word.
Is it democratic to imprison Zundel because he questions the holocaust?
In the light of all the above, why is it UNdemocratic to criticise the war in Iraq?
Time to wake up and smell the coffee
No-one seems to ask the obvious question. Under normal circumstances, every newspaper journalist, TV producer and magazine would want to know the name(s) of the so-called policemen involved in this cold-blooded murder of a restrained man - yet, not a single mention of "who dun it", no-one has bothered to ask the question. I wonder why. A D-notice perhaps. Maybe the killers are no longer in the country. This was a "hit" folks and the trouble is, they "hit" the wrong man. Was it UK police? I have serious doubts. Mossad operatives are trained to go for the head and empty the magazine into their victims, but they use .22s. What calibre bullets were fired? Why isn't the policeman/men who did it suspended and his/their names released? Why has no-one associated with the press tried to find out who he/they is/are? Why the lies? Don't tell me a Brazilian even remotely resembles an Arab. Why did they lie that he ran away? Why did they lie that he wore a "bulky jacket"
You think the UK public give a shit? Of course they don't. The UK public have a LONG history of demanding vengeance, not justice, - pure vengeance. They don't give a shit if Mossad/CIA/M16 or whoever murder 100 innocent men as "suspected bombers" just as long as they get a blood sacrifice for vengeance. They are PISSED because the relatives of the murdered man want an enquiry. THEY demand more blood, ... the rights of the Brazilians - "wot abart us werkers then?"
Is this "democracy" (excuse me whilst I scream with laughter) where no-one is allowed to criticise the war, the government, the jews, the blacks, the muslims or any so-called "minority group", and sovereign countries are bombed and innocent people murdered so that THEY TOO can be forced to enlist in this joke of a so-called democracy. Where an elected government, (Austria, Rhodesia, Venezuela, Haiti to mention but a few) is denounced and new "free and fair" elections demanded until a government pro-USA and pro-Israel is elected.
Is it democratic to FORCE a country to produce a 'democratic" constitution?
Is it democratic that this so-called constitution has to be approved by the USA?
Is it democratic to start a war against a sovereign country because someone in the USA doesn't like the ruler?
Is it democratic to deport Muslims who dare to speak out against the war?
Is it democratic for the Marines to force a President out of his country and into exile?
Is it democratic to declare Austria a pariah country because they elected someone who doesn't like the USA or Israel?
Is it democratic to denounce Bishop Muzarewa, democratically elected and force a new election where UN observers watched voters being herded into voting booths at the point of an AK47 and never said a word.
Is it democratic to imprison Zundel because he questions the holocaust?
In the light of all the above, why is it UNdemocratic to criticise the war in Iraq?
Time to wake up and smell the coffee
Main Page - Wednesday, 8/24/05
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
